Journal of Addiction and Therapies (ISSN: 2577-1507)

Article / Review article

"Treatment of Co-Morbid Alcohol Use Disorder and PTSD in Veterans"

Richard E Wilcox*, K Loggins, C.A Gutierrez

*The University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, USA

*Corresponding author: Richard E Wilcox, The University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, 2409 University Avenue STOP A1900, Austin, TX 78712-1113, PHR 5.224B, USA,  E-mail:

 Received Date: 01 January, 2017; Accepted Date: 05 January, 2017; Published Date: 12 January, 2017

Combat instigated PTSD is one of the more complicated psychological conditions that occurs in the modern world. To add to the complications of treatment, PTSD is often accompanied by other injuries (such as traumatic brain injury) and psychological comorbidities including anxiety and substance use disorders of which the most frequent is alcoholism. While PTSD is normally associated with veterans (combat or non-combat), many of the studies and treatments designs are based on civilian or non-combat instigated PTSD. The lack of information on PTSD in veterans may weaken society’s ability to treat one of the most affected populations and to honor the covenant made with members of the military by that society. Currently treatment for PTSD is still associated with a high incidence of non response and relapse. The purpose of the present paper is three-fold: to evaluate current guidelines for treating PTSD with an emphasis on data from combat veterans; to evaluate treatment of alcohol use disorder in veterans; and finally, to evaluate treatment of co-morbid PTSD with alcohol use disorder in the veteran population.

Objectives: To evaluate current treatment of military or veteran personnel with PTSD and comorbid alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Methods: We compared guideline-based treatment of PTSD with pharmacotherapy effectiveness studies in veteran populations. We evaluated treatment of PTSD with comorbid AUD from veteran populations. Finally, we evaluated available pharmacotherapy against current guidelines and theories of non-medication based treatment for veterans with PTSD. To accomplish this we conducted Pub Med searches focusing primarily on literature from 2000 onwards in clinical populations and available in English as free full text. This was supplemented by other papers using earlier clinical samples as well as preclinical studies when warranted.

Conclusions: While comorbid PTSD and AUD has proven to be a frequent occurrence in veterans, few of the current guidelines were designed from data generated in this at-risk population. Results from the literature suggest that pharmacotherapeutic treatments including modulation of cortisol might be beneficial in PTSD patients. By evaluating studies that occurred in veteran populations and taking into account new information in the changes in brain functions in PTSD and AUD, we suggest that more evidence-based decisions can be made for treatments. Thus, the data have suggested that use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) may warrant a reevaluation in the veteran population. The improved understanding of the brain processing changes that result from PTSD, AUD and their combination can allow clinicians tailor pharmacotherapy prevent it masking the beneficial effects of trauma-focused psychotherapy and the natural extinction of fear responses that occur post-military service. Similarly, a greater understanding of changes in neurotransmitter activity in veterans with PTSD, AUD or both may yield more precise use of medications that target specific aspects of brain chemistry in a hypothesis driven manner. Furthermore, continuing to evaluate the new practice of allowing treatment of both PTSD and AUD with trauma-focused psychotherapy immediately upon diagnosis should increase patient compliance and length of abstinence. By taking advantage of the new developments in our understanding of both the functions of the brain as well as the population specific data for treatment, we can continue to take the necessary steps to allow this population to lead a normal life after their service to our country.

Keywords: Addiction; Alcohol use disorder; Comorbidity; Military veterans; Pharmacotherapy; Psychopathology; PTSD

Up to 25% of combat veterans develop Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD) [1]. Alcohol Use Disorder(AUD) is the most common comorbid disorder in men with PTSD [2]. Thus, there is a compelling need to look closely at the treatment of this group of patients. Although comorbid PTSD and AUD has proven to be a frequently occurring condition in veterans, few of the current guidelines are designed from data generated in this at-risk population. This is, in part due to the fact that the population also presents with additional complications such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and additional psychiatric co-morbidities (including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders). This has resulted in most studies of PTSD being conducted on non-veteran populations.

PTSD and AUD are known to have a compounding effect for an unfavorable treatment outcome in veterans [3-5]. In addition, these co-morbidities add a layer of complexity to the patient’s treatment due to their combined effects on the brain chemistry of fear and memory [6]. In addition, as indicated above, the treatment guidelines for PTSD are not based on data from a veteran population. This is a potentially important gap, since veterans may, for a variety of reasons, manifest different variants of PTSD than non-veterans, leading to different patterns of treatment effectiveness than for civilians [7].

Approach to the Literature

The focus for this review was on investigations published from 2000 onwards using articles published in English and available as free full text. Searches in Pub Med were conducted for research on PTSD treatment in veteran populations. This was followed by searches of treatment for PTSD plus AUD in veteran populations. Results seen in veterans were compared to those in non-veterans populations and used to assess current PTSD treatment guidelines. Additional searches included preclinical and clinical studies on extinction of fear responding and pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of treating PTSD or its animal models.

Disease Prevalence and Need for Treatment

AUD prevalence in veterans

AUDs have been well documented in both general military populations and in veterans with diagnosed PTSD. In military veterans, measured AUD prevalence is 15% for the previous year and 42% over the patient’s life-time [8,9]. Data from 2009 show that of the 5.5 million veterans who received health services from the Veterans Administration (VA), 7.8% received a diagnosis of either an alcohol or drug disorder. In contrast, among veterans with a diagnosis of PTSD 22.8% had a diagnosis of comorbid substance abuse, nearly 3 times the rate in the general VA patient population [10]. This pattern highlights the need to understand AUD in order to treat a veteran sub-population effectively. AUD is associated with drug use disorders and, significantly, with suicide as well as a substantially elevated burden of psychiatric comorbidities, including PTSD, general anxiety disorder and depression [10].

As with PTSD, the odds of developing AUD increase after deployment [11]. Also like PTSD, development of AUD strongly associates with the cumulative burden of trauma over the course of a lifetime. However, PTSD seems to occur in veterans whether or not they were in combat [12]. This is accounted for, in part, by comorbid trauma-related psychopathology in which previous traumatic brain injury and stressful situations may reduce a person’s ability to cope with negative experiences [13,14]. As a legal psychotropic agent, alcohol is often used as a coping method for stressful situations and negative experiences [15-17], increasing the odds of developing AUD during or after combat exposure or military service [10].

PTSD prevalence in veterans

The number of combat veterans with PTSD can differ across reports, based on different definitions of the diagnosis, population sampling, and geography. Combat exposure, in particular, is a large factor that effects the development of PTSD. Between 10 and 13% of Gulf War [18] and Iraq or Afghanistan veteran [19] with combat exposure currently have PTSD. After deployment and combat exposure in Iraq and Afghanistan, surveys of the National Guard showed rates of PTSD at 25% [20], and similar surveys of the army and marines showed PTSD rates between 11-20% [21].

In 2016, Tsai [22] re-examined the prevalence of PTSD in veterans using various instruments. The authors showed that different scoring criteria resulted in from 62% to 84% of veterans scoring positive for PTSD via rating instrument versus via 40% by direct diagnosis. The authors suggested that the rating instruments might be valuable as a pre-screening tool, but that their results should be followed up by expert evaluation.

The effects of PTSD have often been considered to be short-term, but the detrimental effects of the condition can extend over the course of a patient’s lifetime, ultimately leading to depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders 21. Eleven percent of Vietnam veterans still reported impaired function due to PTSD symptoms, 40 years after returning from war [23]. These results are consonant with those of civilian PTSD studies where, in spite of treatment with pharmacological and psychological therapies, 74% of patients have symptoms lasting over 6 months, and up to 30% of patients continued to have active PTSD symptoms after 10 years of treatment [24].

Veterans with both PTSD and AUD

Analysis of veterans who have sought treatment for PTSD through VA programs, supports the finding of an increased risk of Substance Use Disorders (SUD) co-existing with PTSD. Follow-up on data collected during 2004-2006 on veterans with war zone exposure from Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (analyzed as one set of events), the first Persian Gulf War and Vietnam show diagnosis of alcohol abuse and dependence of 20%, 25%, and 29% in outpatients and 39%, 44% and 41% in inpatients. Diagnoses of Drug abuse/dependence of 6%, 13%, 13% in outpatients 20%, 34% and 25% in inpatients and were reported. While the most recently exposed veterans have lower rates of drug abuse, the comorbidity between PTSD and substance use disorders remains a hazard for our veterans. These results also demonstrate that there was a consistent rate of diagnosis of PTSD and diagnosis of alcohol or drug abuse / dependence across the wars, but that the percentages of these symptoms did not change with the passage of time [25]. This confirms earlier findings that over half of the veterans from Vietnam with PTSD continued to show abuse of alcohol in 1996, 21 years after the war was officially over [26]. As recent reviews have noted [6,7], each of these disorders has distinct effects on brain activity, requiring that both disorders be treated concomitantly [6]. AUD is the most common comorbid disorder with PTSD2, with the severity of the PTSD increasing the odds of developing AUD [27].

The prevalence of AUD rises dramatically in the veteran population with PTSD. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) data from 2009 show that of the 5.5 million veterans who received health services from the VA 8% had a diagnosis of a substance use disorder, but in the veterans with PTSD the number rose to 23%.8 The comorbidity has been measured to be as high as one-third of individuals with life-time PTSD developing symptoms of alcohol disorders [28,29]. Unfortunately, heavy use of alcohol is also associated with more severe PTSD symptoms as well as an extended duration of the condition [4,5].

The patterns noted above also hold for civilian populations. Driessen and colleagues [3] examined the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a general population of individuals who sought treatment for Substance Use Disorder (SUD) in 14 German addiction treatment centers. The authors also examined the association between comorbid PTSD and the characteristics of the addiction. In this population of people seeking treatment for an addiction, 31% had PTSD and 41% of the people dependent on both alcohol and other drugs had PTSD. The authors concluded that PTSD is an independent risk factor for an unfavorable outcome in patients with SUD. The extent to which these results generalize to a population of veterans is unclear and determining if this is the case is one purpose of the present review. If it is the case that the results of Driessen and colleagues [3] do generalize, then it is imperative to look at possible commonalities in the effects of PTSD and AUD on brain function and how treatment of both disorders can best use this understanding. Fewer than 20% of veterans utilize VA healthcare services as their primary source of health-care [30]. In addition, in patients with PTSD and comorbid substance abuse, the treatment of PTSD improves symptoms of substance abuse. But unfortunately, treatment directed toward substance abuse does not appear to ameliorate PTSD symptoms [31].


