Comparative Growth Performance in Post-Weaned Guinea Pigs (Cavia Porcellus L) Fed with Panicum Maximum or Pennisetum Purpureum
Emile Miégoué1*, Fernand Tendonkeng1, Jules Lemofouet1, Paulette Ntsafack, Nathalie Mweugang Ngouopo2, Mama Mouchili Et Etienne Tedonkeng Pamo1
1Department
of Animal Production Animal Nutrition and
production Research Unit, Faculty
of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Cameroon
2Department of Animal Production Ichthyology and Applied Hydrobiology Research Unit, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Cameroon
*Corresponding author: Emile Miégoué, Department of Animal Production Animal Nutrition and production Research Unit, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Cameroon. Email: migoumile@yahoo.fr / emile.miegoue@univ-dschang.org
Received Date: 05 November, 2018; Accepted Date: 26 November, 2018; Published Date: 04 December, 2018
Citation: Miégoué E, Tendonkeng F, Lemofouet J, Ntsafack P, Ngouopo
NM, et al. 2018) Comparative Growth Performance in Post-Weaned Guinea
Pigs (Cavia Porcellus L) Fed with Panicum
Maximum or Pennisetum Purpureum. AVST-148. DOI: 10.29011/2637-9988/100048
1. Abstract
To compare the growth
performance of guinea pigs fed with Panicum
maximum or Pennisetum purpureum,
24 guinea pigs, divided into 2 lots of 12 animals (7 males and 5 females) each
were used. The animals in each lot received ad
2. Keywords: Cavia Porcellus;
Growth Performance; Panicum Maximum;
Pennisetum Purpureum
1. Introduction
2. Methods
The study was conducted between December 2016 and May 2017 at the
Research and Application Farm (FAR) of the University of Dschang, Located in
the Western Highlands Cameroon at an altitude of 1420m, at the east longitude
of 09° 85' 10° 06' and at the northern latitude
24 weaned (3 weeks after birth)
guinea pigs of comparable weight were divided into two homogeneous lots of 12
(5 females and 7 males) animals each. The animals were raised in two boxes made
of plywood (1m long, 0.8m wide and 0.6m high) each equipped with lighting and
electric
The plant material was Panicum
maximum and Pennisetum purpureum grasses
harvested at the pre-bloom stage
At weaning, the females were removed from the boxes. The young were
sexed and followed up to 8 weeks of age. Each animal was identified by a
numbered metal buckle carried on his ear. The animals of each lodge received
each day between 8am and 9am Ad
2.1. Collection of Data
Every morning, refusals food and droppings were cleaned before any new food distribution. Animal weighing were done weekly until the 8th week. This made it possible to determine the post-weaning weight evolution.
They following parameters were then determined:
·
The weight of the classic carcass
(PCl = Live weight at slaughter + Weight (blood + head + legs + viscera).
·
Commercial carcass (
·
The weight of faith, intestine
and cecum were determined as follows:
·
Weight of
·
All weighing was carried out
using a digital scale of 7kg of capacity and sensitivity of 1g.
· For reproduction, the following parameters were evaluated.
2.2. Statistical Analyzes
Data on growth performance and
carcass characteristics were tested using Student test 5% level of
3. Results
3.1. Comparative Effect of Panicum Maximum or Pennisetum Purpureum on the Evolution of Post-Weaning Guinea Pigs Weight
The average weight has progressively increased regardless
3.2. Comparative effect of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on the weight evolution of post-weaning female’s pigs
The weight of post-weaning females progressively increased regardless
3.3. Comparative effect of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on weight evolution of post-weaning young males
The weight of post-weaning males increased regardless
3.4. Comparative effect of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on total gains and average daily gains of young post-weaned guinea pigs
Weaning weights were
significantly (P 0.05) higher in females and regardless of sex when animals were fed with P.
3.5. Comparative effect of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on carcass characteristics of guinea pigs.
