Archives of Environmental Sciences and Environmental Toxicology (ISSN: 2688-948X)

research article

  PDF Download

Seasonal Investigation of Heavy Metal Risk Assessment in Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus From Contaminated River Chanchaga Niger State, Nigeria

Oguh Collins Egwu1*, Osuji Chigoziri Akudo1, Obasi Glory Otuomasirichi1, Amadi Eustace Ugochukwu1, Okpaka Confidence Ogechi2, Nwizia Baribefii Paagolah2

1Department of Biochemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria

2Department of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Port Harcourt, River State, Nigeria

*Corresponding author: Oguh Collins Egwu, Department of Biochemistry, University of Nigeria, Nigeria. Tel: (+234)7036017476; Email:

Received Date: 05 September, 2019; Accepted Date: 18 September, 2019; Published Date: 23 September, 2019

Citation: Oguh CE, Osuji CA, Obasi GO, Amadi EU, Okpaka CO, et al. (2019) Seasonal Investigation of Heavy Metal Risk Assessment in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) From Contaminated River Chanchaga Niger State, Nigeria. Arch Environ Sci Environ Toxicol 2: 119. DOI: 10.29011/2688-948X.100019


The contamination of fresh water with a wide range of pollutants has become a matter of great concern over the last few decades, not only because of the threats to public water supplies but also the damages caused to the aquatic life. This study investigates the Heavy Metal Risk Assessment in wet and dry season’s African Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) contaminated with water treatment sludge from river Chanchaga Niger State, Nigeria. Fishes and water samples were collected from river contaminated with sludge (Chanchaga River) and other samples from a private farm (Makolo farm) where there was no sludge served as control during February and June 2019 (dry and wet seasons respectively). The water samples were collected and analyzed for physicochemical properties (dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, pH and temperature) using a standard method and concentrations of heavy metal both in fish and water, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb were analyze using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (FAAS). The potential risk from the consumption of these fish was assessed using standard methods and formula. All the samples collected were digested using a modified procedure from the Association of Official Analytical Chemists and were subsequently analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. The physicochemical properties and Heavy metal concentration in water shows a significant different (P<0.05) between the C. river and M. pond during dry and wet season. The mean of concentration of Heavy Metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Pb) in O. niloticus from C. river during dry and wet season were 2.73, 3.66, 1.79, 2.27, 3.70, 2.90, and 2.90, 3.84, 2.14, 2.69, 3.91, 2.65 mg/kg respectively and from Makolo farm pond during dry and wet were 0.72, 0.95, 1.05, 0.86, 0.22, 1.01 and 0.82, 0.96, 1.17, 1.01, 0.83, 1.17 mg/kg respectively. Fishes in C. river elicited higher (P<0.05) heavy metals concentrations compare to Fishes in M. pond. The values were all greater than the maximum permissible limit of heavy metal in fish 0.01, 0.05, 1.5, 0.5, 0.01 and 0.3 mg/kg respectively recommended by FAO/WHO except Cr in the control pond which is within the limit. The result of health risk assessment shows that fishes from C. river have a higher risk with average hazard index values greater than one (2.6755) and compared to fish in M. pond with average less than one (0.529). The study concludes that water treatment sludge discharge in C. river can bio accumulate toxic substance such as heavy metals in the fish. The risk assessment shows that fish in C. River are contaminated with heavy metals especially during wet season and could pose health risk from the Contamination.


Heavy metals; Oreochromis niloticus; Risk assessment; Seasons; Water


The contamination of fresh water with a wide range of pollutants has become a matter of great concern over the last few decades, not only because of the threats to public water supplies but also the damages caused to the aquatic life. The natural aquatic systems may extensively be contaminated with heavy metals released from domestic, industrial wastes, sludge discharge from treatment plant, agricultural activities, physical and chemical weathering of rocks, soil erosions, as well as sewage disposal and atmospheric deposition. The sources of heavy metals were reported by The FAO [1] as follows mining effluents, industrial effluents, domestic effluents, urban storm-water, cigarette, leaching of metals from garbage and solid wastes dump, metal inputs from rural areas, batteries, pesticides, insecticides, pigments, paints, glass, fertilizers, textiles, dental and cosmetics, atmospheric sources and petroleum industrial activities. Cadmium, lead and zinc are released into tiny particles as dust from rubber tires on road surface by Oguh C. Egwu, et al. [2]. Fish and Bivalve molluscs are used in bioaccumulation tests because they are higher tropic level organisms and are usually eaten by man. Fish have been used for many years as indicators of environmental pollution status, and, thus, they are regarded as good indicators of metal pollution in marine environments by Marcus AC, et al. [3].

Consequently, sludge produced from water purification processes contain high concentrations of those chemical removed by the purification processes by Uwimana A, et al. [4]. Water Treatment Sludge (WTS) is produced in conventional drinking-water treatment processes as sedimentation including suspended and dissolved solids, organic matter, and other suspensions from the water. Due to these facts, the safe disposal of WTS has become one of the main environmental concerns throughout the world due to the enormous quantity of sludge generated by Oguh CE, et al. [5]. Typically, the pumping of WTS into the river causes a number of hazards to marine life, including phytoplankton, zooplankton, and crustacean, macro-algae and fish species. This WTS is dispose and channel back to the river close to the treatment and aquatic life are effected. Metals entering the aquatic ecosystem can be deposited in aquatic organisms through the effects of Bio-concentration, bioaccumulation via the food chain process and become toxic when accumulation reaches a substantially high level by Al-Najjar, et al. [6]. The harmful effect of trace elements when consumed above the recommended limit can be toxic (acute, chronic or Sub-chronic), and heavy metals can be neurotoxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic by Alipour H, et al. [7].