PTSD Overview

It has been suggested that symptoms of PTSD are directly related to a deficit in the extinction of traumatic memories and increased generalization of that fearful state [32]. The development of PTSD is normally attributed to alterations of the stress response systems of which the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis is a part [33,5]. In veterans with PTSD, changes in tissue volume are seen in areas of the brain that are related to memory and emotional integration such as the hippocampus [26,34] and amygdale [35]. There are also changes in the negative feedback processes that regulate the amygdala, such as reduction in activity from the Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC), that regulate executive functions-decision making) [36,37].

PTSD is induced when fear memories combine with current perceived stress / danger in both veterans and civilian populations. Stress exposure can enhance the effect of learned fear memories. This allows the instigating situation to be less intense than the original, but still results in a strong, quickly formed fear response [38-40] Because of this, a history of stress exposure well before the PTSD-inducing experiences can predispose people to anxiety disorders, phobias, and PTSD [41,42].
Emotionally powerful memories are more likely to be retained by a person since these systems have evolved to help maintain organism and species survival. This is due to effects of stress hormones on memory consolidation [43]. Stress hormones from the sympathetic nervous system (i.e., epinephrine and norepinephrine) and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis (i.e., glucocorticoids) [44-47].

Normally, fear memories are consolidated and stored after a traumatic or highly stressful experience. One of the current theories is that patients with PTSD have “over-consolidated” that memory and highly resistant to normal extinction processes [40,48,32].

That is, the memory has been encoded vigorously enough to be easily recalled in situations that bear only a small resemblance to the original event.

Preclinical Studies

A large amount of our understanding of PTSD has occurred via studies conducted on rodents. These designs have been based on the Pavlovian fear conditioning procedure in which animals exposed to an unconditioned stimulus (US, usually a mild foot shock)paired with a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS, such as a light or a sound) will develop a fear response to the CS. Because the neurological effect of rodent fear conditioning is well studied and reproducible, it is a popular model for a variety of conditions such as anxiety and fear related disorders [49,50], as well as the effects of particular drugs on learning mechanisms and stress responses [6].
In pre-clinical fear conditioning models, the fear conditioning itself does not generate PTSD. However, animals that given additional uncontrollable stress exposure, such as water deprivation or immobilization, expressed the heightened fear response and increased anxiety that is observed in humans with PTSD [38,51]. This generation of a PTSD-like state is normally attributed to either strengthened encoding [52] or consolidation of the fear memory [53]. Several variations of fear conditioning that contained inescapable, random, shock delivery, also generated the symptoms of PTSD [54,55]. Prior exposure to multiple shocks enhances speed of acquisition of subsequent fear conditioning that resists later extinction therapy [40].

Neurological Changes in PTSD

Among the best documented brain changes in veterans with PTSD are reduced volume in the amygdale [35] and the hippocampus [26]. As noted above, there is an abnormal reduction in the activity of the MPFC that is directly related to the heightened amygdala activity exhibited by both veterans and civilians with PTSD [36,37]. Changes in the neuroendocrinology of patients with PTSD are also well documented. Levels of each of the stress hormones appear effected long-term for veterans and civilians. For example, despite increased levels of hypothalamic Corticotrophin-Releasing Hormone (CRH) in the cerebrospinal fluid [56,26], pituitary adrenocorticotrophic hormone secretion and serum cortisol levels are reduced (when they would be expected to rise) [5]. In addition, civilian studies have shown that lower hair cortisol levels were associated with a greater length of time since trauma exposure and with higher PTSD intrusion symptoms [57,58].

The sympathetic nervous system shows similar persistent activation in these populations [59]. Norepinephrine concentrations are increased in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum [60,61]. Also, chronic PTSD patients exhibit greater 24-hour urinary epinephrine/norepinephrine excretion and higher nor epinephrine reactivity to psychological stress than controls than general population [62-65] The veteran population has confirmed evidence of abnormal noradrenergic function in PTSD [64,66-69] and is expected to show similar laboratory values.

Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (vmPFC).

The amygdala processes reinforcement in aversive situations and stress-induced enhancement of fear [51]. The amygdala also plays a key role in the display of anxiety in responsiveness to stress [70], and in the stress-related enhancement of long-term fear memory.51 This brain region receives sensory input from multiple brain regions and sends projections to several limbic system (Papez circuit) areas that mediate fear responses, such as the hippocampus [71,72].

In ongoing PTSD, the amygdala is responsible for the generation of anxiety, and increased fear responsiveness; the hypothalamus provides the autonomic responses; and the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (vmPFC) proves the negative feedback that should regulate the activity of the amygdale [1,73]. The vmPFC is generally underactive in PTSD, resulting in the continual over-expression of the fear response [51]. This response may be due either to the amygdala’s overactivity or the underactivity of the vmPFC [1].

During fear training in stressed mice, serotonin activity in the dorsal raphe and the amygdala will produce stress enhancement of fear memory. This is consonant with the role of acute increases in 5HT in inducing anxiety. Also, previous stress exposure increases amygdala sensitivity to serotonin by increasing the density of 5-HT2C receptors, allowing greater stress enhancement of fear memory without higher concentrations of serotonin [51]. It has been well documented, that impairment of the amygdala, as the primary neural region for fear conditioning, through lesion, pharmacological and neurophysiological studies will prevent the formation of fear memory [74-76,77].

Confirmed by data of the structural changes in stressed animals [78], neuroimaging studies have shown reduced amygdala volume in veterans with PTSD [35]. This is contrary to the increased neural activity of the amygdala in PTSD. It is speculated that the amygdala is undergoing remodeling in the dendritic morphology and the spine density of neurons in the basolateral amygdala that may contribute to the inhibitions of the extinction mechanism that are seen in PTSD [79].

Cortical regions, particularly the various sections of the MPFC, act as modulators of the fear responses of the amygdale [73] and contribute to the response inhibition that occurs during extinction [80,81]. Abnormal reductions are shown in the medial prefrontal cortex activity of both veteran and general population patients with PTSD [36,37]. The mPFC normally inhibits the amygdala. With mPFC activity reduced impairments in the extinction of fear should occur, resulting in prolonged conditioned responding over time [82]. The symptoms of PTSD may be a result of the hyper-responding of the amygdala to fear stimuli, without the extinction mechanisms of the cortical regions that results in the mis-calibrated circuit between the medial PFC, the amygdala, and the HPA axis [83]. It is hypothesized that the suppression of the medial prefrontal cortex, resulting in increased generalization and a reduced extinction ability are the foundation of the behaviors associated with PTSD. This suggests that the enhanced acquisition and consolidation of fear memories due to the heightened activity of the amygdala are secondary effects in the development of PTSD [32]. As stated before, because of the connections between the mPFC and the amygdala, the hyper-aroused state may be from either the suppression of the medial prefrontal cortex, or the over activity of the amygdale [1].

The connections between the medial PFC and the amygdala have mostly been described in primates but have recently also been observed in humans. The connectivity has been observed using newer techniques such as the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) combination with diffusion tensor imaging [84]. In healthy patients, increasing levels of anxiety corresponded to increased activity of the pathways between the Ventromedial Medial PFC (vmPFC) to the amygdala, resulting in the conclusion that persons with higher levels of anxiety would have well developed white matter tracts between amygdala and PFC [85].


Both veteran and general population patients with PTSD show decreased hippocampal volumes [26,34]. The reduced hippocampal volume in PTSD can impair the normal HPA response as well as memory processes [86]. The hippocampal reduction is thought to be due to neurotoxicity via increased levels of cortisol during the time of the initial trauma or increased sensitivity5 of the hippocampus’s high concentration of glucocorticoid receptors [87]. Resolution of PTSD symptoms and treatment with paroxetine are associated with an increase in hippocampal volume [88]. The hippocampus is an important region for memory formation, modulation and learning, including fear conditioning [89]. It is also important for the termination of the stress response [87]. While the amygdala is more responsible for emotional memories, the hippocampus is more important for contextual learning and trace fear conditioning [71,90,91]. If the amygdala is damaged or suppressed a patient will remember the Unconditioned Stimulus (US) (e.g. mild shock, or unpleasant sound) paired with a neutral conditioned stimulus but not remember the fear [92]. However, if the hippocampus is damaged or suppressed, a patient will recall the fear but not what happened, the unconditioned stimulus [93]. The hippocampus is also involved as a suppressive factor to the stress response of the HPA [89]. Lesions of the hippocampus increase corticotrophin-releasing hormone in the brain [87]. This increase in corticotrophin-releasing hormone is seen in veteran PTSD populations [56,26] and is a mechanism that is known to increase the effect of the amygdala on memory consolidation, adding an additional pathway of the hippocampal dysfunction to the symptoms of PTSD [1,94].

Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis (HPA)

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is activated by stress, involving activation from the amygdala, resulting in an increase of the release of cortisol (corticesterone in rodents) and other glucocorticoids from the adrenal [5]. The increase in cortisol garners the fight or flight response, and eventually inhibits the HPA axis in the self-regulating termination of the stress response [95]. However chronic or extreme stress can cause HPA axis dysregulation. This type of dysregulation is seen in PTSD with low cortisol levels and an enhanced cortisol suppression response in dexamethasone challenge testing [95]. In addition to glucocorticoids, the HPA releases epinephrine/norepinephrine but with a faster peak onset [96].

As mentioned above, HPA axis stress activation results in the release of glucocorticoids. These, in addition to a variety of responses in the body to adapt to confrontation and challenge [96], also act as negative feedback to the acute stress response of the sympathetic nervous system [97] and have an effect on stress related memory. Glucocorticoid effects on memory appear to be time dependent. During stress exposure glucocorticoids act in the basolateral amygdala. They appear to allow epinephrine and nor epinephrine to enhance memory of the stress inducing situation [98] After an hour or more, the function of the glucocorticoids changes to suppress new information while shutting down the acute stress responses [99].

The information encountered during the stressor is given priority in two ways. First, the information encountered during the event is promoted for consolidation and later retrieval. Second, by reducing competing information from the stressor, the formation of memories is enhanced [59]. If the levels of cortisol are already altered before the stressor, the result may be “over-consolidation” and impaired memory retrieval [59]. This explains the studies identifying low cortisol in the face of trauma as a predisposing factor for the development of PTSD [100]. The primary hypothesis is that the reduced cortisol signaling would impede the cortisol levels necessary to extinguish the HPA generated stress response that would result in the mounting fear response characteristic of PTSD. This appears plausible based on corticosterone treatment after stress being able to rescue PTSD like behavioral effects in animal models [101].

