On Modified Burr XII-Inverse Exponential Distribution: Properties, Characterizations and Applications
Fiaz Ahmad Bhatti1*, Gholamhossein Hamedani2, Haitham M. Yousof3, Azeem Ali1, Munir Ahmad1
1National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, Pakistan
2Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
3Department of Statistics Mathematics and Insurance, Benha University, Al Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt
*Corresponding author: Fiaz Ahmad Bhatti, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, Pakistan. Email: fiazahmad72@gmail.com
Received Date: 06 September, 2018; Accepted Date: 25 September, 2018; Published Date: 05 October, 2018
Citation: Bhatti FA, Hamedani G, Yousof HM, Ali A, Ahmad M (2018) On Modified Burr XII-Inverse Exponential Distribution: Properties, Characterizations and Applications. J Biostat Biom: JBSB-106. DOI: 10.29011/JBSB-106.100006
Abstract
In this paper, a flexible lifetime distribution with increasing, increasing and decreasing and modified bathtub hazard rate called Modified Burr XII-Inverse Exponential (MBXII-IE) is introduced. The density function of MBXII-IE has exponential, left-skewed, right-skewed and symmetrical shapes. Descriptive measures such as moments, moments of order statistics, incomplete moments, inequality measures, residual life function and reliability measures are theoretically established. The MBXII-IE distribution is characterized via different techniques. Parameters of MBXII-IE distribution are estimated using maximum likelihood method. The simulation study is performed to illustrate the performance of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates (MLEs) of the parameters of the MBXII-IE distribution. The potentiality of MBXII-IE distribution is demonstrated by its application to real data sets: fracture toughness, taxes revenue’s data and coal mining disaster data.
Keywords: Characterizations; Moments; Maximum Likelihood Estimation; Reliability
Figure 1: Plots of pdf of the MBXII-IE distribution for selected parameter values.
Figure 2: Plots of hrf of the MBXII-IE distribution for selected parameter values.
Figure 3: Fitted pdf, cdf, survival and pp plots of the MBXII-IE distribution for fracture toughness.
Figure 4: Fitted pdf, cdf, survival and pp plots of the MBXII-IE distribution for Tax Revenue.
Figure 5: Fitted pdf, cdf, survival and pp plots of the MBXII-IE distribution for coal mining disasters data.
|
1 |
α |
β |
γ |
λ |
MBXII-IE distribution |
|
2 |
α |
β |
1 |
λ |
BXII-IE distribution |
|
3 |
α |
1 |
1 |
λ |
Lomax-IE distribution |
|
4 |
1 |
β |
1 |
λ |
Log-logistic-IE distribution |
|
5 |
α |
β |
γ→0 |
λ |
Weibull-IE distribution |
Table 1: Sub-models of the MBXII-IE Distribution.
|
Sample |
Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n=50 |
Means |
0.508 |
0.5275 |
0.4009 |
1.5208 |
0.8235 |
0.9994 |
1.1443 |
1.3154 |
|
Bias |
0.008 |
0.0275 |
-0.0991 |
0.6208 |
0.0235 |
