Correlates of Parenting Stress and Practices Among a Sample of Egyptian Mothers of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Reham Mansour1,
Hossam Mohamed El-Khateeb1, Mahmoud
Farag2, Ghada Refaat Amin Taha2*, Hanan Azzam2,
Ahmed Saad2
1Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology, Cairo, Egypt
2Department of Neuropsychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre
for Mental Health Research &Training, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams
University, Cairo, Egypt
Received Date: 01 August 2018; Accepted Date: 03 September, 2018; Published Date: 13 September, 2018
Citation: Mansour R, El-Khateeb HM, Farag M, Amin Taha GR, Azzam H, et al. (2018) Correlates of Parenting Stress and Practices Among a Sample of Egyptian Mothers of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Psychiatry Cogn Behav: JPCB-141. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7762. 000041
1.
Abstract
ANOVA : Analysis of Variance
CBCL : Child Behaviour Checklist
PP : Parenting Practices
PSI : Parenting Stress Index
1. Introduction
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Raising a child diagnosed with ADHD may require more care and attention from parents until the child becomes independent. It interferes with parental productivity and health related quality of life [1]. Moreover, children and adolescents with ADHD are more likely to exhibit behavioural problems whether externalizing (oppositional behaviours, conduct problems, substance abuse, risk taking behaviours) or internalizing (depression, anxiety, withdrawal) than other adolescents [2]. These behaviours offer more challenges and are associated with high levels of parenting stress [3].
Although research examining the aetiology of ADHD has recognized that nearly 70 % of its causal factors are related to heritability and clear neurobiological mechanisms [4], yet, environmental influences such as parenting and parent-child relationship and attachment have been determined to have strong influences on ADHD and associated behavioural problems [5].
The relationship between parenting stress and parenting practices is one of the most complex relationships that are even more pronounced in children diagnosed with ADHD. Parents of children and adolescents with ADHD experience considerable challenges in their parenting roles [6]. Literature establishes a link between high levels of parenting stress and dysfunctional parenting [7]. Diverse approaches to understanding parenting stress have shown multiple associations with negative parenting attitudes and parental well-being, as well as negative parenting behaviour [8]. Parents who experience high levels of parenting stress have poorer psychological wellbeing [9], exhibit fewer positive parenting behaviours [10] and are less able to implement parenting interventions than other parents [11].
In a study associating parenting stress and parenting practices with academic achievement, Rogers and colleagues [12] reported that high levels of parenting stress are associated with the use of more controlling strategies regarding children’s academic performance, whereas lower stress is associated with a more supportive style of involvement. Acquisition of positive parenting skills and higher sense of parenting competence improves intervention impact on adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviours [13].
Several works have been carried out on the bidirectional relationship (parent-to-child and child-to-parent processes) between parenting stress and practices on one hand and child/adolescent’s ADHD and associated behavioural problems on the other hand [14]. Most of this work is done in western culture. Although there has been recently an increase in ADHD research in Arab countries, yet, research in this field remains relatively sparse [15]. Only few of them addressed the effect of parenting stress on those children [16-18]. Parenting practices have a major influence on child development. Parenting style or practices differs widely between Western high-income countries and Eastern developing countries due to cultural variations or gaps [19].
In particular, parents in the Egyptian culture, from all social, economic and educational backgrounds, generally tend to use harsh discipline with their children [20]. This would possibly be more pronounced in parents of children suffering from ADHD, especially mothers who face more parenting challenges, being the primary and direct caregiver of the child. The interaction between parenting practices and parenting stress in parents of children suffering from ADHD is still a matter of debate. How this interaction affects the severity of ADHD symptoms and the presence of behavioral problems is still poorly understood in the Egyptian children. Thus, this study was carried out aiming at: 1) comparing parenting stress levels and different parenting practices between Egyptian mothers of children diagnosed with ADHD and mothers of apparently normal children. 2) Study the correlations of parenting stress and parenting practices on ADHD symptoms severity and externalizing / internalizing behavioural problems in children with ADHD.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design
This work is a cross-sectional, case-control study conducted in the period from July 2017 to February 2018.
