Research Article

An Observational Retrospective Real-World Study to Evaluate the Effect of Teneligliptin on Parameters of Renal Function, Glycemic Control, and Safety in Indian T2DM Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (TOP RENAL)

by Shashank Joshi1, Hanmant Barkate2*, A K Das3, Sharvil Gadve4, Siddharth S Mavani5, Devendra K Agarwal6, Ashwini Gupta7, Sanjay Choudhari8, Anup Petare8, Mansi Brid8, Sumit Bhushan8

1Senior Consultant, Joshi Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

3Consultant Physician and Endocrinologist, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Science (PIMS).

4Excel Endocrine Center, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India

5Mavani Research center, Ahmedabad, India

Haldiram Moolchand Hospital, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India

Intermed Multispeciality Centre, New Delhi, India

2,8 Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India

*Corresponding author: Hanmant Barkate, Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Mumbai, India

Received Date: 08 January 2024

Accepted Date: 11 January 2024

Published Date: 15 January 2024

Citation: Joshi S, Das AK, Gadve S, Mavani SS (2024) An Observational Retrospective Real-World Study to Evaluate the Effect of Teneligliptin on Parameters of Renal Function, Glycemic Control, and Safety in Indian T2DM Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (TOP RENAL). Curr Trends Intern Med 8: 216. https://doi.org/10.29011/2638-003X.100116

Abstract

Background: Teneligliptin has shown better efficacy, tolerability and reduced associated complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Teneligliptin on renal function and glycemic control in Indian T2DM patients with CKD in a real-world setting.

Methodology: This was a retrospective, observational study that included 377 patients from 4 study sites across India. Details from prescriptions and laboratory investigations of individual patient were recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes measured were changes in the renal parameters, [eGFR, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen] and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and body weight at 3 months and 6 months (±2week) as compared to baseline.

Results: 377 patient’s data collected during August’22-October’22 and grouped according to baseline eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2): G3a: 45-59 (n=102); G3b: 30-44 (n=124); G4: 15-29 (n=151). The mean age was 59.86±9.58 years and 47% were females. Renal parameters: eGFR, Sr creatinine and BUN were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Results showed nonsignificant changes in eGFR, Sr. creatinine and BUN at 3 and 6 months in all three groups. No safety concerns or hypoglycemia were reported during the study.

Conclusion: Teneligliptin use in Indian T2DM patients with mild to severe renal impairment was well tolerated with no safety concerns and showed significant improvement in glycemic control.

Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus; Glycemic Control; Renal Impairment; Teneligliptin

Abbreviations

T2DM :

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

CKD      :

Chronic Kidney Disease

eGFR     :

estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

HbA1c :

Glycated Hemoglobin

FPG       :

Fasting Plasma Glucose

PPG       :

Postprandial Plasma Glucose

BUN      :

Blood Urea Nitrogen

ACR       :

Albumin-To-Creatinine Ratio

TZD       :

Thiazolidinediones

DPP-4i :

Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors

Introduction

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is recognized as a global health concern, imposing a considerable impact on human life and a burden on socio-economic development [1]. International Diabetes Federation (IDF, 2021) estimated that nearly 537 million adults have diabetes at present and this number is expected to increase to 783 million (12%) by 2045 [2].Diabetes, together with its host of micro- and macro-vascular complications, is the 10th leading cause of death [3]. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) or diabetic kidney disease (DKD), is characterized by persistently low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or elevated urinary albumin (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg/g), and is one of the major macro-vascular complications of DM. According to the previous studies, T2DM was the second leading cause of CKD and CKD-related deaths and the third leading cause of CKD-related disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) [4,5].

According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) 2022 executive summary, the choice of therapy for T2DM depends on the patient’s cardiac, cerebrovascular, and renal status [6].According to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guideline, only a few of several oral hypoglycemic agents can be administered in CKD patients, including sulfonylurea (Glipizide and Gliclazide), Meglitinide (Repaglinide), Thiazolidinediones (TZD), and Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors [7,8].

