Subcutaneous Vedolizumab Demonstrates Superior Clinical Remission and Comparable Drug Persistence to Intravenous Vedolizumab at 12 Months: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study at a Specialist IBD Centre
by Al-Zarrad D1*, Fernandes N2, Kamperidis N1, Aslam F1, Chana A1, Radhakrishnan S1, Dyall L1, Arebi N1,2
1Department of IBD, St Marks National Bowel Hospital, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
2Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
*Corresponding author: Al-Zarrad D, Department of IBD, St Marks National Bowel Hospital, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Received Date: 25 August 2025
Accepted Date: 11 September 2025
Published Date: 15 September 2025
Citation: Al-Zarrad D, Fernandes N, Kamperidis N, Aslam F, Chana A (2025) Subcutaneous Vedolizumab Demonstrates Superior Clinical Remission and Comparable Drug Persistence to Intravenous Vedolizumab at 12 Months: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study at a Specialist IBD Centre. J Dig Dis Hepatol 10: 230. https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-3511.100230
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the effectiveness of switching from IV to SC vedolizumab in an IBD cohort and analysed costs from a hospital payor perspective. Methods: Patients receiving IV vedolizumab at a single IBD centre were assessed for eligibility to switch to SC formulation between February 2021 and March 2024. Baseline data and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were collected. The primary outcome was drug persistence at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included persistence at 6 months, clinical remission (HBI<4 for CD, SCCAI<3 for UC), and biochemical remission (CRP <5 mg/L and/or faecal calprotectin <250 µg/g) at 6 and 12 months. Cost savings were estimated using NHS vedolizumab prices. Data were analysed using t-tests, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 265 patients on IV vedolizumab were identified; 50 were excluded due to dose escalation, disease phenotype, or compliance issues. Of 225 eligible patients, 114 continued IV therapy and 111 switched to SC. No significant demographic differences existed between cohorts. Median ages were 45.5 years (IV) and 53.5 years (SC); 58% male, 37% had CD.Twelve-month drug persistence was 90% (SC) and 93% (IV). At 6 months, persistence was 98% (SC) and 97% (IV). Clinical remission at 12 months was 89% (SC) vs 77% (IV) (p=0.016). Odds for remission with SC vedolizumab were 1.1 (p=0.7) at 6 months and 3.6 (p=0.006) at 12 months. Biochemical remission rates at 6 months were 81% (SC) and 71% (IV), and 77% for both at 12 months. In the SC group, 6% switched drugs due to loss of response, 1% due to surgery, and 3% reverted to IV due to adverse events or administration issues. Estimated annual cost savings were £683,944. Conclusion: Switching from IV to SC vedolizumab maintained persistence, improved clinical remission at 12 months, and reduced costs, supporting wider adoption of SC formulations.
Keywords: Drug; Inflammatory bowel disease Center; Vedolizumab; Gastrointestinal
© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.