2.2. Participants
This study was supposed to be conducted on a sample of parents (both mothers and fathers), depending on whom attended the clinical setting with the child. However, this work was shifted to be conducted on mothers only due to predominance of mothers attending clinic seeking help for their children. Finally, one hundred children diagnosed with ADHD according to DSM-IV criteria were recruited consecutively, after taking parental consents, along with their mothers from Ain Shams University, Child Psychiatry Out-Patient Clinic with the following inclusion criteria: age range from 6-16 years, both sexes, fulfilling the criteria of ADHD diagnosis according to the DSM-IV criteria. Exclusion criteria included: IQ below 70, having any medical illness. A control group consisted of 50 apparently healthy children matched for age, sex and IQ, free of any medical or psychiatric illness, were randomly selected from children of employees working at Misr University for Science and Technology.
2.3. Procedures and Tools
After taking consent from the ethical committee of the Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University, all participants were subjected to the following: 1. full clinical and psychiatric history was taken from mothers using the semi-structured child psychiatry sheets of Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University hospitals including: personal history, demographics (mothers’ and fathers’ education and occupation, the number of family members and housing details, family income, crowding index and sanitation), complaint, and history of presenting complaints, past medical and psychiatric history, family history, and diagnosis. 2. MINI-KID [21] for psychiatric diagnoses to assess current and past episodes of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Arabic Version was used [22]. 3. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children, Arabic Version [23]: for measuring IQ in children. 4. Parenting Stress Index (PSI): it evaluates the stress significance in parent-child system and includes 120 items which comprises both childhood (47 items) and parenthood (54 items) domains plus an optional scale for life conflicts (19 items). The child domain comprises six subscales: adaptability, acceptability, demandingness, mood, distractibility/ hyperactivity, and reinforces parent. The parent domain consists of seven subscales: competence, isolation, role restriction, attachment, depression, marital relationships, and parent health. 100 items are rated on a 5 points scale (totally agree up to totally disagree) and 20 yes/ no questions regarding life stress. Each item is given a raw score; scores of each subscale items are added to form a total domain (Chil-d- Parent-Life). Scores are converted to percentages interpreted as follows: 16 - 80 Percentile: Normal Range, 81 - 84 Percentile: Borderline, 85 - 99+ Percentile: Clinically Significant. Reliability coefficients for the Child, Parent, Life domains and Total Stress Scale were 0.90 or greater [24]. 5. Parenting Attitude questionnaire: this is an Arabic questionnaire designed by Ismail and Mansour [25] to assess parenting attitudes and practices. It consists of 146 statements measuring parental attitudes on 10 subscales namely "control, overprotection, negligence, spoiling, harshness, induction of psychological pain, inconsistency, discrimination, lying and using positive parental attitudes". Each answer is given a score on a three-point scale (0-2). Each scale is given a total raw score then changed to a percentage by multiplying it to special constant. The Cronbach alpha coefficients revealed good internal consistency for different parenting attitudes (range 0.986 - 0.997). 6. Child behaviour checklist (CBCL) [26]. It is a 113-question checklist designed for children from 4 to 16 years. It assesses problems classified as internalizing behaviour on 3 dimensions (withdrawal, somatic complaints, anxiety/depression) and externalizing behaviour on 2 dimensions (delinquent behaviour/ aggressive behaviour). In addition, there are 3 non-specific dimensions (social problems, thought problems, attention problems). Items are scored as normal, borderline range or abnormal. The Arabic version was used [27]. 7. The Arabic version of Conner’s’ Parent Rating Scale-Revised [27]: applied to parents of case group only. It was developed by C. Keith Conner [28], translated by El-Sheikh and colleagues [27], and validated through use in many subsequent researches. It assesses the severity of ADHD symptoms (based on DSM-IV) in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years old. It has a total of 48 items forming six subscales, including Hyperactivity, Inattention, Impulsivity, Oppositionality, Liability and Cognitive problems. Items are rated on a 4-point scale (0-3 points). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Data entry, processing and statistical analysis were carried out using MedCalc version 15.8. Mean, Standard deviation (± SD) and range were used for descriptive parametric numerical data, while Median and Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) for non-parametric numerical data. Frequency and percentage were used for non-numerical data. Tests of significance (Chi square, Mann-Whitney's test, ANOVA, Spearman's correlation analysis, multiple and logistic regression analysis) were used for analytical study. Data were presented and suitable analysis was done according to the type of data (parametric and non-parametric) obtained for each variable. P-values less than 0.05 (5%) were considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
The sample of this study is divided into two groups: Case group which included 100 children diagnosed with ADHD; 61 (61%) males and 39 (39%) females with mean age 9.1 ± SD 2.35. Mean IQ for case group was 96 ± SD 6.6. According to ADHD subtype, 60 cases (60%) were of Combined type, Inattentive 23 (23%) and Hyperactive 17 (17%). The control group consisted of 50 apparently healthy children; 26 males (52%) and 24 females (48%) with mean age 9.6 ± SD 2.8. Mean IQ for control group was 97.6 ± SD 6.7. Sociodemographic data of both groups are represented in table 1.