Teneligliptin, a novel 3rd generation DPP4 inhibitor, is a competitive reversible inhibitor of the enzyme DPP4. DPP4 inhibitors exert antihyperglycemic effects by inhibiting the DPP4 enzyme and thereby enhancing levels of endogenous glucagonlike peptide 1 (GLP1) and other incretin hormones. This action stimulates glucose-dependent insulin synthesis and secretion and suppresses glucagon secretion. Teneligliptin has a unique structure exhibiting five consecutive rings (J-shaped) and has an exceptional potency and long-lasting effect [9,10]. Studies on the pharmacokinetics of Teneligliptin suggest no dose adjustment is required, irrespective of renal impairment [11]. Approximately 34% of the administered dose of Teneligliptin is excreted unchanged via the renal route, while 66% is metabolized and eliminated via the hepatic and renal routes [12].

Several evidence of the efficacy and safety of Teneligliptin in Indian T2DM patients are available but there is no robust data available on the safety and effectiveness of Teneligliptin in Indian T2DM patients with CKD. Hence, this real- world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study that aimed to evaluate the effect of Teneligliptin on renal parameters in T2DM patients with CKD was conducted.

Methodology

TOP RENAL study was six months real- world, retrospective, observational, multicenter study on Indian T2DM patients with CKD treated with Teneligliptin orally once daily. The study data collection were done between August 2022 to

October 2022.The protocol of TOP RENAL was approved by the Excel endocrine center Institutional Ethics committee and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (GCP).

The TOP RENAL study enrolled adult (>18 years of age) T2DM patients with eGFR ≥ 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 to ≤ 60 ml/ min/1.73 m2 at the time of treatment initiation with Teneligliptin; patients who were initiated on Teneligliptin and had no change in their prescription of anti-diabetic medication or other concomitant medications for the consecutive six months; and patients for whom complete data of the six months were available according to the study endpoints. Type 1 diabetes patients, pregnant or breastfeeding females; those with known liver or kidney dysfunction (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2 ) or with any Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) event at the time of initiation of treatment with Teneligliptin; patients with renal impairment requiring dialysis; and patients who were diagnosed with or suffering from COVID-19 infection were excluded from the study.

The study investigators and site personnel identified the patient data as per the enrollment criteria from the available patient medical records at the study site. Prescriptions and laboratory investigations of individual patients were uploaded from each site into a web-based database by study investigators. Qualified data entry personnel entered data from prescriptions into electronic data collection form.

The primary endpoint of the study was change in eGFR, serum creatinine (Sr. Creatinine) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) from baseline to 3 and 6 months. Secondary endpoints were changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glucose (PPG), and body weight at 3 and 6 months as compared to baseline, and percentage of patients achieving HbA1c ≤7 % at 6 month. Safety of Teneligliptin was assessed throughout the study.

Statistical Analysis

Demographic characteristics, continuous data like age, weight etc. were summarized with n, mean, Standard Deviation (SD), range and Confidence Intervals (CI). Effectiveness parameters such as HbA1c, FPG, and PPG were presented using descriptive statistics and changes from baseline were evaluated. Number of patients achieving the HbA1c level of <7% were summarized with count (%). Paired t-test was applied to assess the statistical significance and p value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Incidences of adverse events were summarized with count (%).

Results

Data of 377 patients were collected across 4 centers from India during August 2022 to October 2022 and were analyzed. Of the 377 subjects, 179 (47.5 %) were females. Themean age(±SD) of the study population was 59.9 (±9.58) years. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics such as duration of the diabetes were presented in Table 1. Concomitant anti-diabetic medications of the study population are presented in Table 2.The dose of Teneligliptin used was 20 mg once daily in the study population (n=271), there were a few patients (n=106)  who were either initiated or up-titrated to Teneligliptin 40 mg once daily.