Water pollution is defined as introduction by man, directly or indirectly, of substances or energy to the aquatic environment resulting in deleterious effects such as hazards to human health, hindrance of fish activities, impairment of water quality and reduction of climate amenities. Contamination also, caused when an input from human activities causes an increase of a substance in fresh or seawater, sediments and organisms above the natural background level for that area and for those organisms by Clark RB, [8]. The results of many field studies of metal accumulation in fish living in polluted waters show that considerable amount of various metals may deposited in fish tissues without causing mortality by Moustafa, M. Zeitoun, et al. [9]. Heavy metals are natural components of the earth’ crust. They can’t be degraded or destroyed. Heavy Metals (HM) are trace components of the aquatic environment, but their levels have been increased due to industrial wastes, geochemical structure, agricultural and mining activities by Sprocati AR, et al. [10]. The term heavy metal refers to any metallic chemical element that has a relatively high density and is toxic or poisonous at low concentrations. Examples of heavy metals include mercury, cadmium, arsenic, chromium, thallium and lead. Trace metals are classified as ‘light’ or ‘heavy’ with densities less or greater than 5 g/cm3. The densities of Pb, Hg and Cd are 11.4 gcm-3, 13.6 gms/cubic cms and 8.65 gms/cubic cms respectively.

All of these sources of pollution affect the physicochemical characteristics of the water, sediments and biological components and thus the quality and quantity of fish stocks by Singh RK, et al, [11]. Fishes, being major components of most aquatic habitats have also been recognized as good Bio-accumulators of organic and inorganic pollutants by King RP, et al. [12]. Fish are exposed to heavy metals through the uptake of water from the contaminated river, human eat these fishes, ingestion of Fish-and-Animal based foods is the largest sources of heavy metals in human by Amadi BA, et al. [13]. Heavy metal contamination of aquatic environments is of critical concern because of their toxicity and accumulation in aquatic organisms. Many dissolved metals entering rivers are adsorbed onto colloid particulates at high alkalinity and pH, the metals particularly lead and cadmium, precipitate by forming complexes, further influencing the metal toxicity by Dimari GA, et al. [14]. Heavy metals such as mercury, lead and cadmium, even at very low concentrations in marine organisms will be very dangerous for humans if they are used for a Long-term. Heavy metals toxicity can result in damaged or reduced mental and central nervous function, lower energy levels and damage to blood composition, lungs, kidneys, liver and other vital organs. Long-term exposure may result in slowly progressing physical, muscular and neurological degenerative processes that mimic Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, muscular dystrophy and multiple sclerosis. Allergies are not common and repeated Long-term contact with some metals may cause cancer by Oguh CE, et al. [15]. Metals such as cadmium, mercury, arsenic and lead are non-essential and therefore have toxic effects on living organisms such as damage to the renal and nervous systems of fish as well as gill damage (severe destructive pathological changes, i.e. structural lesions) [16-19].

The accumulation of heavy metals in fish is an important issue because many fish species are consumed as a source of protein by a large section of the population, especially those who live near rivers. Due to the insufficiency of protein sources for the vast increased population in the third world countries, fish farming has gained popularity as alternative source of a cheap protein. The low saturated fat and sufficient omega fatty acids in fish are also important in supporting good human health. In human, exposure to high levels of heavy metals through the consumption of fish is known to pose severe health risk such as damage to the organs (such as liver, kidney), cancer and may result in death, and also pause risk for, animals, plant and environmental. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the level of Heavy metal in wet and dry seasons Tilapia fish Oreochromis niloticus contaminated with water treatment sludge from river Chanchaga Niger State, Nigeria and its Risk Assessment.

Materials and Methods

A commonly consumed fish African Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), were selected for the study. The fishes used for the study were harvested fresh from river Chanchaga, Minna Niger State.

Study Areas

The study was carried out in river close to Niger State water board and a private farm (Makolo farm) at Chanchaga, Bosso Local Government Area in North-central, Niger State of Nigeria from May to June 2019. Chanchaga is situated at 9º34’ North latitude, 6º33’ East longitude, with an area of 72 km2 and a population of 201,429 at the 2006 census (Figure 1). River Chanchaga is originated from Tagwai Dam in Minna Niger State. It has a moderate climate with a very high temperature during the dry season and average rainfall during the rainy season. The river is use as water source in Niger State water board authority for water treatment. Makolo farm is a major agricultural enterprise in Chanchaga whose operations include fish farming. It supplies about 1 tonnes of fish per day and is located at Kangiwa road Chanchaga Minna, Niger State.

Study Design

The experiment was carried out under a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four samples and three replicate groups for each. The concentrations of the Heavy metals both in water and fish samples, were done in four groups, from group 1 to 4 which are samples during February and June 2019 (dry and wet seasons respectively) from Chanchaga river and a control pond (where no activities) for (Oreochromis niloticus). Both water and fish sample were randomly collected and analyzed for water physicochemical properties and Heavy Metals As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb.