0.0994 |
0.1443 |
0.8154 |
|
|
MSE |
0.0691 |
0.6688 |
14.5017 |
3.0359 |
1.0307 |
8.3995 |
318.6126 |
3.4638 |
|
|
n=100 |
Means |
0.5047 |
0.5165 |
0.4233 |
1.1072 |
0.7974 |
0.9218 |
0.6404 |
0.8864 |
|
Bias |
0.0047 |
0.0165 |
-0.0767 |
0.2072 |
-0.0026 |
0.0218 |
-0.3596 |
0.3864 |
|
|
MSE |
0.0335 |
0.0542 |
0.1008 |
0.5377 |
0.2057 |
0.8449 |
2.629 |
1.2674 |
|
|
n=200 |
Means |
0.5009 |
0.5092 |
0.4617 |
0.9831 |
0.7882 |
0.926 |
0.7403 |
0.6479 |
|
Bias |
9e-04 |
0.0092 |
-0.0383 |
0.0831 |
-0.0118 |
0.026 |
-0.2597 |
0.1479 |
|
|
MSE |
0.0177 |
0.0229 |
0.0401 |
0.1467 |
0.1524 |
0.1817 |
0.2849 |
0.2877 |
|
|
n=300 |
Means |
0.5016 |
0.5071 |
0.4804 |
0.9509 |
0.7864 |
0.9253 |
0.8063 |
0.5879 |
|
Bias |
0.0016 |
0.0071 |
-0.0196 |
0.0509 |
-0.0136 |
0.0253 |
-0.1937 |
0.0879 |
|
|
MSE |
0.0117 |
0.0132 |
0.0266 |
0.0875 |
0.1211 |
0.1281 |
0.1785 |
0.1394 |
|
|
n=500 |
Means |
0.5001 |
0.5029 |
0.4854 |
0.932 |
0.7921 |
0.9131 |
0.8687 |
0.5514 |
|
|
Bias |
1e-04 |
0.0029 |
-0.0146 |
0.032 |
-0.0079 |
0.0131 |
-0.1313 |
0.0514 |
|
|
MSE |
0.007 |
0.0071 |
0.0153 |
0.0481 |
0.0841 |
0.077 |
0.096 |
0.064 |
Table 2: Means, Bias and MSEs of the MBXII-IE distribution (0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.9) and (0.8, 0.9, 1, 0.5).
|
Model |
|
|
|
|
W |
A |
K-S p-value |
|
MBXII-IE |
0.0181133061 (0.022788744) |
4.1601365928 (0.413218923) |
0.0000000001 (0.002022918) |
1.5161119726 (0.352629351) |
0.1182952 |
0.7247703 |
0.0796 (0.4387) |
|
BXII-IE |
10.836337 (8.8614837) |
2.939956 (0.5268154) |
1 |
5.420295 (1.3394846) |
0.2103398 |
1.295879 |
0.1186 (0.07024) |
|
L-IE |
88.15512 (30.158622) |
1 |
1 |
20.65397 (1.627536) |
0.3337133 |
2.026292 |
0.1147 (0.08714) |
|
LL-IE |
1 |
(4.867383) 0.38248098 |
1 |
2.975707 (0.06835492) |
0.4064326 |
2.522655 |
0.332 (8.12e-12)
|
Table 3: MLEs, their standard errors (in parentheses) and Goodness-of-fit statistics for fracture toughness.
|
Model |
AIC |
CAIC |
BIC |
HQIC |
-l |
|
MBXII-IE |
346.419 |
346.7698 |
357.5355 |
350.933 |
169.2095 |
|
BXII-IE |
351.0785 |
351.2872 |
359.4159 |
354.4641 |
172.5393 |
|
L-IE |
356.4294 |
356.5328 |
361.9876 |
358.6864 |
176.2147 |
|
LL-IE |
370.1331 |
370.2365 |
375.6913 |
372.3901 |
183.0665 |
Table 4: Goodness-of-fit statistics for fracture toughness.
|
Model |
|
|
|
|
W |
A |
K-S (p-value) |
|
MBXII-IE |
0.01574783 (0.017879592) |
2.66428346 (0.356379272) |
0.00150912 (0.002280467) |
0.54190197 (0.168851792) |
0.08121186 |
0.4526733 |
0.1009 (0.2603) |
|
BXII-IE |
3.405735 (1.5676440) |
1.865183 (0.3395644) |
1 |
2.831844 (0.6706193) |
0.2254017 |
1.182635 |
0.2072 (0.0003741) |
|
Lomax-IE |
9.196698 (2.1114083) |
1 |
1 |
6.214104 (0.5991982) |
0.3149302 |
1.693847 |
0.1703 (0.006058) |
|
LL-IE |
1 |
2.770423 (0.23340747) |
1 |
1.676333 (0.07349948) |
0.3281241 |
1.739495 |
0.3634 (6.722e-12) |
Table 5: MLEs, their standard errors (in parentheses) and Goodness-of-fit statistics for Tax Revenue.
