1.
Introduction
In order to
lessen the dependence of fossil fuels, renewable biofuels are receiving growing
attention. In fact, biodiesel is an alternative diesel fuel derived from
vegetable oils or animal fats [1], whose main
components are triglycerides, also identified as esters of fatty acids attached
to a glycerol. Generally, these triglycerides consist of many fatty acids that have
physically and chemically different properties. Actually, the composition of
these fatty acids will be the most important parameters influencing the
corresponding properties of vegetable oils and animal fats [2], whose direct use as inflammable fuel is not appropriate
because of their high kinematic viscosity and low volatility. Furthermore, its
long-term use has been proven to pose serious problems such as deposition, ring
sticking and injector chocking in engine [3]. Therefore,
to reduce the oils viscosity, vegetable oils and animal fats have to be exposed
to chemical reactions, as transesterification, in which triglycerides are
converted into Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME), in the presence of short chain
alcohol such as methanol or ethanol, and a catalyst such as alkali or acid,
with glycerol as a byproduct [1].
The worldwide biodiesel production had risen from 0.8
to nearly 4 h m3 from 2001 to 2007. Actually, edible-grade vegetable
oils particularly rapeseed, sunflower and soy are presently the main biodiesel
feed stocks. Since commercialized biodiesel has been intensively produced some
critical environmental concerns have risen. Indeed, its large-scale production may
lead to disequilibrium in the worldwide food market by the dramatic increase of
the consumption oil prices, which mainly affects developing countries. The rivalry for land with food
crops and especially land availability are also considered as the fundamental
restraints [5]. Unconventional oilseeds are
being studied as alternative feed stocks so as to diminish these environmental
impacts. Castor (Ricinus communis L.) is a
significant non-edible oil crop, deemed as crucial industrial raw material. Although
absent from the oil itself, the toxic protein ricin found in castor's seeds are
poisonous to humans and animals [6]. Castor is cultivated on 12
600 km2 around the world, with an
annual seed production of 1.14 Mt and an average seed yield of 902 kg ha-1 [7]. It is available
at low prices and the plant is recognized to tolerate various weather
conditions. In addition, castor can be grown on peripheral lands
that are commonly inappropriate for food crops. Therefore, all castors’
features make it a promising alternative of biodiesel feedstock. In the
northeast of Brazil, castor oil has been identified as a considerable potential
source of raw material for the local production of biodiesel [8].
Castor oil is made
up almost exclusively (ca. 90%) of triglycerides of Ricinoleic acid
(12-hydroxy-cis-octadec-9-enoic
acid) in which several unique chemical and physical properties were imparted by
the presence of a hydroxyl group at C-12. Hence, castor oil and its derivatives
are totally soluble in alcohols and display viscosities that are up to 7-fold
higher than those of other vegetable oils [9]. These
properties are deployed in several industrial applications of castor oil, namely
the production of coatings, plastics and cosmetics. The elevated level of this
hydroxylated fatty acid conveys distinctive properties to the oil and biodiesel
produced from it. The use of Biodiesel can be in its pure (B100) or blended form
at any level with petro diesel to produce a blend. Blends are denoted as “BXX”,
where “XX” designates the biodiesel fraction (i.e., B20 is 20% biodiesel and
80% petro diesel). To guarantee good vehicle performance, official standards
were set up. ASTM D6751 (American Society for Testing and Materials) is a prevalent
international standard of pure biodiesel (B100) [10].
Practically, more common BXX blends have been legislated in Europe and US. This
work reports a systematic and comparative study of the transesterification of
Tunisian castor oil with ethanol and methanol as transesterification agents in
the presence of various conventional catalysts. Before biodiesel conversion,
some foremost properties of Tunisian castor oil were identified and compared to
Rapeseed oil. The specifications related to the FA composition of pure Ca EE (B100)
and its blend with petro diesel in a 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80% vol ratio (B10-B80)
were investigated according to ASTM D6751 in the United States and EN 14214 in
Europe [10, 11].
2. Materials
and Methods
2.1 Reagents
Castor seeds were obtained from a Tunisian company. Seeds were oven dried at 70°C for 72 h before oil extraction to get rid of excess
moisture. With an industrial extruder, castor oil was extracted by
cold-pressing castor seeds. The crude oil was filtered with a plate filter
press (three plates, final pore size 0.5 mm). All the other
chemical reagents used in this study were of analytical grade. Sodium hydroxide
pellets (97%), sulfuric acid (purity 99%), methanol and absolute ethanol were
purchased from Prolabo (France).
