Outcomes in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center 20-Year Experience
by Maria Guarino1*, Luca Pignata1, Fabiola Di Dato2, Valentina Cossiga1, Mario Capasso1, Raffaele Iorio2, Filomena Morisco1
1Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Departmental Program “Diseases of the liver and biliary system”, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
2Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Corresponding author: Maria Guarino, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System Unit University of Naples “Federico II”Via S. Pansini, 5,80131, Naples,Italy
Received Date: 05 March 2025
Accepted Date: 15 March 2025
Published Date: 18 March 2025.
Citation: Guarino M, Pignata L, Di Dato F, Cossiga V, Capasso M, et al. (2025) Outcomes in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A SingleCenter 20-Year Experience. J Dig Dis Hepatol 10: 222. https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-3511.100222
Abstract
Key objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) in pediatric age is a relatively recent reality with limited information about longterm natural history. This study aimed to describe long-term outcomes in LT children followed-up for more than two decades, with particular interest to late post-transplant complications and patient survival rates. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including all pediatric patients who underwent LT from 1987 to 2013 and followed-up until november 2023 at the “Federico II” University Hospital of Naples. Results: A total of 119 patients have been enrolled with a median age at the time of LT of 1.71 years (25th-75th percentile: 0.73-6.14) and a median follow-up time of 23.2 years (25th-75th percentile: 17.9-27.5). Longterm immunosuppression-related complications included metabolic bone disease (12.6%), arterial hypertension (10.1%) and chronic kidney dysfunction (10.1%). De novo malignancies occurred in 20 patients (16.8%), mostly represented by lymphoproliferative disorders (18/20). Twenty-two re-transplantations were performed in 13 patients with a 20-year graft survival rate of 81.6%. Six deaths (5%) have been registered with a 20-year survival rate of 95%. Conclusions: The present study shows a good patient and graft survival rate in LT pediatric patients and confirms the less frequent onset of complications compared with the adult setting.
Keywords: Pediatrics; Liver Transplantation; Follow-up Studies; Survival Rate; Graft Rejection; Immunosuppression Therapy; Postoperative Complications.
Introduction
Liver transplantation (LT) provides life-saving therapy for children with end-stage liver disease and liver-inborn errors of metabolism. Over the last decades important advances have been made both from the surgical and clinical point of view making LT an effective and widely available treatment in children, ensuring notable results in terms of patient and graft survival rates [1-3]. Despite favorable long-term survival, patients and their families face major challenges after LT, particularly related to post-transplant complications, life-long immunosuppression and periodic followup [4].
Since LT in pediatric age is a now well-established reality, there is still limited knowledge about its long-term impact in terms of quality of life and chronic immunosuppression effects [5-6].
This study aims to retrospectively describe a cohort of consecutive liver transplanted children followed-up for more than two decades at the “Federico II” University Hospital of Naples and analyze the incidence of post-transplant complications (hepato-biliary, immunological, infectious, neoplastic), the adverse effects of chronic immunosuppressive therapy and the survival rates.
Patients and Methods
Study design
A single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of LT children followed-up for more than 10 years at “Federico II” University Hospital of Naples in Italy.
Patients were enrolled according to the following inclusion criteria:
• Pediatric patients undergoing LT from 1987 to 2013
• Patients followed-up for at least 10 years at the Pediatric Liver Unit and then at the Hepatology Unit of “Federico II” University Hospital of Naples
Patients were included and consecutively enrolled in the study with a data collection time going from January 2022 to November 2023 from the analysis and consultation of each patients’ medical record (both paper and electronic records).
Patients’ follow-up was performed according to the guidelines and evidence in literature evolving over time and available at the time of patient management [7-9]. All patients were followed-up on an outpatient basis. During the first 3 months post-LT, and often up to the first year, management was shared with the Transplant Center. Data about donors, obtained through a detailed analysis of the reports received from the transplant centers, made it possible to trace the type of grafts.
In the definition of post-LT onset diseases, all events with an established causal relationship with the surgical LT procedure and/ or with chronic immunosuppressive therapy were classified as complications. Instead, the diseases arising in the post-LT period that cannot be related to chronic immunosuppression and LT, but for which it is likely that there are different contributing factors were defined as comorbidities.
For each patient demographic data (sex, weight, height, Body Mass Index, date of birth, educational qualification level, employment, marital status, possible maternity/paternity status) and data about LT history (date of LT, transplant center where the surgery was performed, indication to LT, presence of any pre-transplant comorbidities, data on any post-transplant complications and schedule of immunosuppressive therapy) were collected.
Statistical analysis
The normality of data was assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables were expressed as median and 25th -75th percentiles. Categorical variables were described as absolute frequency and percentage. Cumulative survival of patients and liver grafts was calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients’ survival was computed from the date of liver transplantation until the date of death (from any cause) or last follow-up visit, while patient death and re-transplantation were considered as graft loss. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (Rel SPSS 21.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA, 2012).
