Journal of Orthopedic Research and Therapy (ISSN: 2575-8241)

Article / research article

"Effects of Alendronate and Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Therapies at Osteoporotic Cancellous Osteotomy Sites in Proximal Tibia of Ovariectomized Rats"

Chie Sato1, Naohisa Miyakoshi1*, Yuji Kasukawa1, Hiroyuki Tsuchie1, Hayato Kinoshita1, Kentaro Ohuchi1, Masashi Fujii1, Tetsuya Kawano1, Masazumi Suzuki1 and Yoichi Shimada1

1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan

*Corresponding author: Naohisa Miyakoshi, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan, Tel: +81-18-884-6148; Fax: +81-18-836-2617; E-mail:miyakosh@doc.med.akita-u.ac.jp

Received Date: 26 October, 2016; Accepted Date: 10 November, 2016; Published Date: 17 November, 2016

Introduction: The effects of Alendronate (ALN) and Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) on cancellous bone repair under osteoporotic conditions remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of ALN and/or LIPUS on cancellous bone repair at cancellous bone osteotomy sites in Ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Materials and Methods: Seven-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to osteotomy at the proximal tibial metaphysis 4 weeks after OVX. The rats were randomized into the following 4 groups: 1) Control group, treated with ALN vehicle and sham LIPUS; 2) ALN group, treated with ALN (1 μg/kg/day) and sham LIPUS; 3) LIPUS group, treated with ALN vehicle and LIPUS (20 min/day); and 4) ALN+LIPUS group, treated with ALN and LIPUS. Bone Mineral Density (BMD), bone histomorphometry, cancellous bone union rate, and bone strength at the cancellous bone osteotomy site were assessed after 2 or 4 weeks of treatment.

Results: Two weeks of ALN, LIPUS, and combined treatment significantly increased bone volume (BV/TV) (p < 0.001, p = 0.012, and p = 0.0014, respectively). ALN and combined treatment for 2 weeks significantly increased the ultimate load (p = 0.029 and p = 0.048, respectively) and breaking energy (p = 0.010 and p = 0.019, respectively) compared with those of control. Four weeks of ALN treatment increased BMD (p < 0.05), BV/TV (p = 0.029), but not cancellous bone union rate and bone strength, compared with control. LIPUS therapy for 4 weeks did not increase the BMD, BV/TV, bone union rate, and bone strength at the osteotomy site. Combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS produced a significant increase in BMD (p < 0.01), BT/TV (p = 0.029), and cancellous bone union rate (p = 0.048), compared with control at 4 weeks.

Conclusion: Combined therapy with ALN and LIPUS increased cancellous bone repair and bone strength in OVX rats.

Keywords: Bisphosphonate; Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound; Cancellous bone repair.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a major health problem because fractures caused by osteoporosis lead to decreased Quality Of Life (QOL) and increased patient mortality [1]. Fragility generally arises from decreased bone mass and/or quality in cortical bone and cancellous bone, and fragile fractures are likely to occur in regions rich in cancellous bone such as vertebral body or proximal femur. These fractures are critical fracture to determine the QOL or mortality of patients [1]. Furthermore, the first fragility fracture is a very strong predictor for additional fractures. Thus, a treatment for osteoporosis should be started as soon as possible during a treatment or operation for fragility osteoporotic fractures to prevent thesem secondary fractures.

However, it has been reported that pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis following fragility fractures are not performed adequately [2,3]. One of reasons of the low proportion of treatment for osteoporosis after a fracture is the fear of pharmacological agents for osteoporosis may negatively interfere with fracture healing [4,5]. Although one of Bisphosphonates (BPs), Alendronate (ALN) is broadly used to prevent bone fragility andthe incidence of fractures in  postmenopausal women [6,7], ALN might inhibit fracture healing because of its effect of suppressingbone turnover. Fu et al. suggested that ALN was beneficial for the mechanical properties of cortical bone, however it delayed cortical bone remodeling in OVX rats [8]. Other studies have demonstrated that BPs result in the formation of a stronger and denser callus with no delay on fracture healing in cortical bones in animal models [9-12]. However, osteoporotic fragility fractures often occur at cancellous bone rich sites, such as in the vertebral body or proximal femur. Effects of ALN on cancellous bone healing under osteoporotic condition are not fully elucidated.