2.2 Characterization of castor oil
The
determination of the fatty acids composition was carried out by the use of
capillary column gas chromatography. The methyl esters were prepared according
to a standard protocol: vigorous shaking of the solution of oil in n/heptane
(0.1 g in 2 mL) with 0.2 mL of 2 N Methanolic potassium hydroxide [12,13]. Prior to analysis, it was necessary to
introduce a silanization reagent to block the hydroxyl group of Ricinoleic
acid, the major component of castor oil. The gas chromatographic analysis of Ca
ME was performed on an Auto System Gas chromatograph equipped with capillary
injection system operating at 250°C,
with a split ratio of 100:1 and sample size of 1 µL.
The capillary Agilent CP-Sil88 column (cyanopropyl polysiloxane), with 50 m in
length, 0.25 mm in internal diameter and 0.2 µm in film thickness, was
employed. Besides, the column temperature program was the initial temperatures
of 60°C (1 min), 15°C/min
to 180°C, 7°C/min to 340°C.
The detection system was equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector (FID)
operating at 350°C. The carrier gas
was high-purity hydrogen.
2.3
Biodiesel production
Biodiesel was
prepared in glass rector submerged on a thermostatic bath, capable of maintaining
the required temperature and equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic
stirrer. The oil was heated at 100°C to remove
the residual water, cooled to the reaction temperature, weighed and then added
to the reactor. The reaction started when alcohol pre-mixed with the catalyst
was added to the reactor. The reaction mixture containing methanol or ethanol,
castor oil with a molar ratio 6:1, and KOH or H2SO4 as catalyst (1% w/w based on the raw material
weight), was refluxed at the boiling point of the respective alcohol for an
appropriate time. Towards
the end of the reaction, the products were left to settle in a separatory pipe
overnight for the separation between biodiesel and glycerol. After separation, the
excess of methanol was recovered from using an oven working at a temperature
around 100°C. The purification of biodiesel was achieved
by washing to get rid of residual catalyst and after drying to obtain the final
product. Gas chromatography was used to determine the biodiesel yield which
expressed in terms of weight percentage of FAEEs or FAMEs formed. The mixture
was dried before the chromatographic characterization in the presence of MgSO4 and centrifuged.
2.4
Pure and blended biodiesel
quality evaluation
Concerning the density measurements, they were taken according to EN ISO
3675 / ISO 12185 / EN12185, and the value found at 15°C
was converted using the density table ASTM 1250. As for the kinematic viscosity KV, it was
determined at 40°C in accordance with EN ISO
3104 / EN 1410, using a Model M-1 Viscometer (Cannon, USA). The viscometer was
maintained in a bath at 40°C. The kinematic
viscosity is determined by the flow time multiplied by the capillary constant. With
respect to the flashpoint, it was identified according to EN ISO 2719 / EN ISO
3679. At the time of the first distinctive sparkle, the temperature was
recorded as being the flashpoint. The distillation characteristics were
evaluated by vacuum distillation unit and semi automated distillation apparatus
according to ASTM D86.
The cetane number CN is about the determination of the temperatures
corresponding to each of these percentages: 0%, 10%, 50%, 80%, 95%, and 100%
with 0.5°C precision. CN was determined according
to EN ISO 5165; it was calculated from the distillation temperatures according
to the following formula:
IC =
45.2 + 0.00892 T10N + (0.131 + 0.901 B) T50N + (0.0523 - 0.42B) T90N + 0.00049
(T²10N-T²90N) +107 B + 60 B²
Sulfur content was determined according to ASTM D4294 by
fluorescence Px.
3.
Results and Discussion
3.1
Characterization of Tunisian
Castor oil
As shown in Table 1, the fatty acid profile of Tunisian castor oil
was similar to the Brazilian one. In fact, it is clear that the Ricinoleic acid
is the major compound with a percentage higher than 88% in both oils.