Results
Current Status
Between 1987 and 2013, 119 patients underwent LT during childhood and followed-up at the University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Italy, met the inclusion criteria for being enrolled in the study. For these patients the median follow-up time was 23.2 years (25th-75th percentile: 17.9-27.5) with a minimum follow-up of 10 years and a maximum follow-up of 36.5 years.
The general characteristics of our population, including data about immunosuppressive therapy and post-LT comorbidities, are shown in (Table 1)and in Supplemental Digital Content.
Characteristics | Overall (n=119) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 62 (52.1) |
Female | 57 (47.9) |
Age at enrollment, yrs (median; 25th-75th percentile) | 26 (20.3-34.3) |
< 18 years, n (%) | 24 (20) |
18-30 years, n (%) | 49 (41) |
>30 years, n (%) | 46 (39) |
Body Mass Index at enrollment, kg/m2 (median; 25th-75th percentile) | 21.75 (19.8-24.5) |
< 18.5 kg/m2, n (%) | 18 (15.12) |
18.5-24.9 kg/m2, n (%) | 76 (63.87) |
25-29.9 kg/m2, n (%) | 19 (15.97) |
> 30 kg/m2, n (%) | 6 (5.04) |
Age at LT, yrs (median; 25th-75th percentile) | 1.71 (0.73-6.1) |
< 1 year, n (%) | 43 (36.1) |
1-5 years, n (%) | 44 (37) |
>5 years, n (%) | 32 (26.9) |
Indication to LT, n (%) | |
Biliary Atresia | 75 (63) |
Liver-based metabolic defects† | 12 (10.1) |
Autoimmune liver diseases‡ | 9 (7.6) |
Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis | 7 (5.9) |
Alagille Syndrome | 4 (3.4) |
Cryptogenic cirrhosis | 3 (2.5) |
Acute Liver Failure | 3 (2.5) |
Hepatoblastoma | 3 (2.5) |
Other§ | 3 (2.5) |
Type of graft | |
Whole liver | 30 (25.2) |
Split liver | 89 (74.8) |
First line post-LT immunosuppressive drugs¶, n (%) | |
Calcineurin inhibitor | 119 (100) |
Antimetabolite | 13 (10.9) |
mTOR inhibitor Steroids | 2 (1.7) 119 (100) |
Single drug, n (%) | 105 (88.2) |
Two or more drugs, n (%) | 14 (11.8) |
Long-Term Steroids (more than 6 months post-LT), n (%) | 17 (4.3) |
Immunosuppressive drugs at the time of enrollment¶, n (%) | |
Calcineurin inhibitor | 116 (97.5) |
Antimetabolite | 29 (24.4) |
mTOR inhibitor | 5 (4.2) |
Single drug, n (%) | 89 (74.8) |
Two or more drugs, n (%) | 30 (25.2) |
Steroids, n (%) | 12 (10.1) |
Comorbidities‖, n (%) | |
Allergic | |
Urticaria and angioedema | 20 (16.8) |
Food allergies | 19 (16) |
Atopic dermatitis | 6 (5) |
Hematologic | |
Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura | 8 (6.7) |
Polycythaemia | 7 (5.9) |
Neuro-psychiatric | |
Intellectual disability | 9 (7.6) |
Sensorineural hearing loss | 3 (2.5) |
Generalized anxiety disorder | 4 (3.4) |
Major depressive disorder | 3 (2.5) |
Otherα | 9 (7.6) |
Gastroenterological | |
Crohn’s disease | 2 (1.7) |
Coeliac disease | 2 (1.7) |
Endocrinological | |
Hypothyroidism | 3 (2.5) |
Table 1: Characteristics of enrolled patients; Note: † Including Hemochromatosis (2 patients), Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 (3 patients), Glycogen storage disease type 4 (2 patients), Wilson’s disease (2 patients), Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (1 patient), Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (1 patient) and Long-chain fatty acids transport defect (1 patient); ‡ Including Autoimmune hepatitis (5 patients) and Primary sclerosing cholangitis (4 patients); § Including Hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (1 patient), Cytomegalovirus-associated fulminant hepatitis (1 patient) and Hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis (1 patient); ¶ One patient can simultaneously receive more than one immunosuppressive drug, so the sum of the drugs used did not necessarily sum to 100%; ‖ One patient can have more than one comorbidity, also within the same group of diseases (e.g. Urticaria and angioedema and food allergies); α Including Epilepsy (2 patients), Language disorders (2 patients), obsessive-compulsive disorder (1 patient), AttentionDeficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (1 patient), Tremor and nystagmus (1 patient), Facial paralysis (1 patient), short-term memory loss (1 patient).
Post-LT complications
(Table 2)shows the post-transplant complications occurred in the 119 patients. Details in Supplemental Digital Content. Of note, skin neoplasms in the entire population were not observed. Post-LT liver disease recurrence was observed in 2 cases (hepatoblastoma and primary sclerosing cholangitis), while 5 patients developed de novo advanced chronic liver disease unrelated to the LT indication (2 Hepatitis C Virus-related, 1 cryptogenic, 1 case of Budd-Chiari syndrome and 1 case secondary to chronic bile duct obstruction).