Sampling of Adult O. niloticus was carried out during February and June 2019 (dry and wet seasons respectively). Two experimental gill nets (measuring 30 m length, 1.5 m depth with stretch mesh size of 3 and 4 inches) were set up and left for three consecutive days. Each net was inspected every day for three days from morning until afternoon. The net was set up along the river that covers the most river pools. The total of 36 fish of similar weights was used from the study area and Makolo fish pond. The average length and weight of the samples were 38 cm and 1 kg from the river and fish farm. Water samples were also collected from the study samples and the control in plastic containers, sealed and transferred to the laboratory in iced packs. Approximately 1ml of concentration HNO3 is added to the water samples to prevent the microbial utilization of heavy metals. The fish samples were frozen in the laboratory in a clean ice Box before heavy metal analysis. The mean was calculated to get triplicate figures for statistical analysis.

Fish Tissue Preparation

Fish samples were rinsed by distilled water to get rid of any remnants of trace metals on the outer surface of the fish, and the scales were removed. Muscle tissues of fish (dorsal muscle) was used in this study because it is the major target tissue for metal storage and is the most edible part of the fish. Fish tissues were cut and oven dried at 110° C to a constant weight. After ensuring of samples dryness they were removed and then were grounded into powder using ceramic mortar and sieved through 20μm mesh and then stored in polyethylene bottles at 30° C until analysis. A wet digestion method was used based on the Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.

Physico-Chemical Properties


The pH value which is a measure of the hydrogen or hydroxyl ion activity of the water system indicates whether the water is acidic, neutral or alkaline in reaction. Fishes suffers much both under very low as well as high pH. The instrument for pH measurement commonly used is a digital pH meters have single electrode assembly. The instrument being a potentiometer, the pH scale has to be calibrated before use with buffer solutions of known pH values. 75 ml of water sample is taken in a 100 ml beaker. The suspension is stirred at regular intervals for 30 minutes and the pH is recorded. The suspension is stirred well just before the electrode are immersed and readings are taken. Three readings were observed and then mean of it was calculated.


Water temperature was determined using a Mercury-in-glass thermometer.

Dissolved Oxygen

Dissolved Oxygen (DO) was performed by Wrinkler method [20]. Manganous sulfate solution (2 ml) and 2 ml of alkaline potassium iodide was added to the water. The solutions were mixed thoroughly 2 ml of conc. Sulfuric acid was added to it. From the above solution 200 ml was transferred into a conical flask. Few drops of starch indicator were added. Then it was titrated against sodium thiosulfate till blue color turns violet. The amount of titrants used gives DO value. Three readings were taken and mean of it was calculated.

The oxygen content of the water was obtained by calculation using the formula

D.O content (mg/L) = Volume of original sample taken/Volume of sample titrated × A

Where A = Volume of the Thiosulphate used in titration.

Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity was determined by [21]. In this method, a 5 ml of sample water mixture is shaken for 30 minutes, allowed to settle then the conductivity measured with a temperature-compensated probe. An approximate soluble salts value may be derived from the conductivity using the empirical relationship.

Soluble salts (%) = Conductivity (dS/m) × 0.35.

Digestion of Water Samples

Water samples were analyzed by a modified procedure from the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [22]. Nitric acid (10 ml) was added to 50 ml of each water sample and heated at 150º C for 30 mins. 5 ml of nitric acid was then added to each tube and heated for 30 minutes at 200o C, to the mixture was added 2 ml of hydrogen peroxide before further heating at 200o C for 30 minutes. The resulting solutions were allowed to cool at room temperature and then the volume made up to 25 ml with distilled water. Digested samples were analyzed for levels of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.

Digestion of Fish Samples

A 5 g of the dry powdered sample was put into a 50 ml beaker with 5 ml of HNO3 and 5 ml of H2SO4. When the fish tissue stopped reacting with HNO3 and H2SO4, the beaker was then placed on a hot plate and heated at 60° C for 30 min. After allowing the beaker to cool, 10 ml of HNO3 was added and returned to the hot plate to be heated slowly to 120° C. The temperature was increased to 150° C, and the beaker was removed from the hot plate when the samples turned black. The sample was then allowed to cool before adding H2O2 until the sample was clear. The content of the beaker was transferred into a 50 ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with ultra-pure water. All the steps were performed in the fume hood. Digested samples were analyzed for levels of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. The above procedures in this section followed the guidelines from the Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy [23].

Bio-accumulation Factor (BAF)

The ratio of the contaminant in the fish to the concentration in the ambient environment at a steady state, where the fish can take in the contaminant through ingestion with its food as well as through direct content [24]. The transfer coefficient was calculated by dividing the concentration of toxic metals in fish by the total toxic metals concentration in the water. This index of Water-fish transfers or intake of toxic elements from water through fish was calculated using

BAF = Cfish/Cwater


BAF represent the transfer factor of snail

Cfish = Toxic elements concentration in fish tissue, mg/kg fresh weight

Cwater = Toxic elements concentration in water, mg/kg dry weight

BAF > 1 indicates that the fish are enriched in elements from the water (Bio-accumulation)

BAF < 1 means that the water excluded the toxic elements from water (excluder)

Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals via the Consumption of Fishes

Risk assessment was evaluated by considering only the edible part (muscles tissues) to determine Daily Intake of Metal (DIM), Health Risk Index (HRI) and Hazard Index (HI).