To resolve bone remodeling and healing, Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) is a clinically available modality for accelerating fracture healing [13]. LIPUS is able to lessen the time to union of fresh fractures by > 30% [14,15], and is also beneficial in situations that are disadvantageous for healing [16]. If ALN may negatively interfere with cancellous bone healing, combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS could improve conditions at cancellous fragile fracture sites more than ALN mono-therapy.

We have reported that the combined therapy of ALN and LIPUS did not affect cancellous bone union in aged rats [17]. However, the effects of ALN and/or LIPUS on cancellous bone healing under osteoporotic conditions caused by OVX remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ALN and/or LIPUS on cancellous bone volume, bone union, and bone strength at bone osteotomy sites at the proximal tibial metaphysis in OVX rats.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Six-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats (SLC, Tokyo, Japan) were housed in a controlled environment at 220C with a 12-h light/dark cycle. Rats were pair-fed and allowed ad libitum access to water and standard diet (CE-2; Clea Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) containing 1.14% calcium, 1.06% phosphorus, and 250 IU vitamin D3 per 100 g of food, as described previously [18,19]. The osteoporosis model was induced by bilateral OVX at six months of age followed by four weeks of rearing [20]. The establishment of post-menopausal osteoporosis was confirmed by the presence of uterine atrophy.

Cancellous bone osteotomy in the right proximal tibia 

Cancellous bone osteotomy was performed on the right proximal tibia of each rat at seven months of age. A median parapatellar incision from the knee joint through the proximal half of the tibia was made on the right hind limb. Using an electric bone saw (Yoshida Medical Inc., Ehime, Japan), an incomplete mid-sagittal osteotomy was created from the joint surface around one-quarter of the proximal tibia, without extending to the caudal cortex  The osteotomized tibia was closed using a non-absorbable suture. After surgery, the rats were allowed to move freely. No animal was observed with abnormal gait or impaired locomotion postoperatively.

Treatment protocol

The rats were randomized into four groups (n = 20 each group): (1) Control group (OVX rats treated with saline (ALN vehicle) and sham-LIPUS); (2) LIPUS group (OVX rats treated with ALN vehicle and LIPUS radiation); (3) ALN group (OVX rats treated with ALN and sham-LIPUS); and (4) ALN+LIPUS group (OVX rats treated with ALN and LIPUS radiation). These treatments were conducted under intraperitoneal anesthesia and initiated two days post-osteotomy and continued until sacrificing at two or four weeks later (n = 10 each). The rats were euthanized with (Ketalar; Daiichi Sankyo Propharma, Tokyo, Japan) and xylazine hydrochloride (1.5 mg/kg) (Sederac; Nippon Zenyaku Kogyo, Fukushima, Japan). The right tibia were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin.The right femur was also harvested with muscle and frozen under -800C. All animal experiments were approved by our institute and conducted according to the “guidelines for animal experimentation”. This study was started at May 2013 and ended at August 2015.

Ultrasound intervention

The LIPUS apparatus was supplied by Sonic Accelerated Fracture Healing Systems (SAFHS®4000J; Teijin Pharma, Tokyo, Japan). LIPUS is often utilized to accelerate bone union. The efficacy models [13,22,23]. The signal strength and duration of treatment used in this study were in accordance with conditions endorsed for clinical situations. The ultrasound signal generated with a transducer consisted of a burst width of 200 μs containing 1.5 MHz sine waves repeated at a frequency of 1.0 kHz, and a Spatial Average- Temporal Average (SATA) intensity of 30 mW/cm2 for 20 minutes per day. Animals were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture ketamine (20 mg/kg) and xylazine (1.5 mg/kg) during LIPUS or sham radiation. The gel and elastic band of this device
 the osteotomy site (Figure 1).

