CMPH Journal

The thematic analysis of the open-ended questionnaire showed that women were concerned that there was not enough data on the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy and on the baby due to its novel use. Other concerns, which were raised, included feared risk of clotting in the presence of varicose veins, possible interaction with low molecular weight heparin, the risk of getting COVID-19 infection even after vaccination, and fear of anaphylaxis. Extraordinarily, one woman refused the vaccine as she had heard that it was made by a man who killed and sterilized African women. One of the patients explained that she had preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane (PPROM) after the vaccine and attributed it to the vaccine.

Discussion

The average COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate at three different Irish hospitals was 71.4% (260/356) among the study population. Two other international studies reported lower vaccine acceptance rates of 62% and 42.6% respectively during pregnancy [4,5]. Thus, globally the uptake of vaccines in pregnancy is low [3].

The good knowledge about COVID-19 infection, the COVID-19 vaccine, and its side effects (Table 1, Figure 1) represent good communication between patients and healthcare service providers as well as the spread of awareness through social media and public health awareness campaigns.

A reasonable number of patients voiced concerns about the safety of the vaccine (45.6%) and its effectiveness (34%); these could be the possible reasons for declining the vaccine. Similar concerns about the low level of self-reported knowledge were also raised by participants of other international studies [4,6]. General mistrust of the COVID-19 vaccine was seen only in a very small number of cases (24/364= 6.6%). Some international studies explored further reasons behind this mistrust and found ‘concerns about the speed of the development of the vaccine and mistrust in government’ regarding the COVID-19 pandemic as possible reasons. Albeit, the available data of women who took the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy explain no increased risk of adverse outcomes after covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy and the COVID-19 vaccine is the safest and most effective way to protect mothers and babies [7].

It was interesting that the total number of employed women (254/364=70%), as well as their uptake of vaccine (206/364=56.5%), was more than the total number of unemployed women (110/364=30%) and vaccine uptake by them (59/364=16%) among the study population. Moreover, employment status showed a significant association with vaccine uptake (p-value <0.001). There could be two reasons behind that; firstly, employed women are generally well informed and secondly, employed women could not stay at home like the unemployed women to prevent COVID-19 infection, thus preferred being vaccinated. Literature review suggests certain predictors of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women were older age, ethnicity, race, confidence in the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, fear of COVID-19 during pregnancy, and employment status [3,8]. Our study also showed that Irish and older women more open to COVID-19 vaccination while women with BAME and of younger age had a lower uptake of the vaccine. Targeted interventions to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake among this subgroup of women are advocated, namely providing audio and written information leaflets in different languages, use of social media, and public campaigns.

Pregnancy is an independent risk factor for Covid-19 infection-related morbidity and mortality and the best way to prevent it is through vaccination [10]. Certain patients are at risk of serious COVID-19 sequelae because of their comorbidities e.g. diabetes, immunosuppression, asthma, etc. In our study population, the number of patients with high-risk factors who got vaccinated was high (Figure 2) explaining that they were well-informed and motivated.

The attitude of pregnant and postnatal women to the COVID-19 vaccine was variable and comprised of satisfaction to anxiety, with a trend of satisfaction feeling among vaccinated women (Figure 3). COVID-19 itself is associated with maternal psychological distress [9,10].

The biggest reasons for the declining vaccine in our study were a perceived danger for the baby and the recent release of the vaccine (Figure 4). The factors compounding this situation include that when the COVID-19 vaccine was introduced, pregnant women were excluded from trials as well as its clinical use initially, resulting in public mistrust. Fears about the safety and side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine have been reiterated in other international studies [3,5]. A certain number of vaccine-friendly patients who took other vaccines previously (36/104=34.6%) declined to take the COVID-19 vaccine in our study. This is contrary to findings in another study which showed flu vaccine was negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy [3]. Other factors predicting vaccine hesitancy included younger age and living in a less urban context [3].

Figure 4: Reasons and concerns for declining COVID-19 vaccine.

Major concerns for the declining vaccine were not enough data about vaccine safety in pregnancy and its novel use in our study (Figure 4). Safety issues regarding the long-term effects of the vaccine on the baby have been also raised in other studies [4,5]. Due to these issues, a certain number of pregnant women declined the COVID-19 vaccine. These pregnant women also suffered as the decision of women not to take the COVID-19 vaccine resulted in the temporary segregation of pregnant women to mitigate public health risks of the pandemic [11].

The risks of COVID-19 infection are poorly understood and/or poorly valued in the subgroup of pregnant and lactating women and it could be helped by giving explicit information and advocating that the vaccine is safe in pregnancy and beneficial for mother and baby (Figure 5). A small number of patients were concerned because of the clotting risk associated with the vaccine as they were at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). A study by Favre G, et al also reported a case of venous thromboembolism at 21 weeks post-vaccination [12]. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine has been associated with frequent adverse local and systemic effects, but severe events including VTE are rare [12]. Contrarily, COVID-19 infection is itself a transient risk factor “current systemic infection” for VTE [13] as well and VTE prophylaxis is provided to pregnant women following RCOG guideline [14].