Vascular complications represented the most frequent cause of graft failure (8/28, 28.6%). Hepatic artery thrombosis (2.5% of the first LT recipients) occurred in the 80% of the cases in the first 30 days, with only 1 case of late hepatic artery thrombosis (after 90 days). Instead, portal vein thrombosis occurred in the 5% of the patients and was mostly a late complication (only 2 cases in the first 30 days after LT).
Post-LT Complications | Overall (n=119) |
Hepato-biliary, n (%) | 28 (23.6) |
Anastomotic biliary strictures | 10 (8.4) |
Portal vein thrombosis | 6 (5) |
Portal vein stenosis | 4 (3.4) |
Hepatic artery thrombosis | 3 (2.5) |
Biliary Fistulas | 3 (2.5) |
Bile leaks | 1 (0.8) |
Hepatic vein stenosis | 1 (0.8) |
Immunological, n (%) | 68 (57.1) |
Acute rejection | 38 (31.9) |
Chronic rejection | 23 (19.3) |
De novo Autoimmune hepatitis | 7 (5.9) |
Metabolic, n (%) | 43 (36.1) |
Metabolic bone diseases | |
Osteopenia | 10 (8.4) |
Osteoporosis | 5 (4.2) |
Diabetes mellitus | 2 (1.7) |
Dyslipidemia | 2 (1.7) |
Arterial hypertension | 12 (10.1) |
Nephropathy | 12 (10.1) |
Infectious, n (%)† | 81 (68) |
Epstein-Barr virus | 34 (28.6) |
Cytomegalovirus | 29 (24.4) |
Varicella-zoster virus | 15 (12.6) |
Herpes-virus simplex | 14 (11.8) |
Candida species | 4 (3.4) |
Neoplastic, n (%) | 20 (16.8) |
PTLDs Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | 14 (11.8) |
Hodgkin Lymphoma | 4 (3.4) |
Non-PTLDs | |
Multiple rhabdomyomas | 1 (0.8) |
Embryonic bladder rhabdomyosarcoma | 1 (0.8) |
Need of re-transplantation, n (%) | 13 (10.9) |
Deaths, n (%) | 6 (5) |
Table 2: Overall complications after liver transplantation;
Note: † One patient may have been affected by more than one pathogen.
Patient and graft survival
Overall, 20 years after the first liver transplantation, 113 patients were alive and 13 (10.9%) original grafts were lost. For this latter group, 7 patients underwent a single re-transplantation, and 6 patients underwent multiple re-transplantations, with a total of 22 re-transplants for 13 patients ((Table 3) details in Supplemental Digital Content). Numerous re-transplantations occurred during the first year (10/22, 45.4%).
Patient number | Retrasplantation number | Interval since previous transplantations (years) | Indications for retransplantation | Follow-up after last retransplantation (years), outcome |
1 | 2 | 5 14 | Chronic rejection Acute Liver Failure | 8, alive |
2 | 4 | 4 1 month 7 20 days | Portal vein thrombosis Hepatic artery thrombosis Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis recurrence Ischemic cholangiopathy | 11, alive |
3 | 1 | 14 days | Portal vein thrombosis | 36, alive |
4 | 1 | 30 | Cryptogenic graft cirrhosis | 2, alive |
5 | 2 | 4 days 14.5 | Acute rejection Cryptogenic graft cirrhosis | 17, alive |
6 | 1 | 21 | Chronic rejection | 2, alive |
7 | 1 | 3 | Chronic rejection | 25, alive |
8 | 1 | 7 days | Portal vein thrombosis | 17, death (sepsis) |
9 | 3 | 9 2 5 | Hepato-pulmonary syndrome Degeneration of the extrahepatic biliary tract Ischemic cholangiopathy | 6, alive |
10 | 2 | 3 days 5 months | Hepatic artery thrombosis Hepatic artery thrombosis | 20, alive |
11 | 1 | 2 days | Hepatic artery thrombosis | 18, alive |
12 | 2 | 8 2 days | Cryptogenic graft cirrhosis Primary graft non function | 9, alive |
13 | 1 | 10 days | Hepatic veins stenosis associated to portal vein thrombosis | 14, alive |
Table 3: Outcome of 13 Children Who Underwent Retransplantation.
Out of a total of 119 patients enrolled in the study, 6 deaths were registered (5%). The death causes were quite varied: 2 patients died because of a sepsis (unrelated to immunosuppressive therapy), 1 developed a fulminant Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD), 1 died for the complications of cirrhosis during wait-list time for liver re-transplantation, 1 died for recurrent hepatoblastoma and the last 1 due to an epilepticus status occurred during a bacterial pneumonia.
The cumulative survival rate of the patients was calculated starting from the age of liver transplant. In Figure 1a is reported the KaplanMeier survival curve of the patient cohort. Based on a median follow-up of 23.2 years, the 5-year, 15-year and 20-year patient survival rates were 100%, 96.6% and 95%, respectively.