Daily Intake of Metals (DIM)

The Daily Intake of Metals (DIM) was calculated to estimate the daily loading of metals into the body system (via the consumption of fish meal) of a specified body weight of a consumer according to [25]. This would entail the relative bioavailability of the studied metals in this study. The Daily Intake of Metals (DIM) was determined by the following

ADDM = DI (kg/day) x Mfish (mg/kg)/BW (kg)


ADDM = Average daily dose (mg,kg/d) of the metal into the body via the consumption of fish.

DI = The daily intake of fish for adult is 0.227 kg/day 1 for food describe by [26].

Mfish = The trace toxic elements (metals) concentration in the fish tissues (mg/kg)

BW = Represent the estimated average body weight of investigated in adult (60 kg for adults).

Health Risk Index (HRI)

The Health Risk Index (HRI) for the populations through the consumption of contaminated fish from sludge contaminated river was assessed based on the Daily Intake of Metals (DIM) relative to Reference Oral Dose (RfD) for each metal. This is an index justifying individual’s risk of heavy metals. The HRI value of less than one implies safe tread and is considered acceptable, otherwise, the fish may pose heavy metals risk. The following equation describe by [27] is used to calculate the HRI of fish.



ADDM = represents the average daily dose (mg,kg/d) of the metal

RfDM = is the reference dose of the metal (mg,kg/d)

RFDM is define as the maximum tolerable daily intake of metal with no adverse effect.

HRI is the ratio between exposure and the Reference Oral Dose (RfD). If the ratio is lower than one, there will be no obvious risk.

Estimation of Hazard Index (HI)

The Hazard Index (HI) was calculated to determine the overall risk of exposure to all the heavy metals via the ingestion of a contaminated fish [28]. The Hazard Index (HI) was calculated as the summation of the Hazard Quotient (HQ) arising from all the metals examined. The value of the hazard index is proportional to the magnitude of the toxicity of the fish consumed. HI > 1 indicates that the predicted exposure is likely to pose potential health risks. However, a hazard index >1 does not necessarily indicate that a potential adverse health effects will result, but only indicates a high probability of posing health risks.

HI = ΣHQAs + HQCd + HQCr + HQCu + HQHg + HQPb

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained were analyzed using IBM Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) version 20 and Microsoft excel 2013. The results were expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out as P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.


Physicochemical Properties of Chanchaga River and Makolo Pond During Dry and Wet Seasons

The physico-chemical properties (dissolved oxygen, pH, Temperature, and electrical conductivity) of water were determined in Table 1. The values of physicochemical properties of C. river and M. pond during dry and wet seasons were dissolve oxygen (6.17, 6.34 and 5.26, 5.93 mg/l), pH (6.26, 6.62 and 5.22, 6.52), Temperature (31.49, 27.34 and 35.73, 28.69º C), and electrical conductivity (622.33, 578.00 and 686.66, 589.66 mg/l) respectively which are significantly different (P<0.05).

Concentration of Heavy Metals in Water Samples

The mean concentration of HMs (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb) in different water samples (C. river and M. pond) during dry and wet seasons are shown on Table 2. The result of C. river shows a significant different (P<0.05) between the M. pond during dry and wet season. The concentration of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb were above the [29] permissible limits of HMs in water 0.01, 0.003, 0.05, 1.0, 0.001, and 0.01 mg/kg respectively.

Concentration of Heavy Metals in Fish Samples

The mean concentrations of heavy metals analyzed on the tissue of Oreochromis niloticus from C. river and M. pond during dry and wet seasons. The concentration of HMs on fish from C. river were all greater than the maximum permissible limit of HMs As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb in fish 0.01, 0.05, 1.5, 0.5, 0.01, 0.3 mg/kg respectively recommended by [29-31]. While the fishes from M. pond were also slightly greater than the maximum permissible limit except Cr which is below the recommended values. The results are shown on Table 3.

Estimation of Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) Of Toxic Element in Fish

The BAF shows the amount of heavy metal that is transferred from water to fish tissue. The BAF of metals As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Pb obtained in fish (O. niloticus) from C. river and M. pond during dry and wet seasons are shown on Figure 1. Where the BAF is greater than one (>1) indicates that the fishes are enriched with the elements from the water (Bio-accumulators). Also where BAF is less than one (<1) means that the fishes exclude the elements from the water (excluders).

Estimation of Average Daily Dose of Metal (ADDM) For Adult

The average daily dose of HMs into the body system for adult (via the consumption of fish tissue) was estimated according to the average fish consume through the food chain. The result of ADDM shows that fishes in C. river has higher values of ADDM (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Pb) both dry and wet seasons compared to fish in M. pond shown on Figure 2.

Estimation of Health Risk Index HRI

The HRI of metals through consumption of fish from C. river and M. pond during dry and wet season were given in Figure 3. The HRI for fish from C. river recorded high HRI than that of fish from M. pond during dry and wet seasons. Metals As and Pb from C. river in both dry and wet were greater than one, which indicate toxicity (Fiureg 3).

Estimation of Hazard index (HI)

The overall health risk of exposure to all the heavy metals analyses via the ingestion of fish from C. river and M. pond during dry and wet seasons is shown in Figure.4. The total Index of all metals in O. niloticus from C. river and M. pond during dry and wet seasons were 2.613, 2.738 and 0.378 and 0.68. The result shows that Fishes from C. river were highly contaminated with heavy metals compare to the fish in M. pond. HI > 1 indicates that the predicted exposure is likely to pose potential health risks.