Patients with PTSD have increased levels of corticotrophin-releasing hormone in the cerebrospinal fluid. This is often released from the hypothalamus during the stress response [102]. However, unlike the normal stress, processing in the presence of corticotrophin-releasing hormone, patients with PTSD retain reduced levels of serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone from the pituitary [5]. The reduction of cortisol levels in patients has been correlated with a greater length of time since the trauma, and higher PTSD intrusion symptoms [58]. In addition as mentioned above, the response suppression to both corticotrophin-releasing hormone and cortisol are strongly enhanced in patients with PTSD during a dexamethasone suppression test. Patients also exhibit an elevated sensitivity to glucocorticoids in lymphocytes [53]. The elevated levels of corticotrophin-releasing hormone may bias the sensitivity to the negative feedback of cortisol at the pituitary [5]. Also due to the effect of corticotrophin-releasing hormone on the basolateral complex of the amygdala, the elevated levels of corticotrophin-releasing hormone enhance the influence of the amygdala on memory consolidation, which may be one pathway to the development of disease [94].

Sympathetic Nervous System

In response to stress, the sympathetic nervous system rapidly releases epinephrine and norepinephrine. Through second messengers in the basolateral amygdala, the Noradrenergic/Norepinephrine (NE) system is a largely implicated in memory consolidation during stress [103]. Epinephrine and norepinephrine are influential in the consolidation and retention of memories during emotional events [59]. Noradrenergic signaling is also critical for the later reconsolidation of fear learning [104]. Abnormal noradrenergic function in PTSD has been found in both general and veteran patients [5]. As mentioned earlier, veteran and general population PTSD patients show heightened levels of norepinephrine in the cerebrospinal fluid and in serum than civilian controls [60,105]. This is similar to what has been observed for civilians with greater 24-hour urinary excretion of epinephrine/norepinephrine metabolites [5].

In PTSD, abnormal noradrenergic function is theorized to contribute to the deficits in fear acquisition and extinction, and to symptoms of hyper-arousal [106]. Patients with PTSD also exhibit an enhanced norepinephrine response to stress relative to controls [65]. This has led to the theory that the sympathetic nervous system is consistently overactive in patients with PTSD [59]. which correlates well with the extended low cortisol levels in PTSD patients. Like corticotrophin-releasing hormone, norepinephrine triggers consolidation of fear memory [107]. Noradrenergic blockade by propranolol injection into the lateral nucleus of the amygdala in rats, blocks reconsolidation of fear memory [104,108]. This manipulation was also shown to work with systemic dosing in humans by blocking reconsolidation of cue and context fear conditioning if given within a matter of hours after the trauma [104,108].There are several drug treatment methods that rely on immediate treatment after trauma to block the development of PTSD. Treatment strategies include administering β-adrenergic receptor antagonists following retrieval of fear memories to block the reconsolidation of the fear memory or as secondary prevention with administration directly after the traumatic event. While β-antagonists appear to have potential, α2-agonists such as clonidine, also show promise. In contrast, the β-agonist Isoproterenol and the α2-antagonist yohimbine show the reverse effect, enhancing reconsolidation of the fear memory and blocking extinction [104,108,109-111].

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) AUD

AUD Overview

AUD has been characterized as a chronic relapsing brain disorder as with many other SUDs [112]. A pattern of both positive and negative affective states is associated with substance use – early stages and the rising of the brain levels of the drug tend to be associated in at-risk persons with pleasure. In contrast, in later stages of the disorder and falling brain drug levels tend to be associated with negative effect. Elsewhere, we have discussed these ideas in greater detail as reflecting want and need for the drug [113,114]. These changes are thought to be due to adaptations in the brain that constitute the addictive process [115-117].

Animal Model

Exposure to alcohol-associated environments or triggers can cause relapse in abstinent alcoholics [118,119]. This mechanism is often modeled in rats strains bred for high alcohol intake using a training period of alcohol self-administration, followed by extinction training. Various models [120] have been used to test reinstatement and extinction patterns and to study the addiction process [121,122].

Neurological Changes in AUD

Effect of Acute Alcohol Abuse and the Self Treatment of PTSD Symptoms.

One of the factors that may lead to comorbid AUD for patients with PTSD is the attempt to self-medicate PTSD symptoms with alcohol. The acute effect of alcohol on the anterior cingulate cortex may, in part, be responsible for the perpetuation of the alcohol use in these patients. Images or triggers of alcohol activate several regions of the “emotional” brain including the anterior cingulate cortex and the mPFC [123,124]. The taste of alcohol in heavy drinkers also activates the mPFC [125]. PTSD patients have a hypo-activity in the anterior cingulate cortex [126] and in the mPFC [36,37], with a correspondingly hyperactive amygdala. This change in pattern of brain activity appears to leave leaving PTSD patients with a higher susceptibility for continued AUD.

Effect of Chronic Alcohol Abuse

After alcohol use becomes chronic, individuals exhibit cortical shrinkage [127] and white matter changes [128,129] that are most pronounced in the PFC and orbitofrontal regions of the brain. The abnormal prefrontal activity suppresses executive function and has been associated with the decreased ability to monitor and resolve conflict [130]. Chronic AUD also leads to a reduced activity of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex that has been linked inappropriate evaluation of negative emotions displayed by other people [131]. Animal and human neuroimaging studies have also shown changes in several neural circuits within the limbic system due to AUD that provide glutamine and dopamine input to other emotion-associated brain structures [125]. These include the ventral striatum - involved in cue-induced drug seeking [132], striatal-palladic-thalamic loop–associated with automaticity of behavior [133], and prefrontal cortices that are directly involved in attentional selection / executive control [134].

The connection between the posterior cingulate cortex, cuneus, and mPFC is referred to as the default mode network [135]. During rest, this network is highly connected, but is decoupled during task performance, which is thought to increase processing efficiency [136]. The connectivity of this network is reduced in alcoholics, but appears to undergo a functional restoration after prolonged periods of alcohol abstinence [137]. The white matter connecting subcortical and cortical portions of the limbic system is alsoaltered in AUD [138,139]. Together, the changes lead to a reduced ability to override learned behavior such as inhibiting strongly incorporated habits and reactive behaviors such as drinking. It appears that the neural changes prevent the patient from overcoming old habits, because of the inability to deactivate the posterior cingulate cortex. These individuals also show a reduced ability to learn some new behaviors [140].

In normal individuals, the posterior cingulate cortex and midbrain are inactive during repetitive or automatic tasks, and active during tasks that required flexibility or modification of previous routines. In alcoholics, the brain activity patterns are reversed [140]. Because the midbrain regions are involved in rewards [133,141], sensorimotor integration [142], and motor based learning [143], the reduced down regulation of midbrain activity during repetitive tasks is consistent with the reduced ability to learn new repetitive behaviors [125].

AUD also alters executive control and repetition learning through decreased input from the posterior and middle cingulate cortices. The middle cingulate cortex is associated with response selection and decision-making [144]. The middle cingulate is more active during difficult tasks in chronic alcoholics. This is thought to be because of the deterioration in the activation of the posterior portion of the system [125]. There is also anincreased connectivity between the striatal regions and the middle cingulate cortex.

Increased activity of the mid plus dorsal anterior cingulate cortices at rest is considered a risk factor for the development of PTSD [126]. Furthermore, smaller brain volumes in the meso-cortical limbic system have been linked to relapse in patients with AUDs. As already noted, the limbic system is involved in impulse control, emotional regulation, and craving as a part of providing the links between the current situation and memory and the energy / motivation to carry out behaviors than enhance organismic and species survival [145]. Unfortunately the reduced activity of the mPFC in PTSD may enhance alcoholic relapse. AUD suppresses the cognitive control mechanisms typically invoked to process high conflict and error learning paradigms [146]. This would be expected to complicate the already altered decision making processes and baseline anxiety levels of a patient with PTSD.

Effect on reward pathways

There is consensus that dopaminergic transmission in the midbrain and ventral striatum occurs in response to the drug trigger in a person with AUD1 [13,114]. This follows from the concept of “incentive salience” or the role of dopamine in determining which stimuli in the environment are significant to the organism [113,114,147]. Drug exposure elicits a “want” response in the individual [140, 148-150]. The dopaminergic connection between the ventral tegmental area and the limbic system, including the nucleus accumbens, and the frontal and prefrontal cortices, is known as the “pleasure pathway” of the brain [113,151]. In AUD, images of alcoholic drinks activate brain regions of the brain associated with “want” (including the anterior cingulate cortex, mPFC, insula and ventral striatum) [123,124,152,153]. Overall, data suggest an important role for limbic system dopamine and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex as well as dopamine receptor concentrations and reactivity in the reward and trigger- processing of drug addiction [140].


Review of Ethanol Use Disorder Treatments 

The treatment of AUDs, after the acute intoxication is past, is focused on reducing the cravings for the drug. Current theories indicate that returning the activity of limbic system pathways towards normal will reduce drug cravings [113,114]. Three targets that have shown response in reducing alcohol cravings are opiate receptors and voltage gated sodium and calcium channels. By blocking opioid receptors, further development of the addictive process may be halted andthe patient’s neural firing in the Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) pathways can begin to be normalized [114]. Patient adherence to opioid antagonist therapy (naltrexone or nalmefene) can be an issue since opioid antagonists block endogenous opioids and can induce a hyper-algesic conditions in which normal sensory stimuli can become uncomfortable [154]. Naltrexone (a competitive antagonist at mu and kappa opioid receptors) was one of several agents shown to reduce alcohol cravings and normalize some of biological markers in the treatment of AUDs [114]. There also has been evidence of reduced ethanol cravings from medications that block voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, including lamotragine, gabapentin and topiramate [155,114]. The major drugs with addictive potential also act on the extended amygdala and the HPAaxis, leading to changes in limbic system corticotrophin-releasing factor [44]. Patients with PTSD already have elevations in corticotrophin- releasing factor [56,156] and increased amygdala activity. Thus, such medications might have multiple benefits for patients with PTSD. It is possible that more links between the treatment of PTSD and substance use disorders will be found as the understanding of the brain stress systems develops.

Non pharmacological Treatment of PTSD

Non-drug treatment overview

Currently, the first-line treatment for PTSD is behavioral therapy in one of several forms. Pharmacological treatment is seen as second-line. The US Department of Defense and VA practice protocols [157], as well as all other major clinical guidelines [158,159] including those of Austria [157] and Australia [160] cite psychotherapy as the predominant treatment approach for PTSD. In particular, Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), and prolonged exposure therapy are the most used forms of therapy for these patients [157,158,160,161]. As of 2015, 98% of VA centers in the US offered both cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure treatments [162-164]. EMDR is not as easily available, but as evidence in veteran populations increase, it is expected to be utilized more widely because of results in civilian studies [162].