Figure 5: Targeted measures to improve vaccine uptake.

Our study highlighted that asking a simple question “Why are you declining the vaccine?” in a supportive manner is also important in reducing vaccine hesitancy as few patients have queries specific to their particular situation e.g. having varicose veins and on LMWH does not interfere with the COVID-19 vaccine and needs simple reassurance. Moreover, the risk of anaphylaxis is extremely rare with the COVID-19 vaccine and we generally advise women who are allergic to a previous dose or its components e.g. polyethylene glycol vaccines not to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

One of our patients said she did not want to take the vaccine as she heard that it was made by a man who killed and sterilized African women. A study conducted in Nigeria focused on vaccine hesitancy caused by misinformation and conspiracy theories about the disease and vaccines and concluded that exploring these insights and improving communication would help increase vaccine literacy.15 One of our patients explained that she had PPROM after the vaccine and attributed it to the vaccine. Although a study by Favre G, et al. [12] also reported a case of PPROM at 31 weeks after getting the COVID-19 vaccine, pregnant women are reassured that this is a rare event.

The limitations of the study include the use of the English language for the questionnaire, thus excluding women with language barriers and a low number of women with a BAME background. As this study was cross-sectional, it did not look at women who declined the COVID-19 vaccine initially to see if their opinions changed over time. Although this study was multi-institutional and conducted in three different hospitals, generalization of results to other regions could not rule out bias as there could be region-specific sociocultural factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy.

The use of terms like “Anti-vaccine” is misleading as most women are vaccine-hesitant because of the potential risks of the vaccine on the development of the fetus and newborn and we could manage them effectively by addressing them scientifically and systematically.

Conclusions

There is a large gap in available evidence regarding factors influencing the choice of pregnant women to get the COVID-19 vaccine. It is important to prioritize research on vaccines in pregnancy, publish results and build up a data bank to reduce vaccine hesitancy and resultant health risks. Maintaining the vaccine registries, publishing results and organising public health campaigns on the long-term safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant and lactating women and infants would help in the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and vaccine awareness. The importance of achieving goals of reducing COVID19-associated health risks and related costs through vaccination of pregnant and lactating women can’t be overemphasized.

Acknowledgements

1. Hajra Begum (RIP)
2. Muhammad Khan Janjua
3. Dr Naveed Kausar Janjua

References

1. RCOG (2022) Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection in Pregnancy.
2. Beigi R, Jamieson DJ, Hughes BL, Swamy G, Turrentine M, et al. (2021) COVID-19 Vaccination Considerations for Obstetric – Gynecologic Care COVID-19 Vaccine Authorization Overview. 1-34.
3. Galanis P, Vraka I, Siskou O, Konstantakopoulou O, Katsiroumpa A, et al. (2022) Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccines among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines 10: 766.
4. Skirrow H, Barnett S, Bell S, Riaposova L, Mounier-Jack S, et al. (2022) Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: a multi-methods study in the UK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22: 1-15.
5. Cui Y, Binger K, Palatnik A (2022) Attitudes and Beliefs Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy. JAMA Netw Open 5: E227430.
6. Simmons LA, Whipps MDM, Phipps JE, Satish NS, Swamy GK (2022) Understanding COVID-19 vaccine uptake during pregnancy: ‘Hesitance’, knowledge, and evidence-based decision-making. Vaccine 40: 2755-2760.
7. Nana M, Nelson-Piercy C (2021) COVID-19 in pregnancy. Clin Med (Lond) 21: e446-e450.
8. Reifferscheid L, Marfo E, Assi A, Dubé E, MacDonald NE, et al. (2022) COVID-19 vaccine uptake and intention during pregnancy in Canada. Can J Public Health 113: 547-558.
9. Janjua NB, Mohamed AF, Birmani SA, Donnelly O, Syed AH, et al. (2021) COVID-19 pandemic and maternal perspectives. Ir Med J 114: 411.
10. Arzamani N, Soraya S, Hadi F, Nooraeen S, Saeidi M. The COVID-19 pandemic and mental health in pregnant women: A review article. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13.
11. Voo TC, Savulescu J, Schaefer O, Ling AHZ, Tam CC (2022) COVID-19 differentiated measures for unvaccinated individuals: The need for clear goals and strong justifications. Vaccine 40: 5333-5337.
12. Favre G, Maisonneuve E, Pomar L, Winterfeld U, Daire C, et al. (2022)COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in pregnancy: Results of the Swiss COVIPREG registry, an observational prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 18: 100410.
13. Daru J, White K, Hunt BJ. Covid-19, thrombosis and pregnancy. Thrombosis Update. 2021;5:100077. doi:10.1016/j.tru.2021.100077.
14. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015) Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium Pregnancy and the Puerperium. Green-top Guidel No 37a.
15. Wonodi C, Obi-Jeff C, Adewumi F, Keluo-Udeke SC, Gur-Arie R, et al. (2022) Conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 in Nigeria: Implications for vaccine demand generation communications. Vaccine 40: 2114-2121.