The oleic and
linoleic acids are the other significant compounds, although present in much
smaller quantities of approximately 3 and 4%, respectively. The other compounds
representing a very small minority are palmitic, stearic and linoleic, each of which
is less than 1%. Rapeseed oil which was chosen as reference in this work was
frequently used in the biodiesel production [13-17]. Like
all other vegetable oils, castor oil has different physical -properties. The
principal properties of castor oil were identified and compared to Rapeseed oil
properties (Table 2). Both oils displayed low
acid values, rendering any acid pre-treatment that is unnecessary for
conversion into the methyl esters. As shown in Table 2,
Castor oil has the smallest iodine value, indicating less unsaturated
chains, and consequently a good oxidative stability. The hydroxyl group in the Ricinoleic
acid causes strong intermolecular interactions by hydrogen bonds, which
increases the density and, especially, the kinematic viscosity which was 6-fold
higher than that of rapeseed oil. This property leads to difficulties in pumping and drainage through filters and pipes. Furthermore, its
long-term use posed serious problems such as deposition, ring sticking and
injector chocking in engine [3]. To circumvent
this problem, a transesterification reaction should be preceding [18].
3.2 Transesterification of castor oil
The
quantification of biodiesel were conducted after the separation and
purification steps in terms of the yield in CaME or CaEE, obtained by the Trans
Esterfication of castor oil with methanol and ethanol, respectively, in the
presence of KOH and H2SO4 as conventional catalysts (Figure 1). The methanolysis of castor oil is
effectively catalyzed by an acid with a very good yield similar to that obtained
by basic catalyst, as clearly shown in Figure 1.
Moreover, the performance
of the acid catalyst is better than the basic one in the case of Ethanolysis. It is stated that the acid
catalyzed transesterification reaction continues at rates that are ca. 4000
times slower than the equivalent base-catalyzed reactions and so have not been
considered commercially practical. Such
conclusions, however, are associated with conventional vegetable oils having
heterogeneous triglycerides, without or with a very low content of derivatives
of hydroxyl fatty acid, which are clearly not applicable with castor oil as the
substrate. A significant feature should
be taken into consideration in the acid or basic catalytic castor oil
transesterification. In fact, in both conditions, the reaction takes place in a
homogeneous phase due to the high solubility of the reagents in the castor oil,
which is not observed with other typical vegetable oils. In addition, in basic
condition, it has been perceived that there are some disadvantages that do not
occur in the acid one. Firstly, a part of the used catalyst may neutralise the
free fatty acids present in the castor oil hence decreasing the formation of
ethoxides and producing soaps within the reaction medium. The formation of
soaps would reduce the mass transfer during the reaction and exacerbate the
problem of phase separation [19]. Secondly, the
hydroxyl group at C-12 of Ricinoleic acid may be converted, into an alkoxide,
in basic medium. The production of this anionic species may compete with the ethoxides
species formation; thus, reducing the ester yields [20]. In the present study, the
best reaction to produce biodiesel from raw Tunisian castor oil was by the use
of ethanol and H2SO4 as catalyst.
3.3
Characterization of
biodiesel
The various
parameters specified in ASTM D6751 and EN14214 can be divided into processes and
oil/petro diesel-related parameters. Concerning the former, it can be
controlled by altering the conditions of the reaction, including sediment and
water, carbon residue sulfated ash, glycerin content, copper strip corrosion
and metals content. As for the category of oil/petro diesel-related parameters,
which is the focus of this study, it encompasses parameters that are
essentially dependent on the composition of the chosen oil Fatty Acid (FA) or
quality of the petro diesel fuel, including Kinematic Viscosity (KV), Cetane Number
(CN), Density and Distillation Temperature (DT). Several other parameters also depend
on the quality of the oil, though not directly linked to the FA composition,
including flash point, acid number and sulfur content. Some interesting properties
of the castor oil and the produced biodiesel in optimum condition were measured
by ASTM or standard EN methods then recapitulated in (Table
3).
3.4
Density
Density is
specified in EN 14214 with a range of 860-900 kg/m3
at 15°C. Neither castor oil nor ethyl esters
meets this specification, although CaEE is closer to the prescribed maximum
value. Values similar to those in Table 3 have been reported in the literature
for CaEE such as 924.4 kg/m3 [21] This may be explained by the fact that the
hydroxyl group of Ricinoleic acid causes a strong intermolecular interaction by
the presence of hydrogen bonding which increases the density of the castor oil [22].
