Case Report

Discrepancy between Biochemical and Radiological Response in Metastatic Hormone- Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

Riccardo Gili1,2, Alberto Miceli3, Irene Giannubilo2,4, Giuseppe Fornarini5, Matteo Bauckneht6,7, Laura Tomasello4, Elisa Zanardi4*

1Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

2Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

3Nuclear Medicine Unit, SS. Antonio and Biagio and Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy

4UO Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

5UO Oncologia Medica 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

6Medicina Nucleare, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

7Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy

*Corresponding author: Elisa Zanardi, UO Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

Received Date: 21 February 2023

Accepted Date: 24 February 2023

Published Date: 27 February 2023

Citation: Gili R, Miceli A, Giannubilo I, Fornarini G, Bauckneht M, et al (2023) Discrepancy between Biochemical and Radiological Response in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review. Ann Case Report. 8: 1185. https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-7754.101185

Abstract

Background: Here we expose a case of a 59-years-old patient with hormone-sensitive metastatic low-volume prostatic cancer with an inconsistency between the PSA data and the detection of new lesions by the PSMA PET/CT.

Case Report: In April 2021, a 59-years-old man was diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma with lymph nodes and bone (sacrum, iliac wing, and ischium) metastases (cT3b N1 M1b) which classified him in a stage IV low-volume according to CHAARTED criteria. At diagnosis, he presented a PSA of 59 ng/ml. Androgen deprivation therapy with LHRH analogue agonist was started. After 5 months, PSA decreased to 8.01 ng/ml and a prostate MRI demonstrated a partial response, therefore radiotherapy to the prostate was considered. However, a restaging with PSMA PET/CT was also prescribed to better define the local treatment planning. New PSA assay [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed a mixed response, with reduction in number and uptake of known lymph nodes lesions, with the appearance of four new highly PSMA-avid bone lesions defining a disease progression.

Discussion: The explanation of the discordance of PSA values and PSMA PET/CT images is still unclear and under investigation, PSMA expression and PSA secretion may be independently regulated with different behaviour after treatment with anti-hormones. Other hypotheses concern a mixed response to treatment, with a general decrease in PSA for an overall volumetric reduction of the lesions, although the newly ones secrete PSA, with preserved PSMA expression. Anyway, an unequivocal answer to the reasons besides this discordance is not possible and other studies are necessary.

Keywords: Hormone; Sensitive; Metastatic; Low-Volume; Prostatic Cancer; PSMA PET/CT; PSA

Key Messages: In about twenty per cent of cases PSA trend is discordant with the outcome of PSMA PET/TC, the most sensitive and specific radiological examination. The aim of this paper is to assess its causes and how to manage it in clinical practice.

Introduction

De novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) represents about 5-10% of all cases of prostate cancer and is related to a poor prognosis [1]. In the last seven years, many studies have evaluated different strategies of combination treatment (docetaxel, new hormonal agents, radiotherapy) with androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) in mHSPC demonstrating a statistical and clinical benefit in overall survival (OS) with respect to ADT monotherapy. In particular, the CHAARTED trial has introduced the concept of the extension of disease as a new prognostic and predictive factor for mHSPC: high-volume disease is defined as the presence of visceral metastases or four or more bone metastases with one or more outside the vertebral bodies or pelvis; all other cases are defined as low-volume disease [2]. Alongside this recent definition of disease volume, the only serum biomarker validated for the management of prostate cancer is the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). PSA is a prostate-specific, not cancer-specific, serum biomarker. It is typical to notice an increase of it in the prostatic neoplasms, but also in other conditions such as prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and recent instrumentation of the urinary tract, urinary tract infection, and even ejaculation [3]. In clinical practice a PSA increase, which lasts throughout time and does not cover the terms above mentioned, may reveal a prostatic tumour presence. When PSA is strictly (o directly) related to the prostatic cancer presence, it becomes a prognostic factor and a response marker (regardless of treatment type among surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy). Indeed, a PSA increase, after or during the treatment, often correlates with disease progression (PD) [4-6]. In the last years, alongside the PSA, new very sensitive imaging techniques have emerged in the detection and monitoring the prostatic disease. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has demonstrated to be more sensitive, specific and accurate compared to other conventional methods in the initial staging of the patient and in the restaging setting, even with low PSA serum levels (e.g. < 1 ng/ml) [7-11]. PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein highly expressed in the majority of prostate cancers and its expression is generally positively correlated to the PSA value and to a lesser extent to other factors such as PSA doubling time, Gleason Score and hormonal status [12-16]. However, during treatment, an inconsistency between PSA value (decreased) and disease status (PD) detected by PSMA PET/CT is possible. Here we expose a case of a 59-years-old patient with a low-volume de novo mHSPC with an inconsistent biochemical and radiological response to ADT.