The mean value of physico-chemical properties of C. river and M. pond (dissolved oxygen, pH, Temperature, and electrical conductivity) were determined were significantly different (P<0.05). The physicochemical changes in water parameter may be due to the sludge discharge and other anthropogenic activities. The amount of dissolve oxygen in a water body has a major impact on fish behavior, stability and survival. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) refers to the level of free, non-bonded oxygen present in water. Dry and wet seasons of C. river has lower DO with 6.17 and 5.26 mg/l compared to Makolo fish pond water in dry and wet season with 6.34 and 5.93 mg/l. The lower concentration of DO in C. river can lead to hypoxia (Absence of enough oxygen in water). The recommended minimum dissolved oxygen require in fresh water is within 6-8 mg/l. The lower DO in C.river may be due to the waste discharge in the river which covers the surface of the river for oxygen penetration. The oxygen dissolves by diffusion from the surrounding air. Oxygen level can be reduced depending on pollutants present, dissolved minerals such as salt and temperature. Most fish species tolerate a drop below these minimum values for a short period of time and the period of time during which the oxygen levels drops below required limit, will cause fish to become stressed. The lower the concentration of DO, the greater the stress. The stress can cause fish death.

The pH concentration in dry and wet season of C. river recorded low values (6.26, and 5.22) than M. pond (6.62 and 6.52) respectively. Low pH level reduces the active nature of fish and also accelerate the release of heavy metals which is due to the waste water channel to the river and also runoff from polluted environment. The World Health Organization [32] recommends a pH value of 6.5 -8.5 for drinking water to prevent corrosion. Fish are influenced by the temperature around them because they are unable to regulate their body temperature. C. river during dry and wet seasons recorded higher temperature (31.49 and 35.35.73) than Makolo fish pond (27.34 dry and 28.69 wet) and electrical conductivity values during dry and wet seasons of C. river are higher (622.33 and 686.66) than M. pond (578.00 and 589.66) shown on Table 1. High temperature do not hold enough oxygen for aquatic organisms to survive. Increase in water temperature means a decrease in dissolved oxygen available for the fish to breathe from the water. Water temperature according [33] affects the EC so that its value increases from 2 up to 3% per 1°C. The average limit of temperature in fish water is 20-30º C. The increase in EC may be due to runoff, sewage waste, sludge, which also increases chloride, phosphate, and nitrate ions. Lower pH also increases electrical conductivity. The permissible limit of EC is 500 mg/l according to [34].

The mean concentration of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb) in C. river samples during dry and wet season (2.08, 2.52, 1.98, 2.34, 3.64, 2.91 and 2.88, 2.99, 2.12, 2.82, 3.94, 2.63 mg/kg) respectively. The concentrations of HMs in M. pond were all lower than C. river as shown in Table 2. The result of C. river shows a significant different (P<0.05) between the M. pond. The result shows that water samples from C. river were more contaminated with Heavy metals compared to water from M. pond especially during wet seasons. The concentration of as, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb in all water samples were above the [29] permissible limits of HMs in water 0.01, 0.003, 0.05, 1.0, 0.001, and 0.01 mg/kg respectively. The study also indicates that Hg in the C. river among the metals had the highest concentration, while Cr was the lowest. The sequence of occurrence for C. River Cr

The ability of fishes to accumulate essential metals equally enables them to acquire other nonessential metals from the river or pond. Fish being at the higher level of the food chain accumulate large quantities of metals and the accumulation depends upon the intake and elimination from the body. There was a highly significant difference in the concentrations of HMs in O. niloticus from C. river and M. river. The entire fish Samples from C. river and M. pond contained detectable levels of the elements studied. The accumulation of these heavy metals in fish may represent a health risk, especially for populations with high consumption rates of fish (2). One-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant (P<0.05) variation in the concentrations of HMs during dry and wet seasons in C. river and M. pond, which is an indication of the extent of metal pollution from the river. HMs recorded during wet seasons were significantly higher than values recorded during dry season. These may be due to runoff during raining season, waste materials are move along side with water from contaminated areas and dump site to the river. Generally, C. river had higher heavy metals concentrations (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Pb) than the controls, which were all above the [29] permissible limit of 0.01, 0.05, 1.5, 0.5, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/kg respectively (Table 3). The mean values recorded at the control pond were also higher than the FAO/WHO acceptable value except Cr which is below the permissible limit of 1.5 mg/kg. The mean concentration of heavy meals in O. niloticus from C. river is decrease in the following order Hg>Pb>Cd>Cu>As>Cr. The levels of chromium were comparatively lower in the fish samples which is in accordance with the findings of [35]. Heavy metals and nutrients absorbed by fish are usually translocate to different parts of the fish which could limit the concentrations in the river. However, availability of heavy metals in the water and continuous stay in the polluted water could lead to higher concentration in the fish.