Patient death and re-transplantation were considered as graft loss. The overall graft survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were 90.8%, 85.8% and 81.6%, respectively. In Figure 1b is reported the Kaplan-Meier survival curve of the liver grafts (Figure 1A, B).
Figure (1A, B): Kaplan-Meier estimate of graft survival rate over time (A) and patient survival rate over time (B).
Discussion
Pediatric liver transplantation has a recent history and for this reason there is a lack of solid data on long-term outcomes in this special setting of patients. Currently very few studies examined such a long follow-up after pediatric LT, up to 30 years with a median time of 23.2 years, including the transition period from pediatric age to adulthood [3,6,10]. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the largest to date analyzing long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation.
As for age at LT and etiology, our population is comparable to the ones reported in literature, with biliary atresia which is confirmed to be the main cause of transplantation in pediatric age, especially for the age group up to 5 years [6,11-13]. An interesting data concerns the high prevalence of LT performed abroad in the 1980s (6/7, 85.7%) and the 1990s (27/43, 62.8%), especially when compared to the 2000s (2/69, 2.9%), showing the progressive increase of pediatric LTs performed in our country in the last 30 years.
One of the main aims of this study was to define long-term morbidity in pediatric LT recipients. Fourteen patients (11.8%) experienced complications related to bile duct reconstruction in line with Yazigi who described an average incidence of these complications in 5-25% of pediatric liver graft recipients [2]. Instead, a 2017 systematic review of literature by Karjoo et al. assessed the incidence of biliary complications between 22% to 47.3% of the patients [14].
In the studies by Elisofon et al. (2019) and Arnon et al. (2010), both reviewing data from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Registry in two different periods, the rates of acute hepatocellular rejection were in line with our study: 37.4% (within the first 6 months) and 34.7% (within the first year), respectively [12-13]. Conversely, chronic rejection rate (19.3%) in our study appears to be relatively high if compared with previous reports with an incidence rate of 5-13% [15-16]. However, the length of follow-up and the number of patients undergoing liver biopsy substantially influence this data. In fact, Fouquet et al. who performed liver biopsies 10 years post-LT in 280 children reported a chronic rejection rate of 64% [17]. Chronic graft injury represents one of the major concerns in pediatric LT as confirmed by Feng et al. highlighting that consistently normal results of liver tests may hide a spectrum of histopathology that can only be accurately exposed by tissue examination, supporting the necessity of liver biopsy to guide personalized immunosuppression decision-making [18].
We observed that the use of cyclosporine was associated with a higher incidence of rejection when compared to tacrolimus, with a significantly more pronounced gap in chronic one: 35.7% vs 14.7% in chronic rejection and 38.1% vs 31.6% in acute one. Previous studies already reported a lower incidence of rejection with the use of tacrolimus when compared to cyclosporin [19].
Another significant post-LT immunological complication is the occurrence of de novo autoimmune hepatitis. According to current literature, de novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in the 5-10% of pediatric LT recipients and is more frequent than in adult LT setting (1-2%) [20]. Although described in pediatric recipients as a quite aggressive disease [21], none of the 7 patients (2 males and 5 females) of our cohort experienced graft loss or progression to advanced fibrosis and all of them achieved remission of the disease after corticosteroid or azathioprine-based treatment.
Considering that all patients underwent to a Calcineurin Inhibitor as first line post-LT immunosuppressive therapy and more than 97% continued this class of drugs, this study allows important considerations on long-term effects of Calcineurin Inhibitor on pediatric LT recipients. Metabolic bone diseases occurred in the 12.6% of the patients representing the most frequent post-LT metabolic complication recorded. Although the role of chronic liver disease and chronic immunosuppression in determining the reduction of bone mineral density has been widely demonstrated [7,22-23], to date few data have been collected in pediatric recipients. In the adult population a recent meta-analysis and systematic review of literature reported an incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis after LT of 34.5% and 11.7%, respectively [24]. In children, instead, the evaluation of post-LT bone mineral density led to conflicting results. In fact, if some studies showed low bone mineral density values in pediatric LT recipients with incidence rates ranging from 6% to 15% [25-27], other ones did not demonstrate a significant decrease of this parameter over time28. However, none of these studies exceeded a mean post-LT follow-up time of 10 years.
Likewise, in our experience the other metabolic complications showed lower incidence and prevalence rates compared to what has been previously reported in literature. In fact, in pediatric LT patients the incidence of new-onset diabetes type II is estimated around 10% with a range of 8.0–14.1% [29]. and dyslipidemia between 7 to 57% [30], while in our cohort both diseases occurred only in less than 2% of the patients.
