Current Research on HIV/AIDS (ISSN: 2575-7105)

short communication

  PDF Download

The Transition to Dolutegravir-Based Regimens in the Presence of High- Level Drug Resistance to Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Does It Deserve More Attention?

Vinie Kouamou*, Chiratidzo E Ndhlovu and Justen Manasa

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe

*Corresponding author: Vinie Kouamou, Unit of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box A178, Harare, Zimbabwe

Received Date: 23 March, 2021; Accepted Date: 27 March, 2021; Published Date: 31 March, 2021

Citation: Kouamou V, Ndhlovu CE, Manasa J (2021) The Transition to Dolutegravir-Based Regimens in the Presence of High-Level Drug Resistance to Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Does It Deserve More Attention? Curr Res HIV: CRHA-123. DOI: 10.29011/2575-7105.100123


Due to the increasing availability and major improvements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) over the past decade, survival and quality of life has dramatically improved in people living with HIV (PLHIV) [1-3]. Although ART has delivered remarkable benefits, it has been compromised by the development of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR), due to poor patient adherence and/or inconsistent drug supply [4]. The emergence of HIVDR constitutes one of the challenges to ART success and represents a serious emerging threat to the global scale-up of HIV treatment access. These challenges are more pronounced in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) where there is limited access to viral load (VL) testing and genotypic resistance testing is rarely performed [5].

In many LMICs including Zimbabwe, public health-based approaches to ART had been developed to simplify and streamline care using limited therapeutic options. The fixed dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and lamivudine (3TC) as nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), with efavirenz (EFV) as a non-NRTI (NNRTI) had been preferably used in first-line therapy [6]. However, high levels of acquired drug resistance to HIV reverse transcriptase (NRTI and NNRTI) have been described in Africa, amongst PLHIV failing NNRTI-based first-line therapy [7-12]. In the TenoRes study, TDF resistance was found to be highest in sub-Saharan Africa (57%) [13]. In Zimbabwe, high levels of pre-treatment and acquired HIVDR have recently been reported [14-17].

Due to the increasing prevalence of NNRTI associated mutations in naive and experienced individuals, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended dolutegravir (DTG)-based ART as the preferred first-line regimen in these regions [18]. Recently, DTG has also been recommended by the WHO as a preferred component for second-line therapy [19]. The low-cost, fixed-dose combination of TDF, 3TC and DTG (TLD) has become available in several LMICs [20] and is expected to address the problems of HIVDR in these regions. By 2017, four African countries (Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda) had included DTG as first-line ART option in their national guidelines [20]. As of July 2019, the Zimbabwe National ART guidelines had also been revised to include DTG in the preferred first-line ART for adults and adolescents [21]. However, as DTG is being given in combination with 2 NRTIs (TDF and 3TC), it is important to be vigilant about the possible effects of acquired NRTI resistance, specifically K65R (causing high level resistance to TDF) and M184V (causing high level resistance to 3TC) mutations in the TLD regimen. Both of these mutations reduce HIV-1 replication fitness [22].

Previous studies have reported challenges of scaling up DTG-based regimens in sub-Saharan Africa; with high levels of NRTI resistance affecting the potential effectiveness of DTGbased regimens [23-25]. In Zimbabwe, we recently reported high levels of NRTI (71%) and NNRTI (93%) among PLHIV failing a NNRTI-based first-line ART; with M184V and K65R mutations found in 65% and 34% respectively. In our study, only 58% of these participants had a predicted genotypic susceptibility score (corresponding to the number of ‘active’ drugs in the TLD regimen) of more than 2; suggesting that 42% with a genotypic susceptibility score of 2 or less were at risk for exposure to potential DTG functional monotherapy [23]. Similarly, in Togo, ART switch to a DTG-based regimen after VL failure (VL >1000 copies/ml) or blind switching without prior VL testing to a new DTG-based first line, estimated 31% and 47.6% of patients respectively to be potentially on functional DTG monotherapy [24]. Furthermore, a systematic review of the genetic mechanisms of DTG resistance concluded that the risk of functional monotherapy had implications for the use of DTG plus two NRTIs in NRTI-experienced persons in LMICs where VL monitoring is limited and genotypic resistance testing is not routinely available to guide therapy [26]. All these studies concluded that clinical trials and/or observational studies would be urgently needed to quantify this risk and better comprehend the consequences of this switch of treatment in LMICs. There has not been clinical data to evaluate whether TLD would be effective in PLHIV with virologic failure on a first-line NNRTI-containing regimen harbouring NRTI resistance such as K65R and M184V. Clinical evidence to support switching PLHIV from TDF/3TC/ EFV (TLE) with detectable or unknown VL levels directly to TLD is lacking.

