Clinical & Experimental Dermatology and Therapies

Clinical and Experimental InvivoEPR For the Detection of Free Radicals in Dermatology

Thomas Herrling*, Grit Sandig, Marieta Seifert, Katinka Jung

Gematria Test Lab, Berlin, Germany 

*Corresponding author:Thomas Herrling, Gematria Test Lab. Berlin, Parkstraße23, 13187 Berlin,Germany. Tel: +493043737764; Email: email@gematria-test-lab.de

Received Date: 14 September, 2017; Accepted Date: 21 October, 2017; Published Date: 30 October, 2017

Citation: Herrling T, Sandig G, Seifert M, Jung K (2017) Clinical and Experimental In vivoEPR For the Detection of Free Radicals in Dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol Ther: CEDT-137.DOI: 10.29011/CEDT-137/100001

1.      Abstract

Human skin is constantly directly exposed to the air, solar radiation, environmental pollutants, or other mechanical and chemical insults, which are capable of inducing the generation of free radicals as well as Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) of our own metabolism. Extrinsic skin damage develops due to several factors: ionizing radiation, severe physical and psychological stress, alcohol intake, poor nutrition, overeating, environmental pollution, and exposure to UV Radiation (UVR). It is estimated that among all these environmental factors, UVR contributes up to 80%. UV-induced generation of ROS in the skin develops oxidative stress, when their formation exceeds the antioxidant defence ability of the target cell. The primary mechanism by which UVR initiates molecular responses in human skin is via photochemical generation of ROS mainly formation of superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2). The detection of free radicals is performed by nitroxides with SURFER.

The only protection of our skin is in its endogenous protection (melanin and enzymatic antioxidants) and antioxidants we consume from the food (vitamin A, C, E, etc.). The most important strategy to reduce the risk of sun UVR damage is to avoid the sun exposure and the use of sunscreens. The next step is the use of exogenous antioxidants orally or by topical application and interventions in preventing oxidative stress and in enhanced DNA repair. 

1.      Introduction 

The skin is an ideal target organ for EPR for several reasons. It is thin and detection of nitroxides applied topically does not re- quire large penetration depth of microwaves so one can use the S-band (2.2-3.0 GHz for in vivo or even X-band for in vitro specimens, which results in an improved sensitivity. Imaging does not require full 2D or 3D imaging; once nitroxides are applied topically a simples pectral - spatial 1 Dimaging with one gradient orthogonal to the skin surface is sufficient to obtain distribution of nitroxides and the redox status in the different skin layers. 