PARAMETER

Overall (N=377)

Age (Years)

Mean (SD)

59.9±9.58

Gender

Male

198 (52.52 %)

Female

179 (47.5 %)

Weight (kg)

Mean ±SD

68.4± 9.52

BMI (Kg/m2)

Mean±SD

27.6±4.62

Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)

Mean±SD

133.5 ±11.84

Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)

Mean±SD

80.5± 7.11

Duration of Diabetes (N=256)

1 to 5 years

129 (50.4%)

6 to 10 years

104 (40.6%)

>10 years

23 (9 %)

Data Not Available

121

Abbreviations: BMI (Body Mass Index); SD= Standard Deviation

Table 1: Demographics and clinical characteristics of the study population.

Effect of Teneligliptin on Renal Parameters:

Patients were classified based on the captured eGFR values. Of the 377 patients, 102 patients had eGFR between 45-59 mL/ min/1.73m2 (G3a), 124 patients had eGFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73m2 (G3b) and 151 had eGFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73m2 (G4). Overall, the mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) at baseline, 3 months and 6 months were 36.4±12.3, 36.4±12.4, and36.8±12.5, respectively. The overall differences in eGFR in the follow up visits were not statistically significant (P> 0.05) (Figure 1). In the G3a, G3b, and G4 groups, the baseline eGFR values were 51.7±3.6, 40±3.6 and 23.2±3.4, respectively. After 6 months, these values were 52.1±4.5, 40.5±4.5 and 23.4±3.2 respectively. There was no significant change in serum creatinine and BUN levels from baseline (1.86±0.53 and 21.42±9.69, respectively) to six months (1.85±0.54 and 21.08±10.82, respectively) (Table 2).

 

Figure 1: Change in eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2).

Concomitant Medications

G3a (n %)

G3b (n %)

G4 (n %)

METFORMIN

33 (8.75%)

10 (2.65%)

105 (27.85%)

METFORMIN+ ALPHA- GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITOR

2 (0.53%)

9 (2.39%)

2 (0.53%)

METFORMIN+ SGLT2 INHIBITORS

0.00%

0.00%

1 (0.27%)

METFORMIN + SULFONYLUREA

51 (13.53%)

27 (7.16%)

8 (2.12%)

METFORMIN + SULFONYLUREA + THIAZOLIDINEDIONE

1 (0.27%)

2 (0.53%)

1 (0.27%)

METFORMIN+ SULFONYLUREA + ALPHA- GLUCOSISADE INHIBITOR

2 (0.53%)

16 (4.24%)

1 (0.27%)

METFORMIN + SULFONYLUREA + SGLT2 INHIBITORS

0.00%

3 (0.80%)

1 (0.27%)

ALPHA- GLUCOSISADE INHIBITOR

2 (0.53%)

8 (2.12%)

5 (1.33%)

ALPHA- GLUCOSISADE INHIBITOR+SGLT2 INHIBITORS

0.00%

2 (0.53%)

0.00%

MEGLITINIDE

1 (0.27%)

10 (2.65%)

1 (0.27%)

MEGLITINIDE+ALPHA- GLUCOSISADE INHIBITOR

2 (0.53%)

25 (6.63%)

12 (3.18%)

MEGLITINIDE+SGLT2 INHIBITORS

0.00%

5 (1.33%)

4 (1.06%)

MEGLITINIDE+SULFONYLUREA+METFORMIN

0.00%

0.00%

1 (0.27%)

SGLT2 INHIBITORS

0.00%

0.00%

1 (0.27%)

SULFONYLUREA

6 (1.59%)

5 (1.33%)

7 (1.86%)

SULFONYLUREA+ SGLT2 INHIBITOR

0.00%

1 (0.27%)

0.00%

SULFONYLUREA+ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITOR

1 (0.27%)

0.00%

0.00%

SULFONYLUREA + THIAZOLIDINEDIONE

1 (0.27%)

0.00%

1 (0.27%)

SULFONYLUREA + THIAZOLIDINEDIONE + ALPHA- GLUCOSIDASE

INHIBITOR

0.00%

1 (0.27%)

0.00%

102 (27.06%)

124 (32.89%)

151 (40.05%)

Table 2: Concomitant Anti-Diabetic Medications (eGFR Class wise) of the study population.

