Treatment of Recalcitrant Medial Clavicle Non-union with Novel Dual Plating Technique
Sevag Bastian*, John Itamura
Cedars-Sinai Kerlan, Jobe Institute at White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*Corresponding author: Sevag Bastian, Fellow, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute at White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Tel: +19739723860; Email: sevag.bastian@gmail.com
Received
Date: 21 March, 2018; Accepted Date: 03 April,
2018; Published Date: 11 April, 2018
Citation: Bastian S, Itamura J (2018) Treatment of Recalcitrant Medial Clavicle Non-union with Novel Dual Plating Technique. Ann Case Rep: ACRT-165. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7754/100065
1. Abstract
Medial clavicle fracture
are rare injuries associated with significant morbidity. Treated conservatively
historically, operative management has been recommended to improve function and
union rates. Optimal surgical fixation has not been described, particularly in
revision cases following failed fixation. Previously described options include
sternoclavicular fusion or partial claviculectomy. We describe a case of a
33-year-old female surgeon who had two failed surgeries treated with iliac
crest tricortical grafting with dual plating using an anterior plate and an
inverted distal clavicle plate. Postoperatively, she was instructed to use a
bone stimulator and receive teriparatide treatment. At the 9 months follow up,
patients pain and function improved, and she is back to working full time. Dual
plating technique supplemented with bone stimulator use and teriparatide
administration appears to be a good treatment option in the short-term.
1. Introduction
Medical clavicle fractures account for 2-3% of all clavicle fracture [1]. Historically, most have been treated conservatively. Displaced fractures have been shown to cause symptomatic non-unions in 8% of patients treated non-operatively [2]. Surgical management has been recommended, especially for young, active patients [3]. However, this is associated with high complication and failure rates, particularly hardware migration [1,4-8]. Different fixation techniques have been described such as K-wires, plates, and nails [1,4-8]. Various plate options have included standard clavicular plates, plating across the sternoclavicular joint, using hook plates [8], and even distal radius plates [9].
Revision treatment for failed surgical fixation with non-union has not been well described. Partial claviculectomy has been reported for recalcitrant non-union of the medial clavicle, but this procedure is generally reserved as a salvage option, primarily in pathologic cases [10]. Sternoclavicular joint fusion has also been described, but with risk of failure, stiffness, hardware migration, and pneumothorax. This usually demands a second procedure to remove the fixation across the joint [11].
We present a case of a young, active patient who sustained a medial clavicle fracture and failed two previous surgeries that was treated with a novel dual plating technique.
2. Case Report
A 33-year-old healthy female patient sustained a bicycling injury at the age of 23. She was found to have a medial clavicle fracture treated with an open reduction internal fixation using a superior plate. Although she continued to have pain, she was able to proceed with her pursuit of becoming a physician. Towards the end of her surgical training, at the age of 32, she had gradual onset of worsening symptoms about the medial clavicle and was unable to operate or partake in physical activities. X-rays at that time showed a medial clavicle non-union with a broken plate, which was missed (Figure 1). This was eventually addressed with a revision open reduction internal fixation using superior plating and synthetic bone grafting with calcium triphosphate.
Four months after her
second surgery, the patient presented to us for an initial consultation. She
was complaining of continued pain, poor function, decreased motion, inability
to work, difficulty sleeping, and
paresthesias about her ipsilateral upper extremity. X- rays at that time showed
a non-union with an impending catastrophic hardware failure (Figure 2). Patient at the time was undergoing treatment with a bone
stimulator without any improvement and came to us for a second opinion.
We performed a complete
infectious and metabolic workup, which was fortunately negative. CT scan was
obtained, which confirmed the non-union and further delineated the significant
lucencies about the screws (Figures
3a and 3b). A 3-D model of her
contralateral clavicle was made for operative planning for the patient’s true
length and rotation (Figures 4a-d). Surgery was performed with a direct approach
to the medial clavicle. Her previous incision was excised. Vascular and hand
surgeons helped with the exposure. The posterior clavicle was adhered to the
subclavian artery and vein. This was carefully elevated off the clavicle. The brachial plexus was explored
and a formal neurolysis was achieved. Once the clavicle was exposed, fracture
reduction was achieved and autologous tricortical iliac crest bone graft was
compressed within the fracture site. Care was taken to recreate healthy
bleeding beds on both sides for optimal osteointegration. Bone marrow aspirate
was also used to help stimulate local healing. Our plating technique consisted
of an anterior titanium LCP plate and an inverted ipsilateral titanium distal
clavicle plate placed superiorly (AccuMed, Portland, Oregon) (Figures 5a-c). Appropriate bending of the plate was done as needed. Previous
screw holes were filled with synthetic bone graft and an amnion membrane was
placed underneath the clavicle to prevent scarring and adherence of the
subclavian vascular bundle along with the brachial plexus. She was restarted on
her bone stimulator for four months post- operatively and underwent a three-month
treatment with teriparatide.