Arterial hypertension prevalence rate ranges from 20-28% in pediatric LT recipients [31-33]. In Italian healthy young adults (aged 18-35) and in healthy children (aged less than 18), instead, the prevalence rates are around 11% and 4-6% [34-35], respectively. Our finding of 10.2% is therefore in line with what reported in the healthy population. McLin et al. suggested the following three risk factors for the development of late-onset postLT arterial hypertension: age at LT between 5 and 8 years, ongoing steroid exposure at the time of the last blood pressure measurement and the presence of a glomerular filtration rate below 90 ml/ min/1.73m2 at the time of the last blood pressure measurement [31]. In our cohort none of the 12 patients was transplanted in that age group nor was on steroid treatment when the diagnosis was established, while 3 of them had a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (25%). However, it should be emphasized that we considered only the defined diagnoses of arterial hypertension (with blood pressure values above the reference ranges for age, sex, and height on at least 3 occasions) while in the study cited above patients were classified as affected by arterial hypertension with a single elevated blood pressure measurement using standard automated techniques at an outpatient visit performed at 5 or up to 10 years post-LT [31].
Twelve patients (10.2%) developed chronic kidney disease (CKD) during the follow-up (glomerular filtration rate primary below 90 ml/min/1.73m2 on at least 2 occasions 90 days apart). In the study by Martinelli et al. with a 20-years follow-up the overall incidence of CKD, stage 2 and above, was 35% [3]. Similarly, a review by Lacquaniti et al. reported a prevalence of CKD between 25 and 38% and showed that renal issues more frequently appear 5 years after LT [36]. A recent study by Lund et al. (median follow-up: 19 years) further confirms this data (prevalence of CKD at the end of follow-up: 38%) [33]. Harambat et al. in their long-term followup study (median follow-up: 9.3 years) identified 3 independent variables as risk factors for CKD after pediatric LT: primary liver diseases with potential renal involvement (a group including among the others Alagille syndrome, inborn error of metabolism such as Wilson’s disease and cystic fibrosis, and congenital hepatic fibrosis), use of cyclosporin as first immunosuppressive regimen and development of arterial hypertension during follow-up [37].Regarding our patients, only two, who later developed CKD, used cyclosporine as first immunosuppressive therapy (16.6%); three, as already mentioned, were affected by both CKD and arterial hypertension but with later onset of the renal damage and two were transplanted for liver diseases with potential renal involvement (1 Alagille syndrome and 1 Wilson’s disease). In this case as well, possible bias is represented by the diagnostic criteria adopted in the different studies.
As already reported, allergic diseases were the most frequent comorbidities, especially food allergies, observed in 16.8% of our patients. This finding is consistent with the most recent literature, according to which de novo food allergies occur in the 15% of pediatric LT recipients, with younger age at transplant and tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens as risk factors [38].
Last but not the least, of great importance is the impact of pediatric LT on neuropsychological functioning. Vimalesvaran S. et al. described in their long-term follow-up experience a significant incidence of anxiety and depression (19.1%) and of learning difficulties (13.1%), the first ones with an occurrence not far from the corresponding national data, while the second ones with an increased incidence [6]. In our population, 5.9% received a diagnosis of anxiety or depressive disorder and 9.3% showed learning difficulties. This evidence probably testifies lower neuropsychological impact in our transplant cohort but also confirms that great attention should be paid to the psychosocial and mental health status of these patients.
Among the neoplastic complications, PTLDs (16.8% of the patients) were the most diagnosed, especially Epstein-Barr Virus-related non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (44.4% of all PTLDs). A recent retrospective single-center cohort study including 1954 LT patients showed a pediatric PTLDs’ incidence rate of 5.1% (vs an adults’ rate of 2.3%), a pediatric mortality rate of 44.7%, an early post-LT occurrence (median time between LT and PTLDs of 14 months) and a better outcome in children than adults [39]. Furthermore, a 2019 systematic review of literature reported these lymphoproliferative disorders as the most common de novo malignancies after a pediatric LT with an incidence rate between 5 and 20% with the predominance of Epstein-Barr Virus-related nonHodgkin’s lymphomas [40]. Therefore, in addition to the relatively high incidence rate recorded in our population, noticeable data concern the limited number of early-onset PTLDs occurred (5/18 in the first year post-LT, 9/18 in the first 5 years post-LT) as well as the low mortality rate registered (only 1 patient, 5.5%). No significant differences were found in the incidence rate of PTLDs between tacrolimus and cyclosporin (14.7% vs 19%). Considering the incidence rate of these neoplasms in healthy children in Southern Europe (2008-2012 regional incidence ranging from 2.9 to 37.3 cases/million with histotype-related variations [41] ), PTLDs remain one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality after pediatric LT.
The absence of skin neoplastic lesions as well as of gastrointestinal malignancies represents another relevant finding. In fact, although non-PTLD neoplasms are rare in pediatric LT recipients, preexisting literature reported non-melanoma skin cancer as the most common non-PTLD neoplastic disease affecting LT children [42]. Considering all vascular complications, the incidence rate of was 11.76%. In the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Registry 2011-2018, hepatic artery thrombosis was detected in 6.3% of grafts in the first 30 days and in the 0.7% after more than 90 days [12]. Orlandini et al. analyzed 99 patients who underwent deceased donor LT between 1995 and 2009 mainly focusing on vascular complications that occurred in 19.2% of patients with early hepatic artery thrombosis, the most common vascular complication [43]. In the study by Basturk et al., hepatic artery thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis occurred in 4.8% and caused a significant number of graft failures representing also important causes of death (25% and 8.3% of death, respectively) [44]. Therefore, our data are in line with literature further demonstrating an important impact of vascular diseases, especially arterial and early onset ones, on graft survival rates.