The high concentration of As and Cd at C. river may be due to sludge from water treatment plant, atmospheric deposition, combustion, etc. which translocate through the fishes. Arsenic affects almost all organs during its acute or chronic exposure. Liver has been reported as target organ of arsenic toxicity. Toxicity is due to arsenic’s effect on many cell enzymes, which affect metabolism, DNA repair and brain problem. The most prominent chronic manifestations of as involve the skin, lungs, liver and blood systems. The levels of Cd recorded in this study was however much higher than the values of 0.27 mg/kg reported for fish by [36]. Cadmium is a dangerous element because it can be absorbed via the alimentary track, penetrate through placenta during pregnancy and damage membrane and DNA. Significant concentration of Cd may have gastrointestinal effect and reproductive effect on livestock [37,38] reported that cadmium causes both acute and chronic poisoning, adverse effect on kidney, liver, vascular and the immune system.

High dose of chromium is observed to cause Bronchopneumonia, chronic bronchitis, diarrhea, emphysema, headache, irritation of the skin, itching of respiratory tract, liver diseases, lung cancer, nausea, renal failure, reproductive toxicity, and vomiting. Copper is indeed essential, but in high doses it can cause anaemia, diarrhea, headache, metabolic disorders, nausea, vomiting, liver and kidney damage, stomach and intestinal irritation on human health. The levels of Cu recorded in this study was however much higher than the values of 0.02 ± 0.002 mg/kg reported for C. anguillaris by [39]. According to high levels of copper can cause metal fumes fever with flu-like symptoms, hair and skin decolouration, dermatitis, irritation of the upper respiratory tract, metallic taste in the mouth and nose.

Mercury poisoning symptoms include blindness, deafness, brain damage, digestive problems, kidney damage, lack of coordination and mental retardation. Lead has no beneficial biological function and is known to accumulate in the body. [40] reported that lead causes both acute and chronic poisoning and thus, poses adverse effects on kidney, liver, vascular and immune system. Lead can cause serious injury to the brain, nervous system, red blood cells, low IQ, impaired development, shortened attention span, hyperactivity, mental deterioration, decreased reaction time, loss of memory, reduced fertility, renal system damage, nausea, insomnia, anorexia, and weakness of the joints when exposed to high lead. The Bio-accumulated metals on the fish may interact directly with biomolecules such as nucleic acid, protein, carbohydrate, disrupting critical biological processes, resulting in toxicity and the concomitant transfer of these metals through the food chain could ultimately pose risk to human life [41,42].

The BAF of HMs from water-fish is the main component of human exposure to HMs through the food chain. The BAFs during dry and wet season of O. niloticus from C. river were significantly different from M. pond. This indicate the high presence of metals in the C. river. The more the presence of metal in the water the more the bioaccumulation on the fish. The water-fish BAF of O. niloticus from C. river during dry season for Cr, Cu, and Pb were below one (<1) except As, Cd, and Hg which were up to and greater than one (>1). The BAF from C. river during wet season for As, Cd, Cr, and Pb were above one except Cu and Hg which is below one. The BAF of O. niloticus from M. pond were all below one except Cd, Cr and Pb for dry season while the BAF in wet season were above one except As and Cd which were below (<1). The BAF values below one (<1) indicate that the fish do not take up toxic element or exclude the element from the river or pond shown in Figure 1. Where BAF > 1 indicates that the fish are enriched in elements from the water (Bio-accumulation).

As intake of fish is a possible source of metal accumulation in humans, there is an important interest in calculation of the daily and weekly consumptions of heavy metals through fish eating. The ADDM values for heavy metals were significantly little high in fishes from C. river than fishes from M. pond. The highest intakes of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Pb in fish were from C. river. The Daily intake indicate the amount of HMs that will be taken in the body when such fish is consume.

The HRI values for Heavy metals were significantly high in fishes from C. river. The (HRI) values were significantly <1, in fishes from M. pond, indicating that consumers of fishes from these pond is not exposed health risk of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Pb. The HMs as (1.0) and Hg (1.30) were greater than one >1 for both seasons which indicate that consumption of fishes from C. river will lead to accumulation of as and Hg in the body, which can lead to severe health problem. Hazard Index (HI) shows the overall risk of exposure to all the metal in fish from C. river and M. pond. The control fishes from M. pond were below <1, which indicates that the consumption of fish cannot pose health risk to consumer. The values of HI in fishes from C. river were above >1, it indicates that the consumption of all the fish can pose health risk to consumer through the intake of metal.


The present study revealed that African Tilapia Fish O. niloticus from Chanchaga river are contaminated with heavy metals that exceed the maximum prescribed limits for elements in fish especially during wet season, which toxicity can disrupt natural ecosystems and affects the food chain, which leads to deleterious health problems in humans.

Figure: Topo-Map of Minna Niger State showing River Chanchaga with numbering 1-12.

Figure 1: Bioaccumulation factor of Metals in Oreochromis niloticus.

Figure 2: Estimation of Daily Intake of Metals in Oreochromis niloticus.

Figure 3: Estimation of Health Risk Index of Metals in Oreochromis niloticus.

Figure 4: Estimation of Hazard Index of Metals in Oreochromis niloticus.

Physicochemical Properties


Water Samples



Dry Season

Wet Season

PL (29)*,(30**)

Dissolve Oxygen (mg/l)

C. River

6.17 ± 0.02b

5.26 ± 0.02d


M. Pond

6.34 ± 0.03a

5.93 ± 0.04c


C. River

6.26 ± 0.04c

5.22 ± 0.02d


M. Pond

6.62 ± 0.03a

6.52 ± 0.02b

Temperature (ºC)

C. River

31.49 ± 0.61b

35.73 ± 0.10a

20-30 ºC*

M. Pond

27.34 ± 0.08d

28.69 ± 0.02c

EC (mg/l)

C. River

622.33 ± 9.60b

686.66 ± 5.50a

500 mg/l**

M. Pond

578.00 ± 4.58c

589.66 ± 5.50c

Results Expressed as Mean ± SD. Mean values with different superscript letters on the rows are considered significant (P<0.05). PL=Permissible limit, C: Chanchaga, M: Makolo, EC: Electrical conductivity n=3

Table 1: Physicochemical Properties of Chanchaga River and Makolo pond.

