International Journal of Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke (ISSN: 2688-8734)

short communication

Wake-Up Stroke-Current Data on the Possibilities of Reperfusion Therapy

Adam Wiśniewski*

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland

*Corresponding author: Adam Wiśniewski, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, The University Hospital No. 1, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Skłodowskiej 9 Street, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Received Date: 25 March, 2021; Accepted Date: 02 April, 2021; Published Date: 06 April, 2021

Abstract

Wake-up stroke accounts for nearly a quarter of all strokes and remains a significant clinical problem. Recently, increasingly attempts have been made to reperfusion treatment of this particular group of stroke subjects. Data from current research into specific therapy options in wake-up strokes, including diagnostics, efficacy and safety, were emphasized.

Keywords

Alteplase; Efficacy; Safety; Thrombolysis; Unclear onset; Wake-up stroke

Wake- up stroke accounts for the vast majority of strokes of unknown onset and approximately 25% of all strokes and represents a significant clinical challenge for neurologists [1]. Until 3 years ago, this large percentage of patients did not have any reperfusion treatment options, which was associated with a worse prognosis and less chance to regain full recovery [2]. Only the results of the clinical trial made it possible to implement thrombolytic treatment in a selected group of patients [3]. The basis for qualification for specific treatment is mismatch in two sequences of the magnetic resonance imaging- ischemic focus is visible in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and no clearly visible in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) sequence, reflecting that it has not been more than four and a half hours since the onset of the stroke [4]. This treatment resulted in the benefit of a favorable functional status after 3 months with a similar risk of bleeding complications compared to placebo. Some authors raised the topic of efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy among wake-up strokes, based on different neuroimaging investigations, used as the main inclusion criterion to thrombolysis.

Most studies relied on DWI and FLAIR sequences, similar to those, mentioned in clinical trial. Ahmed et al. revealed that 65.2% of subjects with wake-up stroke treated with intravenous alteplase exhibited a favorable clinical outcome (0-1 points measured in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) at 3 months after the onset of stroke [5]. They also emphasized that no detection of intracranial hemorrhage was observed among all stroke subjects who underwent reperfusion therapy. Aoki et al., also reported no cases of symptomatic and major intracranial hemorhages [6]. However, they noticed a moderate rate of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (40%) due to therapy with alteplase. The rate of favorable outcome at 3 months after stroke was lower (40%), compared to Ahmed et al., but the authors adopted larger scale range (mRS 0-2 points) as a beneficial prognosis. Mourand et al., estimated the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis and combined therapy (thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy) in wake-up stroke subjects and showed that such a strategy may be beneficial for approximately 52% subjects (measured as a favorable outcome (mRs 0-2) at 3 month after stroke) in the alteplase alone group to even 61% with combined specific treatment [7]. At the same time, a low rate of mortality (7.3%) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.9%) were noted, reflecting the safety of the combined therapy.

Another diagnostic option remains Perfussion-Weighted Imaging (PWI). Breuer et al., qualified the wake-up strokes for thrombolysis based on PWI and DWI mismatch and estimated favorable outcome at 30% and 50% (set mRS ranges 0-1 points and 0-2 points, respectively) [8]. Such a treatment was associated with a low rate of intracranial bleeeding (10%). Cho et al., qualified stroke subjects with uncertain time of onset to reperfusion therapy based on simultaneous assessment PWI/DWI and DWI/Flair mismatches [9]. No significant differences in efficacy and safety endpoints between strokes with unknown and certain onset, treated by alteplase under standard protocol, were ephasized. However, the group of strokes with uncertain onset included not only those limited to wake-up strokes. Beneficial outcome (mRS 0-2 points) was reported in 50% in the group with uncertain time of stroke onset after 90 days and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was below 10%.