In terms of survival, long-term follow-up studies conducted in the last two decades have shown encouraging results with a progressive increase in the survival of both patients and grafts, especially considering pediatric LTs performed since the late 1990s. Our results are perfectly in line with this positive trend showing a higher survival. Twenty years after LT patient and graft survival rate were 95% and 81.6%, further confirming that nowadays late mortality and late graft loss are uncommon events. The explanation for this data may lie in the large number of patients in our cohort transplanted after 2000 (67/119, 58%) and who have therefore benefited from the optimization of management of the last 20 years (Table 4).
First Author |
Year |
Country |
No. of patients |
Median followup (years) |
LT time interval |
Graft survival rates (%) 5 yrs 10 yrs 15 yrs 20 yrs |
Patient survival rates (%) 5 yrs 10 yrs 15 yrs 20 yrs |
||||||
Wallot MA [45] |
2002 |
Belgium |
467 |
7.36 |
1984-1998 |
67 |
65.8 |
- |
- |
80.5 |
78.6 |
- |
- |
Jain A [46] |
2002 |
USA |
808 |
12.6 |
1981-1998 |
60 |
57 |
52.3 |
37.9 |
72.6 |
69.4 |
65.8 |
64.4 |
Fouquet V [17] |
2005 |
France |
280 |
7.8 |
1986-2000 |
73.1 |
71.4 |
- |
- |
82 |
82 |
- |
- |
Oh SH [47] |
2010 |
South Korea |
113 |
6.87± 4† |
1994-2006 |
83 |
81.5 |
- |
- |
86.3 |
84.8 |
- |
- |
Kasahara M [48] |
2018 |
Japan |
2085 |
10.6 |
1989-2015 |
90.4 |
84.6 |
82 |
79.9 |
91.5 |
87.1 |
85.4 |
84.2 |
Martinelli J [3] |
2018 |
France |
128 |
24 |
1988-1993 |
74 |
73 |
69 |
64 |
84 |
83 |
80 |
79 |
Elisofon SA[12] |
2020 |
USA/Canada |
1911 |
N/A |
2011-2018 |
87.7 |
- |
- |
- |
94.2 |
- |
- |
- |
Pu S [49] |
2020 |
China |
260 |
5.5 |
2000-2019 |
76.6 |
76.6 |
- |
- |
80 |
80 |
- |
- |
Moosburner S [50] |
2022 |
Germany |
187 |
7.3 |
1991-2021 |
74 |
69 |
- |
55%‡ |
82 |
78 |
- |
78%‡ |
Guarino M. |
2023 |
Italy |
119 |
23.2 |
1987-2013 |
90.8 |
85.8 |
82.9 |
81.6 |
100 |
98.3 |
96.6 |
95 |
Table 4: Patient and graft survival rates in our study compared with recent literature; Note: † Mean ± Standard Deviation; ‡30 years survival rates.
The strengths of this study include its study design. It is the first published report about long term outcomes of pediatric liver transplanted patients followed-up in a single center. Secondly, to our knowledge, our data shows for the first time the outcomes of liver transplanted children in adulthood after a median follow-up of 23 years, reaching in several cases more than 30 years. Nonetheless, our study has some limitations. First, the relatively small sample size, even if not so small for a single center experience. Secondly, its retrospective nature makes it vulnerable to several unintended biases.
Conclusions
To date, a considerable improvement in long-term outcomes of liver transplanted pediatric patients has been achieved, allowing these patients to live a normal and full life. In fact, the long-term complications related to the transplant procedure and chronic immunosuppressive therapy are less frequent than previously and better manageable with adequate compliance and periodic clinicallaboratory-instrumental check-ups. Still some critical points remain, like vascular complications, chronic rejection and PTLDs, which continue to have a considerable impact on morbidity and mortality of these patients. So future efforts should be directed toward prevention of these events through early identification and mitigation of risk factors. Furthermore, more studies on long-term follow-up should be realized to confirm these positive findings and even extend the length of the observation period. In conclusion, pediatric LT is an established and highly successful treatment for several liver diseases, but it is increasingly evident that long-term survival depends on several factors including unforeseen surgical complications, infections, immunosuppression-related side effects, as well as neurocognitive difficulties.
Acknowledgements
Guarino M and Pignata L designed research, wrote, edited and finalized the text; Di Dato F participated in research design and in the performance of the research. Cossiga V and Capasso M performed the statistical analysis; Iorio R and Morisco F reviewed the paper for important intellectual content.
Furthermore, the authors thank Dr. Margherita Carotenuto, Dr. Valeria Esposito, and Dr. Eleonora Barbaro for their contribution during data acquisition. The authors also thank CRT Campania (Centro Regionale Trapianti) for its constant support in the management of liver transplanted patients in Campania Region. The submitted material or portions has not been published previously, nor is it under consideration elsewhere.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Financial Support Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethics Approval Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with both the Declarations of Helsinki and Istanbul and the protocol was approved by the local ethic board “Federico II” University of Naples (project identification code 81/2023, report n. 13/2023, 25.05.2023).