Weights (
3.6. Weight and length of some
digestive organs in guinea pigs fed with Panicum
maximum or Pennisetum purpureum
Liver weight, large intestine length, and small intestine density were significantly (P 0.05) higher in animals fed with Pennisetum purpureum (Table 5). On the other hand, no significant difference (P> 0.05) was observed between weight of the large intestine, small intestine and caecum of animals fed with P. maximum or Pennisetum purpureum. The large intestine was significantly (P 0.05) longer in animals fed with Pennisetum purpureum. While, the lengths of the small intestine and caecum were comparable (P> 0.05) between the two grasses.
4. Discussion
The average weight of animals at 8 weeks was comparable between the two grasses. This shows that animals have valued Panicum maximum as well as Pennisetum purpureum. Indeed, after weaning, the piglets would have acquired a greater capacity to value any kind of forage with regard to their herbivorous diet. This would have favored a digestion of the grass regardless of the type of forage. In fact, [7] more the animal is getting older the more it has the ability to better value the cellulose contained in the feed. The highest average weight 332.67g obtained with Panicum maximum in females and 330.16g registered in males fed with Pennisetum purpureum is less than 342.42g for P. purpureum and 337.67g for P. maximum obtained in young animals supplemented with a ration containing Arachis glabrata [8]. This weight is greater than 214 g and 216 g observed respectively with 16% and 18% of protein at the 8-week-old guinea pig [9]. This difference can be explained by the form of presentation of the grass. Indeed, in these last authors, Pennisetum purpureum had been dried, crushed and incorporated into the other ingredients while in this study the animals receive it fresh (leaves and stems).
Weight gain and ADG of guinea pigs receiving Pennisetum purpureum were significantly higher than those of
animals fed with Panicum maximum at 8
weeks of age regardless of sex. This is explained by the chemical composition
of Pennisetum purpureum whose was
better compared to that of Panicum
maximum. Pennisetum purpureum
would therefore be better suited for meeting the needs of animals after
weaning. Our value obtained in this study (4.16 g) is less than 4.94 g obtained
[8] in guinea pigs supplemented with Arachis
glabrata. This will be explained by the low protein content of our rations.
Comparative effect of P. purpureum or
P. maximum on guinea pig weights at
slaughter and carcass yields live weight of animals at slaughter were
comparable for both grasses. However, the highest weight (302.6g) was recorded
with P. purpureum. This observation
justifies the high bromatological value of P.
purpureum compared to P.
The carcass weights while being comparable for both grasses were higher (116.33g) with P.maximum for the commercial carcass and (178.80 g) with P. purpureum for the conventional carcass. The highest live weight (302.6g) obtained in this study is lower than that of the animals fed with diets containing D. intortum (408.40g for P. purpureum and, 426.60g for P. maximum) obtained [8] but remains above 221 ± 11g recorded [9] with 16% protein ration. This difference can be explained by the fact that our grass was served fresh. The highest carcass weight (116.33g for the conventional carcass and 178.80g for the commercial carcass) obtained in this study is greater than 99.3 ± 3.3g observed [9] in male guinea pigs fed with a 16% protein ration. It is, however, less than 202.6 to 246.0g obtained [10] in hybrids from the cross between male and female Bukavu. This would be due to the genetic difference with the animals used in the context of this study. P. maximum gave better carcass yield regardless of the type of carcass.
The highest carcass yield (47.68% for P. purpureum and 49.28% for P. maximum) obtained in the animals submitted to the diets containing D. intortum [8] are higher than 35.10% for P. purpureum and 40.62% for P. maximum obtained in this study. Our numbers are also lower than the 43.5 ± 1.7% and.9% respectively obtained [9] with male guinea pigs fed with a 16% protein diet and [10] in hybrids from the cross between male and female Bukavu. This would be due to the difference in protein level and the low genetic potential of our animals. Compared effect of P. purpureum or P. maximum on some organs involved in digestion in the guinea pig. The weight of the liver, the length of the large intestine and the density of the intestine were significantly higher with P. purpureum. This difference would be related to the bromatological value of this grass indeed according to Atuahéné et al. (1986), the weight of the 5th neighborhood increases with the level of fiber in the food.