Alendronate administration

An ALN (Wako Junyaku, Osaka, Japan) solution was prepared in saline at a concentration of 0.02 mg/mL. Rats in the ALN and ALN+LIPUS groups received a daily subcutaneous injection of ALN (1 μg/kg). This dosage of ALN was equivalent to the dosage used in humans (5 mg/day, peroral) and chosen to be in accordance with that used in previous animal studies [23-25]. Saline was selected as the vehicle control, and 0.2 mL of saline was administered as a subcutaneous injection to rats in the control and LIPUS groups. Body weights were measured weekly and injection dosages were adjusted accordingly.

Assessment

Measurement of Bone Mineral Density (BMD BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic QDR-4500, Hologic, MA, USA) in an anteroposterior plane. We assessed BMD of the right proximal tibia at the osteotomy site. The region of interest was 20 mm and one-third of the tibial length from the proximal edge of the tibia. Two scans of each sample were performed and average values of BMD were used for analysis [23].

Sample preparation

After BMD measurements, the proximal half of the right tibia, including the osteotomy site, were decalcified with neutral ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for four weeks and embedded in paraffin. Subsequently, 3-micron-thick mid-frontal sections were prepared for hematoxylin and eosin (H-E) staining to assess cancellous bone histomorphometry and to evaluate bone union.

Bone histomorphometry and bone union rate

Bone histomorphometrical analyses of H-E stained sections were performed with a semiautomatic graphic system (Histometry RT CAMERA, System Supply Co., Nagano, Japan). Measurements the growth plate-metaphyseal junctions in the caudal direction, t exclude the primary spongiosa, as well as 390 μm from the endocortical surfaces [17,26]. The cancellous Bone Volume per Tissue Volume (BV/TV), Osteoid Surface per Bone Surface (OS/BS), Eroded Surface per Bone Surface (ES/BS) and Osteoclast Number per Bone Surface (Oc.N/BS) were measured at a magnification of 200 [27]. The bone union rate was evaluated at 100 magnification within the same field as histomorphometry. We defined cartilaginous bonding as bony union, while fibrous assimilation as nonunion. The proportion of bony union in the total length of the osteotomy line was counted [17,21,26].

Mechanical properties of cancellous bone

Because the area subjected to LIPUS radiation included the distal metaphysis of the femur, we performed compression tests to assess the mechanical properties of the distal femur. The distal metaphysis of the femur was cut using an electric saw 10 mm from the joint surface of the condyle. A compression load was applied to the specimens using a rectangular parallelepiped crosshead (length 20 mm, width 20 mm, and height 10 mm) from the lateral aspect to the medial aspect. Load and displacement curves were recorded at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min and compressive depth up to 2.5 mm, and the following extrinsic parameters were calculated by the testing machine software (CTR win; System Supply Co., Nagano, Japan): ultimate load (N), stiffness (N/mm), and breaking energy (Nm) [28,29].

Statistical analyses

All data are expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). Differences between groups at each time point were evaluated using One-Way Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were made using either Scheffe’s or Friedman’s post hoc tests, as appropriate. Two-factor factorial ANOVA was performed to evaluate
the effect of ALN or LIPUS alone and the interaction between these interventions. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Biosciences software (SPBS v 9.6) [30]. Probability values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

BMD (Table 1): After two weeks (six weeks after OVX) of ALN, LIPUS, and ALN+LIPUS treatment, no effect on BMD was observed. ALN administration for four weeks significantly increased BMD (without interaction; p < 0.001; two-factor factorial ANOVA). The BMD of the ALN (p < 0.05), LIPUS (p < 0.05) and ALN+LIPUS (p < 0.01) groups were significantly higher than that of control group, according to the Friedman post hoc test. The BMD of the ALN+LIPUS group was also significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the LIPUS group after four weeks of treatment.

Bone histomorphometry at the osteotomy site (Table 2) :

The analysis showed that ALN treatment significantly increased BV/TV (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and decreased Oc.N/BS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) at two and four weeks by two factor factorial ANOVA. In comparison, LIPUS significantly increased BT/TV (p = 0.012) at two weeks.