Patient Consent Statement
Individual informed consent was obtained from patients and parents.
References
- Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Schladt DP,Skeans MA, et al. (2019) OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Liver. Am J Transplant 19 Suppl 2: 184-283.
- Yazigi NA (2013) Long Term Outcomes after Pediatric Liver Transplantation. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition. 16: 207-218.
- Martinelli J, Habes D, Majed L, Guettier C, Gonzalès E, et al. (2018) Long-term outcome of liver transplantation in childhood: A study of 20year survivors. Am J Transplant 18: 1680-1689.
- Bucuvalas JC, Alonso E, Magee JC, Talwalkar J, Hanto D, et al. (2008) Improving long-term outcomes after liver transplantation in children. Am J Transplant 8: 2506-2513.
- Kanmaz T, Yankol Y, Mecit N, Durmaz O, Acarli K, et al. (2014) Pediatric liver transplant: a single-center study of 100 consecutive patients. Exp Clin Transplant 12:41-45.
- Vimalesvaran S, Souza LN, Deheragoda M, Samyn M, Day J, et al. (2021) Outcomes of adults who received liver transplant as young children. EClinicalMedicine 38:100987.
- Kelly DA, Bucuvalas JC, Alonso EM, Karpen SJ, Allen U, et al. (2013) Long-term medical management of the pediatric patient after liver transplantation: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl 19: 798-825.
- EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation (2016). J Hepatol 64: 433-485.
- Lee H, Vacanti JP (1996) Liver transplantation and its long-term management in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 43 : 99-124.
- Ekong UD, Gupta NA, Urban R, Andrews WS (2019) 20- to 25-year patient and graft survival following a single pediatric liver transplantAnalysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database: Where to go from here. Pediatr Transplant 23 : e13523.
- Bowring MG, Massie AB, Chu NM, Bae S, Schwarz KB, et al. (2020) Projected 20- and 30-Year Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients in the United States. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 70 :356363.
- Elisofon SA, Magee JC, Ng VL, Horslen SP, Fioravanti V, et al. (2020) Society of pediatric liver transplantation: Current registry status 20112018. Pediatr Transplant 24 :e13605.
- Arnon R, Kerkar N, Davis MK, Anand R, Yin W, et al. (2010) Liver transplantation in children with metabolic diseases: the studies of pediatric liver transplantation experience. Pediatr Transplant. 14: 796805.
- Karjoo M, Kiani MA, Bahreini A, Saeidi M (2017) Short and Long Term Complications after Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Review and Literature. ijp ; Int J Pediatr
- Gupta P, Hart J, Cronin D, Kelly S, Millis JM, et al. (2001) Risk factors for chronic rejection after pediatric liver transplantation. Transplantation 72: 1098-1102.
- Tannuri ACA, Lima F, Mello ES de, Tanigawa RY, Tannuri U (2016) Prognostic factors for the evolution and reversibility of chronic rejection in pediatric liver transplantation. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 71 : 216-220.
- Fouquet V, Alves A, Branchereau S, Frabar S, Debray D, et al. (2005) Long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation for biliary atresia: a 10-year follow-up in a single center. Liver Transpl 11: 152-160.
- Feng S, Bucuvalas JC, Demetris AJ, Burrell BE, Spain KM, et al. (2018) Evidence of Chronic Allograft Injury in Liver Biopsies From Long-term Pediatric Recipients of Liver Transplants. Gastroenterology 155 : 1838-1851.e7.
- Lloyd C, Arshad A, Jara P, Burdelski M, Gridelli B, et al. (2021) Longterm Follow-up of a Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine A Microemulsion in Children Post Liver Transplantation. Transplant Direct 7: e765.
- Vukotic R, Vitale G, D’Errico-Grigioni A, Muratori L, Andreone P (2016) De novo autoimmune hepatitis in liver transplant: State-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol 22 : 2906-2914.
- Stirnimann G, Ebadi M, Czaja AJ, Montano-Loza AJ (2019) Recurrent and De Novo Autoimmune Hepatitis. Liver Transpl 25: 152-166.
- Rodríguez-Aguilar EF, Pérez-Escobar J, Sánchez Herrera D, GarcíaAlanis M, Toapanta-Yanchapaxi L, et al. (2021) Bone Disease and Liver Transplantation: A Review. Transplant Proc 53 : 2346-2353.
- Li XY, Lew CCH, Kek PC (2021) Bone mineral density following liver transplantation: a 10-year trend analysis. Arch Osteoporos 16 : 169.
- Lim WH, Ng CH, Ow ZGW, Wen Ho OT,Lin Tay PW, et al. (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of osteoporosis and fractures after liver transplant. Transl Int 34 : 1032-1043.
- Nightingale S, McEwan-Jackson FD, Hawker GA, Macarthur C, Khambalia AZ, et al. (2011) Corticosteroid exposure not associated with long-term bone mineral density in pediatric liver transplantation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 53: 326-332.