The mean scores for subscales of the Conner’s Parent Rating Scale-Revised in the ADHD group were as follows: means ± SD for Hyperactivity was 77.15 ± 13.86, Inattention 76.16 ± 12.01, Impulsivity 76.23 ± 13.36, Cognitive problems 70.64 ± 9.61, Liability 68.2 ± 12.44, Oppositionality 74.04 ± 13.74.
3.2. Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
When comparing Child Behavior Checklist between both case and control groups using Mann-Whitney's test, there was highly significant statistical difference in increased externalizing problems (delinquent, aggressive and total externalizing score, U= 595.5, 952.5, 700 respectively, p < 0.0001 for each respectively) and increased internalizing problems (withdrawn, anxious depressed and total internalizing score, U= 880, 1552.5, 1271.5 respectively, p < 0.0001 for each respectively), decreased sex problems and increased social, attention problems and total CBCL scores among ADHD group compared to control group (U=1685, 891, 375, 655 respectively, p < 0.0001 for each respectively). While thought problems, somatic complaints did not show any difference between both groups (p > 0.05 respectively).
3.3. Parenting Stress Index (PSI)
When comparing different domains of Parenting Stress Index (PSI) in both cases and control groups, it was significantly apparent that the child, parent and total PSI domains were significantly higher in the case than in the control group. However, marital relationships and life stress domain failed to show difference between both groups (see table 2).
3.5. Relation Between Parenting Stress and Parenting Practices in Mothers of ADHD Children
To find out the correlations of PSI scores in mothers of ADHD children on their parenting practices, multiple regression analysis was conducted. The increase in child PSI domain alone had significant independent effect on increasing practicing of control, induction of psychological pain, lying and discrimination (p < 0.0001 respectively), increased negligence and harshness practicing (p = 0.0102, 0.0212 respectively).
While increased both child and life stress PSI domains had significant independent effect on increased practicing of overprotection (p = 0.0255, p = 0.0288 for each domain respectively). Also, increased child and parents PSI domains had significant independent effect on increased practicing of inconsistency (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0011 for each domain respectively). Whereas decreased child and parent PSI domains had significant independent effect on increased using positive parental attitudes (p = 0.0164, p < 0.0001 for each domain respectively).
3.6. Parenting Stress and Parenting Practices: Correlations with ADHD Subtypes
Comparisons between ADHD subtypes in relation to PSI and parenting practices (PP) scores were conducted using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test. Table 4 shows that mothers of hyperactive and inattentive subtypes showed significantly increased negligence and spoiling practices compared to mothers of combined subtype (p = 0.016, p = 0.028 respectively). At the same time, the hyperactive and combined subtypes were significantly associated with increased child and parent PSI scores in comparison to inattentive subtype (p = 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively).
Additionally, multiple regression analysis was done to assess parenting practicing factors affecting behavioral problems (CBCL) in both control and ADHD groups (table 6).
Lastly, logistic regression analysis was applied using Backward method to assess all factors affecting ADHD susceptibility. It showed that increased child, parent, life stress PSI scores; increased negative practicing of (control, overprotection, spoiling, harshness and induction of psychological pain) had an independent effect on increasing the probability of ADHD susceptibility with significant statistical difference (P < 0.05 respectively) (table 7).