Trauma- vs Non-trauma-focused therapy

The behavioral therapies for PTSD are classified into two main types, trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused. Non- trauma focused therapies include supportive therapy, psychodynamic therapy, hypnotherapy and stress management [165]. These therapies focus on current situations, stress and recent reactions as well as personal interactions and future goals [162]. Supportive therapy often relies on active listening and emotional support and encouragement. Psychodynamic therapy places more of an emphasis of analyzing unconscious mental processing or confronting and discussing the underlying sources of a patients actions. Hypnotherapy, also deals with the subconscious, focuses on inducing a relaxed state in the patient that would be more open to attitude changes. With the exception of stress management therapy, non-trauma based therapies have not shown to reduce the symptoms of PTSD in either civilians or veterans to a significant extent [160,161,166]. Stress management (also called stress inoculation training), is often recommended as an adjunct to trauma-based therapies. This therapy teaches the patient anxiety management skills. This includes, but is not limited to, breathing exercises and methods of positive thinking to help control negative thought patterns [162,167].

Trauma-based therapies

These include Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) a specific form of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), prolonged exposure therapy, and eye movement desensitization reprocessing. Each will be discussed in turn.

Cognitive processing therapy

CPT induces the patient to reprocess the traumatic event(s) through writing, and subsequently speaking about the details of the event. The therapist also questions the patient about the event. Thus, this method is analogous to the reprogramming of memory during a reprocessing window that has been effective in pre-clinical and clinical studies in addicted populations [168]. CPT has shown positive outcomes in veterans [158,169-171]. CPT includes aspects of the more general Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) [158,169-174]. In CBT, the patient works to identify problem behaviors and develops coping strategies and emotional regulation to reduce the problematic behavior [175,176]. Formal CBT has also shown to be effective in veterans [158,169-171,177,178]. Unlike CPT, CBT does not focus on exposure or re-experiencing the traumatic event.

Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PET; also termed flooding) is similar to the above in that the patient repeatedly recounts, mentally re-experiences, and is encouraged to process the trauma from different perspectives using cues from the therapist. The patient also repeatedly engages with their fear triggers [179].

Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR)

EMDR is an extension of this PET in which the patient is exposed to the traumatic memories coincident with a small distraction. In the original version of EMDR, the distraction consisted of hand movements of the therapist to direct movements of the patient’s eyes. More recent versions of EMDR include other types of distractions such as hand-tapping or audio cues [162,180]. Results with EMDR have been obtained from a few studies showing large symptom reduction in veterans [181], including results maintained at 9-month follow-up and 78% of completers no longer meeting criteria for PTSD [182,183-185]. Much of the evidence supporting EMDR is still from studies in civilians [186].

Therapeutic Commonalities

Each of the PTSD treatments discussed above focuses on the idea that learning to reprocess the old emotional memory will allow the patient to develop less dramatically fearful responses to triggers of that memory and help the patient to extinguish their original responses to the memory through re-experiencing the trauma in a safe setting. Trauma based treatments focus extinction of the original emotional, fearful response. This neurological response will be discussed in greater detail later, as it is also a topic for adjunctive pharmacotherapy.

This is expected to be more difficult in the veteran PTSD population than in the general population, in part because a veteran is highly unlikely to have had only one traumatic experience [187-190]. Single versus multiple traumatic exposures may help explain the finding that outcomes for PTSD treatment in civilians tend to be more positive than in the veteran population [191].Veterans and refugees are exposed to chronic and complex trauma, unlike the majority of the general population who are treated for PTSD. This may help explain the higher effectiveness of trauma-based versus non- trauma based therapies in veterans versus the general population [192].
Since the traumatic memories are brought to consciousness in the patient many times during the therapy, such sessions are emotionally demanding and unpleasant, and are intentionally designed to increase the patient’s level of anxiety [160]. Also, each session requires from 30-90 minutes and 12 sessions are typically expected for these types of therapy to have an effect [162,193]. The number of required sessions is still a matter of debate, with numbers ranging from 9 to 12 [160, 165, 191]. As mentioned earlier, reducing the required time in sessions is considered an important step in increasing patient compliance and reducing drop-out rate in treatment. Options have included a more intense 2-week process [191], decreasing the trauma sessions to 30 min, and adding medications.

Behavioral therapy in veterans

As mentioned above, most studies on PTSD treatment are done in the general population, and this may have led to some disparities in the literature due to differences in gender, types of trauma, and length of time before the initial trauma was treated. Steenkamp and associates [160] conducted a meta-analysis on the current data available from randomized, intent to treat, trials for psychotherapy for military-related PTSD. While only 36 of the available 891 publications qualified for the study, the authors’ main conclusion was that trauma-focused therapy, specifically Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure both yielded clinically meaningful improvements, even with high dropout rates. The authors indicated two study weaknesses: up to three quarters of the patients in behavior therapy studies were also on uncategorized psychotropic medications and many studies have been quoted as using “treatment-as-usual” as a control group without further information.158 This meta-analysis defined clinically meaningful symptom improvement as a 10 -12 point reduction in PTSD symptoms, as reported by either the patient or the interviewer with either the PTSD Checklist or the Clinician Administered PTSD Scales. However, mean post treatment scores for both types of treatment remained at or above the diagnostic cutoff for PTSD. Thus, 60-72% of the enrolled patients retained their PTSD status at the end of the studies. It should be noted that the two trauma-focused psychotherapy approaches still performed better than non-trauma-based protocols. Overall, cognitive processing therapy has shown large effect sizes when compared with both non-treatment and treatment as usual patients [160]. There is an ongoing multisite trial directly comparing cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure in 900 male and female veterans that should yield helpful results [194].

Extinction Training

Extinction is normally associated with the removal or degradation of a consolidated memory response. The response can be a positive response to the stimulus such as reducing craving by taking a drug; it can also be a negative response such as a fear response to a stimulus. Extinction is considered an active learning process where the brain incorporates new information to memories and experiences from the past that have been learned. It thus represents an active inhibition of previously learned emotional and physical responses. Although both AUD and PTSD have shown promise in terms of responses to extinction training in laboratory settings, the treatment of PTSD patients has shown greater progress in applications in non-laboratory settings. While areas of interest include Substance Use Disorders (SUD), anxiety disorders and PTSD [195] the majority of extant extinction research focused on the extinction of aversive memories [196,114]. The goal of extinction therapy in PTSD treatment is to allow the patient to have a new neutral response to a stimulus previously associated with intense fear. In SUD (Including AUD) treatment, extinction training focuses on reducing the cravings instigated by objects or situations that the patient associates with alcohol or drinking. The extinction training for both PTSD and AUD is intended to reduce the consolidated responses of fear or alcohol craving to the stimuli that would normally instigate the condition dependent response in the patient.

Drawbacks of Extinction

One of the primary concerns about extinction therapy is the change of from a treatment setting to normal life [195,197]. The treatment is time consuming, and not normally considered pleasant for the patient, and a portion of patients will not respond to treatment, relapse or drop out of treatment [198,199]. Because of this and the possibility of improving the efficiency of the extinction process, pharmaceutical augmentation continues to be an area of strong interest [200].

Extinction in PTSD

Extinction methods have shown to be effective in PTSD therapy and show increasing potential with adjunct pharmaceutical treatment; the extinction mechanism is part of each style of trauma-focused psychotherapy. PTSD is thought to be a result of fear memories that are resistant to extinction. The current theory is that individuals with PTSD have a fear inducing memory that is resistant to extinction or modification via new experiences, due in part to the state of hyper-arousal that a mortally dangerous situation can cause. It has also been theorized that substance craving triggers are also resistant to extinction because their effect on dopaminergic pathways is more intense than that of natural reward [196].

As stated above, exposure procedures are a first-line treatment for PTSD [201,202]. Continued exposure of the patients to the fear triggers in a safe environment has shown relative efficacy in the extinction of the fear response in PTSD [186] and anxiety [202,203]. Unlike extinction techniques in substance use disorders which focus on the stimulus-reward pathway, extinction techniques in PTSD also involve fear acquisition. Because of the emotional component in neurological processing of the fear response, extinction therapy for PTSD is thought to focus in the amygdala, the HPA axis and the PFC. This gives additional targets for pharmaceutical modification [204,205] with promising clinical trials [206]. Adjunctive pharmaceutical treatment is being perused to increase the likelihood that the memories of safety will dominate over the original emotional response of fear [197].

Neurochemical Changes In PTSD and Pharmacotheapy


Affective disorders, including PTSD, are linked to dysregulation of serotonergic systems. Serotonin is one of the cardinal mediators involved in the amygdala’s ability to consolidate fear memories and regulate anxiety and emotions such as anger [207]. Studies of civilians with PTSD show patterns of decreased amygdala Serotonin Transporter Protein (SERT) binding [208]. Above, we noted a loss of amygdala volume. Together such changes may contribute to the loss of extinction and to a hyper-excitable state. The result is less control over anger and other emotions. The amygdala’s enhanced consolidation of fear memory in people with PTSD is mediated by serotonin, primarily through serotonin-2 receptors. As indicated above, the enhanced consolidation is selectively enabled by a prior history of inescapable stress exposure [51]. Both animal and human studies of control subjects show an increase in fear memory acquisition and expression after Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) treatment [209-211]. The reduced expression of the SERT leads to serotonin remaining in the synaptic cleft for a longer period and greater stimulation of serotonin receptors and a net increase in serotonin activity. Excess serotonin activity is linked to altered threat processing, with increased amygdala reactivity to phasic aversive stimuli [212]. Essentially, excess serotonin during the time of fear conditioning increased the fear response generated by the experimental protocol. Administration of a serotonin 2A receptor agonist (that mimics endogenous serotonin) after fear conditioning increases the expression of the fear, and concordant with the expected pattern; administration of a serotonin 2A receptor antagonist blocks acquisition of the fear memory [213]. These results support a therapeutic opportunity to modulate fear processing using serotonin-2 receptor antagonists. In basolateral amygdala neurons there is a high concentration of serotonin-2 receptors; these are thought to help to regulate anxiety [214]. Similar to the serotonin 2A receptor responses to agonists and antagonists, increased expression of the receptors (through gene modification therapy in animals) increases sensitivity to serotonin induced anxiety levels [215], and pharmacologic blockade of the serotonin-2C receptor prevents stress induced anxiety [216].

The amygdala, hippocampus, and frontal cortex receive serotonergic input via projections form the dorsal and median raphe nucleus [217-219]. During rodent aversive learning, serotonin is released in the dorsal raphe nucleus projection regions [220-222], where it remains elevated in the downstream target of the basolateral amygdala for an hour or more after training is complete [223,224]. Rodent studies have shown that repeated stress exposure increases the intensity of fear learning [38] that is induced due to the serotonergic processes involved in the consolidation of fear training. Fear learning requires serotonin activity in the dorsal raphe nucleus during fear conditioning as well as serotonin activity at the serotonin-2 receptor of the basolateral amygdala after the fear conditioning is complete [217,225-228]. Stress enhances the expression of serotonin-2 receptors in the amygdala, but does not alter the serotonin levels present during fear conditioning. This allows serotonin stimulation in the dornal raphe nuclei that is not present in unstressed animals and may alter processing of fear conditioning in a stressed animal. Also, inhibition of the serotonergic dorsal raphe during fear conditioning prevents the stress induced enhancement of the fear training [51]. Consistent with these results, administration of a serotonin-2C antagonist agomelatine seems to reduce the consolidation or reconsolidation of traumatic memories; this agent has had beneficial effects in PTSD [229].