Case Report

A 59-years-old man was diagnosed in April 2021 with an adenocarcinoma of the prostate (Gleason score 4+4 in 2/12 biopsies, GS 4+3 in 8/13 biopsies e GS 3+4 in 1/13 biopsies). He performed a Multipara metric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI), a computerized tomography (CT) scan and a bone scan: the clinical stage was cT3bN1M1b, defined as low-volume disease, according to CHAARTED criteria, for the presence of metastases to regional lymph nodes and three bone metastases all located to the pelvis (sacrum, iliac wing, ischium). This stage was confirmed with a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for staging purposes. The PSA value at diagnosis was 59 ng/ml. The treatment strategy chosen for the patient was ADT + Radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate as for the STAMPEDE trial [17]. Note that androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSI) such as abiraterone, apalutamide and enzalutamide were not yet available in Italy at that moment. The patient started treatment with ADT (LH-RH analogue agonist). After 5 months of treatment with ADT, overall well tolerated, PSA decreased to 8.01 ng/ml (with concomitant suppression of the testosterone value) and the multipara metric prostate MRI revealed a partial response (RP) of the primary lesion. However, a restaging with PSMA PET/CT was also prescribed to better define the local treatment planning. Although performed with [18F]F-PSMA-1007, the restaging PSMA PET/ CT clearly showed a mixed response compared to the baseline. In particular, a reduction in number the uptake of regional lymph nodes metastases and the appearance of new highly PSMA-avid bone lesions to the anterior arch of V rib, D9, right sacrum and pubic symphysis [Figure 1]. Although validated for the castrationresistant phase of prostate cancer, if the PSMA PET progression (PPP) criteria were applied, it resulted in PD [18,19]. The patient, subsequently, underwent a new PSA test showing a further slight reduction, reaching the value of 6.75 ng/ml. Given the radiological progression of the disease, radiotherapy of the prostate was not performed and a first-line treatment for the metastatic castrationresistant setting with Enzalutamide was started. In May 2022, after 3 months from the beginning of treatment, the patient appeared in good condition at clinical examination, reported excellent tolerance to the drug and the PSA value decreased to 1.01 ng/ml. A further [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT performed in July 2022 revealed a radiological response with the PSMA uptake uniformly decreased in all metastatic sites, without the appearance of new lesions. PSA value in July 2022 was 0.45 ng/ml. The patient continued the treatment, which is still in progress.


Figure 1: Baseline and post-therapy PSMA PET/CT. The disease volume on the Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) images is highlighted in blue. An example of a new lesion is evident in red, while in green a lesion presenting morph metabolic reduction.