Effect of Teneligliptin on Glycemic Parameters

The mean HbA1C (% ± SD) at baseline, 3 months and 6 months were 8.05±0.67, 7.62 ±0.81 and7.23±0.79, respectively. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline across both time intervals was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.001). In the G3a, G3b, and G4 groups, the mean reductions in HbA1c values were 0.73, 1.08, and 0.67, respectively.

The proportion of patients that achieved HbA1c levels ≤ 7 % at 6 months was 48.81% (Figure 2). The overall mean baseline FPG significantly decreased from baseline 142.9± 32.9to 128.1±35.4at 6 months (P <0.0001). Similarly, significant (P <0.0001) reduction was seen in overall PPG from baseline200.75±32.29to174.9±35.94at 6 months (Table 3).There was no significant change in body weight was observed throughout the study duration.

 

Figure 2: Change in HbA1c (%).

Class

Baseline Visit

Follow-up Visit (3 Months)

Follow-up Visit (6 Months)

Intragroup p-value

(Paired t-test)

Baseline to 3 months

Intragroup p-value

(Paired t-test) Baseline to 6 months

Serum Creatinine (Mean ± SD)

Overall

1.86±0.53

1.85±0.53

1.85±0.54

-0.22003

-0.1401

eGFR (G3a) (45-59)

1.31±0.14

1.32±0.13

1.3±0.12

-0.1032

-0.31846

eGFR (G3b) (30-44)

1.61±0.25

1.57±0.24

1.59±0.27

-0.04656

-0.2959

eGFR (G4) (15-29)

2.45±0.19

2.44±0.21

2.44±0.22

-0.52736

-0.48774

Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) (Mean ± SD)

Overall

21.42±9.69

21.21±10.9

21.08±10.8

0.21289

0.09129

eGFR (G3a) (45-59)

17.41±10.31

16.84±9.97

16.65±9.76

0.14071

0.08522

eGFR (G3b) (30-44)

17.64±7.54

17.29±10.6

17.02±11.3

0.3275

0.16112

eGFR (G4) (15-29)

27.24±7.75

27.37±8.73

27.39±7.52

0.50115

0.47885

PPG (mg/dl) (Mean ± SD)

Overall

200.75±32.29

186±34.97

174.9±35.9

<0.0001

<0.0001

eGFR (G3a) (45-59)

187.2±36.9

170.18±25.99

159.14±23.87

<0.0001

<0.0001

Class

Baseline Visit

Follow-up Visit (3 Months)

Follow-up Visit (6 Months)

Intragroup p-value

(Paired t-test)

Baseline to 3 months

Intragroup p-value

(Paired t-test) Baseline to 6 months

eGFR (G3b) (30-44)

198.52±24.81

177.15±30.4

159.14±21.76

<0.0001

<0.0001

eGFR (G4) (15-29)

211.7±30.71

203.98±35.91

198.49±39.13

<0.0001

<0.0001

FPG (mg/dl) (Mean ± SD)

Overall

142.99±32.91

135.44±32.84

128.03±35.37

<0.0001

<0.0001

eGFR (G3a) (45-59)

144.89±30.04

136.43±21.57

125.82±18.45

-0.00015

<0.0001

eGFR (G3b) (30-44)

121.38±27.96

110.47±25.23

99.7±25

<0.0001

<0.0001

eGFR (G4) (15-29)

159.44±28.36

155.28±30.91

152.79±33.32

<0.0001

<0.0001

Abbreviations: eGFR= estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; HbA1c= Glycated Hemoglobin; FPG= Fasting Plasma Glucose; PPG= Postprandial Plasma Glucose; BUN= Blood Urea Nitrogen; SD= Standard Deviation.