Role of Serotonin in Extinction Therapy

Fear-learning and extinction are fundamentally controlled via the amygdala, interacting with the hippocampus and the mPFC [80,230,231]. Serotonin is expected to play a pivotal part in fear acquisition, expression and extinction, since (as noted above) acute administration of a serotonin-2A receptor agonist can change the development and processing of fear. If the serotonin 2A agonist is administered after fear conditioning, it increases the expression of the conditioned fear [232]. If the serotonin 2A antagonist is administered before fear conditioning, the fear development is blocked [213]. If the serotonin 2A agonist is administered before extinction, extinction is enhanced [232]. However, chronic SSRI use impairs fear learning, and interferes with the extinction of fear memories [233]. It is well documented that SSRIs increased cued fear acquisition and expression in rodents and human patients [209-211].

It is thought that the serotonin decreases the activity of the amygdala during the extinction process and during initial fear conditioning by down-regulating the NR2B subunit of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the lateral and basal nuclei of the amygdala through a change in glutamate transmission. Fear learning during both initial fear conditioning and extinction depends on the activation of these receptors [233,234]. SSRI’s are a first line pharmacological treatment for PTSD. Thus, the effects of such medications on extinction treatments is of direct clinical importance, since it may explain the lack of clinical effectiveness in SSRI treatment with psychological fear extinguishing [233].


As mentioned above, the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis (HPA) releases cortisol (a glucocorticoid) as a response to stress. Patients and rodent models of PTSD show that dysregulation of cortisol during or after chronic or extreme stress is linked to symptoms of PTSD, with reduction of symptoms of veterans with PTSD reduced by treating with a combination of hydrocortisone and traumatic memory reactivation therapy [235]. Glucocorticoid modulation enhances extinction, since extinction therapy using a combination of such medications with behavioral therapy has been shown effective in non-PTSD disorders [236,237]. Glucocorticoid modulation in the forms of hydrocortisone combined with prolonged exposure therapy has resulted in greater patient retention during fear extinction therapy sessions [238]. In preclinical studies, glucocorticoids are also linked to modulation of memory consolidation [106, 237,239].


Opioids are involved in the regulation of conditioned fear extinction. Opioid signaling in the ventro-laterial periaqueductal gray matter is thought to be responsible for the activation of the mPFC and the baso-lateral nucleus of the amygdale [240,241]. Opioid antagonists increase conditioned fear [32]. In rodent studies, opioid antagonists either prevent fear extinction or enhance fear acquisition [242-244]. In rodent studies, mu opioid receptor antagonism increases contextual fear conditioning [245,246] and prevents the extinction of previous trained fear responses [247]. This represents a problem for individuals suffering from both PTSD and AUD. This is because mu opioid receptor antagonists (naltrexone and nalmefene) are considered first-line for the treatment of AUD and opioid use disorders.
Kappa opioid receptor antagonism decreases conditioned fear, in both the baso-lateral and the central nuclei of the amygdala. If the antagonism is only in the central nuclei, there is a generalized anxiolytic effect. Fear conditioning increases the density of kappa opioid receptors in the baso-lateral amygdala while reducing them in the corpus striatum (of the basal ganglia) [245,246]. In humans, lower kappa opioid receptor expression is associated with greater symptoms following trauma [248]. Opioid agonists, such as morphine have been shown to block conditioned fear acquisition in both rodent and human testing in normal fear training and post-stress fear training [249,250]. This model is being investigated for secondary preventative treatment after trauma to prevent PTSD [32]. In rodents, nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors (also known as the kappa-type 3 opioid receptor), activation appears to block contextual and cued fear consolidation in controls and model-PTSD subjects.

Post retrieval Extinction

The normal pattern of extinction training appears more effective if the patient or subject receives a memory cue before the extinction therapy (post-retrieval extinction) [195]. This appears to be because activation of the prefrontal cortex allows more effective extinction of the fear mechanism than during the normal extinction training when the PFC is not activated [251]. In rodents the memory cue is a reminder foot shock paired with the conditioned stimulus 10 minutes before the extinction training takes place. This is thought to reactivate the original memory and to expose the subject to the extinction training during the reconsolidation window. This window is speculated to close within 6 hours of the memory retrieval, but during that period the original memory is thought to be altered(instead of layering on new conflicting memories) [251-253]. The reconsolidation system seems to be a method for the brain to update an old memory or response to be consistent with current contexts [254,255]. This effect on fear extinction was reduced when rodents were housed in groups as opposed to the dramatic effects when the animals were housed separately [195]. This may be due to increased stress on the animals effecting the extinction learning of fear responses [ 256-258] In humans, the effect of post-retrieval extinction therapy has been classified as moderate in preventing the return of fear [195]. Mirroring the effectiveness in animal models, convincing suppression of heroin use for 180 days in humans has been shown [259,195]. The effect of post-retrieval extinction vs. standard extinction therapy for fear is also time dependent. Studies that tested return of fear after a long delay after training (6-30 days) showed large and significant effects. Studies that tested the return of fear after a shorter delay (1-3 days) only showed small and non-significant effects. This pattern was not seen in extinction of appetitive studies. This is an area that requires more research [195].

Pharmacological effects

One of the effective treatments in fear [252] and appetitive memory training in animals is the use of protein-synthesis inhibitors or receptor blockers, to interfere with the original memory. For example, the administration of a beta-adrenergic or NMDA receptor antagonist during the reconsolidation window can block the return of the fear or the craving [252]. Thus far, the pharmacologic blockade approach has a moderate effect size in reducing appetitive responses in animals [260] and fear responses in humans [261,195] Extinction in both PTSD and drug-seeking for ethanol [262], and nicotine (smoking) [262-264] was facilitated with the administration of d-cycloserine (a partial agonist at NMDA receptors, producing some of the effects of glutamate) after extinction training. Propranolol (beta-adrenergic blocker) has been used in post-retrieval sessions to lower sympathetic nervous system reactivity to mental imagery of the trauma a week after treatment [265]. This was replicated in PTSD patients and yielded a reduction of PTSD symptoms over time [266]. These approaches appear promising, as post-retrieval extinction strategies become more common in clinical practice.

Pharmacological Treatment Of Veteran PTSD Patients

Pharmacological treatment of PTSD

Guidelines agree that pharmacotherapy should occur in conjunction with behavior therapy. However, most medication regimens have inadequate evidence for treating PTSD even in the general population [267]. As stated above, most guidelines are established in civilians; also, these studies utilize a greater proportion of females than occurs with veterans. Female veterans need to be treated for PTSD just as much as their male counterparts. However, gender differences in response may dictate additional studies to insure that both male and female veterans receive optimal therapies.

Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Based on the discussion above that serotonergic dysfunction underlie many PTSD symptoms, both first -line treatments for PTSD include Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) or Selective Norepinephrine Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRI). The most commonly cited SSRIs are fluoxetine, paroxetine or sertraline, or the SNRI venlafaxine XR [159-161,165]. Veteran PTSD has had positive results using paroxetine (SSRI) [268] and fluvoxamine (SSRI) [269,270] in open trials. Additional medication classes such as Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCA) and Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) inhibitors are normally either not encouraged or not considered until SSRI’s or SNRI’s have been attempted because of the greater risk for side effects with these agents [160]. In veterans, this approach has been questioned [271]. There is a lower proportion of female veterans with PTSD [9]. Also, most veterans are exposed to a multiple traumatic experiences over an extended time period often in conjunction with traumatic brain injury. Finally, we noted above that SSRI’s may interfere with the extinction process, although this remains a topic of some controversy. We note that newer drug treatments for PTSD are often compared against an SSRI because it is often considered a standard of care, or because an SSRI is allowed during evaluations of behavioral therapy.

According to the VA DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines, after an adequate trial of SSRI/SNRI, agents with different mechanisms of action (such as the G-protein coupled receptor blocker mirtazepine) should be considered [272,165] and this agent has shown with good responses in civilians [273]. Also, mirtazepine has shown high response rates in the treatment of veteran PTSD in two open trials274,275 and a randomized, open label trail in the military population compared with sertraline (SSRI) [274].

Tricyclic antidepressants

The Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs) are effective in treating major depressive disorder but considered to be third-line agents because of a host of significant side effects. Two TCAs, imipramine [276,277] and amitriptyline [278], are considered 3rd line treatments [159] with good responses in civilians with PTSD. The effectiveness of TCAs in the treatment of PTSD is thought to be related to their reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine rather than the lesser reuptake inhibition of serotonin. Desipramine (TCA), an additional 3rd line agent in the treatment of civilian PTSD, was more effective than paroxetine (SSRI) in a double blind study in veterans with PTSD plus comorbid AUD [268].


The so-called atypical antipsychotics (that either block serotonin-2A plus dopamine receptors or act as partial dopamine and serotonin agonists) olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole have used as monotherapy to reduce PTSD symptoms [279]. In treatment algorithms for PTSD these agents are currently considered to be 3rd line agents. Their effectiveness in PTSD appears to be due to their ability to restore the balance in dopamine modulation of the limbic system (including mPFC and amygdala) [159]. This is the same mechanism and neural substrate upon which these agents act in persons with schizophrenia. In the general population, a meta-analysis of antipsychotics showed a reduction of PTSD re-experiencing and intrusion symptoms [280]. However, the extrapyramidal side effects of weight gain, dyslipidemia and elevated blood glucose that may be present with the atypical antipsychotics suggest that metabolic monitoring should be considered during the course of treatment [160]. Aripiprazole and ziprasidone are considered less likely to be induce extrapyramidal side effects. Quetiapine has also been used as a treatment for PTSD associated insomnia, 159 and is often preferred by clinicians vs. olanzapine and risperidone [193] due to it’s reduced likelihood of causing extrapyramidal or metabolic side effects [160]. Consultation with a specialist is normally advised, especially because this is recommended after several other therapy regimens have failed [193].

In the veteran population, quetiapine was shown by some studies to be effective as monotherapy in comparison to SSRIs [281,282]. As adjunctive therapy to SSRI treatment, risperidone failed to show improvements in PTSD symptoms in a large six-month randomized controlled trial of 250 veterans with SSRI-resistant PTSD symptoms [283]. This result is not consistent with the trends from previous small trials showing the effectiveness of risperidone as adjunctive therapy in veterans [284], and civilians [285-287]. Olanzapine has been shown to be effective as adjunctive therapy in military patients with treatment resistant PTSD [288].