The surface loop coils are sufficient, i.e. the whole objects need not to be within the resonator, which allows the EPRI of objects of any size, including humans. This is an important feature in cell opens the possibilities of application of EPR in human (clinical) studies of not only Pharmaco-kinetics of nitroxides, but also of mechanism of action of certain drugs, skin melanoma, oximetry [1-3]. A nice illustration of pharmacokinetics of nitroxides in skin as studied by 1 D spectral-spatial EPR is given by Fuchs et al. [4] studied diffusion of several nitroxides in to skin biopsies of hairless mice. By studying the spatially resolved diffusion of maleimide - PROXYL nitroxide into different skin layers (surface, epidermis, dermis), which chemically reacts with thiol groups, they effectively determined the spatial distribution of thiol groups as well. The analysis of spectral features showed spatially resolved partitioning of the nitroxide Di-Tert-Butylnitroxide(DTBN) between polar and apolar region. They also found that penetration of lipophilic nitroxides is much faster than penetration of more hydrophilic nitroxides. They also studied percutaneous absorption and distribution of anitroxide- labeled drug (estradiol) and a local anesthetic (procaine) finding that the former readily penetrates in to deep skin layers while the latter does not, even in the presence of a penetration enhancer, such as dimethyl sulfoxide. This paper clearly demonstrated that both the rate and spatial distribution of the physiological processes involved in the metabolism of nitroxides or nitroxide labeled compounds can be studied. Although this research has been performed using X-band EPR and skin biopsies, it set the stage for further extension for in vivo applications, which always raises the question of toxicity. Various nitroxide probe shave been tested for bio stability in the skin and possible cutaneous irritation [5,6]. The stability in skin biopsies, homogenates and cell cultures of keratinocytes decrease in the following order imidazoline4 pyrrolidine 4 DTBN4piperidine 4   oxazolidine [5]. The irritation potency of different nitroxides has been classified as nonirritant to moderately irritant, thus, nitroxide scan be safely employed for in vivo EPR studies of skin even at high concentrations (100mM) [6]. The fact that some nitroxides and drugs are simply impermeable to skin, as demonstrated by studying the spin labeled equivalents, prompted another line of research of investigating potential drug carriers. Group of authors [7,8] systematically studied potential applications of liposomes as drug carriers for topical treatment of skin disorders using 1DEPR. They found that entrapment in liposomes promotes the penetration of otherwise impenetrable charged nitroxides in to skin and that the loss of integrity of liposomes in different layers of the skin (indicating the site of delivery) can be assessed. Studies revealed that the size and phospholipid composition of liposomes significantly influence their efficiency, thus providing the base for their application in medicine and cosmetics. Nitroxide pharmacokinetics has been studied in various preparations of skin homogenates and cell cultures [5,9], animal[5,10,11] and human biopsies [5,12] as well as in vivo on animal models [10,11,13,14] or on human subjects [10,15]. The principle for measuring distribution and pharmacokinetics is the same as outlined in, except that measurements were performed in vivo at lower frequencies and using more sophisticated equipment. The larger part of research has been devoted to the evaluation of the UV irradiation influence on the redox status of skin. UV irradiation of the skin can cause inflammatory processes through several possible mechanisms: (1)direct damage of DNA;(2)generation of different free radicals (ROS,lipid derived radicals - peroxyl or alkyl), and (3)production of inflammatory agents (prostaglandins, histamine). EPR studies are of importance for two main reasons: (1)better understanding of processes under- lying postulated oxidative damage induced by UV irradiation; (2)examining free radical scavenging efficacy of various anti- oxidant sand sun screens for protection. Enhanced production of ROS following UV irradiation of the skin has been demonstrated by spin trapping [16,17] and also by analyzing nitroxide decay kinetics [10-12,13,15]. In vivo measurements of UVB influence on rat skin [13] and analysis of the obtained 15N-PDT reduction skin ethics showed the decrease of both penetration and reduction rate in all skin layers after the exposure to UVB light. The decrease of the reduction rate constant was more pronounced in dermis and hypodermis than in epidermis layer. Oximetry measurements showed that pO2 did not change after treatment with UVB light, hence oxygen concentration and microcirculation were disqualified as possible causes of alterations in nitroxide reduction rates. Results of other authors [10-12], however, showed the opposite trend - the increase of reduction rate of nitroxide after the treatment of skin by UV light. Exposure of the skin not only led to the change in nitroxide signal decay rate but also affected the shape of the kinetic curve [13]. Namely, when three different nitroxides (TEMPO,3-CPand 3-CxP) were topically applied to non-irradiated skin biokinetics corresponded to first order exponential process while upon irradiation by UV light all the kinetics could be fitted by bi-exponential function. It has been assumed that the faster process is due to reduction of nitroxides by radicals produced UV irradiation, while the slower process corresponds to reduction of nitroxides by so called daughter radicals of ROS(for instance lipid carbon centered and lipid peroxyl radicals).The work of Takeshita et al. [11] adds to understanding of a probable cause of nitroxide. 

2.      Skin Testing on Large Surface 

The incidence of malignant melanoma [18,19,20] the most dangerous form of skin cancer, is rising each year. However, some aspects of the tumor initiation and development are still unclear, and the current method of diagnosis, based on the visual aspect of the tumor shows limitations. For these reasons, developments of new techniques are ongoing to improve basic knowledge on the disease and diagnosis of tumors in individual patients. Discussion and the way that a new measurement method [17] based on Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) might answer to it will be explained and debated. 

