Emergency Medicine Investigations (ISSN: 2475-5605)


  PDF Download

Allergic Reactions Caused by a COVID-19 Vaccine

Keiji Sugiura*, Mariko Sugiura

*Corresponding Author: Keiji Sugiura, Department of Environmental Dermatology & Allergology, Daiichi Clinic, Nittochi Nagoya Bld., 2F, 1-1 Sakae 2, Nakaku, Nagoya, 468-0008, Japan.

Received Date: 06 October, 2021

Accepted Date: 12 October, 2021

Published Date: 18 October, 2021

Citation: Sugiura K, Sugiura M (2021) Allergic Reactions Caused by a COVID-19 Vaccine. Emerg Med Inves 6: 10113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29011/2475-5605.010113


 Keywords: Allergy; Anaphylaxis; COVID-19; Polyethylene glycol (PEG); Vaccine

Two years have passed since the beginning of the global COVID-19 pandemic. People have been afraid of being severely affected by COVID-19 infection, but we have struggled bravely with this difficult virus. At present, we have no proven therapeutic agents against COVID-19, but one effective weapon against this virus is vaccination. There are various kinds of vaccine against COVID-19; our focus here is on allergic reactions following the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The BNT162b2 vaccine does not use live virus, and this vaccine targets the viral spike protein of COVID-19. This spike protein is necessary for the virus to infect human cells. The mRNA molecules of the viral spike protein are surrounded by lipid nanoparticles attached by Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), which provides stability and increases efficiency [1]. The nanoparticles are unaffected by enzyme actions or treatments of diseases and are available to deliver mRNA to cells [2,3]. Virus spike protein produced under the direction of mRNA in cells can cause immune reactions, and this action produces antibodies against virus spike protein [4].

It is possible for most people to use this vaccine, however, a small number of people are not able to use it because of severe adverse side effects. The most common adverse side effects of BNT162b2 are fatigue, headache, muscle pain and fever. Severe reactions such as anaphylaxis occur rarely. From 14 December 2020 to 23 December 2020, 21 of 1,893,360 recipients of their first dose of BNT162b2 showed anaphylactic reactions, yielding a rate of 11.1 anaphylactic cases per million administered vaccines [5]. Severe allergic reactions occurred in 6 cases in North America in 272,001 vaccinations prior to December, 2020. The frequency of a severe allergic vaccine reaction was 1:1 million [6]. What kinds of ingredients in this vaccine cause allergic reactions? One major excipient in this vaccine is PEG, which is a suspected origin of allergic reactions. PEG is widely used in cosmetics, drugs and therapeutic proteins because it is considered a non-immunogenic high polymer, and it improves the stability and solubility of medicines in the body [7]. The molecular weight of PEG is 300-6000 g/mol, and that of the PEG in BNT162b2 is 2000 g/mol [8]. One popular PEG is macrogol, and cases of allergic reactions due to macrogol at the time of colonoscopy have been reported [9-14]. Additionally, Garvey reports 37 cases of PEG hypersensitivity with macrogol [15], and 3 cases of anaphylaxis out of 7,935 registered cases are known to have been induced by macrogol alone [16]. The frequency of macrogol allergy has been increasing in recent years [15,17], but cases of immediate allergic reaction to a vaccine are rare, on the order of 1.3 cases/million [5,6,18].