Postoperatively, the patient’s paresthesias have resolved. Her pain level is lower than it was preoperatively, and her range of motion is now full after 9 months. She is back to operating full time and complains of only mild discomfort with heavy overhead activities. She does not have difficulty sleeping and is very happy with her progress. Her SANE score improved from a 20 to 80. Clinically she has no tenderness or signs of a neuroma. Her strength improved from 3+ to 5- with respect to abduction, forward elevation, and rotation.
3. Discussion
Surgical treatment of displaced medial clavicle fractures have been recently recommended in order to improve function and decrease the chance of symptomatic non- unions. Since the medial fragment is usually small, optimal stabilization is difficult to achieve. Its location to vital neurovascular structures also makes this a difficult procedure with an increased chance of complications.
Various methods have been described, all with their own sets of complications. No gold standard has been established. In revision cases, fixation becomes even more difficult. K-wire fixation is not rigid enough and can fail [3,8]. Plating across the sternoclavicular joint limits motion and requires a second procedure to remove the temporary fusion [9].
Oe et al. in 2012 [1] treated ten patients using various plating options. The authors found that T-locking plates are preferred and recommended at least three locking screws in the medial fragment. Brunner et al. [12] reported a failure or medial clavicle fixation using 2.4 mm locking T-plates and hence advocated using a 3.5 mm locking plate for medial clavicle fractures.
In our case, we used
dual locking plates. The anterior plate is a 3.5 mm LCP plate with the ability
to tap threads in any screw hole to create options for angled locking screws.
The superior plate used is a 180-degree inverted distal clavicle locking plate,
which gives multiple 2.7mm locking screw options that provide additional
fixation into the medial fragment. Inverted clavicle plates are always an option
and may contour well to the medial clavicle in some cases [13,14]. Due to our patient’s two previous failures, we augmented are
rigid construct with the use of tricortical iliac crest autograft and BMAC. We
also used post-operative bone stimulation and teriparatide, as we routinely do
for our professional athletes. At the 9 months follow up, we have satisfactory
clinical results. CT imaging shows fracture healing and filling of the previous
screw lucencies (Figures 6 and 7).
4. Conclusion
Revision medial clavicle non-union fixation is a difficult problem. Dual plating appears to be a viable option. Bone stimulation and biologic anabolic may also be considered.
Figure 1: Radiograph during the symptomatic stage showing broken hardware.
Figure 2: This image was taken three months after the patients first
revision surgery. Clearly visible is a medial one- third clavicle non-union
with lucencies about the three medial screws and the lateral most screw. The
superior plate seems to have started to bend with an apex superior deformity
and likely impending catastrophic hardware failure.
Figure 3a: Coronal CT images of the non-union and lucencies about the
screws.
Figure 3b: Axial CT images showing the non-union and screw lucencies.
Figures 4a and 4b: This
shows the dual plate construct for the contralateral unaffected size using a 3D model.
Figures 4c and 4d: Showing
the same construct on a model of the ipsilateral side using a 3D model. The
deformity and amount of correction is clearly shown.
Figures 5a and 5b: Dual plating construct showing anterior plating
and inverted distal clavicle plating superiorly. Notice the multiple locking
screws in the medial fragment possible by inverting the distal clavicle plate.
Figure 5c: Intra-operative picture of final construct. In this picture, the
head is to the right side and the shoulder to the left.
Figures 6a-c: Coronal CT images showing fracture healing and filling of cysts
left behind from previous fixation at two and a half months after surgery.
Figures 7a-c: Coronal CT images 7 months after surgery showing fracture union
and no change in hardware position. Notice medial cyst still present but nearly
fully filled.
© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.