Recently (2021), a large randomized study (NADIA) carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Zimbabwe has found that, DTG was effective in second-line treatment, even in the presence of high-level resistance to NRTIs included in the regimen [27]. Furthermore, the authors reported that, TDF and 3TC could be recycled in secondline treatment even in the presence of high-level resistance to the drugs, without compromising viral suppression when taking either DTG or darunavir/ritonavir [27]. These findings indeed support and cement the public health approach on ART in LMICs, which includes simplified monitoring, sparse VL and no resistance testing. However, it is critical to note that four people in the DTG arm developed resistance i.e. three high-level resistance and one intermediate-level resistance. This high-level DTG resistance found in the NADIA study is a concern and deserves more attention. Hence, more data on the risk of DTG resistance in long term use is needed, in case reduced antiviral pressure due to partial drug resistance might take longer for viral rebound to occur.

Furthermore, with the scale up of DTG in first-line ART in many LMICs, development of HIVDR to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) is likely to occur. Ensuring adequate VL and adherence monitoring should remain a priority as well as active monitoring and surveillance of HIVDR to InSTIs. Although genotypic resistance testing is limited in many resource limited settings [28,29]; low-cost, rapid and simplified point mutation assays previously developed and implemented in many LMICs [30-33] for HIVDR detection may contribute to expanding access to resistance testing for the clinical care of people on DTG-based regimens in these regions.


The adoption of dolutegravir in many LMICs is expected to minimize the emergence and transmission of this HIVDR problem. Although dolutegravir was shown to be effective in the presence of high-level resistance to NRTIs included in the regimen, it is critical to note that, its implementation in LMICs should be accompanied by an accelerated scaling up of access to VL monitoring.


The author would like to thank Prof Alan Michael McGregor, Dr Justen Manasa and Prof Chiratidzo Ellen Ndhlovu for their unwavering supervision and mentorship.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