               

Table 3: Changes in Renal Parameters (Sr. Creatinine and BUN) and Glycemic Parameters (FPG and PPG).

Safety Profile

There were no adverse events reported data in any of the patients.

Discussion

This study aimed to assess the effect of Teneligliptin on renal parameters in Indian T2DM patients with CKD in real world setting as it is widely used in India. Primarily liver eliminates Teneligliptin, hence dose modification is not required when using in mild to moderate renal impairment patients [13]. Findings from our ‘TOP RENAL’ real-world study illustrated the effectiveness of Teneligliptin in reducing HbA1c levels (mean reduction from baseline: 0.82 %, P < 0.001) in T2DMpatients with CKD. It was observed that the eGFR of patients was maintained, suggesting no adverse effects of Teneligliptin on renal functions. Similar results were obtained in RUBY study that reported the least squares mean change in HbA1c adjusted to the baseline was - 0.68 to - 0.85% and - 0.71 to - 0.85% across the eGFR groups, respectively [14]. RUBY study observed that long-term treatment with Teneligliptin was generally well- tolerated in patients with any stage of renal impairment from normal to end-stage renal disease [14]. Tanaka K, et al. (2016) conducted a study in T2DM patients with CKD who were treated with Teneligliptin at 20 mg/day or Linagliptin at 5 mg/day for 6 days and then switched to the other agent for another 6 days and reported that Linagliptin and Teneligliptin have comparable effects on the mean amplitude of glucose excursions in T2DM patients with CKD and are potentially useful and safer for treatment of such patients [15].

Agrawal P et al. (2021) treated patients with suboptimal control of T2DM (HbA1c >7.5%) with Teneligliptin monotherapy and observed a persistent reduction in HbA1C (p< 0.001) [16]. It also reported that the difference in eGFR across different time intervals was not statistically significant (p = 0.958), indicating that administration of Teneligliptin did not have any impact on eGFR [16]. These studies indicated adequate glycemic control with Teneligliptin in T2DM patients with no adverse impact on renal function.

The two large-scale RWE studies in the Indian population, TREAT-India 1 (N=4305 patients) and 2 (N= 10,623 patients), reflected the effectiveness of Teneligliptin in improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM when prescribed as monotherapy or as add-on to one or more antidiabetic drugs [17,18]. Teneligliptin also significantly reduced HbA1c (1.13% p < 0.0001) in patients with impaired renal function without worsening the eGFR [18].Insight into differences in chemical structure, the binding mode to DPP4, and the lipophilicity of each DPP4 inhibitor suggests differences in their renoprotective effects as well.

Kitada M et al (2019) reported that shifting from other DPP4 inhibitors to Teneligliptin for 24 weeks reduces plasma DPP4 activity, which was associated with a reduction in albuminuria [19]. Han E, et al (2020) observed that switching from Linagliptin to Teneligliptin reduced FBG (148.1 ± 47.1 to 139.6 ± 43.4 mg/ dL), HbA1c (7.9 ± 1.3 to 7.5 ± 1.2%), and PBG (224.8 ± 77.4 to 205.8 ± 70.8 mg/dL) levels (all P < 0.05) [20]. Dange S et al (2020) also reported Teneligliptin to be equally effective in comparison to Sitagliptin and can be considered a good cost-effective option as an add-on for patients with T2DM uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy [21].

The emerging clinical evidence suggests that Teneligliptin has strong antioxidative and Reno-protective effects that might be independent of its blood glucose-lowering effects [22].Sagar M, et al. (2016) elucidated improvement in endothelial function and reduction in renal and vascular oxidative stress in patients with T2DM and CKD with the use of Teneligliptin [23].Mitra A and Ray S (2020) demonstrated that marginal improvement of kidney function as expressed through a borderline change in the ACR (P = 0.052) from baseline to three months [24].