Furthermore, the current results showed that ADHD children significantly displayed increased total externalizing and internalizing problems scores (especially delinquent, aggressive withdrawn, anxious-depressed, social and attention problems scores) compared to control group. Several studies have confirmed these findings among children with ADHD in different cultures [18,43-46]. This high level of behavioral problems either internalizing or externalizing in ADHD children represent a substantial burden on the family as a whole and on parents of ADHD children, in particular, would adversely impact parent’s quality of life leading to elevated parenting stress and use of inadequate parenting practices in comparison to parents of control children [18].
Several researches have been carried out on the
bidirectional relationship (parent-to-child and child-to-parent processes)
between parenting stress and child/adolescent’s ADHD symptoms. Some studies
point out that parental stress can increase both the symptoms of ADHD and the
psychological maladjustment of children [14]. Conversely,
it is well established that the higher ADHD symptom severity, the more
parenting stress [36]. Increased parenting
stress leads to negative parenting practices (inconsistent discipline, and
corporal punishment) which reinforce the unsuitable conducts and oppositional
behaviors of children [47]. The current study
supports this notion where multiple regression analysis showed that increased child PSI domain alone had significant
independent effect on increased negative parenting practicing such as control,
negligence, harshness, induction of psychological pain, lying and
discrimination. While increased both child and parents PSI domains had
significant independent effect on increased practicing of inconsistency. Conversely,
decreased child and parent PSI had significant independent effect on increased
using positive parental attitudes.
Furthermore, mothers
of children with ADHD were found to use more negative and controlling practices
[30]. High levels of negative parenting
practices were associated with ADHD symptom severity [48],
higher rates of inattention, homework, social and home impairment [14]. Consistently, multiple regression analysis in
the current study
showed that increased
parenting practicing of harshness, inconsistency and lying was significantly
correlated with increased Conner's Hyperactivity and Oppositionality and
increased parenting practicing of harshness and inconsistency was significantly
correlated with increased Conner's Impulsivity. While increased practicing of
induction of psychological pain was significantly correlated with increased Conner's
Inattention, Cognitive and Liability domains. Whereas increased practicing of
control was significantly correlated with increased Conner's Cognitive domain.
Another interesting and important finding obtained from the current study was that increased parenting stress (child, parent and life stress) and increased negative parenting practices (of control, overprotection, spoiling, harshness and induction of psychological pain) were predictors for increased probability of ADHD susceptibility (table 7). In a more detailed study, Keown [53] reported that lower levels of paternal sensitivity and maternal positive regard in early childhood are uniquely predictive of higher levels of inattentiveness in middle childhood while intrusive paternal behaviors are predictive of hyperactive- impulsive behaviors at school. Furthermore, recent evidence provides a link between parenting practices and child brain structure and function. Research investigating the neurobiological effects of parenting showed that positive maternal behavior directed to the child is associated with an acceleration of the normal pattern of cortical thinning in the prefrontal cortex (involved in executive functions, attention and response inhibition) during early adolescence which appears to reflect positive development and superior functioning. While negative parenting might indirectly influence poor adolescent outcomes and functioning via immature or delayed brain maturation [54].
Figure 1: Summary diagram showing the correlational impact of parenting stress
and practices on
ADHD symptom severity and associated behavioral problems.
Variable |
Control group (50) |
ADHD group (100) |
Χ2 value |
p-value |
|
Gender |
Female |
24 (48%) |
39 (39%) |
0.77 |
0.3803 |
Male |
26 (52%) |
61 (61%) |
|||
Socio-economic status |
Low |
10 (20%) |
59 (59%) |
28.176 |
< 0.0001** |
Middle |
28 (56%) |
38 (38%) |
|||
High |
12 (24%) |
3 (3%) |
|||
Child's educational level |
Primary |
36 (72%) |
86 (86%) |
4.303 |
0.1163 |
Preparatory |
11 (22%) |
11 (11%) |
|||
Secondary |
3 (6%) |
3 (3%) |
|||
Child's academic performance |
Poor |
0 (0%) |
9 (9%) |
52.263 |
< 0.0001** |
Barely adequate |
2 (4%) |
14 (14%) |
|||
Fair |
8 (16%) |
44 (44%) |
|||
Good |
22 (44%) |
33 (33%) |
|||
*= Significant **= Highly significant |
Table 1: Shows sociodemographic data of ADHD and control groups using Chi square test.