The degree of allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine may be associated with the molecular weight of PEG. PEG has not been commonly used as an excipient in vaccines until recently. The mechanism for PEG hypersensitivity remains unknown. PEG is often used in cosmetics, detergents, medicines and food additives because it is non-toxic and non-ionic. PEG connecting with nanoparticles or proteins may induce anti-PEG antibodies in the form of haptens. The induction of anti-PEG antibodies is affected by the route of administration, applied dose, kinds of haptens and modified rate of PEG. Immunogenicity may develop when PEG connects with tissue proteins and induces antibodies [19]. There have been reports on the existence ratio of anti-PEG antibody [11,20-25], but anti-PEG antibody presents not only as an induced antibody but also as a natural antibody [26,27], and the reason for the presence of natural antibody remains unknown. PEG is a strong stimulator of humoral immune reactions in the form of Complement Activation-Related Pseudo Allergy” (CARPA) [28]. It is suspected that people may be exposed to PEG in foods, cosmetics or medicines without their knowledge, and anti-PEG antibodies could develop. In the case of a local skin inflammation after using or eating something containing PEG, it appears that PEG penetrates to the inflammation site, immune cells are stimulated, and anti-PEG antibody is produced [20]. In the case of pre-existing anti-PEG antibody, the presence of the antibody triggers an immunologic reaction [29,30]. This cell immunological activation and CARPA could bring about anaphylactic reactions associated with PEG. Cases that suffer an anaphylactic reaction to the BNT162b2 vaccine are fewer than the positive ratio cases of natural anti-PEG antibody, and natural anti-PEG antibody is not responsible for all anaphylactic reactions. Anti-PEG IgE antibody has been detected in all anaphylactic cases that showed high titers of anti-PEG IgG [22]. At the least, methods to suppress the induction of anti-PEG antibody are important in order to decrease allergic reactions to this vaccine. People with a PEG allergy must be careful of polysorbate, which has potential cross-reactivity with PEG [15,22,31].

Skin testing with PEG2000 is one method of investigating a possible allergy to BNT162b2. People with an IgE-mediated allergy to PEG who show positive results on skin testing with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine should use a different vaccine in order to prevent anaphylactic reactions [15,31], and it is important for those with positive reactions to PEG2000 skin testing to use other vaccines as well. If the results of skin testing by using BNT162b2 are negative, this alone is not sufficient evidence for the subject to be able to use the vaccine because the negative results may be truly negative or pseudo-negative. If insufficient antigen infiltrates the skin because of the large molecular weight, this could cause a pseudo-negative result. Generally, the molecular weight of substances that are able to infiltrate the skin is 200 g/mol, while the molecular weight of PEG2000 is much greater and other substances with the same molecular weight are usually unable to penetrate the skin. If the results of skin testing are negative, the patient should be followed carefully after injection. Skin testing is very difficult for all people and would be an impractical way to identify those with a PEG2000 allergy before vaccination.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been stamped out, because variant strains of the virus may well emerge. Although the BNT162b2 vaccine is not perfect, vaccinations its recipients are generally able to avoid severe illness and prevent infection. We hope to find therapeutic agents that will help to bring an end to this pandemic.