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, no significant risk of any hypoglycemia with Teneligliptin as compared to placebo (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.44–1.60; I2 = 0%; P = 0.60) was found, but the risk was 1.84 times higher when combined with other hypoglycemic agents [25]. A post-marketing surveillance of more than 10,000 patients on Teneligliptin reported the occurrence of adverse effects in 3.85% of patients. The most frequent adverse effects included gastrointestinal disorders (0.8%), most commonly constipation [26].

Limitations

With retrospective design of the study some inherent limitation are applicable to study. Randomized controlled trial with larger sample size should be conducted to get further insights.

Conclusion

Teneligliptin use in Indian T2DM patients with mild to severe renal impairment did not adversely affect the renal function. It was well tolerated with no safety concerns and showed significant improvement in glycemic control.

Funding: No external funding was provided.

Competing interest- None   

Declaration of Interest: Nil

Acknowledgement

We extend our gratitude to the patients for their participation, and the study investigators and personnel for their dedicated efforts.

References

  1. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, et al. (2020) Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes - Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health 10: 107-111.
  2. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, et al. (2022) IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 183: 109119.
  3. Naser AY, Alwafi H, Alotaibi B, Salawati E, Samannodi M, et al. (2021) Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Diseases in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in the Middle East: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Endocrinol 2021: 4572743.
  4. Li H, Lu W, Wang A, Jiang H, Lyu J (2021) Changing epidemiology of chronic kidney disease as a result of type 2 diabetes mellitus from 1990 to 2017: Estimates from Global Burden of Disease 2017. Journal of diabetes investigation 12: 346-356.
  5. Deng Y, Li N, Wu Y, Wang M, Yang S, et al. (2021) Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes-related chronic kidney disease from 1990 to 2019. Frontiers in endocrinology 12: 672350.
  6. Blonde L, Umpierrez GE, McGill JB, Reddy SS, Berga SL, et al. (2022) American Association of Clinical Endocrinology clinical practice guideline: Developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan— 2022 update. Endocrine Practice 28: 923-1049.
  7. de Boer IH, Khunti K, Sadusky T, Tuttle KR, Neumiller JJ, et al. (2022) Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Diabetes Care 145: 3075-3090.
  8. Ou SH, Chen HY, Fang NW, Yin CH, Chen CL, et al. (2021) Effect of anti-diabetic drugs in dialysis patients with diabetes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Cardiovascular Diabetology 20: 1-3.
  9. Shao S, Xu Q, Yu X, Pan R, Chen Y (2020) Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and their potential immune modulatory functions. Pharmacol Ther 209:107503.
  10. Ceriello A, De Nigris V, Iijima H, Matsui T, Gouda M (2019) The Unique Pharmacological and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Teneligliptin: Implications for Clinical Practice. Drugs  79: 733-750.
  11. Abubaker M, Mishra P, Swami OC (2017) Teneligliptin in Management of Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Review of Place in Therapy. J Clin Diagn Res  11:OE05-OE09.
  12. Sharma SK, Panneerselvam A, Singh KP, Parmar G, Gadge P, et al. (2016) Teneligliptin in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy 16: 251-60.
  13. Kumar V, Agarwal S, Saboo B, Makkar B (2022) RSSDI Guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 1542: 1-30.
  14. Haneda M, Kadowaki T, Ito H, Sasaki K, Hiraide S, et al. (2018) Safety and Efficacy of Teneligliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Renal Function: Interim Report from Post-marketing Surveillance. Diabetes Ther 9: 1083-1097.