Variables |
Control group (50) |
ADHD group (100) |
U value |
p value |
Median (IQR) |
Median (IQR) |
|||
Child domain |
||||
Adaptability |
24 (20-29) |
29 (26-31) |
1576.5 |
0.0002** |
Acceptability |
14 (12-18) |
27 (26-29) |
185 |
< 0.0001** |
Demandingness |
19.5 (18-22) |
26 (24-28.5) |
867 |
< 0.0001** |
Mood |
10 (7-12) |
14 (13-16) |
751 |
< 0.0001** |
Distractibility/
Hyperactivity |
25.5 (13-26) |
28 (28-30) |
766.5 |
< 0.0001** |
Reinforces parent |
12 (10-14) |
16 (14-18) |
1139.5 |
< 0.0001** |
PSI Child (Total) |
105.5 (85-118) |
143 (135-148) |
420.5 |
< 0.0001** |
Parent domain |
||||
Competence |
23 (20-30) |
28 (24.5-30) |
1996.5 |
0.0441* |
Isolation |
15.5 (13-16) |
20 (18-24) |
666 |
< 0.0001** |
Role Restriction |
20 (18-23) |
24 (20-26) |
1532.5 |
0.0001** |
Attachment |
15 (13-16) |
16 (14-20) |
1575 |
0.0002** |
Depression |
20 (18-23) |
28 (26-30) |
784 |
< 0.0001** |
Marital Relationships |
15 (14-18) |
16 (14-18) |
2336 |
0.5089 |
Health |
15 (11-16) |
18 (14-20) |
1333 |
< 0.0001** |
PSI Parent (Total) |
122 (113-136) |
152 (140-60) |
1148 |
< 0.0001** |
PSI Life Stress |
10 (0-11) |
10 (5-20) |
2227.5 |
0.2625 |
PSI (Total) |
230.5 (205-257) |
294 (276.5-308.5) |
721 |
< 0.0001** |
*= Significant **= Highly significant |
Table 2:Compares PSI between ADHD and control groups using Mann Whitney's test.
Variable |
Control
group (50) |
ADHD
group (100) |
U
value |
P-value |
Median
(IQR) |
Median
(IQR) |
|||
Control |
10
(8-12) |
20
(16-23) |
491 |
<
0.0001** |
Overprotection |
9
(6-10) |
8
(6-14) |
2217.5 |
0.2561 |
Negligence |
6
(4-10) |
6
(4-8) |
2473.5 |
0.9141 |
Spoiling |
7
(4-8) |
6
(4-8) |
1789 |
0.0036** |
Harshness |
4
(0-6) |
12
(8-14) |
663.5 |
<
0.0001** |
Induction
of psychological pain |
10
(8-12) |
16
(10-18) |
1222 |
<
0.0001** |
Inconsistency |
10
(8-14) |
15
(14-16) |
1143.5 |
<
0.0001** |
Discrimination |
6
(4-10) |
16
(14-18) |
530.5 |
<
0.0001** |
Lying |
8
(6-10) |
6
(6-8) |
1600 |
0.0002** |
Using
positive parental attitudes |
206
(194-222) |
163
(150-176) |
550.5 |
<
0.0001** |
*= Significant **= Highly significant |
Table 3: Compares Parenting
Practices (PP) data between ADHD and control groups using Mann-Whitney's test.
