Relationships of Leadership Styles of Health Care Professionals with Subordinates, Motivation, Satisfaction and Performance
Naresh Khatri1*, Andrew Felker2
1Health Management and Informatics, University
of Missouri School of Medicine, USA
2J. Reuben Clark Law Society, Missouri Kansas, USA
*Corresponding author: Naresh Khatri, Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA. Tel: +1-5738842510, Email: khatrin@health.missouri.edu
Received
Date:
02 March, 2018; Accepted Date: 9
March, 2018; Published Date: 20
March, 2018
Citation: Khatri N, Felker A
(2018) Relationship of Leadership Styles of Health Care Professionals with
Subordinates’ Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance. J Hosp Health Care
Admin: JHHA-113. DOI: 10.29011/JHHA-113.000013
1. Abstract
Recruitment, placement, and promotion of
individuals to leadership and senior managerial positions in health care organizations
are based primarily on technical competence. Unfortunately, technical
competence of an individual is not a good predictor of their leadership and managerial
competence. This is because the leadership/managerial role is quite complex and
requires certain skills and competencies in individuals for properly performing
it. In this paper, we examined the relationships of leadership styles of health
care professionals of Missouri hospitals with motivation, satisfaction, and work
performance of subordinates. Our findings suggest that health care leaders are
less socially skill ful and they are less bold and change seeking than being
knowledgeable and experienced. Consequently, they are not as effective in
influencing the motivation, satisfaction, and performance of their
subordinates. Health care organizations need to hire, promote, and reward
leaders/managers that are highly socially skillful and that are bold and change
seeking for boosting the morale and performance of health care workers.
1. Methods
We surveyed the employees of eight health care organizations in mid-Missouri using a leadership style instrument developed by Khatri and his colleagues [1,2]. The leadership instrument measures charismatic and visionary abilities of leaders as perceived by their followers. The survey was mailed to 400 employees of hospitals. Managers that were rated on their leadership styles included physicians and physician managers, nurse managers, finance managers, human resource managers, and other administrators. In all, 216 subordinates assessed the leadership style of their bosses (N = 106) and how these styles influenced their motivation, satisfaction, morale, and work performance.
2. Results and Discussion
Our findings suggest that leadership styles of health care managers have three charismatic and visionary attributes, namely, socially sensitive, bold and change seeking, and knowledgeable and experienced. The results of multiple regression analyses showing the relationships of the leadership styles with subordinates’ outcomes are presented in (Table 1) and the scales measuring these leadership styles are provided in Appendix. A glance at the results in (Table 1) suggests that social sensitivity, a charismatic attribute, is the only attribute among the above three that has a significant positive relationship with the satisfaction of followers. Further, of the three attributes, social sensitivity, shows the strongest relationship with the motivation level of subordinates. Bold and change seeking, a visionary attribute, showed significant positive relationships with motivation, morale, quantity of work, and quality of work. Its effects were particularly pronounced on motivation, morale, and quantity of work of subordinates. It did not show any significant relationship with followers’ satisfaction. Knowledgeable and experienced, a visionary attribute, showed only modest relationships with motivation and quality of work. In short, socially sensitive and bold and change seeking styles have much greater influence than knowledgeable and experienced style. Social sensitivity consists of social/interpersonal skills, sensitivity to the needs and values of followers, and being a caring and friendly person. Bold and change seeking style includes behaviors such as daring to be different, challenging tradition, thinking outside the box, and driven for change. Knowledgeable and experienced style implies having broad knowledge in the field, being an expert in the field, having a lot of experience, and knowing the workings of the business well.
Further, health care managers and professionals in the study sample were found to be higher on the knowledgeable and experienced dimension (mean score of 5.23 on a scale of 1 to 6) than on the bold and change seeking (mean score of 4.26 on a scale of 1 to 6) and social sensitivity (mean score of 4.81 on a scale of 1 to 6) dimensions. Thus, there is scope for improving the two important leadership skills – social sensitivity and bold and change seeking – of health care managers and professionals to enhance greatly the motivation, satisfaction, morale, and quantity and quality of work of health care workers.
3. Conclusion
We identified three important
leadership styles or attributes of health care professionals, namely, social sensitivity, being bold and seeking change, and being knowledgeable and experienced. These
three attributes have a highly significant effect on motivation, satisfaction,
morale, and quantity and quality of work of health care professionals. Health
care managers and professionals were higher on knowledgeable and experienced dimension than social sensitivity and bold and change-seeking dimensions,
the dimensions that have much greater impact on followers than the knowledgeable and experienced dimension.
Consequently, health care managers and professionals need to improve upon their
social sensitivity and be bolder and change seeking in their approach. The important
implications for recruitment, placement, and promotion of individuals for
managerial and leadership positions in health care organizations are that
individuals recruited and promoted to these positions should have greater social
skills and be bolder and more change seeking. The usual practice of hiring and
promoting individuals based merely on their technical knowledge and experience
is problematic and may cause leadership deficit in health care organizations.
Motivation | Satisfaction | Morale | Quantity of Work | Quality of Work | |
Socially Sensitive | 22.16*** | 6.07*** | 3.56*** | -1.22 | 2.30* |
Bold & Change Seeking | 4.74*** | 1.24 | 3.22*** | 4.87*** | 2.46* |
Knowledgeable & Experienced | 2.53** | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.69+ | 1.97* |
Model F | 469.90*** | 36.68*** | 25.55*** | 12.68*** | 18.75*** |
Adjusted R2 | 0.88 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.21 |
*** p <.001; ** p < .01; * p < .05; + p < .10, N=216 |
Table 1: Regression Analysis of Social Sensitivity, Bold & Change Seeking, and Knowledgeable & Experienced on Motivation, Satisfaction, Morale, and Quantity and Quality of Work of Subordinates (t-values).