At best, benzodiazepines have only very limited value in the treatment of PTSD and may actually worsen the disorder [159,160,165]. Nevertheless benzodiazepines are still often used as adjunctive therapy, often as treatment to improve sleep quality and reduce nightmares.9Benzodiazepine has also been shown to treat irritability and hyper-arousal in the veterans [289]. In controlled studies in the general population, benzodiazepine adjunctive therapy did not prove to be effective in the treatment of PTSD [290,291,292] The modest efficacy of the benzodiazepines in the treatment of veterans with PTSD, may be explained by the use of nighttime dosing, that improves symptoms of insomnia.

Adrenergic agents

Prazosin (an alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist) has shown consistent efficacy in improving sleep quality and decreasing nightmares in veterans [293] by blocking the changes in sleep architecture mediated by norepinephrine [159,159]. Also, because prazosin is not itself an addictive agent (versus benzodiazepines), it holds a prominent position in PTSD treatment guidelines for sleep augmentation [159-161,165]. Trials in military populations of various ages have confirmed prazosin’s effectiveness as a treatment for sleep disturbances and nightmares [282,294-297]. A larger study was more recently done that confirmed the effective use of prazosin over the course of 15 weeks in a military population, giving credence to safety and the long term effectiveness of prazosin sleep augmentation in both male and female veterans [293]. Although the indication would require further study [159], prazosin has also shown promise as a preventative treatment for the prevention of PTSD and this is expected to be due to it’s effect on the extinction mechanism [298].


While it has been thought that opiates, such as morphine, may confer protective effects if given immediately afterwards or during trauma, this may not be a practical solution for veteran or combat induced PTSD that is not related to a physical trauma and that may be repeated many times during a deployment. The use of morphine in military personnel and civilians who sustained physical trauma during combat has been tied to decreased development of PTSD [299] in part due to morphine’s ability to block the acquisition of conditioned fears [249,250,32].

Opioid antagonists provide a well-documented component in the treatment of the SUD to opioids and ethanol, but opioids have shown mixed effects in the treatment of PTSD [159]. Some open label data from both civilian [300-302] and veteran [303] populations, indicate that naltrexone also treats flashbacks associated with PTSD. In civilian studies opioid antagonists shown promise in the treatment of depersonalization and derealization symptoms that can be induced by trauma [304,305]. This contrasts with the actions noted above that blocking opioid receptors may enhance fear memory.

Naloxone and naltrexone can also aggravate symptoms of opiate withdrawal after trauma exposure and may increase the presenting symptoms of PTSD such as stress, and anxiety by blocking the effects of endogenous endorphins and enkephalins [159]. Also, discordant opioid signaling may be an underlying cause of PTSD [306]. Also, as opioids are among the most commonly abused agents in the PTSD population, opiate antagonists as therapy may have an additional risk in this population by inducing opioid withdrawal. Current guidelines do not support the use of opiate antagonists in the treatment of PTSD at this time and a broader understanding of the role of endogenous opioids and the effects of exogenous opioids on brain function is needed before agents acting on this system can be used safely and effectively.


Current guidelines include hydrocortisone as an experimental treatment option [159]. As we noted above, glucocorticoids may act in PTSD by facilitating the extinction mechanism [307]. Hydrocortisone has been shown to resolve the symptoms of model-PTSD in rodent studies when administered after stress exposure. As discussed earlier, hydrocortisone normalizes the low cortisol associated with PTSD [308]. Previously, hydrocortisone had been investigated primarily as a secondary prevention therapy after trauma to minimize PTSD. As such it was hypothesized to reduce“PTSD” development in rodent models when administered within a short time window after trauma [101,309-311]. More recent humans studies expanded the use of this approach, showing that in veterans with PTSD, hydrocortisone administration combined with behavior therapy induced traumatic memory reactivation in therapeutic settings and resulted in a reduction of PTSD symptoms. Studies in the general population showed increased patient acceptance of prolonged exposure therapy with concomitant hydrocortisone use [238]. Of course there are substantial risks associated with long-term systemic dosing with glucocorticoids that need to be weighed against the potential benefits in patients. However, such studies suggested that glucocorticoid modulation enhances the extinction mechanism, with promising results in augmenting exposure therapy in other fear-based disorders and phobias [236,237,246,238,312]. Yehuda, et al. [247] conducted a double blind randomized trial in 24 veterans, comparing prolonged exposure therapy augmented with hydrocortisone versus placebo. In addition, receptor sensitivity to glucocorticoids was assessed via pre- and post-treatment cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cell response in the in vitro lysozyme inhibition test. In this small study, hydrocortisone augmentation was shown to be significantly more effective in reducing PTSD symptoms than placebo. This effect was attributed to the greater patient retention in the hydrocortisone treatment group. An additional feature noted was that complete responders also had the highest pre-treatment sensitivity to glucocorticoids in vitro that diminished over the course of treatment. Thus, patients may well need to be phenotyped for glucocorticoid response prior to initiation of therapy [238].

Others approaches

Additional treatment possibilities for veteran PTSD are now under investigation that are based on a better understanding of fear extinction and retrieval processes. Human studies in civilians show promise in the use of the protein synthesis inhibitor D-cycloserine and the alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist yohimbine, as well as deep brain stimulation to enhance the effects of extinction training [206,235-238,313-318]. The toxicity and side effects of such pharmacological agents and the dangers associated with the implantation of electrodes for chronic brain stimulation render these options not appropriate for treatment but of potential value in elucidating novel mechanisms upon which practical therapies could be based. As indicated above, propranolol (which is thought to block the norepinephrine triggered fear response in the amygdala), is also under study for use in human patients. Like hydrocortisone, D-cycloserine (a modulator of NMDA receptors), memantine (an NMDA antagonist used in Alzheimer’s disease patients) and even ketamine-like drugs (a blocker of NMDA receptors) are thought to enhance extinction and might improve the effects of such training in humans.

Relationship Between non-Drug Therapies For PTSD And AUD

The relationship between behavioral treatments of comorbid PTSD and AUD have not been well explored. This may in part be due to the idea that exposure therapy and cognitive processing therapy could cause relapse in SUD patients [319]. This is because such treatments are designed to increase anxiety and stress in a safe environment. As mentioned earlier, treatment studies for PTSD typically exclude individuals with conditions such as AUD [320]. In the past, trauma-focused treatment was not allowed for a patient with comorbid substance abuse until they had been in remission for at least 6 months to prevent relapse of the substance and because the SUD was thought to directly hinder effectiveness of the treatment of the patient’s PTSD [321-327]. While studies addressing these concerns exist, the data is still sparse [319]. However, recent research evaluating the exposure-based treatment for patients with comorbid PTSD and AUD supports the initiation of trauma-based treatment [328-331]. Unfortunately cognitive treatments have been less well studied at this point.

The veteran population mimics the general population in that not treating PTSD increases the possibility of relapse for SUD [332].Furthermore, alcohol consumption is likely to impair desensitization to stressors and modification of maladaptive mental paradigms [333]. Currently, the focus has shifted to treat both conditions simultaneously [319]. Randomized control studies in the general population showed that patients with comorbid PTSD and AUD receiving exposure therapy for PTSD showed less cue-reactivity (in the form of alcohol craving) in response to trauma or traumatic memories and significantly greater decreases in triggered distress than non-trauma focused therapy [334].

In 2014, Kaysen and colleagues [319] conducted a chart review comparing the effectiveness of CPT(cognitive processing therapy) for over 500 veterans with PTSD and AUD past and present against PTSD without AUD that participated in a VA outpatient treatment program. This study did not show strong differences in drop-out rate in the treatment groups, and showed similar attendance rates among the three groups. As expected, in this study the PTSD patients with comorbid AUD had more severe self-reported PTSD symptoms before treatment was initiated [335-337]. However, treatment effectiveness appeared unaffected by AUD diagnosis. This study helps support the growing concept that CPT, and other trauma focused therapies should be initiated for the treatment of PTSD even if the patient has AUD or another SUD [338].

As non-pharmacological therapies have gained interest, veteran studies are still less abundant and less statistically powerful than those in the general population. However, available results suggest that trauma related psychotherapy is well tolerated in the dual diagnosis population, and improves the symptoms of both PTSD and AUD [325,339,340].

Conclusions and Future Directions

The above discussion has highlighted that some behavioral therapies may work well in persons with PTSD and AUD. Little has yet been done to determine the effects of medications plus behavior therapy in veterans with both PTSD and AUD and these complex studies need to be done. While not a focus of the present paper, the clinical and preclinical literature also suggests that there may be gender differences in response to therapy that must be addressed in future work. New agents continue to be evaluated. For example, clinical trials are being conducted with the agent MDMA (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, “ecstasy”) [341,342] and of BNC210 (also known as IW-4123, a negative allosteric modulator of the alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor found to be an effective anti-anxiety agent [343].

Studies are currently being conducted on device-based treatments for the enhancement of extinction learning for anxiety disorders and PTSD [313,317,318]. Some the techniques under investigation include including deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation [344,345]. Deep brain stimulation is one of the most extensively studied for the treatment of psychiatric disorder and shows promise for the treatment of PTSD [344,346-349]. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the mPFCis also under study as a noninvasive alternative [350]. This has shown reduction of PTSD symptoms when combined with exposure therapy, over the course of 2 weeks [351-353]. These techniques are thought to be a promising option for future treatments and offer a potential way to complement behavioral therapy and medications.

Although comorbid PTSD and AUD has proven to be a common and chronic syndrome in veterans, few of the current guidelines are designed from data generated in this at-risk population. In the future, treatments based on an improved knowledge of the role of the stress systems of the brain (including the HPA axis and sympathetic nervous systems) could be expected to take a more central role in the treatment of PTSD patients. Also, it is now being recognized that the nature of PTSD in veterans may be fundamentally different than that in civilians because of the greater likelihood of coexistent traumatic brain injury and of repeated traumatic experiences in this population. By evaluating studies of veterans and taking into account new information in the neurological changes in brain that occur in both PTSD and AUD, more appropriate clinical decisions can be made for behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Furthermore, the appreciation of the potential importance of combination behavioral plus medication therapy is allowing more effective treatments to be explored. Also, it will be important to evaluate the use of current medications including SSRIs and opioid antagonists that may be beneficial in AUD but not in PTSD since the literature demonstrates that these therapies may actually have negative effects on persons with PTSD. By having additional information about the changes in the processing of the brain we can tailor pharmacotherapy to refrain from hindering trauma-focused therapy and the natural extinction of fear responses that can occur over time.