Animals fed with P. purpureum had the highest ceacal weight (38.40g). This could be due to the high cellulose content of P. purpureum (34.78g / MS against 33.08g / MS in P. maximum) used in this study. Our results are in agreement with those of [8] who noted in guinea-pigs supplemented with legumes the highest caecum weight compared to the control batch. Similarly, the values (32.9 ± 1.7g, 29.2 ± 2.3g and 26.3 ± 2.5g) recorded [9] respectively with 14, 16 and 18% protein show that the weight of cecum drops with increasing protein level or lower fiber level food ration. Thus, guinea pigs fed with P. purpureum would have ingested more fiber which would have promoted the development of organs involved in digestion. In fact, in guinea pigs, as in most pseudo-ruminants, caecum is the organ strongly involved in the digestion of cellulose because it houses the microbial flora able to digest cellulose. Thus, the more the food is fibrous, the more microorganisms are solicited and reciprocally the development of the cecum follows. The cecum is indeed [11], the rumen equivalent in ruminants.
Conclusion
This study shows that:
·
The weight of the pigs at 8th
week was comparable for both grasses;
·
Pennisetum purpureum gave better weight gains from
weaning at 8th week of age;
·
Panicum maximum gave better carcass yields and
low organ weights compared to Pennisetum purpureum.
PM: Panicum maximum, PP: Pennisetum purpureum.
Figure 1: Comparative effect of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum
purpureum on the evolution of post-weaning guinea pigs weight.
PM: Panicum maximum, PP: Pennisetum purpureum.
Figure 2: Comparative effect
of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on the growth
evolution of post-weaning female’s pigs.
Figure 3: Comparative effect of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on weight evolution of post-weaning young
males.
Chemical
composition |
Dry
maters (%) |
Organic material (%MS) |
Crude
protéine (%MS) |
Lipids
(%MS) |
Gross
cellulose (%MS) |
Ashes
(%MS) |
Panicum maximum |
91,76 |
85,88 |
13,45 |
2,67 |
33,08 |
14,12 |
Pennisetum purpureum |
94,83 |
85,98 |
14,84 |
2,96 |
34,78 |
14,02 |
Table 1: Chemical composition of the
different forage used.
Ingrédients |
Quantities |
Remolding |
31 |
Maize |
30 |
Cotton cake |
5 |
Palm kernel cake |
25 |
Soybean meal |
2 |
Fish meal |
3 |
Shell Powder |
2 |
Prémix* |
1 |
Cooking salt |
1 |
TOTAL |
1OO |
Valeur nutritive |
|
Dry (DM en %) |
91,97 |
Organic material (%DM) |
89,83 |
Crude protein (%DM) |
15,76 |
Lipids (%DM) |
08,74 |
Gross cellulose (%DM) |
17,48 |
Ashes (%DM) |
10,17 |
EM
(Kcal /KgDM) |
2576,5 |
Table 2: percentage and chemical
composition of the compound food.
Characteristic |
Sex |
Treatments |
ESM |
P |
|
Panicum maximum |
Pennisetum purpureum |
||||
Weaning weight (g) |
♂ |
168,40a(7) |
150,64a(5) |
5,30 |
0,10 |
♀ |
182,00a(5) |
139,57b(6) |
10,67 |
0,02 |
|
♂♀ |
175,20a(12) |
145,11b(11) |
6,42 |
0,04 |
|
Weight at 8
(g) |
♂ |
320,60a(7) |
330,16a(5) |
4,32 |
0,39 |
♀ |
332,67a(5) |
322,55a(6) |
12,67 |
0,73 |
|
♂♀ |
326,64a(12) |
326,36a(11) |
7,32 |
0,63 |
|
Total gains (g) |
♂ |
118,00a(7) |
144,73b(5) |
3,21 |
0,001 |
♀ |
117,00a(5) |
145,67a(6) |
9,67 |
0,07 |
|
♂♀ |
117,50a(12) |
145,20b(11) |
5,22 |
0,001 |
|
(g/day) |
♂ |
3,37a(7) |
4,14b(5) |
0,91 |
0,001 |
♀ |
3,34a(5) |
4,16a(6) |
0,60 |
0,10 |
|
♂♀ |
3,36a(12) |
4,15b(11) |
0,40 |
0,001 |
|
, b: Averages with the
same letters on the same line are not significantly different at the 5%
threshold; ADG: Average daily
gain; ESM: Standard error on
average; P: Probability. |
Table 3: Comparative effect
of Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on Total gains and
average daily gains of young post-weaned guinea pigs.