The surface loop coils are sufficient, i.e. the whole objects need not to be within the resonator, which allows the EPR of object of any size, including humans. This is some important features since it opens the possibilities of application of EPR in human (clinical) studies of not only pharmacokinetics of nitroxides, but also of mechanism of action of certain drugs (storage in Liposomes), skin melanoma, oximetry. UV-light generate free radicals which were reduced by nitroxides in a different manner. (Figure 1)

Using the 1D localized spectroscopy (SURF ERS) we have measured the reduction kinetics of Tempo in human skin. An ethanol/water (50/50) solution of 30 µl with a Tempo concentration of 50 mM were applied on the human forearm. The tempo solution was covered with a Finn chamber (Epitest Ltd Oy Finnland) to prevent an evaporation. 

After a treatment time of 20 min. the Tempo solution was completely penetrated into the skin and the measurement could start. The surface coil was fixed on the forearm at the place of the Tempo application. The forearm was positioned together with the surface coil resonator in the center of the electromagnet. The ESR spectra were measured with a sweep time of tB = 0,5 s and a field sweep of = 9,5 mT to prevent movement artefacts by the volunteers. To increase the sensitivity 80 spectra were accumulated and resulted in a final spectrum and a total recording time of 40 s. 

For the determination of the reduction curve 25 spectra were used which measurement required 1000 s. The measured spectra are represented in Figure 2 a. The intensity distribution as a function of time of the mid field peak of tempo is shown in Figure 2 b. The reduction kinetic was best fitted as mono exponential decay (e-curve) which show that the radical reduction corresponds to the following function 

S(t) = S(0) exp – (kt) . 

With S(0) as the intensity at t=0. 

This reduction curve is determined by the rate constant k and the half time t1/2which can give information about the radical scavenging activity of the patient. The presented reduction curve resulted in a rate constant k = 0,14/min or half life time t1/2=4,8 min.

 

3.      Surface Mapping 

Scanning the surface (SURF_ERM) of a large sample by mechanical movement of the surface coil can result in a 2D map. 

As an example, a clover leaf was putted with its stalk in vessel filled with ethanol/water (20/80) solution of the spin probe Tempyo 100 mM. After a treatment time   of 24 h the leaf was removed out of the spin probe solution and was fixed in the x-z plane of the magnet. A scanning area with the dimensions of x =35mm and z = 35 mm with 16 continuous measuring points to each direction resulted in a matrix of Mxy=16x16=256 points. The spatial resolution was calculated from the ratio

.

Figure1:Surface Coil (S-band)-3 GHz)-resonator in a Teflon-retainer made for application on skin.



Figure 2(a-b):Reduction of the spin probe Tempo in the skin of a human forearm after 20 min treatment of 30 µl Tempo solution (50 mM solved in ethanol water 50/50) represented by 25 spectra (a) in a time period of 1000 s and representation of the corresponding reduction curve (b) as the intensity distribution of the mid field peak of Tempo versus time which resulted in a rate constant k = 0,14 /min and a half life time of t1/2=4,8min.


Figure 3:2D ESR image of a clover leaf.



Figure 4(a-b):Lateral distribution pattern of the spin probe Tempyo in the skin surface of human forearm. An ethanol water (50/50) solution of 30µl with Tempyo (50mM) was applied on human forearm and treated for 20 min under an occlusion with a Finn chamber. The first 2D(x,z) image (a) was measured immediately after removing the Finn chamber. Two hours later the second mage (b) was measured showing no significant change in the distribution pattern of Tempyo.



Figure 5(a-b):Longitudinal distribution of Tempyo in the human skin measured for the middle line of the spectrum and the corresponding Introgram IG(B) (a) caused by the field gradient gradyB =12,6 mT/cm in the vertical y direction, Tempyo was applied in the same manner like for the experiment in Figure 2.(b)The deconvolution of the InrogramIG(B) resulted in the vertical spatial distribution R(y) of Tempo. The time depend reduction of the vertical distributed Tempo is represented by 10 intrograms measured over a time period of 700 s which resulted in the 2D spatial-temporal image IM(x,T) (c).   




