Clinical & Experimental Dermatology and Therapies (ISSN: 2575-8268)

case report

  PDF Download

Gentamicin Wet Compress and Hormone Therapy for Superficial Second-Degree Burns Complicated with Atopic Dermatitis

Authors: Jingran Yu, Zhaofeng Han*, Ruixue Qi, Hualin Xu

*Corresponding Author: Zhaofeng Han, Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China.

Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China.

Received Date: 01 April 2022

Accepted Date: 18 April 2022

Published Date: 27 April 2022

Citation: Yu J, Han Z, Qi R, Xu H (2022) Gentamicin wet compress and hormone therapy for superficial second-degree burns complicated with atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol Ther 7: 178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-8268.100178

Abstract

Burn is a kind of injury chiefly to skins and/or mucous membranes caused by physical or chemical factors, mainly including external heat sources, electrical current, radiation sources, and chemical substances. A serious burn can cause damage to subcutaneous or/and submucosal tissues. Superficial second-degree burns damage the epidermis and part of the dermis. The regenerative ability of these tissues is strong. If treated properly, they can be healed in one stage, and there may be pigmentation in a short period after healing. Improper treatment can lead to wound deepening, infection and an allergy, and after healing, there can be pigmentation, scars, and local functional and sensory impairment caused by scar contracture. Treatment of burn wounds requires many surgical or invasive operations, which cause significant pain as well as blood loss, often requiring general anesthesia, such as debridement, scab cutting, skin grafting, dressing change of burn wounds, exposure therapy, wet compress techniques, etc. [1]. Allergic dermatitis is a common skin condition, also called contact dermatitis [2]. The main reasons for the attack are allergies and primary stimulation. It happens when skin mucous membranes come in contact with exogenous substances with inflammatory allergic reactions such as the dense small pimples, erythema, blisters, pain and swelling. The pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis is complex and diverse. Patient factors, external factors, sources of water, food and many other factors may be its inducements, and the pathogenesis of most patients is unknown. The case of the report is a 24-year-old female, diagnosed with “allergic dermatitis secondary to superficial second-degree burns on the right forearm and back of the right hand”. The curative effect of the treatment with dexamethasone, gentamicin wet compress and hormone therapy is very good [3].

Keywords: Superficial Second-degree Burns; Allergic Dermatitis; Wet Compress; Glucocorticoid

Background

One of the characteristics of burns is a large area of skin damage. The barrier function of the skin is destroyed, and the burn wound becomes the main way of an invasion of allergens and pathogenic bacteria. As a type of superficial burn, a superficial second-degree burn is usually characterized by local redness, severe pain, blisters of various sizes, and basal flushing containing yellow or reddish plasma like fluid after removal of the epidermis [4].

Once the burn wound is infected and allergic, it will lead to slow healing of the wound, and even after healing, it is often accompanied by scars and pigment deposition. Although it is not a fatal disease, the scars and itching that result from wound healing often adversely affect patients’ quality of life and physical and mental health [5]. Atopic dermatitis secondary to burns is rare and its treatment is unclear. At present, the traditional treatment is mainly glucocorticoid, but the curative effect is just acceptable and the course of the disease is long. Allergies may lead to slower wound healing and more obvious scars, so how to treat patients with atopic dermatitis secondary to burns more effectively has become the focus of clinical treatment.

We present a case of a superficial second-degree burn complicated with [6,7] atopic dermatitis managed with dexamethasone wet compress, gentamicin wet compress and hormone therapy which turn out to be a satisfying augmentation with less invasion as reported below [8].

Methods

A 24-year-old female patient was admitted with hydrothermal burns 36 hours after the burn. She was diagnosed with superficial second-degree burns on her right forearm and back of the right hand, covering an area of about 3%, without any complications [9]. Physical examination revealed scattered yellowish blisters of different sizes on the right forearm and back of the right hand, with partial epidermal exfoliation, basal flushing, local redness and swelling, accompanied by severe pain and anesthesia, meeting the diagnostic criteria for superficial second-degree burns (Figure 1). Before admission, the patient underwent a dressing change for burns at a local hospital. The specific external medication was unknown, and no internal medicine treatment was provided.