Discussion

PSA values are related to disease trend in patients affected by prostatic cancer: their reduction indicates an active response and a consequent benefit related to the medical, radiotherapy or surgical treatment used, instead their increase correlates with the progression of the disease. In castration-resistant tumours it has already been demonstrated that in about a quarter of cases PSA trend and imaging results are discordant, mainly manifesting with a decrease in PSA value with a concomitant progression of disease detected by PSMA PET/CT [7-9,18,20,21]. A similar situation likely extends to the hormone-sensitive setting, but there are no data from the literature about this condition. The reasons underlying the discordance between PSA values and PSMA PET/CT findings are still unclear and under investigation. The expression of PSMA can be very heterogeneous [22-24]. Many in vitro and in vivo studies showed that PSMA expression and PSA secretion are independently regulated with different behaviour after treatment with anti-hormones [25,26]. It seems that in men with hormonesensitive cancers, androgen deprivation leads in most cases to a decrease in maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV) at PSMA PET/CT as well as PSA secretion. On the contrary in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer, androgen deprivation leads to increased SUVs at PSMA PET/CT, but PSA response can be variable or delayed [26,27]. Nevertheless, a flare phenomenon of expression of PSMA has been reported when starting hormone therapy both in castration-sensitive and in castrationresistant setting [28]. Another explanation of this discordance is that different prostate cancer cell clones may develop during tumour progression or under treatment with different expression of PSMA or PSA secretion [29]. An emblematic example is the progressive neuroendocrine dedifferentiation of some advanced prostate cancers that is associated with poor PSA secretion and heterogeneous and inconstant PSMA uptake [30-33]. Finally, a mixed response to treatment may justify the biochemical and PSMA PET/CT discordant findings, with a general decrease in PSA for an overall volumetric reduction of the lesions, although the newly ones secrete PSA, with preserved PSMA expression [34,35]. This hypothesis is further supported by the high percentage of patients who do not benefit from the ADT treatment for a long time: in patients considered low-volume in the STAMPEDE study the failure-free-survival rate was about 80% [17]. In this scenario, medical oncologists will be faced with the question of how to deal with this significant proportion of patients, in the absence of studies with sufficient case series and the resulting indications. The main options are to continue the current treatment or to switch to a subsequent line of therapy, whether in the hormone-sensitive or castration-resistant setting. Until the role of the new lesions, their nature and possible evolution over time are not clear, giving an unequivocal answer to what is the correct way to proceed is not possible. Other studies are necessary to investigate the prognostic role and the clinical guidance of PSMA PET/CT in these contexts. In the strong suspicion that, despite a satisfactory overall response to treatment, the new foci are clones resistant to therapy, indicating a real progression of the disease, it was decided in this case to move to the next line of therapy. The new line of treatment with ARSI resulted in a biochemical and radiological response. New studies are warranted to identify the correct strategy to apply in terms of biochemical and radiological follow-up during treatment for mHSPC and the best treatment choice in patients with discordant radiological PD and biochemical response.