Characteristic |
Treatments |
ESM |
P |
|
Panicum maximum |
Pennisetum purpureum |
|||
(g) |
||||
LWS |
291,4a |
302,6a |
20,62 |
0,32 |
Head |
42,00a |
48,20b |
1,59 |
0,04 |
Heart |
1,00a |
1,60a |
0,50 |
0,11 |
tract |
84,67a |
94,20a |
2,51 |
0,09 |
Commercial carcass |
116,33a |
106,40a |
10,36 |
0,38 |
Classic carcass |
178,33a |
178,80a |
12,54 |
0,97 |
Yield (%) |
||||
Commercial carcass |
40,62a |
35,10b |
1,41 |
0,03 |
Classic carcass |
62,46a |
59,03a |
1,42 |
0,08 |
Proportion of organs (%) |
||||
Head / LWS |
14,78a |
15,91a |
0,39 |
0,14 |
Liver / LWS |
2,11a |
3,37b |
0,14 |
0,03 |
tract / LWS |
29,32a |
31,12a |
0,24 |
0,08 |
, b: Averages with the
same letters on the same line are not significantly different at the 5%
threshold; ESM: Standard Error on
the Average; P: Probability, LWS: Live weight at slaughter. |
Table 4: Comparative effect of
Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum on carcass
characteristics of guinea pigs.
Characteristic |
Treatments |
ESM |
P |
|
Panicum maximum |
Pennisetum purpureum |
|||
Weight (g) |
||||
Liver |
6,00b |
10,20a |
0,37 |
0,02 |
Large intestine |
49,33a |
49,40a |
3,52 |
0,42 |
Small intestine |
11,00a |
13,20a |
1,20 |
0,27 |
Cæcum |
33,66a |
38,40a |
1,24 |
0,38 |
Length (cm) |
||||
Large intestine |
92,16b |
102,70a |
2,58 |
0,02 |
Small intestine |
134,50a |
130,00a |
2,42 |
0,57 |
Cæcum |
11,00a |
11,60a |
0,40 |
0,41 |
Density (g/cm) |
||||
Small intestine |
0,08b |
0,10a |
0,01 |
0,02 |
, b: Averages with the
same letters on the same line are not significantly different at the 5%
threshold; ESM: Standard Error on
the Average; P: Probability. |
Table 5: Weights and lengths of some digestive organs in guinea pigs fed Panicum maximum or Pennisetum purpureum.
2. Herman CY, Dorothy F, Meutchieye
F, Niba AT (2014) Cavies for income generation, manure for the farm and meat
for the table. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science 4 :
260-264.
4. Metre Th K (2011) Petit, bon pour la santé et très
prolifique. Rural 21 : 51-53.
7. Rivière R (1991) Manuel
d'Alimentation des Ruminants domestiques en milieu tropical. Institut d’Elevage
et de Médecine Vétérinaire des pays Tropicaux (IEMVT) Paris.
8. Miégoué E (2016) Evaluation de quelques légumineuses fourragères comme
source de protéine dans l’alimentation du cochon d’Inde (Cavia porcellus L.)
nourri avec Pennisetum purpureum ou Panicum maximum. Thèse pour l’obtention
du grade de Docteur de la Faculté d’Agronomique et des Sciences Agricoles de
l’Université de Dschang 150-157.
9. Zougou TG, Tendonkeng F, Miégoué E, Noumbissi MNB,
Matimuini NF, et al. (2017) Effet du niveau de protéines alimentaires sur
la croissance post-sevrage et la carcasse chez le cobaye 00E0 l’Ouest-Cameroun.
Livestock Research for Rural Development 29.
11. Lormeau E (2010) Contribution à l’étude de Cavia porcellus (Linné, 1758) : Atlas
radiographie et ostéologie. Thèse d’exercice, Médecine vétérinaire, Toulouse
207.