Local treatment On the first day of her admission, wound care and a dressing change was performed. The next day when removing the old dressing, we saw widely distributed intensive blisters with “needlepoint” and “green bean” sizes in her right forearm, slow yellow drainage outflow, and intensive and transparent blisters with “needlepoint” sizes distributed from nearness to farness in the skin surface of metacarpophalangeal joints. The patient complained of “an allergic constitution”, but the allergen was unknown. After consultation with a dermatologist, she was diagnosed with allergic dermatitis secondary to burns. Changing the treatment plan: We used a dilution of normal saline and iodophor according to a ratio of 1 to 1 to disinfect the wounds three times, mixed gentamicin injectable solution 4ml (Henan Runhong Pharmaceutical Co., LTD., GB: H41020318, Specification: 2ml: 80,000 U), dexamethasone injectable solution 2ml (Zhengzhou Zhuofeng Pharmaceutical Co., LTD., GB: H41020055, Specification: 1ml: 5mg)

and 100ml 0.9% sodium chloride injectable solution and then soaked the sterile gauze in the mixture. The gauze was spread flat on the wound surface with vascular forceps and tweezers without dripping solution and applied for 20 minutes once a day [10]. After the application, we applied a piece of double sterile gauze to the wound, ensuring an aseptic operation during the whole process.

Internal medicine treatment: On the first day of admission, two measures were taken: anti-infection: injecting cephalosporin injectable solution of 0.5g (Hainan Hailing Chemipharma Co., LTD., GB: H10930215, Specification: 0.2g), and analgesia: dezocine injectable solution (Yangzijiang Pharmaceutical Group Co., LTD., GB: H20080329, Specification: 1ml: 5mg) I.V drip treatment. In addition to anti-infection and analgesia treatment, we used methylprednisolone injectable solution (Pfizer Manufacturing Belgium NV approval number: H20170197, Specification: 40mg) I.V drip treatment (injecting 80mg methylprednisolone injectable solution into 250ml 0.9% sodium chloride injectable solution at 8:00 a.m. each day and 40mg methylprednisolone injectable solution into 100ml 0.9% sodium chloride injectable solution at 8:00 p.m. each day). Additionally, 1 tablet of loratadine BID (Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., GB: H20020092, Specification: 5mg) was taken orally according to the direction of a consultant dermatologist. This therapy was followed by a 4-day methylprednisolone injection reduction (injecting 60mg methylprednisolone injectable solution into 250ml 0.9% sodium chloride injectable solution at 8 a.m. each day) and loratadine discontinuation. two days later, the drug was discontinued.

Results

During hospitalization, the patient had no adverse reactions and other complications, burn wounds were healed well, the pain was relieved, and blisters disappeared with a little pigmentation. Therefore, using a wet compress, combined with anti-infection and anit-allergic therapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis secondary to burns can obviously accelerate the subsiding of allergic symptoms [11] and the patient’s satisfaction is good, so it is worth clinical application and promotion (Figure 2).

Discussion

Superficial burns are usually burns of less than two degrees. Superficial second-degree burns damage the epidermis and the superficial dermis, which are rich in nerves and sensitive to local pain. The etiology and pathogenesis of eczema secondary to burn wounds are different from that of common eczema. Most researchers argue that this is relevant to traumatic factors such as bacterial colonization and drugs for external use. To name but a few: (1) Patients are allergic to external medication for burns; (2) After the burn, the skin basal tissue is subjected to different degrees of heat damage, tissue protein in the wound is denatured with a series of inflammatory reactions, tissue liquefied and necrosed, bacterial peptides, toxins and antigen-antibody complexes are recognized by antibodies of the immune system, causing allergic symptoms; (3) Patients’ burn wounds are in a stress state, and is easily affected by diet, contactants and weather changes during treatment, resulting in allergic symptoms; (4) The abnormality of the immune system is also one of the causes of allergies secondary to burns. To sum up, both internal factors and environmental factors can be allergens. But the epidermis of the blisters in this patient did not fall off and rupture, so this may be the reason for the late allergic reaction of the patient. Once allergic symptoms occur, it is necessary to change the treatment in time. In addition to making thorough burn dressing change on the wound in time, applying appropriate antibiotics to avoid infection and using anti-allergic drugs, combined with wet compress therapy such a local treatment can achieve a good therapeutic effect.

About the antihistamine for inhibiting allergic symptoms, oral desloratadine is the first choice in our hospital, which has a strong and selective antagonistic effect against peripheral H1 receptors. In addition to

counteracting histamine in the body, desloratadine also shows antiallergic and anti-inflammatory effects, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Glucocorticoid drugs have an anti-allergic effect, can relieve various symptoms of acute inflammatory reaction and prevent some inflammatory sequelae, such as tissue adhesion and scar formation. So local treatment of the wounds combined with methylprednisolone can effectively inhibit allergic reactions. But this kind of medicine has no inhibiting effects on pathogenic microorganisms. Furthermore, because it can inhibit inflammatory reactions and immune responses, and weaken the body’s defense ability, it has the potential to activate or spread latent infectious lesions. Moreover, the long-term use of hormone drugs may cause hormone dependence, and more adverse reactions [12], which is also very important so joint anti-infection treatment [13]. In conclusion, it’s necessary to combine anti-infective treatment.

To sum up, wet compress combined with anti-infection drugs and anti-allergy drugs can significantly promote wound healing and relieve symptoms in the treatment of burn complicated with allergy, with significant efficacy.