- Guthery SL, Pohl JF, Bucuvalas JC, Alonso MH, Ryckman FC, et al. (2003) Bone mineral density in long-term survivors following pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9: 365-370.
- Valta H, Jalanko H, Holmberg C, Helenius I, Mäkitie O (2008) Impaired bone health in adolescents after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 8: 150-157.
- Sheikh A, Cundy T, Evans HM (2018) Growth, body composition, and bone density following pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 22: e13201.
- Regelmann MO, Goldis M, Arnon R (2015) New-onset diabetes mellitus after pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 19: 452-459.
- Rothbaum Perito E, Lau A, Rhee S, Roberts JP, Rosenthal P (2012) Posttransplant metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents after liver transplantation: a systematic review. Liver Transpl 18: 1009-1028.
- McLin VA, Anand R, Daniels SR, Yin W, Alonso EM (2012) SPLIT Research Group. Blood pressure elevation in long-term survivors of pediatric liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 12: 183-190.
- Bruno RM, Pucci G, Rosticci M, Guarino L, Guglielmo C, et al. (2016) Association Between Lifestyle and Systemic Arterial Hypertension in Young Adults: A National, Survey-Based, Cross-Sectional Study. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 23: 31-40.
- Lund LK, Grabhorn EF, Rüther D, Buchholz A, Melanie Lang M, et al. (2023) Long-term Outcome of Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients Who Have Reached Adulthood: A Single-center Experience. Transplantation 107: 1756-1763.
- Menghetti E, Strisciuglio P, Spagnolo A, Carletti M, Muzzi G, et al. (2015) Hypertension and obesity in Italian school children: The role of diet, lifestyle and family history. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 25: 602607.
- McNiece KL, Poffenbarger TS, Turner JL, Franco KD, Sorof JM, et al. (2007) Prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension among adolescents. J Pediatr 150: 640-644.e1.
- Lacquaniti A, Campo S, Casuscelli Di Tocco T, Rovito S, Bucca M, (2020) Acute and chronic kidney disease after pediatric liver transplantation: An underestimated problem. Clin Transplant 34: e14082.
- Harambat J, Ranchin B, Dubourg L, Liutkus A, Hadj-Haissa A, et al. Renal function in pediatric liver transplantation: a long-term follow-up study. Transplantation 86:1028-1034.
- Bergamo C, Argento EC, Giampetruzzi S, Cutini M, Ciabattoni F, et al. (2022) De novo Food Allergy After Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review. Front Pediatr 10: 885942.
- Tajima T, Hata K, Haga H, Nishikori M, Umeda K, et al. (2021) Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 1954 Transplants. Liver Transpl 27: 1165-1180.
- Manzia TM, Angelico R, Gazia C, Lenci I, Milana M, et al. (2019) De novo malignancies after liver transplantation: The effect of immunosuppression-personal data and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol 25: 5356-5375.
- Chun GYC, Sample J, Hubbard AK, Spector LG, Williams LA (2021) Trends in pediatric lymphoma incidence by global region, age and sex from 1988-2012. Cancer Epidemiol 73: 101965.
- Buell JF, Gross TG, Thomas MJ, Nelf G, Muthiah C, et al. (2006) Malignancy in pediatric transplant recipients. Semin Pediatr Surg 15: 179-187.
- Orlandini M, Feier FH, Jaeger B, Kieling C, Vieira SG, et al. (2014) Frequency of and factors associated with vascular complications after pediatric liver transplantation. J Pediatr (Rio J) 90: 169-175.
- Basturk A, Yılmaz A, Sayar E, Dinckan A, Aliosmanoglu I, et al. (2016) Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Our Experiences. Eurasian J Med 48: 209-212.
- Wallot MA, Mathot M, Janssen M, Holter T, Psul K, et al. (2002) Longterm survival and late graft loss in pediatric liver transplant recipients-a 15-year single-center experience. Liver Transpl 8: 615-622.
- Jain A, Mazariegos G, Kashyap R, Kosmach-Park B, Starzl TE, et al. (2002) Pediatric liver transplantation. A single center experience spanning 20 years. Transplantation 73: 941-947.
- Oh SH, Kim KM, Kim DY, Joo Lee Y, Rhee KW, et al. (2010) Longterm outcomes of pediatric living donor liver transplantation at a single institution. Pediatr Transplant 14: 870-878.
- Kasahara M, Umeshita K, Sakamoto S, Fukuda A, Furukawa H, et al. (2018) Living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia: An analysis of 2085 cases in the registry of the Japanese Liver Transplantation Society. Am J Transplant 18: 659-668.
- Pu S, Jin S, Xiang B, Yang J, Li K, et al. (2020) The current status and outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation in western China: A multicenter retrospective study. Pediatr Transplant 24: e13810.
- Moosburner S, Wiering L, Gül-Klein S, Ritschl P, Dziodzio T, et al. (2022) Over 30 Years of Pediatric Liver Transplantation at the CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin. J Clin Med 11: 900.
© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.