At two weeks, the BV/TV of the ALN+LIPUS treatment group was significantly higher than the control (p = 0.0014) and LIPUS (p = 0.015) groups. The Oc. N/BS of the ALN and ALN+LIPUS groups were significantly lower than the control group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively).

At four weeks of treatment, the BV/TV of the ALN and ALN+LIPUS groups were significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.029 and p = 0.029, respectively). Additionally, the Oc.N/BS of the ALN+LIPUS group was significantly lower than the control group (p = 0.030).

Histological evaluation of the osteotomy site (Fig 2) :

At two weeks of treatment, ALN and combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS show some trabecular bone at the osteotomy site (arrows). At four weeks of treatment, ALN alone and the combined treatment reveal much trabecular bone (arrows) at the osteotomy site, and we have identified that a cancellous bone union is completed.

Bone union rate (Table 3) :

Two treatments with ALN and/or LIPUS did not affect the cancellous bone union. ALN treatment for four weeks significantly increased (p = 0.023, two factor factorial ANOVA) cancellous bone union. The cancellous bone union of the ALN+LIPUS group at four weeks was significantly higher than the control (p = 0.048) or LIPUS (p = 0.029) groups, according to the Scheffe multiple comparison test.

Biomechanical analysis of the right distal femur (Table 4):

ALN treatment for two weeks significantly increased ultimate load (p = 0.029) and breaking energy (p = 0.010). The ALN+LIPUS group showed a significant increase in ultimate load compared with the control group (p = 0.048), and in breaking energy compared with the control and LIPUS groups (p = 0.019 and p = 0.024, respectively) at two weeks. At four weeks, ALN and/ or LIPUS treatment did not affect the mechanical properties of the distal femur.

Discussion

This study investigated the effects of ALN and/or LIPUS on cancellous bone and its healing at proximal tibial osteotomy sites in OVX rats. ALN increased BMD and BV/TV while decreasing Oc. N/BS after two and four weeks of treatment. LIPUS also increase BV/TV, but not BMD, with a decrease in Oc.N/BS observed at two weeks of treatment. Combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS significantly increased BV/TV more than LIPUS treatment alone at two weeks. However, the cancellous bone union rate was not improved with the combined treatment at two weeks. At four weeks of treatment, neither ALN nor LIPUS treatment improved cancellous bone union; however, combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS increased cancellous bone union at the proximal tibial osteotomy site in OVX rats.

The present study demonstrated that ALN did not inhibit cancellous bone healing at the proximal tibial osteotomy site in an osteoporotic animal model. A recent animal study also showed that ALN increased the ultimate force required for screw insert into the tibial metaphysis in mice [31]. These animal studies demonstrated that ALN did not impair healing or remodelling of damaged cancellous bone. In clinical studies of BP effects on cancellous bone injuries, zoledronic acid did not cause a significant increase in the incidence of delayed healing or the non-union rate in low-trauma hip fractures compared with placebo [32]. BP usedid not significantly affect the clinical results during conservative treatment for osteoporotic spinal fractures [33]. However, the occurrence of an intravertebral cleft sign was associated with a history of BP use [33]. Although these results indicate that BPs do not impair cancellous bone healing or union in osteoporotic conditions in animals and clinical studies, further study will be needed to confirm the effects of ALN on cancellous bone healing at several different sites in osteoporotic conditions.

Several previous studies have reported the mechanisms of LIPUS in fracture healing. LIPUS exerts positive effects on signal transduction, gene expression, cell differentiation, and extracellular matrix synthesis and mineralization [34-37]. Furthermore, a rodent study has shown that LIPUS produces an anabolic effect during each sequential phase of the healing process: during the initial inflammatory stage, soft callus formation, hard-callus formation, and remodeling [13]. Additionally, recent work has shown that LIPUS may accelerate fracture healing by enhancing callus formation and maturation [38]. These mechanisms contributed to suppress bone resorption, increase bone volume, and improve cancellous bone union following ALN treatment in this study.