  15. Tanaka K, Okada Y, Mori H, Inada Y, Suzuka K, et al. (2016) Efficacy of linagliptin and Teneligliptin for glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: assessment by continuous glucose monitoring a pilot study. Diabetology international 7: 368-374.
  16. Agrawal P, Gautam A, Jain A, Pursnani N, Manjula S (2021) Renoprotective effects of Teneligliptin: An observational study. Journal of Diabetology 112: 146-150.
  17. Ghosh S, Trivedi S, Sanyal D, Modi KD, Kharb S (2016) Teneligliptin real-world efficacy assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in India (TREAT-INDIA study). Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy 8: 347-353.
  18. Ghosh S, Tiwaskar M, Chawla R, Jaggi S, Asirvatham A, et al. (2020) Teneligliptin Real-World Effectiveness Assessment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India: A Retrospective Analysis (TREATINDIA 2). Diabetes Therapy 11: 2257-2268.
  19. Kitada M, Ogura Y, Nitta K, Fujii M, Kanasaki K, et al. (2019) Effect of switching to Teneligliptin from other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose control and renoprotection in type 2 diabetes patients with diabetic kidney disease. J Diabetes Investig 10 :706-713.
  20. Han E, Lee M, Lee YH, Kim HS, Lee BW, et al. (2020) Effect of Switching from Linagliptin to Teneligliptin Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes MetabSyndrObes 213: 4113-4121.
  21. Dange SV, Narkar NS, Rane P, Das S, Madrewar V, et al.(2020) Comparison of teneligliptin with sitagliptin as an add on to metformin in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus: an observational study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 20209: 934-936.
  22. Nakamura K, Oe H, Kihara H, Shimada K, Fukuda S, et al. ( DPP-4 inhibitor and alpha-glucosidase inhibitor equally improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: EDGE study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 201430: 110.
  23. Sagara M, Suzuki K, Aoki C, Tanaka S, Taguchi I, et al.  (2016) Impact of Teneligliptin on oxidative stress and endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease: a case–control study. Cardiovascular Diabetology 15: 1-10.
  24. Mitra A, Ray S (2020) Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of Teneligliptin at a higher dose in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: A retrospective analysis. Cureus 12: e6812.
  25. Pelluri R, Kongara S, Nagasubramanian VR, Mahadevan S, Chimakurthy J (2023) Systematic review and meta-analysis of Teneligliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 9: 1-3.
  26. Kadowaki T, Haneda M, Ito H, Sasaki K, Matsukawa M, et al. (2020) Long-term, real-world safety and efficacy of Teneligliptin: a postmarketing surveillance of more than 10,000 patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Advances in therapy 37: 1065-1086.
  27. Erande S, Sarwardekar S, Desai B (2019) QT/QTc safety and efficacy evaluation of Teneligliptin in Indian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: the “thorough QT/QTc” study (Q-SET study). Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2112: 961-967.

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

Current Trends in Internal Medicine

uji keberuntungan mahjong terkinipola slot pgpola jam mahjongslot mahjong ways 3 playstarrtp slot gacor hari inislot gacor scatterakun slot jackpotslot server kambojaagen sabung ayam onlinehujan perkalian starlight christmasslot dana terpercayaagen slot gacor anti rungkaddaftar situs bonanza gold5 pg soft terbaikrtp ways kuda qilinslot demo mahjongslot mahjong ways gokilslot olympus tiba maxwinrtp pg softscatter mahjong pgsofttrik mahjong kemenanganmahjong ways maxwinslot pg maxwindafar slot depo danartp pragmatic gacorslot depo pulsamanisnya jp rujak bonanzarahasia cheat slot apktrik pecah selayar mahjongkumpulan slot mahjong gacorkemenangan mahjong tanpa batasalgoritma slot mahjongmaxwin zeus x5000rtp mahjong terbaru maxwinrtp pg soft akhir julyslot mahjong kambojaslot mahjong jp maxwinslot depo danatop 5 pg softslot online mahjongsitus togel terpercayafitur terbaru mahjong winspola starlight princess maxwinbocoran slot volatility tinggirm1131aman totoamantoto