3.5
Kinematic
viscosity
The viscosity
affects the atomization of fuel during injection into combustion chamber, as
well as the formation of engine deposits. In general, viscosity increases with
the number of CH2 groups in FAEE’s chain and decreases with the
increase in the number of oil instauration [23].
Reducing the kinematic viscosity is the main reason for the transesterification
of oils. The results show that the viscosity of CaEE is less than the
initial oil .
However, these
values are far from the norm EN 14214 or ASTM D6751. Only the mixture of
these esters with petroleum diesel would be possible. The obtained KV value is
close to that of methyl Ricinoleate (15.44mm2/s)
[24]. This high viscosity may be due to the intermolecular
hydrogen bonding of molecules methyl Ricinoleate.
3.6
Flash
point
The flash point is a security criteria imposed by
norms to prevent the risk of flammability of enormous quantities of biofuels
during storage. This is the temperature at which the vapors burn spontaneously
in the presence of a flame. The obtained results have shown that the flash
point is high compared with that of diesel set by ASTM between 55-120°C, thus giving the biodiesel a greater security
handling. This increase is explained by the high molecular weight of the castor
oil [25]. These values directly affect the
diesel engine i.e., the higher the point is, the slower the inflammation completion
is. During the flash point’s determination, false sparks were obtained when the
temperature is equal to that of the boiling ethanol. This is due to residual
alcohol. Indeed, after the separation of the glycerol and biodiesel, excess
alcohol is removed by evaporation using rotary vap. This is not sufficient to
remove all alcohol because Ricinoleate oil retains most of the alcohol due to
its bonding with the methyl Ricinoleate by the hydrogen bonds [23]. The alcohol residue drops the temperature to 107°C compared to 165°C
for the rapeseed oil [26].
3.7
Distillation
This property
enables the measurement of temperature range in which fuel is volatilized.
Distillation proceeds to separating the constituents of a homogeneous mixture
under the heat effect. The substances vaporize successively, and the resulting
vapor is liquefied to give distillate. DT determines the distillation curve of
a fuel and specifies the maximum temperature of distillation for 90% of its
components. To the best of our knowledge, the distillation temperature has not
been of much interest to researchers. In fact, the reason behind this is
probably linked to the fact that this test specification is excluded from the
European standard (EN 14214), and necessitates costly specialized equipment. Besides,
the initial distillation temperature of biodiesel is considerably more elevated
than that of petro diesel. For instance, while the DT limits of rapeseed
biodiesel are 299-346°C, those of petro
diesel are 177.8-345°C [27]. The biodiesel fuel evaporation temperature is
dependent on the length of chain of the fatty acid ester carbon and has practically
no dependence on the saturation degree.
Figure
2 shows the distillation curve of biodiesel using the
ASTM D86 method. As expected, the high content of Ricinoleic acid (which has
the same number of carbons as oleic and linoleic acids) leads to very high
distillation temperature (398°C),
thus not meeting the standard limit. This can significantly affect the degree
of formation solid deposits of combustion.
3.8
Cetane
number
Cetane number is
a dimensionless descriptor of biodiesel explosion quality, which affected by
the chain length and that of branching and unsaturation. The decrease of these
variables leads to the decrease of the cetane number. The latter is a measure
of the biodiesel’s ignition delay, with higher CNs, mentioning less time
between the initiation of ignition and fuel injection [28].
The good performance of the engine and the reduction of NOx emissions are
related to high cetane number values [29].
Compared to diesel fuels, biodiesels hold higher cetane number. Despite the
importance of CN as a critical parameter for evaluating the fuel quality, this
fact is not mentioned in the literature. For instance, Know the [30] measured the CN of pure methyl Ricinoleate
(37.38), and Cvengros et al [21] used an
extrapolation for CaME (43.9) as well as (43.8) for castor ethyl esters. Though
the CN of CAEE (52.23) is low, it was found in this study that it is somewhat
above the lower limit of the standard and this is probably caused by the
branching of the hydroxyl group in Ricinoleic acid [31].
3.9
Sulfur
content
Because of firm environmental restrictions,
sulfur content in petro diesel has been considerably declined during the past few years. As a consequence, the reduced fuel
lubricity can be detrimental to the engine [32].