Our previous study using aged rats demonstrated that ALN did not impair, and LIPUS improved cancellous bone union at proximal tibial osteotomy sites at two and four weeks post-osteotomy [17]. However, combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS did not affect cancellous bone union in aged rats [17]. On the other hand, LIPUS did not improve cancellous bone healing at two and four weeks of treatment in OVX rats. Furthermore, only combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS for four weeks, but not for two weeks, improved cancellous bone healing in OVX rats. The results of the present and previous studies indicate that restoration of cancellous bone volume is required for healing of cancellous bone after osteotomy under osteoporotic conditionsproduced by OVX.

ALN monotherapy and combined treatment with ALN and LIPUS produced significant increases in bone strength in the distal femoral metaphysis. This result indicates that the ability of ALN to increase bone strength under osteoporotic conditions is not limited to regions of cancellous bone damage. In clinical situations, the prevention of consequent fractures arising from bone fragility is very important in elderly people. Based on the results of the present study, ALN treatment should be initiated as early as possible after osteoporotic vertebral or femoral fractures to prevent subsequent fractures.

It is known that ALN monotherapy can delay the healing of non-spinal fractures in humans [39]. Nozaka et al. reported that LIPUS with teriparatide therapy may become a useful option in the treatment of elderly patients with lower limb fractures [40]. However, no report has evaluated the clinical effects of ALN and LIPUS on cancellous bone healing in osteoporotic patients. The present study indicated that this combined therapy has potential for use in osteoporotic fractures. The primary limitation of this study is that osteotomy at the proximal tibia may not correspond to cancellous bone fractures encountered clinically, such as those involving the vertebra, hip, knee, or shoulder. We have utilized this osteotomy procedure to evaluate cancellous bone healing as a model of periarticular fractures.

Conclusion

ALN increased bone volume and did not prohibit cancellous bone repair at the osteotomy of proximal tibial metaphysis in OVX rats. LIPUS also stimulated cancellousbone recovery at the osteotomy site in OVX rats. ALN and LIPUS combination therapy is a good option for treating cancellous bone fractures under osteoporotic conditions.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Teijin Pharma, Tokyo, Japan, for kindly supplying the SAFHS® system, and Ms. Matsuzawa for her support in performing the experiments. Conflict of interest All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

 

Figure 1: LIPUS expoture, LIPUS radiation delivered to the osteotomyb site of the right proximal tibia was performed under anesthesia, and the transducer was attached with an elastic band.

 

 

Figure 2: Histological samples of the osteotomy site stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H-E) at two and four weeks. Histological section, at × 100 magnification, of control (A), ALN (B), LIPUS (C), and ALN+LIPUS (D) at two weeks of treatment. The osteotomy line was observed as a disruption of the growth plate (arrowhead). Rich, mature trabecular bone bonding (arrows) was observed in the ALN (F) and ALN+LIPUS (H) groups compared with the Control (E)or LIPUS (G) groups at four weeks of treatment

 

 BMD (mg/cm2)

Control

ALN

LIPUS

ALN+LIPUS

Two factor factorial ANOVA

ALN

LIPUS

Interaction

2 wks

0.225± 0.012

0.245±0.013

0.229 ± 0.013

0.250 ± 0.023

p = 0.068

p = 0.58

N.S.

4 wks

0.229 ± 0.022

0.260 ± 0.011*

0.241 ± 0.012*

0.275 ± 0.026

p < 0.001

p = 0.12

N.S.

All values are mean ± SD
Control, Saline + Sham LIPUS; ALN, Alendronate + Sham LIPUS; LIPUS, Saline + LIPUS; Combined, Alendronate + LIPUS
N.S., not significant; *, p < 0.05 vs. control group; †, p < 0.01 vs. control group; ‡, p < 0.05 vs. LIPUS group by one-way ANOVAwiththe Friedman post hoc test.

 

Table 1: Bone mineral density (BMD) at the osteotomy site of proximal tibia.

 

 

Control

ALN

LIPUS

ALN+LIPUS

 

Two factor factorial ANOVA

ALN

LIPUS

Interaction

2 wks

 

BV/TV (%)

16.05 ± 1.61

26.18 ± 9.00

21.10 ± 4.30

34.36 ± 4.68 a,b

p < 0.001

p = 0.012

N.S.