Acknowledgements: We thank the patient for giving us his consent to write his case.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 71: 209-249.
  2. Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, Liu G, Jarrard DF, et al (2018) Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial. JCO. 36: 1080-1087.
  3. Sooriakumaran P (2021) Prostate cancer screening and the role of PSA: A UK perspective. CCJM. 88: 14-16.
  4. Braeckman J, Michielsen D (2007) Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer. In: Ramon J, Denis LJ, eds. Prostate Cancer. Vol 175. Recent Results in Cancer Research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007: 25-32.
  5. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, mason M, Metcalfe C, et al (2016) 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 375: 1415-1424.
  6. Pezaro C, Woo HH, Davis ID (2014) Prostate cancer: measuring PSA: Measuring PSA. Intern Med J. 44: 433-440.
  7. Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, Mei R, Telo S, et al (2021) Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 62: 596-604.
  8. von Eyben FE, Picchio M, von Eyben R, Rhee H, Bauman G (2018) 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology Focus. 4: 686-693.
  9. Zhou J, Gou Z, Wu R, Yuan Y, Yu G, et al (2019) Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 48: 1915-1924.
  10. Han S, Woo S, Kim Y il, Lee JL, Wibmer AG, et al (2021) Concordance between Response Assessment Using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET and Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels after Systemic Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics. 11: 663.
  11. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, et al (2020) Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. The Lancet. 395: 1208-1216.
  12. Perera M, Papa N, Christidis D, Wetherell D, Hofman MS, et al (2016) Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68 Ga–Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology. 70: 926-937.
  13. Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Zhang S, Terracciano L, Sauter G, Chadhuri A, et al (2007) Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) protein expression in normal and neoplastic tissues and its sensitivity and specificity in prostate adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study using mutiple tumour tissue microarray technique. Histopathology. 50: 472-483.
  14. Pereira Mestre R, Treglia G, Ferrari M, Pascale M, Mazzara C, et al (2019) Correlation between PSA kinetics and PSMA-PET in prostate cancer restaging: A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 49: e13063.
  15. Yildirim ÖA, Gündoğan C, Can C, Poyraz K, Erdur E, et al (2021) Correlations between whole body volumetric parameters of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and biochemical-histopathological parameters in castration-naive and resistant prostate cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med. 35: 540-548.
  16. Eissa A, Elsherbiny A, Coelho RF, Rassweiler J, Davis JW, et al (2018) The role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan in biochemical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 70: 462-478.
  17. Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, Clarke NW, Hoyle AP, et al (2018) Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 392: 2353-2366.
  18. Fanti S, Hadaschik B, Herrmann K (2020) Proposal for Systemic-Therapy Response-Assessment Criteria at the Time of PSMA PET/CT Imaging: The PSMA PET Progression Criteria. J Nucl Med. 61: 678-682.
  19. Grubmüller B, Senn D, Kramer G, Baltzer P, Andrea DD, et al (2019) Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 46: 1063-1072.
  20. Maurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE (2016) Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 13: 226-235.
  21. Lenzo NP, Meyrick D, Turner JH (2018) Review of Gallium-68 PSMA PET/CT Imaging in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 8: E16.
  22. Ferraro DA, Rüschoff JH, Muehlematter UJ (2020) Immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns of primary prostate cancer tissue are associated with the detection rate of biochemical recurrence with 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET. Theranostics. 10: 6082-6094.
  23. Rüschoff JH, Ferraro DA, Muehlematter UJ, Laudicella R, Hermanns T, et al (2021) What’s behind 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in primary prostate cancer PET? Investigation of histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 48: 4042-4053.
  24. Nesari Javan F, Aryana K, Askari E (2021) Prostate Cancer With Neuroendocrine Differentiation Recurring After Treatment With 177Lu-PSMA: A Chance for 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy? Clin Nucl Med. 46: e480-e482.
  25. Sommer U, Siciliano T, Ebersbach C, Beier AE, Stope MB, et al (2022) Impact of Androgen Receptor Activity on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 23: 1046.
  26. Mathy CS, Mayr T, Kürpig S, Meisenheimer M, Pommerich RCD, et al (2021) Antihormone treatment differentially regulates PSA secretion, PSMA expression and 68Ga-PSMA uptake in LNCaP cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 147: 1733-1743.
  27. Bakht MK, Oh SW, Youn H, Cheon GJ, Kwak C, et al (2017) Influence of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on the Uptake of PSMA-Targeted Agents: Emerging Opportunities and Challenges. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 51: 202-211.
  28. Aggarwal R, Wei X, Kim W, Small EJ, Ryan CJ, et al (2018) Heterogeneous Flare in Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Uptake with Initiation of Androgen Pathway Blockade in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 1: 78-82.
  29. Ben Jemaa A, Bouraoui Y, Oueslati R (2014) Insight into the heterogeneity of prostate cancer through PSA-PSMA prostate clones: mechanisms and consequences. Histol Histopathol. 29: 1263-1280.
  30. Yamada Y, Beltran H (2021) Clinical and Biological Features of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 23: 15.
  31. Giovacchini G, Giovannini E, Riondato M, Ciarmiello A (2017) Radiopharmaceuticals for the Diagnosis and Therapy of Neuroendocrine Differentiated Prostate Cancer. Curr Radiopharm. 10: 6-15.
  32. Acar E, Kaya GÇ (2019) 18F-FDG, 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-PSMA Positive Metastatic Large Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Tumor. Clin Nucl Med. 44: 53-54.
  33. Chen S, Cheung SK, Wong KN, Wong KK, Ho CL (2016) 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Unmasked a Case of Prostate Cancer With Neuroendocrine Differentiation. Clin Nucl Med. 41: 959-960.
  34. Seitz AK, Rauscher I, Haller B, Kronke M, Luther S, et al (2018) Preliminary results on response assessment using 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing docetaxel chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 45: 602-612.
  35. Kuroda K, Liu H, Kim S, Guo M, Navarro V, et al (2009) Docetaxel down-regulates the expression of androgen receptor and prostate-specific antigen but not prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer cell lines: implications for PSA surrogacy. Prostate. 69: 1579-1585.

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

Annals of Case Reports

pola slot gacor zeusslot gacor mudah jackpotslot sugar rushslot mahjong thailandmahjong scatter naga hitamslot mahjong ways 2slot pg soft gacorprediksi judi bola sbobetparlay sbobet euro 2024rtp pg softbocoran rtp dan pola gacoragen bola euro terpercayatrik slot mahjong ways 2trik menaklukkan slot mahjong waysbandar bola terpercayaslot gacor gampang menangslot olympus 1000jam gacor pragmaticslot gacor mudah maxwinagen judi bola resmimahjong ways pola jitu maxwinpola gacor starlight princessslot server kambojarahasia scatter hitam mahjong waysturbo spin slot mahjongrtp slot candy villagepola gacor mahjong wins terbaruslot server luar terbarurtp slot olympusslot mahjong waysrtp sweet bonanzaagen sbobet euro 2024judi bola parlay sbobetslot gates of olympus jepe maxwinrtp slot gacorslot starlight christmas pragmatic