Heavy Metals

Water Samples


DSC River

WSC River

DSM Pond

WSM Pond

PL (mg/kg) by (31)


2.08 ± 0.05b

2.88 ± 0.11a

0.91 ± 0.05d

1.08 ± 0.03c



2.52 ± 0.10b

2.99 ± 0.02a

0.95 ± 0.01d

1.31 ± 0.02c



1.98 ± 0.01b

2.12 ± 0.01a

1.02 ± 0.02d

1.13 ± 0.01c



2.34 ± 0.03b

2.82 ± 0.10a

0.93 ± 0.04c

1.00 ± 0.02c



3.64 ± 0.05b

3.94 ± 0.04a

0.24 ± 0.03d

0.57 ± 0.01c



2.91 ± 0.08a

2.63 ± 0.04b

1.01 ± 0.02d

1.15 ± 0.01c


Results Expressed as Mean ± SD. Mean values with different superscript letters on the rows are considered significant (P<0.05).  PL=Permissible limit, DSC: Dry Season Chanchaga, M: Makolo n=3, WSC: Wet season Chanchaga, DSM: Dry season Makolo WSM: Wet season

Table 2: Concentration of Heavy Metals in Water Samples.

Heavy Metals

                    Oreochromis niloticus Samples







PL (mg/kg) by (31) *,(32)**


2.73 ± 0.11b

2.90 ± 0.05a

0.72 ± 0.03c

0.82 ± 0.04c



3.66 ± 0.08b

3.84 ± 0.05a

0.95 ± 0.06c

0.96 ± 0.03c



1.79 ± 0.05b

2.14 ± 0.01a

1.05 ± 0.02d

1.17 ± 0.01c



2.27 ± 0.01b

2.69 ± 0.05a

0.86 ± 0.13d

1.01 ± 0.01c



3.70 ± 0.01b

3.91 ± 0.06a

0.22 ± 0.06d

0.83 ± 0.06c



2.90 ± 0.02a

2.65 ± 0.02b

1.01 ± 0.02d

1.17 ± 0.01c


Results Expressed as Mean ± SD. Mean values with different superscript letters on the rows are considered significant (P<0.05). PL=Permissible limit, D: Dry, W: Wet, M: Makolo, S: Season, C: Chanchaga,  n=3

Table 3: Concentration of Heavy Metals in Fish Samples.