OS/BS (%)

49.03 ± 3.83

50.15 ± 1.64

52.24 ± 6.37

55.89 ± 5.00

p = 0.32

p = 0.066

N.S.

ES/BS (%)

28.83 ± 3.32

26.72 ± 3.43

31.49 ± 2.58

27.12 ± 3.86

p = 0.063

p = 0.38

N.S.

Oc.N/BS (N/mm)

4.1 ± 0.3

2.8 ± 0.9 c

3.8 ± 0.8 

2.6 ± 1.1d

p = 0.001

p = 0.37

 N.S.

4 wks

 

BV/TV (%)

17.93 ± 6.96

34.42 ± 10.75e

24.04 ± 4.53

34.50 ± 8.93 e

p = 0.002

p = 0.43

N.S.

OS/BS (%)

63.73 ± 3.18

60.90 ± 4.90

58.16 ± 8.54

63.80 ± 6.31

p = 0.53

p = 0.58

N.S.

ES/BS (%)

27.28 ± 3.93

22.82 ± 7.39

25.17 ± 6.12

21.92 ± 5.78

p = 0.052

p = 0.46

N.S.

Oc.N/BS (N/mm)

4.1 ± 1.6

2.9 ± 0.8

3.9 ± 1.1

2.7 ± 1.0 f

 

p = 0.002

p = 0.40

N.S.

All values are mean ± SD
Cancellous bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV); osteoid surface per bone surface (OS/BS); eroded surface per bone surface (ES/BS); osteoclast number per bone surface (Oc.N/BS)
a, p = 0.0014 vs. control group; b, p = 0.015 vs. LIPUS group; c, p = 0.002vs. control group; d, p = 0.001 vs. control group; e, p = 0.029 vs. control group; f, p = 0.030 vs. control group by one-way ANOVAwiththe Scheffe post hoc test.

 

Table 2: Bone histomorphometric indices at the osteotomy site of proximal tibia.

 

 

Control

ALN

LIPUS

ALN+LIPUS

 

Two factor factorial ANOVA

ALN

LIPUS

Interaction

Bone union rate (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 wks

28.99 ± 10.06

38.86 ± 12.29

30.81 ± 14.88

42.46 ± 22.53

p = 0.060

p = 0.68

N.S.

4 wks

23.95 ± 12.30

28.80 ± 11.71

22.10 ± 10.25

44.52 ± 10.20α,β

p = 0.023

p = 0.20

N.S.

All values are mean ± SD
α, p = 0.048 vs. control group; β, p = 0.029 vs. LIPUS group by one-way ANOVAwiththe Scheffe post hoc test

 

Table 3: Bone union rate at the osteotomy site of proximal tibia.

 

 

Control

ALN

LIPUS

ALN+LIPUS

 

Two factor factorial ANOVA

ALN

LIPUS

Interaction

2 wks

 

ultimate load (N)

143.6 ± 44.9

159.4 ± 34.0

165.9 ± 42.8

221.8 ± 30.5

p = 0.029

p = 0.057

N.S.

stiffness (N/mm),

174.4 ± 38.1

191.9 ± 77.2

149.2 ± 27.0

204.5 ± 50.2

p =0.15

p = 0.62

N.S.

breaking energy (Nm)

355.1 ± 105.9

410.4 ± 50.8

360.2 ± 43.1

496.5 ± 39.5§*

p = 0.010

p = 0.18

N.S.

4 wks

 

ultimate load (N)

201.0 ± 46.2

190.9 ± 14.1

185.6 ± 40.6

202.3 ± 36.6

p = 0.85

p = 0.88

N.S.

stiffness (N/mm),

235.4 ± 52.2

226.3 ± 24.2

240.6 ± 25.8

259.4 ± 26.7

p = 0.76

p = 0.17

N.S.

breaking energy (Nm)

429.5 ± 70.9

422.9 ± 65.8

417.1 ± 50.3

453.7 ± 26.1

p = 0.59

p = 0.71

N.S.