1.       Mäder K, Bacic G, Swartz  HM (1995) In vivo detection of anthralin - derived free radicals in the skin of hairless mice by low- frequency electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. JInvestigDermatol 104: 514-517.

2.       Vanea E, Charlier N, De Wever J, Dinguizli M, Feron O,et al. (2008) Molecular electron paramagnetic resonance imaging of melanin in melanomas: a proof- of-concept. NMR Biomed 21: 296-300.

3.       Khan N, Williams BB, Swartz HM (2006) Clinic al applications of in vivo EPR: rationale and initial results.ApplMagn Reson 30: 185-199.

4.       Fuchs J, Groth N, Herrling T, Milbradt R, Zimmer G, et al. (1992)Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) imaging in skin : biophysical and biochemical microscopy.JInvestigDermatol 98: 713-719.

5.       Fuchs J, Freisleben HJ, Podda M, Zimmer G, Milbradt R, et al. (1993) Nitroxide radical bio stability in skin.Free RadicBiol Med 15: 415-423.

6.       Fuchs J, Groth N, Herrling T(1998)Cutaneous tolerance to nitroxide free radicals in human skin. Free RadicBiol Med 24: 643-648.

7.       Gabrijeič V,  Šentjurc M   ,  Schara M (1994) The measurement o fliposome entrapped molecules'penetration in to the skin:a1DEPR and EPR kinetic imaging study. Int J Pharm 102: 151-158.

8.       Šentjurc M,  Vrhovnik K, Kristl J (1999) Liposomes as a topical delivery system: the role of size on transport studied by EPR imaging method. J Control Release 59:87-97.

9.       Fuchs J, Groth N, Herrling T, Zimmer G(1997) Electron paramagnetic resonance studies on nitroxide radical 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-4-piperidin-1-oxyl (TEMPO) redox reaction sin human skin. Free Radic BiolMed 22: 967-976.

10.    Herrling T, Jung K, Fuchs J (2006)Measurements of UV-generated free radicals/ reactive oxygen species (ROS)in skin. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 63: 840-845.

11.    Takeshita K, Chi C, Hirata H, Ono M, Ozawa T (2006) In vivo generation of free radicals in the skin of live mice under ultraviolet light, measured by L-band EPR spectroscopy. Free Radic Biol Med 40: 876-885.

12.    Herrling T, Fuchs J, Rehberg J,  Groth N (2003)UV-induced free radicals in the skin detected by ESR spectroscopy and imaging using nitroxides. Free Radic Biol Med 35: 59-67.

13.    Halpern HJ, Peric M, Yu C, Barth ED, Chandramouli GVR, et al. (1996) In vivo spin- label murine pharmacodynamics using low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance imagin. Biophys J 71: 403-409.

14.    Takeshita K, Takajo T, Hirata H, Ono M, Utsumi H (2004)In vivo oxygen radical generationintheskinoftheprotoporphyriamodelmousewithvisiblelight exposure: an L-band ESRstudy. J Investig Dermatol 122: 1463-1470.

15.    He G, Samouilov A, Kuppusamy P ,Zweier JL(2001)In vivo EPR imaging of the distribution and metabolism of nitroxide radical sin human skin. J  Magn Reson 148: 155-164.

16.    Jurkiewicz BA, Buettner GR(1994) Ultra violet light -induced free radical formation in skin: an electron paramagnetic resonance study. Photochem Photobiol 59:1-4.

17.    Herrling T, Rehberg J, Jung K, Groth N(2002) SURF_ER--surface electron spin resonance (ESR) of the surface domain of large objects.SpestrochimicaPart Acta A 58: 1237 -1244.

18.    Godechal Q, Gallez B (2011) The Contribution of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance toMelanoma ResearchSkin Cancer.Journal of Skin Cancer2011: 1- 6 .

19.    Kleschyov L, Wenzel P,Munzel T (2007) Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin trapping of biological nitricoxide. Journal of Chromatography B 851: 12-20.

20.    Swartz HM, Khan N, Khramtsov VV (2007) Use of electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to evaluate the redox state in vivo. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 9: 1757-1771.

 

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Read More About Open Access Policy.

Update cookies preferences