By understanding more about the consequences of neurotransmitter change in both PTSD and AUD more stringent parameters for pharmacotherapy during future studies would yield less variability between studies. Continuing to evaluate the new practice of allowing treatment of both PTSD and AUD with trauma-focused therapy immediately upon diagnosis should increase patient compliance and length of abstinence. By taking advantage of the new developments in our understanding of the functions of the brain as well as the population specific data for treatment, we can continue to take the necessary steps to allow this population to lead a normal life after their service.



  1. Taghva A, Oluigbo C, Corrigan J, Rezai AR (2013) Posttraumatic stress disorder: neurocircuitry and implications for potential deep brain stimulation. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery 4: 207-219.
  2. 2. Kessler R, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB (1995) Arch Gen Psychiatry 12: 1048-1060.
  3. Driessen M1, Schulte S, Luedecke C, Schaefer I, Sutmann F, et al. (2008) Trauma and PTSD in patients with alcohol, drug, or dual dependence: a multi-center study.  Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32: 481-488.
  4. Saladin M, Brady KT, Dansky BS, Kilpatrick DG (1995) Understanding co morbidity between PTSD and substance use disorders: two preliminary investigations. Addictive behaviors 5: 643-655.
  5. Yehuda R1 (2001) Biology of posttraumatic stress disorder.  J Clin Psychiatry 62 Suppl 17: 41-46.
  6. Tipps ME, Raybuck JD, Lattal KM (2014) Substance abuse, memory, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Neurobiology of learning and memory 112: 87-100.
  7. Junger S (2016) Tribe - On homecoming and belonging. New York: Hachette Book Group.
  8. Kerfoot KE, Petrakis I, Rosenheck RA (2011) Dual diagnosis in an aging population: Prevalence of psychiatric disorders, comorbid substance abuse, and mental health service utilization in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Journal of dual diagnosis 7: 4-13.
  9. Sofuoglu M1, Rosenheck R, Petrakis I (2014) Pharmacological treatment of comorbid PTSD and substance use disorder: recent progress.  Addict Behav 39: 428-433.
  10. Fuehrlein BS, Mota N, Arias AJ, Trevisan LA, Kachadourian LK, et al. (2016) the burden of alcohol use disorders in U.S. Military veterans: results from the national health and resilience in veterans study. Addiction 10: 1786-1794
  11. Kelsall HL, Wijesinghe MS, Creamer MC, McKenzie DP, Forbes AB, et al. (2015) Alcohol use and substance use disorders in Gulf War, Afghanistan, and Iraq War veterans compared with nondeployed military personnel.  Epidemiol Rev 37: 38-54.
  12. 12. Junger S (2016) Tribe :on homecoming and belonging : large print. Large print edition. ed.Twelve, New York.
  13. Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol 44: 513-524.
  14. Holmes T (1974) Life Change and Illness Susceptibility. u Dohrenwend BS & Dohrenwend BP (Ur.): Stressfull Life Events-Their Nature and Effects. John Willey & Sons, New York.
  15. Dixon LJ, Leen-Feldner EW, Ham LS, Feldner MT, Lewis SF (2009) Alcohol use motives among traumatic event-exposed, treatment-seeking adolescents: associations with posttraumatic stress. Addictive behaviors 12: 1065-1068.
  16. Kehle SM, Reddy MK, Ferrier-Auerbach AG, Erbes CR, Arbisi PA et al. (2011) Psychiatric diagnoses, comorbidity, and functioning in National Guard troops deployed to Iraq. Journal of psychiatric research. 1: 126-132.
  17. Ullman SE1, Townsend SM, Starzynski LL, Long LM (2006) Correlates of comorbid PTSD and polysubstance use in sexual assault victims.  Violence Vict 21: 725-743.
  18. Kok BC, Herrell RK, Thomas JL, Hoge CW (2012) Posttraumatic stress disorder associated with combat service in Iraq or Afghanistan: reconciling prevalence differences between studies. J Nerv Ment Dis 5:444-450.
  19. Kang HK (2003) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-like Illness among Gulf War Veterans: A Population-based Survey of 30,000 Veterans. American journal of epidemiology 2: 141-148.
  20. Thomas J, Wilk JE, Riviere LA, McGurk D, Castro CA et al. (2010) Prevalence of mental health problems and functional impairment among active component and National Guard soldiers 3 and 12 months following combat in Iraq. Arch Gen Psychiatry 6: 614-623.
  21. Hoge C, Castro CA, Messer SC, McGurk D, Cotting DI, et al. (2004) Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. NEJM 1: 13-22.
  22. Tsai J, Pietrzak RH, Hoff RA, Harpaz-Rotem I (2016) Accuracy of screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in specialty mental health clinics in the U.S. Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Psychiatry research 240: 157-162.
  23. Marmar CR, Schlenger W, Henn-Haase C, Kulka RA, et al. (2015) Course of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 40 Years After the Vietnam War: Findings From the National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal Study. JAMA psychiatry 9: 875-881.
  24. Breslau N (2001) Outcomes of posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Clin Psychiatry 17: 55-59.
  25. Fontana A1, Rosenheck R (2008) Treatment-seeking veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan: comparison with veterans of previous wars. . J Nerv Ment Dis 196: 513-521.
  26. Bremner JD1, Southwick SM, Darnell A, Charney DS (1996) Chronic PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans: course of illness and substance abuse. J Psychiatry 153: 369-375.
  27. Pietrzak RH, Goldstein RB, Southwick SM, Grant BF (2011) Prevalence and Axis I comorbidity of full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: results from Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Anxiety Disord 3: 456-465.
  28. Blanco C, Xu Y, Brady K, Perez-Fuentes G, Okuda M, et al. (2013) Comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence among US adults: results from National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Drug and alcohol dependence 3: 630-638.
  29. Kushner MG, Abrams K, Thuras P, Hanson KL, Brekke M, (2005)  Follow-up Study of Anxiety Disorder and Alcohol Dependence in Comorbid Alcoholism Treatment Patients. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 8: 1432-1443.
  30. Wisco BE, Marx BP, Wolf EJ, Miller MW, Southwick SM, et al. (2014) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the US veteran population: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 12: 1338-1346.
  31. Hien DA, Jiang H, Campbell AN, et al. (2010) Do treatment improvements in PTSD severity affect substance use outcomes? A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial in NIDA's Clinical Trials Network. The American journal of psychiatry 1: 95-101.
  32. Bowers ME, Ressler KJ (2015) An Overview of Translationally Informed Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Animal Models of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning to Human Clinical Trials. Biological psychiatry 5: 15-27.
  33. Smith MA, Davidson J, Ritchie JC, et al. (1989) The corticotropin-releasing hormone test in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological psychiatry 4:349-355.
  34. Karl A1, Schaefer M, Malta LS, Dörfel D, Rohleder N, et al. (2006) A meta-analysis of structural brain abnormalities in PTSD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30: 1004-1031.
  35. Morey RA, Gold AL, LaBar KS, et al. (2012) Amygdala volume changes in posttraumatic stress disorder in a large case-controlled veterans group. Arch Gen Psychiatry 11: 1169-1178.
  36. Rauch SL, Whalen PJ, Shin LM, et al. (2000) Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional MRI study. Biological psychiatry 9: 769-776.
  37. Shin LM, Orr SP, Carson MA, et al. (2004) Regional cerebral blood flow in the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex during traumatic imagery in male and female Vietnam veterans with PTSD. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2: 168-176.
  38. Meyer RM, Burgos-Robles A, Liu E, Correia SS, Goosens KA (2014) a ghrelin-growth hormone axis drives stress-induced vulnerability to enhanced fear. Molecular psychiatry 12: 1284-1294.
  39. Rau V1, Fanselow MS (2009) Exposure to a stressor produces a long lasting enhancement of fear learning in rats.  Stress 12: 125-133.
  40. Rau V, DeCola JP, Fanselow MS (2005) Stress-induced enhancement of fear learning: an animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuroscience and bio behavioral reviews 8: 1207-1223.
  41. Lederbogen F1, Kirsch P, Haddad L, Streit F, Tost H, et al. (2011) City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans.  Nature 474: 498-501.
  42. Mazure CM (1995) Does stress cause psychiatric illness?: American Psychiatric Pub.
  43. McGaugh JL (2003) Memory and emotion: The making of lasting memories: Columbia University Press.
  44. Koob GF (2013) Theoretical frameworks and mechanistic aspects of alcohol addiction: alcohol addiction as a reward deficit disorder. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences 13:3-30.
  45. Koob GF, Caine SB, Parsons L, Markou A, Weiss F (1997) Opponent process model and psychostimulant addiction. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 3: 513-521.
  46. Koob GF1, Le Moal M (1997) Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 278: 52-58.
  47. Koob GF, Le Moal M (2008) Neurobiological mechanisms for opponent motivational processes in addiction. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B Biol sci. 12: 363:3113-3123.
  48. Parsons RG1, Ressler KJ (2013) Implications of memory modulation for post-traumatic stress and fear disorders.  Nat Neurosci 16: 146-153.
  49. Chester JA, Kirchhoff AM, Barrenha GD (2014) Relation between corticosterone and fear-related behavior in mice selectively bred for high or low alcohol preference. Addiction biology 4: 663-675.
  50. Kim JJ1, Jung MW (2006) Neural circuits and mechanisms involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30: 188-202.
  51. Baratta MV, Kodandaramaiah SB, Monahan PE, et al. (2016) Stress Enables Reinforcement-Elicited Serotonergic Consolidation of Fear Memory. Biological psychiatry 10:814-822.
  52. Suvrathan A, Bennur S, Ghosh S, Tomar A, Anilkumar S et al. (2014)  Stress enhances fear by forming new synapses with greater capacity for long-term potentiation in the amygdala. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 1633: 20130151.
  53. Yehuda R, Halligan SL, Golier JA, Grossman R, Bierer LM (2004) Effects of trauma exposure on the cortisol response to dexamethasone administration in PTSD and major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 3:389-404.
  54. Foa EB1, Zinbarg R, Rothbaum BO  (1992) Uncontrollability and unpredictability in post-traumatic stress disorder: an animal model.  Psychol Bull 112: 218-238.
  55. Maier SF (2001) Exposure to the stressor environment prevents the temporal dissipation of behavioral depression/learned helplessness. Biological psychiatry49: 763-773.
  56. Baker DG, West SA, Nicholson WE, Ekhator NN,Kasckow JW, et al. (1999)  Serial CSF corticotropin-releasing hormone levels and adrenocortical activity in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. The American journal of psychiatry 156: 585-588.