  1. FAO (1996) Review of Heavy Metals. Report No. 22 on the 9 steering committee meeting Gaborone, Botswana. 13-16.
  2. Oguh C. Egwu, Musa A. Dickson, Orum T. Gabriel, Iyaji R. Okai, Musa Amanabo. (2019) Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals Level in soil and Jute Leaves (Corchorus olitorius) Treated with Azadirachtin Neem Seed Solution and Organochlorine. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology 4: 256-266.
  3. Marcus AC, Okoye CO, Ibeto CN (2013) Bioaccumulation of trace metals in shellfish and fish of Bonny River and creeks around Okrika in Rivers State, Nigeria. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90: 708-713.
  4. Uwimana A, Nhapi I, Wali UG, Hoko Z (2010) Sludge Characterization at Kadahokwa Water Treatment Plant, Rwanda Water Sci Technolo Water Supply 10: 1-16.
  5. Oguh, CE, Uzoefuna CC, Oniwon WO, Ugwu CV, Ahaiwe, PT, et al. (2019) Risk assessment on bioaccumulation of potentially toxic elements on soil and edible vegetables Corchorus olitorius and Amaranthus cruentus grown with water treatment sludge in Chanchaga Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology 8: 92-103.
  6. Al-Najjar T, Al-Momani R, Khalaf M, Wahsha M, Sbaihat M, Khalaf N, et al. (2016) Levels of Heavy Metals in Fishes (Cheilinus trilobatus) from the Gulf of Aqaba, Jordan. Natural Science 8: 256-263.
  7. Alipour H, Pourkhabbaz A, Hassanpour M (2015) Estimation of potential health risks for some metallic elements by consumption of fish. Water Qual Expos Health 7: 179-185.
  8. Clark RB (2001) Metals in Marine pollution. Oxford University Press. Oxford 5th Edition 98-125.
  9. Moustafa M. Zeitoun, El-Sayed E. Mehana (2014) Impact of Water Pollution with Heavy Metals on Fish Health: Overview and Updates. Global Veterinaria 12: 219-231.
  10. Sprocati AR, Alisi C, Segre L, Cremisini C (2006) Investigating heavy metal resistance, bioaccumulation and metabolic profile of a metallophile microbial consortium native to an abandoned mine. Science of the Total Environment 366: 649-658.
  11. Singh RK, Chavan SL, Sapkale PH (2006) Heavy metal concentrations in water, sediments and body tissues of red worm (Tubifex ) collected from natural habitats in Mumbai, Indian. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 129: 471-481.
  12. King RP, Jonathan G E (2003) Aquatic environment perturbations and monitoring: African experience,USA.
  13. Amadi BA, Akaninwor JO, Igwe FU, Amadi EI (2018) Biochemical Impact of Sludge Obtained from Wastewater Treatment Plant on Soil Properties within Port Harcourt Environment J. Environ. Anal Toxicol, 8: 540.
  14. Dimari GA, Abdulkarim FI, Akan JC, Garba ST (2008) Metal concentrations in Tissues of Tilapia galier, Clarias lazera, and Osteoglosidae caught from Alau Dam, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 4: 473-379.
  15. Oguh CE, Ubani CS, Osuji CA, Ugwu VC (2019) Heavy metal risk Assessment on the Consumption of Edible Vegetable Talinum Triangulare Grown on Sewage Dump Site in University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology. 8: 104-112.
  16. Barka S, Pavillon JF, Amiard JC (2001) Influence of different essential and non-essential metals on MTLP levels in the Copepod Tigriopus brevicornis. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 128: 479-493.
  17. Lars J (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British Medical Bulletin 68: 167-182.
  18. Velcheva E, Tomova D, Arnaudova D, Arnaudov A (2010) Morphological investigation on gills and liver of fresh water fish from Dam Lake "Studen Kladenets". Bulgarian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 16: 364-368.
  19. Deore SV, Wagh SB (2012) Heavy metal induced histopathological alterations in liver of Channa gachua (Ham). Journal of Experimental Science 3: 35-38.
  20. Boyd CE (1979) Water Quality in warm Water Fish Ponds. Auburn University, Auburn.
  21. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. U.S Salinity Laboratory, U.S. Dept. Agric. Hbk pp-160.
  22. Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC) (1995) Official methods of Analysis 15th edition Washington.
  23. Perkin Elmer (1996) Analytical methods for atomic absorption spectroscopy. USA The Perkin-Elmer Corporation.
  24. S Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Bioaccumulation testing and interpretation for the purpose of sediment quality assessment U.S. Environmental Protection Agency access date June 29 2010.
  25. USEPA Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition (2011) Office of Research and Development Washington DC. USA.
  26. Shakeri A, Shakeri R, Mehrabi B (2015) Potentially toxic elements and persistent organic pollutants in water and fish at Shahid Rajaei dam, north of Iran. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12: 2201-
  27. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2017) Human health risk assessment model ecological risk assessment.
  28. Multimedia, multi-pathway and multi-receptor risk assessment (3MRA) modellling system USEPA. (2002) U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development, Washington DC.
  29. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme Codex Alimentarius Commission 10th Session (2016) Working Document for Information and Use in Discussions Related to Contaminants and Toxins in The GSCTFF (Prepared by Japan and the Netherlands) 4 - 8 April.
  30. Svobodová Z, Lloyd R, Máchová J, Vykusová B (1993) EIFAC Technical Paper Food and agriculture organization of the united nation. Water quality and fish health.
  31. Saha N, Mollah M, Alam M, Rahman MS (2016). Seasonal investigation of heavy metals in marine fishes captured from the Bay of Bengal and the implications for human health risk assessment. Food Control 70: 110-
  32. WHO (2010) Guideline for Drinking Water Quality. 3rd Edition World Health Organization Geneva. Switzerland.
  33. Lenntech BV (2014) Water treatment Delft, The Netherlands.
  34. world Health Organization Geneva (2004) International standards of drinking water pp: 55-79.
  35. Joy FA, Chiaka IA,Henrietta OA (2013) Assessment of heavy metal residues in water, fish tissue and human blood from Ubeji, Warri, Delta State, Nigeria. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag, 17: 291-297.
  36. Hossam AZ, Adnan MA, Hisham NW (2017) Baseline Concentration of Heavy Metals in Fish Collected from Gaza Fishing Harbor in the Mediterranean Sea along Gaza Coast, Palestine. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 17: 101-109.
  37. Maobe MAG, Gatebe E, Gitu L, Rotich H (2012) Profile of heavy metals in selected medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes, malaria and pneumonia in Kisii region, Southwest Kenya. Global J. of Pharmacology 6: 245-251.
  38. Ndukwu BC, Obute GC, Eze E (2008) Uptake and accumulation of heavy metals by plants on abandoned refuse dumpsites in parts of Rivers State, Nigeria. Scientia Africana 7: 130-140.
  39. Hany MY, Elwoa SS (2012) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in water, sediment and fish (Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias anguillaris), in Rosetta branch of the River Nile, Egypt. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 14204-14216.
  40. Basapor N, Ngabaza T (2015) Toxicological effect of chlorpyrifis and lead on the acquatic snail Helisoma duryi. Advances in Biological Chemistry 5: 225-233.
  41. Huang Z, Lu Q, Wang J, Chen X, Mao X, et al. (2017) Inhibition of the bioavailability of heavy metals in sewage sludge biochar by adding two stabilizers 12.
  42. Oguh CE, Ugwu CV, Uzoefuna CC, Usman S, Nkwocha CC, et al. (2019) Toxicity Impact on Bioaccumulation of Potentially Toxic Elements in African Giant Land Snail (Archachatina margenata) treated with different soils and Its Ecological Risk Assessment. Asian Journal of Research in Biochemistry 4: 1-15.

Copyright and Licensing: This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.


share article