All values are mean ± SD
¶, p = 0.048 vs. control; §, p = 0.019 vs. control; and *, p = 0.024 vs. LIPUS by one-way ANOVAwiththe Scheffepost hoc test

 

Table 4: Mechanical properties of cancellous bone.

 

 

  1. Browner WS, Pressman AR, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1996) Mortality following fractures in older women. The study of osteoporoticfractures. Arch Intern Med 156:1521-1525.
  2. Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, AdachiJD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: aninternational phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293-305.
  3. Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, Davison KS, Beaulieu M, et al. (2008) The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture.OsteoporosInt 19:79-86.
  4. Goldhahn J, Little D, Mitchell P, Fazzalari NL, Reid IR, et al. (2010) Evidence for anti-osteoporosistherapy in acute fracture situations-recommendations of a multi-disciplinaryworkshop of the International Society for FractureRepair. Bone 46:267-271.
  5. Larsson S and Fazzalari NL (2014) Anti-osteoporosis therapy and fracture healing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:291-297.
  6. Cranney A, Wells G, Willan A, Griffith L, Zytaruk N, et al. (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women. Endocr Rev 23:508-516.
  7. Wells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, et al. (2008) Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 23.
  8. Fu LJ, Tang TT, Hao YQ, Dai KR (2013) Long-term effects of alendronate on fracture healing and bone remodeling of femoral shaft in ovariectomized rats. ActaPharmacol Sin 34:387-392.
  9. Madsen JE, Berg-Larsen T, Kirkeby OJ, Falch JA, Nordsletten L(1998) No adverse effects of clodronate on fracture healing inrats. ActaOrthopScand 69:532-536.
  10. Koivukangas A, Tuukkanen J, Kippo K, Jamsa T, Hannuniemi R, et al. (2003) Long-term administrationof clodronate does not prevent fracture healing in rats.ClinOrthopRelat Res 408:268-278.
  11. Li C, Mori S, Li J, Kaji Y, Akiyama T, et al. (2001) Long-term effect of incadronate disodium (YM-175) onfracture healing of femoral shaft in growing rats. J Bone MinerRes 16:429-436.
  12. Peter CP, Cook WO, Nunamaker DM, Provost MT, Seedor JG, et al. (1996) Effect of alendronate on fracture healing and bone remodeling in dogs. J Orthop Res 14:74-79.
  13. Azuma Y, Ito M, Harada Y, Takagi H, Ohta T, et al. (2001) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res 16:671-680.
  14. Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ,Kilcoyne RF (1994) Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:26-34.
  15. Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Roe LR (1997) Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:961-973.
  16. Watanabe Y, Matsushita T, Bhandari M, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH (2010) Ultrasound for fracture healing: current evidence. J Orthop Trauma 24:56-61.
  17. Aonuma H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Kamo K, Sasaki H, et al. (2014) Effects of combined therapy of alendronate and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on metaphyseal bone repair after osteotomy in the proximal tibia of aged rats. J Bone Miner Metab 32:232-239.
  18. Tamura Y, Miyakoshi N, Itoi E, Abe T, Kudo T, et al. (2001) Long-term effects of withdrawal of bisphosphonate incadronate disodium (YM175) on bone mineral density, mass, structure, and turnover in the lumbar vertebrae of ovariectomizedrats. J Bone Miner Res 16:541-549.
  19. Suzuki K, Miyakoshi N, Tsuchida T, Kasukawa Y, Sato K, et al. (2003) Effects of combined treatment of insulin and human parathyroid hormone (1-34) on cancellous bone mass and structure in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Bone 33:108-114.
  20. Abe T, Sato K, Miyakoshi N, Kudo T, Tamura Y, et al. (1999) Trabecular remodeling processes in the ovariectomized rat: modified node-strut analysis. Bone 24:591-596.
  21. Nozaka K, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Maekawa S, Noguchi H, et al. (2008) Intermittent administration of human parathyroid hormone enhances bone formation and union at the site of cancellous bone osteotomy in normal and ovariectomized rats. Bone 42:90-97.
