Annals of Case Reports

Investigated the Thickness of the Neural Layer in the Macula of the Retina in Individuals with Amblyopia

Satoru Totsuka1, Toshiaki Goseki 1*, Hitoshi Ishikawa1, 2, Nobuyuki Shoji 1,2

1Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara, Japan

2Department of Rehabilitation, Orthoptics of Visual Science, School of Allied Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, Sagamihara, Japan

*Corresponding author: Toshiaki Goseki, Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 228-8555, Japan. Tel: +81427789671; Fax +81427789684; Email: gosekikun@aol.com

Received Date: 01 June, 2018; Accepted Date: 06 June, 2018; Published Date: 14 June, 2018

Citation: Totsuka S, Goseki T, Ishikawa H, Shoji N (2018) Investigated the Thickness of the Neural Layer in the Macula of the Retina in Individuals with AmblyopiaAnn Case Rep: ACRT-185. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7754/100085


Letter

As Amblyopia is often a diagnosis of exclusion [1]. Structural lesions in eyes with amblyopia generally cannot be observed through eye examinations [2]. However, structural changes in the retinas of amblyopic eyes have recently been observed using high-precision optical coherence tomography (OCT) [3]. This study investigated the thickness of the neural layer in the macula of the retina in healthy individuals, and in individuals with anisotropic amblyopia or strabismus amblyopia, and then visualized abnormalities using a significance map.

The study included 26 healthy individuals, 39 with anisotropic amblyopia, and 39 with strabismic amblyopia (mean age: 6.1 years, range: 3-8 years; visual acuity=logMAR score of 0.1 or lower). Refractive error ranged from +2D to +10D. The thickness of the myelinated retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), the ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (GCL+), and the ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer + myelinated retinal nerve fiber layer (GCL++) were measured using optical coherence tomography (3D OCT 2000). Abnormalities were defined as being found in less than 5% of entries in the normal database, and the total thickness values were used to compare the nasal retina and temporal retina.

There were no significant differences in mRNFL, GCL+, and GCL++ thickness between healthy eyes and eyes affected by strabismic/anisometropic amblyopia. Conversely, the total number of abnormalities in mRNFL thickness on the nasal and temporal sides of the retinas of healthy individuals, those with anisometropic amblyopia, and those with strabismic amblyopia were 6.0±5.2/10.7±6.210.5±8.2/13.5±7.1and 13.8±10.3/17.8±10.8, respectively; there were significantly more abnormalities on the temporal side of the retina (p<0.05) (Figure 1). There were no significant differences in GCL+ or GCL++ thickness.

There was no difference between the mRNFL in healthy eyes and those with strabismic/anisometropic amblyopia, but there was a significant difference in mRNFL thickness between the nasal and temporal sides of the retina. This difference was more pronounced in eyes with strabismic amblyopia.


Figure 1: Fault point of mRNFL.


© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.

Update cookies preferences