In this study, the sulfur content of CaEE determined by referring to the
standard ASTM D4294, which is still in norms. This low value is one of
biodiesel advantages compared to diesel, indicating the reduction of gas
emissions and pollution.
The prevailing levels of Ricinoleic acid
(89.15%, Table 1) primarily affected the
physical properties of CaEE discussed above. The most harmful impact, based on intermolecular
interactions imparted by the hydroxyl moiety, was found on KV and DT, which
surpassed, the international standard limits. Such
parameters are directly detected by the choice of feedstock for biodiesel
production, because no KV and DT improvers are found. To increase the range of feed
stocks for the biodiesel industry there exist two probable solutions. The first
one would involve the reduction of the Ricinoleic acid content in castor seeds by
means of genetic engineering or breeding selection programs. Indeed, although Rojas-Barros
et al. [33] have already discovered such a
mutant with 71.4% Ricinoleic acid, his program takes time to materialize
entirely. The second solution, most interesting, involves blending CaEE in petro
diesel. In this context, the performance of a diesel engine fueled with
different CaEE blends (B0-B80) were examined according to the European
standard.
3.10
Characterization of Blend biodiesel / diesel
Although it is
out of the standard norm, biodiesel is usually mixed with petroleum diesel (petro
diesel). Blends are denoted as “BXX”, where “XX” represents the biodiesel
fraction for example: B20 is 20% biodiesel and 80% petro diesel, while a B100
is a pure biodiesel. Several types of blend are marketed; the most common of
which are B2, B5, B20 and B100. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding of alkyl Ricinoleate
molecules is the major obstacle for the pure use of B100 as engines fuel, the
dissolution of biodiesel in petroleum diesel minimizes intramolecular
interactions responsible for this property. (Figure 3)
shows the distillation curves for B10, B20, B40, B60 and B80. It is clear that
only B10 and B20 were found to very closely meet the maximum temperature limit
for 90% distillation.
While other
blends B40, B60 and B80 like B100 (Figure 2) exceed
the standard limit. To complete this study, it is interesting to examine the
other fuel properties. In this context, (Table 4)
summarizes the values found on the density, viscosity, flash point, cetane
number and sulfur content from petro diesel, blends up to pure biodiesel. As
shown in (Table 4), there are some advantages
for biodiesel and its blends to the petro diesel.
The sulfur
content of biodiesel and its blends are very low; it is insignificant compared
to diesel. Moreover, the high flash point of biodiesel and its blends compared
with that of diesel give the biodiesel greater security handling. Another
important advantage of B100 or blends compared to petro diesel is the higher
cetane number. A high index leads to complete fuel combustion, which is
correlated with a lower gas emission. In spite of the various benefits of
biodiesel and its blends with petro diesel, the density and viscosity still remains
the main obstacle of their application as Fuel. Indeed, the density and
viscosity of the blends biodiesel/diesel to about 20% by volume is within the
limits of standard.
Although we
cannot exceed B20 to stay within the limits required by the standard, the
results are found to be very interesting. It is important to note that, to the
best of our knowledge, this is the first time we obtain a blend with 20%
biodiesel. In fact, a
new research inspected the performance of a diesel engine fuelled with various
CaME blends (B0-B20) and resolved that B10 develops better power than diesel [34].
4. Conclusion
The search for
alternative feed stocks for biodiesel as a partial replacement for petro diesel
has recently extended to castor oil. The castor oil ethyl esters were prepared
with high yield using H2SO4 as acid catalyst. The complexity and chemical
diversity of biodiesel (mixed esters) requires that it should be certified
according to several quality criteria (ASTMD6751 in North America or Europe EN
14214) before being marketed. The high values of KV and DT due to the intermolecular
hydrogen bonding of molecules methyl Ricinoleate limit the direct application
of pure Biodiesel. Only the mixture of these esters with petroleum diesel would
be possible. The performance of a diesel engine fueled with different CaEE
blends (B10-B80) show that B20 is the best one that can respect all standard
limits.
5. Acknowledgments
The authors
would like to thank Mr Mohamed Chelly, Director of SNDP-AGIL laboratory and Mr
Mohamed Falfoul, Manager of exco-Tunisia, for their contribution to this study.