  22. Gebauer GP, Lin SS, Beam HA, Vieira P, Parsons JR (2002) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases the fracture callus strength in diabetic BB Wistar rats but does not affect cellular proliferation. J Orthop Res 20:587-592.
  23. Aonuma H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Kamo K, Sasaki H, et al. (2011) Combined treatment of alendronate and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) increases bone mineral density at the cancellous bone osteotomy site in aged rats: a preliminary study. J Nepal Med Assoc 51:171-175.
  24. Cao Y, Mori S, Mashiba T, Westmore MS, Ma L, et al. (2002) Raloxifene, estrogen, and alendronate affect the processes of fracture repair differently in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 17:2237-2246.
  25. Huang RC, Khan SN, Sandhu HS, Metzl JA, Cammisa FP, et al.  (2005) Alendronate inhibits spine fusion in a rat model. Spine 30:2516-2522.
  26. Tsuchie H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Aonuma H, Shimada Y (2013)Intermittent administration of human parathyroid hormone before osteosynthesis stimulates cancellous bone union in ovariectomized rats.Tohoku J Exp Med229:19-28.
  27. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, et al. (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature,symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2: 595-610.
  28. Saito M, Shiraishi A, Ito M, Sakai S, Hayakawa N, et al. (2010) Comparison of effects of alfacalcidol and alendronate onmechanical properties and bone collagen cross-links of callus inthe fracture repair rat model. Bone46:1170-1179.
  29. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Itoi E, Tsuchida T, Tamura Y, et al. (2004) Effects of h-PTH on cancellous bone mass, connectivity, and bone strength in ovariectomized rats with and without sciatic-neurectomy.J Orthop Res 22: 457-464.
  30. Murata K and Yano E (2002) Medical statistics for evidence-based medicine with SPBS user’s guide. Nankodo, Tokyo.
  31. Sandberg O, Bernhardsson M, Aspenberg P (2016) Earlier effect of alendronate in mouse metaphyseal versus diaphyseal bone healing. J Orthop Res.
  32. Colon-Emeric C, Nordsletten L, Olson S, Major N, Boonen S, et al. (2011) Associationbetween timing of zoledronic acid infusion and hip fracturehealing. OsteoporosInt22:2329-2336.
  33. Ha KY, Park KS, Kim SI, Kim YH (2016) Does bisphosphonate-basedanti-osteoporosis medication affect osteoporotic spinal fracture healing? Osteoporos Int 27:483-488.
  34. Hasegawa T, Miwa M, Sakai Y, Niikura T, Kurosaka M, et al. (2009) Osteogenic activity of human fracture haematoma-derived progenitor cells is stimulated by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:264-270.
  35. Naruse K, Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Urabe K, Uchida K, Itoman M (2009) Therapeutic ultrasound induces periosteal ossification without apparent changes in cartilage. Connect Tissue Res 50:55-63.
  36. Olkku A, Leskinen JJ, Lammi MJ, Hynynen K, Mahonen A (2010) Ultrasound-induced activation of Wnt signaling in human MG-63 osteoblastic cells. Bone 47:320-330.
  37. Fávaro-Pípi E, Bossini P, de Oliveira P, Ribeiro JU, Tim C, et al. (2010) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound produced an increase of osteogenic genes expression during the process of bone healing in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:2057-2064.
  38. Cheung WH, Chow SK, Sun MH, Qin L, Leung KS (2011) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerated callus formation, angiogenesis and callus remodeling in osteoporotic fracture healing. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:231-238.
  39. Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, et al. (2005) Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J ClinEndocrinolMetab 90:1294-1301.
  40. Nozaka K, Shimada Y, Miyakoshi N, Yamada S, Hongo M, et al. (2016) Can combined therapy with teriparatide and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) accelerate fracture healing?J Orthop Trauma 3:S2.

Citation: Sato C, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Tsuchie H, Kinoshita H, et al. (2016) Effects of Alendronate and Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Therapies at Osteoporotic Cancellous Osteotomy Sites in Proximal Tibia of Ovariectomized Rats. J Orthop Res Ther 2016: 118. DOI: 10.29011/2575-8241.000118

free instagram followers instagram takipçi hilesi