Independent
variables (ADHD group) |
Hyperactive
(17) |
Inattentive
(23) |
Combined
(60) |
ANOVA
test |
|
Mean
± SD |
Mean
± SD |
Mean ± SD |
F |
P
value |
|
PP
(Control) |
19.94
± 4.74 |
19.39
± 5.7 |
19.73
± 4.86 |
0.0635 |
0.939 |
PP
(Overprotection) |
10.94
± 5.29 |
10.08
± 5.09 |
9.31
± 6.4 |
0.535 |
0.587 |
PP
(Negligence) |
8.11
± 3.56 |
9.3
± 6.48 |
6.23
± 3.71 |
4.289 |
0.016* |
PP
(Spoiling) |
6.35
± 2.14 |
6.43
± 2.82 |
5.06
± 2.28 |
3.719 |
0.028* |
PP
(Harshness) |
12.35
± 4.75 |
9.47
± 4.23 |
10.83
± 4.69 |
1.917 |
0.153 |
PP (Induction of
psychological pain) |
14.58
± 3.44 |
13.82 ± 7.38 |
15.3 ± 4.53 |
0.697 |
0.501 |
PP
(Inconsistency) |
15.17
± 1.74 |
13.47 ± 4.64 |
14.73
± 3.01 |
1.605 |
0.206 |
PP
(Discrimination) |
16.35
± 2.37 |
16.65
± 6.47 |
15.2
± 5.28 |
0.783 |
0.460 |
PP
(Lying) |
7.41
± 3.06 |
6.43
± 1.47 |
6.46
± 1.78 |
1.621 |
0.203 |
PP
(Using positive parental attitudes) |
162.47
± 13.61 |
173
± 25.3 |
165.5
± 20.88 |
1.478 |
0.233 |
PSI
Child (Total) |
141.94
± 12.24 |
131.9
± 16.5 |
143.38
± 10.5 |
7.224 |
0.001** |
PSI
Parent (Total) |
153.76
± 9.82 |
127.4
± 25.8 |
155
± 15 |
21.652 |
< 0.001** |
PSI
Life Stress |
9.7
± 7.59 |
11.08 ± 6.9 |
11.05
± 7.87 |
0.223 |
0.801 |
*=Significant **=Highly Significant |
Table 4: Shows comparisons
between ADHD subtypes and scores of PSI and PP in ADHD group using ANOVA test.
Conner’s domain |
Factor |
β |
SE |
R2 |
t |
P |
Conner’s
Hyperactivity |
Harshness |
0.9812 |
0.3211 |
0.3193 |
3.056 |
0.0029** |
Inconsistency |
1.8122 |
0.4903 |
3.696 |
0.0004** |
||
Lying |
2.0607 |
0.7148 |
2.883 |
0.0049** |
||
Conner’s
Inattention |
Induction of psychological
pain |
1.2294 |
0.3367 |
0.1576 |
3.651 |
0.0004** |
Conner’s
Impulsivity |
Harshness |
0.7086 |
0.3213 |
0.2571 |
2.205 |
0.0299* |
Inconsistency |
2.0215 |
0.4871 |
4.150 |
0.0001** |
||
Conner’s
Cognitive |
Control |
0.5977 |
0.1989 |
0.2837 |
3.005 |
0.0034** |
Induction of psychological
pain |
1.1231 |
0.2336 |
4.809 |
<
0.0001** |
||
Conner’s
Liability |
Induction of psychological
pain |
1.2854 |
0.2688 |
0.2383 |
4.782 |
<
0.0001** |
Conner’s
Oppositionality |
Harshness |
0.8159 |
0.3159 |
0.3299 |
2.583 |
0.0114* |
Inconsistency |
1.9083 |
0.4824 |
3.956 |
0.0001** |
||
Lying |
1.9671 |
0.7032 |
2.797 |
0.0063** |
||
β: Regression
coefficient, SE: Standard error, *=
Significant **= Highly significant Independent
effect:
independently affecting outcome without effect of other factors. |
Table 5: Shows the correlations
between Conner's severity scores and different parenting practices in the ADHD
group using multiple regression analysis.