  1. Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Ribaudo HJ, Swindells S, Eron J, et al. (2014) Effects of early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infection: results from the phase 3 HPTN 052 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 14: 281-290.
  2. Nachega JB, Sam-Agudu NA, Mofenson LM, Schechter M, Mellors JW (2018) Achieving viral suppression in 90% of people living with human immunodeficiency virus on antiretroviral therapy in low-and middle-income countries: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Clin Infect Dis 66: 1487-1491.
  3. Tanser F, Bärnighausen T, Grapsa E, Zaidi J, Newell ML (2013) High coverage of ART associated with decline in risk of HIV acquisition in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Science 339: 966-971.
  4. Muri L, Gamell A, Ntamatungiro AJ, Glass TR, Luwanda LB, et al. (2017) Development of HIV drug resistance and therapeutic failure in children and adolescents in rural Tanzania: an emerging public health concern. AIDS Lond Engl 31: 61.
  5. Rossouw TM, Feucht UD, Melikian G, Van Dyk G, Thomas W, et al. (2015) Factors associated with the development of drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 infected children failing protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. PLoS One 10: e0133452.
  6. Ministry of health (2013) N. Zimbabwe_HIV-Guidelines-Dec2013.pdf. 2013.
  7. Guichet E, Aghokeng A, Serrano L, Bado G, Toure-Kane C, et al. (2016) High viral load and multidrug resistance due to late switch to second-line regimens could be a major obstacle to reach the 90-90-90 UNAIDS objectives in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 32: 1159-1162.
  8. Boullé C, Guichet E, Kouanfack C, Aghokeng A, Onambany B, et al. (2016) Virologic failure and human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance in rural Cameroon with regard to the UNAIDS 90-90-90 treatment targets. In: Open forum infectious diseases. Oxford University Press.
  9. Konou AA, Dagnra AY, Vidal N, Salou M, Adam Z, et al. (2015) Alarming rates of virological failure and drug resistance in patients on long-term antiretroviral treatment in routine HIV clinics in Togo. Aids 29: 2527-2530.
  10. Boender TS, Kityo CM, Boerma RS, Hamers RL, Ondoa P, et al. (2016) Accumulation of HIV-1 drug resistance after continued virological failure on first-line ART in adults and children in sub-Saharan Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother 71: 2918-2927.
  11. Wallis CL, Aga E, Ribaudo H, Saravanan S, Norton M, et al. (2014) Drug susceptibility and resistance mutations after first-line failure in resource limited settings. Clin Infect Dis 59: 706–715.
  12. Gupta-Wright A, Fielding K, van Oosterhout JJ, Alufandika M, Grint DJ, et al. (2020) Virological failure, HIV-1 drug resistance, and early mortality in adults admitted to hospital in Malawi: an observational cohort study. Lancet HIV 7: e620–628.
  13. Gregson J, Tang M, Ndembi N, Hamers RL, Rhee S-Y, et al. (2016) Global epidemiology of drug resistance after failure of WHO recommended first-line regimens for adult HIV-1 infection: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 16: 565-575.
  14. Makadzange AT, Higgins-Biddle M, Chimukangara B, Birri R, Gordon M, et al. (2015) Clinical, virologic, immunologic outcomes and emerging HIV drug resistance patterns in children and adolescents in public ART care in Zimbabwe. PLoS One 10: e0144057.
  15. Chimbetete C, Katzenstein D, Shamu T, Spoerri A, Estill J, et al. (2018) HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Third-Line Therapy Outcomes in Patients Failing Second-Line Therapy in Zimbabwe. Open Forum Infect Dis 5.
  16. Kouamou V, Mavetera J, Manasa J, Ndhlovu CE, Katzenstein D, et al. (2021) Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance Among Adults Initiating or Re-Initiating First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Zimbabwe: Fast-Tracking the Transition to Dolutegravir-Based First-Line Regimens? AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2021.
  17. Kouamou V, Shamu T, Mapangisana T, Chimbetete C, Mudzviti T, et al. (2020) Drug Resistance Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Virologic Failure of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy and Response to Second-Line Treatment. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 36: 566-573.
  18. World Health Organization (2017) Guidelines on the public health response to pretreatment HIV drug resistance: July 2017.
  19. World Health Organization (2018) Updated recommendations on first-line and second-line antiretroviral regimens and post-exposure prophylaxis and recommendations on early infant diagnosis of HIV: interim guidelines: supplement to the 2016 consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. World Health Organization; 2018.
  20. World Health Organization (2017) HIV treatment: transition to new antiretrovirals in HIV programmes: policy brief. World Health Organization; 2017.
  21. The National Medicines and Therapeutics Policy Advisory Committee (NMTPAC) and AIDS and TB Directorate of the Ministry of Health and Child Care. Final Addendum to the 2016 ART Guidelines_19 Feb_2019.pdf. 2019.
  22. Oliveira M, Ibanescu RI, Pham HT, Brenner B, Mesplède T, et al. (2016) The M184I/V and K65R nucleoside resistance mutations in HIV-1 prevent the emergence of resistance mutations against dolutegravir. Aids 30: 2267-2273.
  23. Kouamou V, Manasa J, Katzenstein D, McGregor AM, Ndhlovu CE, et al. (2019) Drug resistance and optimizing dolutegravir regimens for adolescents and young adults failing antiretroviral therapy. Aids 33: 1729-1737.
  24. Salou M, Butel C, Comlan AS, Konou AA, Tegueni K, et al. (2020) Challenges of scale-up to dolutegravir-based regimens in sub-Saharan Africa. Aids 34: 783-787.
  25. Vitoria M, Hill A, Ford N, Doherty M, Clayden P, et al. (2018) The transition to dolutegravir and other new antiretrovirals in low-income and middle-income countries: what are the issues? Aids 32: 1551-1561.
  26. Rhee S-Y, Grant PM, Tzou PL, Barrow G, Harrigan PR, et al. (2019) A systematic review of the genetic mechanisms of dolutegravir resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 74: 3135-3149.
  27. Paton NI (2021) Nucleosides and darunavir/dolutegravir in Africa (NADIA) trials: 48 wks primary outcome. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, abstract 94, 2021.
  28. Lessells RJ, Avalos A, de Oliveira T (2013) Implementing HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing in antiretroviral therapy programs in Africa: needs, opportunities, and challenges. AIDS Rev 15: 221.
  29. Phillips A, Cambiano V, Nakagawa F, Magubu T, Miners A, et al. (2014) Cost-effectiveness of HIV drug resistance testing to inform switching to second line antiretroviral therapy in low income settings. PloS One 9: e109148.
  30. Kouamou V, Manasa J, Katzenstein D, McGregor AM, Ndhlovu CE, Makadzange T (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of pan-degenerate amplification and adaptation assay for HIV-1 drug resistance mutation analysis in low-and middle-income countries. J Clin Microbiol 58.
  31. Duarte HA, Beck IA, Levine M, Kiptinness C, Kingoo JM, et al. (2018) Implementation of a point mutation assay for HIV drug resistance testing in Kenya. Aids 32: 2301-2308.
  32. Panpradist N, Beck IA, Chung MH, Kiarie JN, Frenkel LM, et al. (2016) Simplified paper format for detecting HIV drug resistance in clinical specimens by oligonucleotide ligation. PloS One 11: e0145962.
  33. Panpradist N, Beck IA, Vrana J, Higa N, McIntyre D, et al. (2019) OLA-Simple: A software-guided HIV-1 drug resistance test for low-resource laboratories. EBioMedicine 50: 34-44.

Copyright and Licensing: This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.


share article