|
Model |
AIC |
CAIC |
BIC |
HQIC |
-l |
|
MBXII-IE |
289.7468 |
290.1678 |
300.1675 |
293.9642 |
140.8734 |
|
BXII-IE |
300.7174 |
300.9674 |
308.5329 |
303.8805 |
147.3587 |
|
L-IE |
304.8322 |
304.956 |
310.0426 |
306.941 |
150.4161 |
|
LL-IE |
307.8828 |
308.0065 |
313.0932 |
309.9915 |
151.9414 |
Table 6: Goodness-of-fit statistics for Tax Revenue.
|
Model |
|
|
|
|
W |
A |
K-S p-value |
|
MBXII-IE |
0.014003462 (0.010293280) |
0.974040069 (0.114284919) |
0.002542779 (0.001955081) |
2.319100102 (1.400766759) |
0.06743529 |
0.4651009 |
0.1142 (0.1167) |
|
BXII-IE |
0.5257374 (0.1056558) |
0.9798724 (0.1313540) |
20.8102228 (4.3210242) |
1 |
0.804424 |
4.659193 |
0.5874 (<2.2e-16) |
|
L-IE |
0.5129513 (0.0608668) |
1 |
1 |
20.4062733 (3.3094989) |
0.8043515 |
4.653696 |
0.592 (<2.2e-16) |
|
LL-IE |
1 |
0.6939298 (0.05621336) |
1 |
36.3055045 (4.43815735) |
0.9376481 |
5.457812 |
0.521 (<2.2e-16) |
Table 7: MLEs, their standard errors (in parentheses) and Goodness-of-fit statistics for coal mining disasters.
|
Model |
AIC |
CAIC |
BIC |
HQIC |
-l |
|
MBXII-IE |
1409.089 |
1409.474 |
1419.854 |
1413.455 |
700.5445 |
|
BXII-IE |
1493.264 |
1493.493 |
1501.338 |
1496.539 |
743.6322 |
|
L-IE |
1491.287 |
1491.4 |
1496.67 |
1493.47 |
743.6435 |
|
LL-IE |
1503.023 |
1503.136 |
1508.406 1 |
505.206 |
749.5115 |
Table 8: Goodness-of-fit statistics for coal mining disasters.
3. Begum AA, Parvin S (2002) Moments of order statistics from Doubly truncated Burr XII distribution. J. of Statist. Res 36: 179-190.
10. Korkmaz MC, Erişoglu M (2014) The Burr XII-Geometric Distribution. Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science 3: 75-87.
15. Abouelmagd THM, Al-mualim S, Afify AZ, Ahmad M, Al-Mofleh H (2018) The Odd Lindley Burr XII Distribution with Applications. Pak. J. Statist34: 15-32.
19. Guerra RR, Pena-Ramirez FA, Cordeiro GM (2017) The gamma Burr XII distribution: Theory and application. Journal of Data Science15.
20. Kumar D (2017) The Burr type XII distribution with some statistical properties. Journal of Data Science15.
21. Mdlongwa P, Oluyede B, Amey A, Huang S (2017) The Burr XII modified Weibull distribution: model, properties and applications. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis10: 118-145.
22. Mead ME, Afify AZ (2017) On five-parameter Burr XII distribution: properties and applications. South African Statist J51: 67-80.
24. Korkmaz MC, Yousof HM, Rasekhi M, Hamedani GG (2018) The Odd Lindley Burr XII Model: Bayesian Analysis, Classical Inference and Characterizations. Journal of Data Science 16: 327-353.
28. Bourguignon M, Silva RB, Cordeiro GM (2014) The Weibull-G Family of Probability Distributions. Journal of Data Science 12: 53-68.
31. Nagarajah H (1988) Some characterizations of continuous distributions based on regressions of adjacent order statistics and record values Sankhya Series A 50: 70-73.
32. Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagarajah H (1998) Records, John Wiley New York.
33. Khan AH,Alzaid AA (2004) Characterization of distributions through linear regression of non-adjacent generalized order statistics, Journal of Applied Statistical Science 13: 123-136.
© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.