Due to the limited availability of advanced imaging methods and the long duration of their implementation, several studies have been also conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of including wake-up strokes for specific treatment based on Computed Tomography (CT) scans. Barreto et al., in their study evaluated the admission CT scan of wake-up stroke subjects and after exclusion of intracranial bleeding and visible, extensive ischemic lesions, intravenous alteplase was administered within 3 hours of awakeing with neurological deficit [10]. The efficacy endpoint showed a favorable functional condition (mRS 0-2 points) at 3 month after the onset in 52.6 % of subjects, which is a result comparable to the procedures related to magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, the rate of adverse effects was also comparable (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage- 0%, asymptomatic- 15%). Cortijo et al., included stroke subjects with uncertain time of onset for intravenous thrombolysis based on CT perfusion findings [11]. A favorable status (mRS 0-2 points) was reported in 56.3% of subjects at 3 month after onset, whereas the safety endpoints rates were consistent with those reported by other authors (symptomatic hemorrhage- 0%, asymptomatic hemorrhage- 21.9%). However, the analyzed group incuded also other types of stroke with uncertain time of onset.

It is worth to mention that another therapeutic options remains tenecteplase, a modified alteplase molecule characterized by better pharmacokinetics properties. In the ongoing TWIST trial a dose o 0.25 mg/kg of tenecteplase is administered for wake-up strokes and the inclusion based only on an admission CT scan is performed [12]. Promising preliminary results of the above clinical trial could lead to significant changes to the current guidelines on the treatment of wake-up strokes that allow alteplase therapy only in subjects with existing DWI/FLAIR mismatch [13]. It is possible that further research will enable therapeutic decisions to be made on the basis of other MRI sequences or computed tomography scans. Such a strategy could significantly contribute to increasing the rate of wake-up strokes receiving intravenous thrombolysis.



References

  1. Mackey J, Kleindorfer D, Sucharew H, Moomaw CJ, Kisella BM, et al. (2011) Population-based study of wake-up strokes. Neurology. 76: 1662-1667.
  2. Denny MC, Boehme AK, Dorsey AM, George AJ, Yeh AD, et al. (2014) Wake-up Strokes Are Similar to Known-Onset Morning Strokes in Severity and Outcome. J Neurol Neurol Disord. 1: 102.
  3. Thomalla G, Simonsen CZ, Boutitie F, Andersen G, Berthezene Y, et al. (2018) MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset. N Eng J Med. 379: 611-622.
  4. Thomalla G, Cheng B, Ebinger M, Hao Q, Thourdias T, et al. (2011) DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 10: 978-986.
  5. Ahmed H, Logallo N, Thomassen L, Navotny V, Mathisen SM, et al. (2020) Clinical outcomes and safety profile of Tenecteplase in wake‐up stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 142: 475-479.
  6. Aoki J, Kimura K, Iguchi Y, Shibazaki K, Iwanaga T, et al. (2011) Intravenous thrombolysis based on diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch in acute stroke patients with unknown onset time. Cerebrovasc Dis. 31: 431-441.
  7. Mourand I, Milhaud D, Arquizan C, Lobotesis K, Schaub R, et al. (2016) Favorable Bridging Therapy Based on DWI-FLAIR Mismatch in Patients with Unclear-Onset Stroke. Am J Neuroradiol. 37: 88-93.
  8. Breuer L, Schellinger PD, Huttner HB, Halwachs R, Engelhorn T, et al. (2010) Feasibility and safety of magnetic resonance imaging-based thrombolysis in patients with stroke on awakening: initial single-centre experience. Int J Stroke. 5: 68-73.
  9. Cho AH, Sohn SI, Han MK, Lee DK, Kim JS, et al. (2008) Safety and efficacy of MRI-based thrombolysis in unclear-onset stroke: a preliminary report. Cerebrovasc Dis. 25: 572-579.
  10. Barreto AD, Fanale CV, Alexandrow AV, Gaffney KC, Vahidy FS, et al. (2016) Prospective, open-label safety study of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in wake-up stroke. Ann Neurol. 80: 211-218.
  11. Cortijo E, Garcıa-Bermejo P, Calleja AI, Perez- Fernandez S, Gomez R, et al. (2014) Intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke with unknown onset using CT perfusion. Acta Neurol Scand. 129: 178-183.
  12. Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial.
  13. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, et al. (2018) 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 49: e46-110.