CBCL |
Factor |
β |
SE |
R2 |
t |
P-value |
Total
CBCL Externalizing control group |
PP
(Spoiling) |
2.8057 |
0.5712 |
0.6332 |
4.912 |
< 0.0001** |
PP
(Inconsistency) |
2.2438 |
0.3198 |
7.017 |
< 0.0001** |
||
Total
CBCL Externalizing ADHD group |
PP
(Overprotection) |
-0.3588 |
0.1051 |
0.8376 |
-3.415 |
0.0009** |
PP
(Negligence) |
-0.8315 |
0.1457 |
-5.706 |
< 0.0001** |
||
PP
(Harshness) |
0.7668 |
0.1514 |
5.066 |
< 0.0001** |
||
PP
(Inconsistency) |
0.7351 |
0.3218 |
2.285 |
0.0246* |
||
PP
(Using positive parental attitudes) |
-0.3679 |
0.0460 |
-7.988 |
< 0.0001** |
||
Conner's
PR (Hyperactivity) |
0.3320 |
0.0473 |
7.014 |
< 0.0001** |
||
Total
CBCL Internalizing control group |
PP
(Control) |
0.4916 |
0.1540 |
0.5829 |
3.192 |
0.0026** |
PP
(Spoiling) |
1.0901 |
0.4189 |
2.603 |
0.0125* |
||
PP
(Harshness) |
0.6541 |
0.2096 |
3.120 |
0.0032** |
||
PP
(Inconsistency) |
1.0786 |
0.2114 |
5.103 |
< 0.0001** |
||
Total
CBCL Internalizing ADHD group |
PP
(Control) |
0.2701 |
0.1112 |
0.5910 |
2.428 |
0.0171* |
PP
(Negligence) |
0.4713 |
0.1143 |
4.124 |
0.0001** |
||
PP
(Inconsistency) |
0.5420 |
0.1787 |
3.033 |
0.0031** |
||
Conner's
PR (Hyperactivity) |
-0.2518 |
0.0375 |
-6.699 |
<0.0001** |
||
β: Regression coefficient,
SE: Standard error, *= Significant **= Highly significant Independent
effect: independently affecting outcome without effect of other factors. |
Table 6: Shows effects of
parenting practicing on CBCL total scores in both control and ADHD groups using
multiple regression analysis.
Independent
variables |
β |
SE |
R2 |
Wald |
P-value |
(Constant) |
-44.1238 |
|
0.9446 |
|
|
PSI
Child (Total) |
0.46745 |
0.19569 |
|
5.7061 |
0.0169* |
PSI
Parent (Total) |
-0.12683 |
0.059415 |
|
4.5567 |
0.0328* |
PSI
Life Stress |
0.17135 |
0.086128 |
|
3.9580 |
0.0466* |
PP
(Control) |
0.81055 |
0.34998 |
|
5.3636 |
0.0206* |
PP
(Overprotection) |
1.17237 |
0.53457 |
|
4.8097 |
0.0283* |
PP
(Spoiling) |
2.50281 |
1.12748 |
|
4.9276 |
0.0264* |
PP
(Harshness) |
2.21240 |
0.93338 |
|
5.6183 |
0.0178* |
PP
(Induction of psychological pain) |
0.90687 |
0.41179 |
|
4.8500 |
0.0276* |
PP
(Inconsistency) |
0.65979 |
0.37490 |
|
3.0974 |
0.0784 |
β: Regression
coefficient, SE: Standard error, *=
Significant **= Highly significant Independent
effect: independently affecting outcome without effect of other factors. |
Table 7: Shows Logistic Regression
analysis for the factors affecting ADHD susceptibility.
5.
Johnston C and Chronis-Tuscano A (2015)
Families and ADHD. In Barkley, R. A. (Ed.), Attention-deficit hyperactivity
disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4th ed., pp: 191-209.
10.
Crnic KA, Low C (2002) Everyday stresses
and parenting. Handbook of parenting, Practical issues in parenting. 2nd.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 5: 243-267.
16.
Sayed M, El Gaafary M, El Kholi S (2005)
Parenting stress among mothers of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children.
Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 24:113-124.
22.
Ghanem M, Ibrahim M, Elbehary A A, El
Merghany H (1999) Validation and reliability of first Arabic version of Mini
International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents
(MINI-KID). Unpublished MD thesis, Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams
University, Cairo, Egypt.
23.
Melika L (1984) Wechsler Intelligence
Scale for Children - Arabic version. Publisher: Dar El-Nahda El-Masryia, Cairo,
Egypt.
24.
Abidin RR (1995) Parenting Stress Index
(PSI) manual. (3rd Edition). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
25.
Ismail EE, Mansour RF (1999) Parental
Attitude Scale. Publisher: Nahda El-Masryia Library. Cairo, Egypt.
27.
El Sheikh M, Sadek A, Omar AN, El-Nahass G
(2002) Psychiatric Morbidity in First Degree Relatives of ADHD children.
Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
28.
Conners CK (2001) Conners Rating Scales-Revised.
North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
29.
Haugaard JJ (2008) Child psychopathology. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.