  1. Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM (2016) PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 99: 28-51.
  2. Kumari A, Singla R, Guliani A, Yadav SK (2014) Nanoencapsulation for drug delivery. EXCLI J 13: 265-286.
  3. Abu Lila AS, Ishida T (2017) Liposomal Delivery Systems: design Optimization and Current Applications. Biol Pharm Bull 40: 1-10.
  4. Chung CH, Mirakhur B, Chan E, Le QT, Berlin J, et al. (2008) Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. N Eng J Med 358: 1109-1117.
  5. Cabanillas B, Novak N (2021) Allergy to COVID-19 vaccines: A current update. Allergol Int 70: 313-318.
  6. De Vrieze (2020) Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions. Science Insider.
  7. Veronese FM, Pasut G (2005) PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 10: 1451-1458.
  8. Garvey LH, Nasser S (2021) Anaphylaxis to the first COVID-19 vaccine: is polyethylene glycol (PEG) the culprit? Br J Anaesth 126: e106-e108.
  9. Carbowax TM (2016) Polyethylene Glycols: Industrial Brochure: Dow Chemical.
  10. NIH Daily Med (2018) National Library of Medicine.
  11. Armstrong JK, Hempel G, Koling S, Chan L, Fisher T, et al. (2007) Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cancer 110: 103-111.
  12. Rau RE, Dreyer Z, Choi M, Liang W, Skowronski R, et al. (2018) Outcome of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma with hypersensitivity to pegaspargase treated with PEGylated Erwinia asparaginase, pegcrisantaspase: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65: 10.1002/pbc.26873.
  13. Povsic TJ, Lawrence MG, Lincoff AM, Mehran R, Rusconi CP, et al. (2016) Pre-existing antiPEG antibodies are associated with severe immediate allergic reactions to pegnivacogin, a PEGylated aptamer. J Allergy Clin Immunol 138: 1712-1715.
  14. Fernandez CA, Stewart E, Panetta JC, Wilkinson MR, Morrison AR, et al. (2014) Successful challenges using native coli asparaginase after hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated E. coli asparaginase. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73: 1307-1313.
  15. Wenande E, Garvey L (2016) Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols: a review. Clin Exp Allergy 46: 907-922.
  16. Wylon K, Dolle S, Worm M (2016) Polyethylene glycol as a cause of anaphylaxis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 12: 67.
  17. Sellaturay P, Nasser S, Ewan P (2020) Polyethylene glycol-induced systemic allergic reactions (anaphylaxis). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 9: 670-675.
  18. Su JR, Moro PL, Ng CS, Lewis PW, Said MA, et al. (2019) Anaphylaxis after vaccination reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1990-2016. Allergy Clin Immunol 143: 1465-1473.
  19. Mima Y, Hashimoto Y, Shimizu T, Kiwada H, Ishida T (2015) Anti-PEG IgM Is a Major Contributor to the Accelerated Blood Clearance of Polyethylene Glycol-Conjugated Protein. Mol Pharm 12: 2429-2435.
  20. Yang Q, Lai SK (2015) Anti-PEG immunity: emergence, characteristics, and unaddressed questions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 7: 655-677.
  21. Kleine-Tebbe J, Klimek L, Hamelmann E, Pfaar O, Taube C, et al. (2021) Severe allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine-statement and practical consequences. Allergol Select 5: 26-28.
  22. Zhou ZH, Stone CA Jr, Jakubovic B, Phillips EJ, Sussman G, et al. (2021) Anti-PEG IgE In Anaphylaxis Associated with Polyethylene glycol. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 9: 1731-1733.
  23. Armstrong JK (2009) The occurrence, induction, specificity and potential effect of antibodies against poly(ethylene glycol). In: PEGylated Protein Drugs: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. Veronese FM (Editor). Birkhäuser Basel: Basel, Switzerland, pp: 147-168.
  24. Moreno A, Pitoc GA, Ganson NJ, Layzer JM, Hershfield MS, et al. (2019) Anti-PEG Antibodies Inhibit the Anticoagulant Activity of PEGylated Aptamers. Cell Chem Biol 26: 634-644.
  25. Zhang P, Sun F, Liu S, Jiang S (2016) Anti-PEG antibodies in the clinic: Current issues and beyond PEGylation. J Control Release 244: 184-193.
  26. Richter AW, Akerblom E (1984) Polyethylene glycol reactive antibodies in man: titer distribution in allergic patients treated with monomethoxy polyethylene glycol modified allergens or placebo, and in healthy blood donors. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 74: 36-39.
  27. Lubich C, Allacher P, de la Rosa M, Bauer A, Prenninger T, et al. (2016) The Mystery of Antibodies Against Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) - What do we Know? Pharm Res 33: 2239-2249.
  28. Szebeni J, Fontana JL, Wassef NM, Mongan PD, Morse DS, et al. (1999) Hemodynamic changes induced by liposomes and liposome-encapsulated hemoglobin in pigs: a model for pseudoallergic cardiopulmonary reactions to liposomes. Role of complement and inhibition by soluble CR1 and anti-C5a antibody. Circulation 99: 2302-2309.
  29. Hsieh YC, Wang HE, Lin WW, Roffler SR, Cheng TC, et al. (2018) Pre-existing anti-polyethylene glycol antibody reduces the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of PEGylated liposomes. Theranostics 8: 3164-3175.
  30. Garay RP, El-Gewely R, Armstrong JK, Garratty G, Richette P (2012) Antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy subjects and in patients treated with PEG-conjugated agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 9: 1319-1323.
  31. Stone CA Jr, Liu Y, Relling MV, Krantz MS, Pratt AL, et al. (2019) Immediate Hypersensitivity to Polyethylene Glycols and Polysorbates: More Common Than We Have Recognized. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 7: 1533-1540.

Copyright and Licensing: This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.


share article