Figures


Figure 1: Observation before burn treatment. The burned area on the front of the right forearm (A), the area on the back of the right hand (B), and the area on the back of the right forearm (C).


Figure 2: Observation after comprehensive treatment. The burned area on the front of the right forearm (A), the area on the back of the right hand (B), and the area on the back of the right forearm (C).

References

  1. Ellison DL (2013) Burns. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 25: 273-285.
  2. Owen JL, Vakharia PP, Silverberg JI (2018) The Role and Diagnosis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 19: 293-302.
  3. Esteban S (2010) Treatment of superficial second degree burn blisters: literature review from different points of view. Enferm Clin 20: 66-67.
  4. Luengo-Pastor MÁ, Guerrero-Domínguez R, Navarro-Suárez EC, Rasero-Moreno Cet (2019) Intervention to reduce pain in patients with superficial and intermediate second degree burns. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) 66: 172-173.
  5. Cen Y, Chai j, Chen H, Chen J, Guo G, et al. (2015) Guidelines for burn rehabilitation in China. Burns Trauma 3: 20.
  6. Young AW, Dewey WS, King BT (2019) Rehabilitation of Burn Injuries: An Update. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 30: 111-132.
  7. Nielson CB, Duethman NC, Howard JM, Moncure M, Wood JG (2017) Burns: Pathophysiology of Systemic Complications and Current Management. J Burn Care Res 38: e469-e481.
  8. Liang M, Luo XH, Zhou P, Deng J (2021) A prospective randomized controlled study of the therapeutic effects of a self-developed novel low-temperature boric acid wet dressing on the face and neck wounds of patients with superficial burns. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 37: 582-585.
  9. Schaefer TJ, Tannan SC (2022) Thermal Burns. Book.
  10. Altintas B, Altintas AA, Kraemer R, Sorg H, Vogt PM, et al. (2014) Acute effects of local cold therapy in superficial burns on pain, in vivo microcirculation, edema formation and histomorphology. Burns 40: 915-921.
  11. Silveira PCL, Ferreira KB, Rocha FRD, Pieri BLS, Pedroso GS, et al. (2016) Effect of Low-Power Laser (LPL) and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) on Inflammatory Response in Burn Wound Healing. Inflammation 39: 1395-1404.
  12. Stark JL, Avitsur R, Hunzeker J, Padgett DA, Sheridan JF (2002) Interleukin-6 and the development of social disruption-induced glucocorticoid resistance. J Neuroimmunol 124: 9-15.
  13. Wennervaldt M, Ahlström MG, Menné T, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD (2019) Diagnostic workup of occupational allergic nickel dermatitis in a nurse with multiple nickel exposures. Contact Dermatitis 81: 311-313.
  • Chawla J, Gruener G (2010) Management of critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy. Neurol Clin 28: 961-977.
  • Guarneri B, Bertolini G, Latronico N (2008) Long-term outcome in patients with critical illness myopathy or neuropathy: the Italian multicentre CRIMYNE study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79: 838-841.
  • De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, et al. (2002) Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA 288: 2859-2867.
  • Fouque D, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple J, Cano N, Chauveau P, et al. (2008) A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2008 73: 391-398.
  • Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, Taylor K, Harry B, et al. (2008) Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 36: 2238-2243.
  • Thiéry G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ciroldi M, De Miranda S, et al. (2005) Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study. J Clin Oncol 23: 4406-4413.
  • Lemaire A, Parquet N, Galicier L, Boutboul D, Bertinchamp R, et al. (2017) Plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: Technical aspects and complications. J Clin Apheresis 32: 405-412.
  • Bellomo R, Ronco C (1998) Indications and criteria for initiating renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Kidney Int Suppl 66: S106-109.
  • Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, Barsoum RS, Burdmann EA, et al. (2012) Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 20: 1-138.
  • Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22: 707-710.
  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, et al. (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315: 801-810.
  • Perme C, Nalty T, Winkelman C, Nawa RK, Masud F (2013) Safety and Efficacy of Mobility Interventions in Patients with Femoral Catheters in the ICU: A Prospective Observational Study Cardiopulm Phys Ther J 24: 12-17.
  • Damluji A, Zanni JM, Mantheiy E, Colantuoni E, Kho ME, et al. (2013) Safety and feasibility of femoral catheters during physical rehabilitation in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 28: 535.e9-e15.
  • Wang YT, Haines TP, Ritchie P, Walker C, Ansell TA, et al. (2014) Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life. Crit Care 18: R161.
  • Rivera AM, Strauss KW, van Zundert A, Mortier E (2005) The history of peripheral intravenous catheters: how little plastic tubes revolutionized medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 56: 271-282.
  • Copyright and Licensing: This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

       

    share article