  57. Steudte S, Kolassa IT, Stalder T, Pfeiffer A, Kirschbaum C,  et al. ( 2011) Increased cortisol concentrations in hair of severely traumatized Ugandan individuals with PTSD. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36: 1193-1200.
  58. Steudte S, Kirschbaum C, Gao W, Alexander N, Schönfeld S, et al. ( 2013)  Hair cortisol as a biomarker of traumatization in healthy individuals and posttraumatic stress disorder patients. Biological psychiatry74: 639-646.
  59. Hruska B, Cullen PK, Delahanty  ( 2014)  DL Pharmacological modulation of acute trauma memories to prevent PTSD: considerations from a developmental perspective. Neurobiology of learning and memory 112:122-129.
  60. Geracioti TD Jr1, Baker DG, Ekhator NN, West SA, Hill KK, et al. (2001) CSF norepinephrine concentrations in posttraumatic stress disorder.  Am J Psychiatry 158: 1227-1230.
  61. Yehuda R, Boisoneau D, Lowy MT, Giller EL (1995)  Dose-response changes in plasma cortisol and lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptors following dexamethasone administration in combat veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52: 583-593.
  62. Friedman MJ (1991)   Biological approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress 4: 67-91.
  63. Kosten TR, Mason JW, Giller EL, Ostroff RB, Harkness L (1987) Sustained urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine elevation in post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 12:13-20.
  64. Yehuda R1, Southwick S, Giller EL, Ma X, Mason JW (1992) Urinary catecholamine excretion and severity of PTSD symptoms in Vietnam combat veterans.  J Nerv Ment Dis 180: 321-325.
  65. Strawn JR1, Geracioti TD Jr (2008) Noradrenergic dysfunction and the psychopharmacology of posttraumatic stress disorder.  Depress Anxiety 25: 260-271.
  66. Blanchard EB,  Kolb LC,  Prins A,  Gates S,  McCoy  GC (1991)  Changes in plasma norepinephrine to combat-related stimuli among Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 179: 371-373.
  67. Perry BD, Giller EL Jr, Southwick SM (1987) Altered platelet alpha 2-adrenergic binding sites in posttraumatic stress disorder. The American journal of psychiatry 144:1511-1512.
  68. Southwick SM1, Krystal JH, Bremner JD, Morgan CA 3rd, Nicolaou AL, et al. (1997) Noradrenergic and serotonergic function in posttraumatic stress disorder.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 54: 749-758.
  69. Southwick SM1, Krystal JH, Morgan CA, Johnson D, Nagy LM, et al. (1993) Abnormal noradrenergic function in posttraumatic stress disorder.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 50: 266-274.
  70. Moya PR,  Fox MA,  Jensen CL,Justin  LL, Helen TF ,  et al. (2011) Altered 5-HT2C receptor agonist-induced responses and 5-HT2C receptor RNA editing in the amygdala of serotonin transporter knockout mice. BMC Pharmacol 11:3.
  71. McEchron MD1,  Bouwmeester H,  Tseng W,  Weiss C,  Disterhoft JF  (1998) Hippocampectomy disrupts auditory trace fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning in the rat.  Hippocampus 8: 638-646.
  72. Phillips RG1, LeDoux JE (1992) Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.  Behav Neurosci 106: 274-285.
  73. Sotres-Bayon F1, Quirk GJ (2010) Prefrontal control of fear: more than just extinction.  Curr Opin Neurobiol 20: 231-235.
  74. Davis M1 (1997) Neurobiology of fear responses: the role of the amygdala.  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 9: 382-402.
  75. Fendt M1, Fanselow MS (1999) The neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of conditioned fear.  Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23: 743-760.
  76. LeDoux J1 (1996) Emotional networks and motor control: a fearful view.  Prog Brain Res 107: 437-446.
  77. Koenigs M, Huey ED, Raymont V,Bobby C, Jeffrey S, et al. (2008) Focal brain damage protects against post-traumatic stress disorder in combat veterans. Nature neuroscience. 11:232-237.
  78. Vyas A, Mitra R, Shankaranarayana Rao BS, Chattarji S (2002)  Chronic stress induces contrasting patterns of dendritic remodeling in hippocampal and amygdaloid neurons. The Journal of neuroscience 22: 6810-6818.
  79. Maroun M, Ioannides PJ, Bergman KL, Kavushansky A, Holmes A, et al. (2013)  Fear extinction deficits following acute stress associate with increased spine density and dendritic retraction in basolateral amygdala neurons. Eur J Neurosci 38: 2611-2620.
  80. Milad MR1, Quirk GJ (2002) Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction.  Nature 420: 70-74.
  81. Sierra-Mercado D, Padilla-Coreano N, Quirk GJ (2011) Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology   36: 529-538.
  82. Hariri AR, Bookheimer SY, Mazziotta JC (2000) Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. Neuroreport 11: 43-48.
  83. Akirav I1, Maroun M (2007) The role of the medial prefrontal cortex-amygdala circuit in stress effects on the extinction of fear.  Neural Plast 2007: 30873.
  84. Croxson PL, Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TE,Robson MD,Pinsk MA, et al. (2005)  Quantitative investigation of connections of the prefrontal cortex in the human and macaque using probabilistic diffusion tractography. The Journal of neuroscience 25: 8854-8866.
  85. Kim MJ, Whalen PJ   (2009)   The structural integrity of an amygdala-prefrontal pathway predicts trait anxiety. The Journal of neuroscience 29: 11614-11618.
  86. Schulkin J, Gold PW, McEwen BS (1998) Induction of corticotropin-releasing hormone gene expression by glucocorticoids: implication for understanding the states of fear and anxiety and allostatic load. Psychoneuroendocrinology23: 219-243.
  87. Herman JP, Figueiredo H, Mueller NK, Ulrich-Lai Y,Ostrander MM, et al.(2003) Central mechanisms of stress integration: hierarchical circuitry controlling hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenocortical responsiveness. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology24: 151-180.
  88. Vermetten E, Vythilingam M, Southwick SM, Charney DS, Bremner JD (2003) Long-term treatment with paroxetine increases verbal declarative memory and hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological psychiatry 54: 693-702.
  89. Bratt AM, Kelley SP, Knowles JP, Barrett J, Davis K, et al. (2001)  Long term modulation of the HPA axis by the hippocampus. Behavioral, biochemical and immunological endpoints in rats exposed to chronic mild stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26: 121-145.
  90. Phelps MA, Foraker AB, Gao W, Dalton JT, Swaan PW (2004) A novel rhodamine-riboflavin conjugate probe exhibits distinct fluorescence resonance energy transfer that enables riboflavin trafficking and subcellular localization studies. Mol Pharm 1: 257-266.
  91. Phelps EA1 (2004) Human emotion and memory: interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex.  Curr Opin Neurobiol 14: 198-202.
  92. LaBar KS, LeDoux JE, Spencer DD, Phelps EA (1995) Impaired fear conditioning following unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans. The Journal of neuroscience 15: 6846-6855.
  93. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, Adolphs R, Rockland C, et al. (1995) Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans. Science 269: 1115-1118.
  94. Roozendaal B, Brunson KL, Holloway BL, McGaugh JL, Baram TZ (2002)  Involvement of stress-released corticotropin-releasing hormone in the basolateral amygdala in regulating memory consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13908-13913.
  95. McEwen BS, McKittrick CR, Tamashiro KL, Sakai RR (2015) the brain on stress: Insight from studies using the Visible Burrow System. Physiol Behav 146: 47-56.
  96. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (2000)  How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21: 55-89.
  97. Joëls M1, Fernandez G, Roozendaal B (2011) Stress and emotional memory: a matter of timing.  Trends Cogn Sci 15: 280-288.
  98. Groeneweg FL1, Karst H, de Kloet ER, Joëls M (2011) Rapid non-genomic effects of corticosteroids and their role in the central stress response.  J Endocrinol 209: 153-167.
  99. Joels M,  Pu Z,  Wiegert O,  Oitzl MS,  Krugers HJ (2006) Learning under stress: how does it work?. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 152-158.
  100. Walsh K1, Nugent NR, Kotte A, Amstadter AB, Wang S, et al. (2013) Cortisol at the emergency room rape visit as a predictor of PTSD and depression symptoms over time.  Psychoneuroendocrinology 38: 2520-2528.
  101. Daskalakis NP, Cohen H, Cai G, Buxbaum JD, Yehuda R (2014) Expression profiling associates blood and brain glucocorticoid receptor signaling with trauma-related individual differences in both sexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 13529-13534.
  102. Cook CJ1 (2004) Stress induces CRF release in the paraventricular nucleus, and both CRF and GABA release in the amygdala.  Physiol Behav 82: 751-762.
  103. McGaugh JL, McIntyre CK, Power AE (2002) Amygdala modulation of memory consolidation: interaction with other brain systems. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78: 539-552.
  104. Debiec J1, Ledoux JE (2004) Disruption of reconsolidation but not consolidation of auditory fear conditioning by noradrenergic blockade in the amygdala.  Neuroscience 129: 267-272.
  105. Yehuda R, Siever LJ, Teicher MH,Levengood RA, Gerber DK, et al. (1998) Plasma norepinephrine and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol concentrations and severity of depression in combat posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. Biological psychiatry 44: 56-63.
  106. Roozendaal B1, McEwen BS, Chattarji S (2009) Stress, memory and the amygdala.  Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 423-433.
  107. O'Donnell T1, Hegadoren KM, Coupland NC (2004) Noradrenergic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of post-traumatic stress disorder.  Neuropsychobiology 50: 273-283.
  108. Debiec J, Bush DE, LeDoux JE (2011) Noradrenergic enhancement of reconsolidation in the amygdala impairs extinction of conditioned fear in rats--a possible mechanism for the persistence of traumatic memories in PTSD. Depression and anxiety 28: 186-193.
  109. Gazarini L, Stern CA, Carobrez AP, Bertoglio LJ (2013) Enhanced noradrenergic activity potentiates fear memory consolidation and reconsolidation by differentially recruiting alpha1- and beta-adrenergic receptors. Learning & memory 20:210-219.
  110. Gamache K, Pitman RK, Nader K (2012) Preclinical evaluation of reconsolidation blockade by clonidine as a potential novel treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 37: 2789-2796.
  111. Singewald N1, Philippu A (1998) Release of neurotransmitters in the locus coeruleus.  Prog Neurobiol 56: 237-267.
  112. Krishnan HR1, Sakharkar AJ1, Teppen TL1, Berkel TD1, Pandey SC2 (2014) The epigenetic landscape of alcoholism.  Int Rev Neurobiol 115: 75-116.
  113. Pakdaman S, Wilcox RE, Miller JD1 (2014) Theories and treatment of drug dependency: a neurochemical perspective.  Curr Mol Pharmacol 7: 52-66.
  114. Wilcox RE, Miller JD (2016) Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Abuse, Dependency and Craving. Journal of Addiction and Dependence 2:1-12.
  115. Koob TJ1, Hernandez DJ (2003) Mechanical and thermal properties of novel polymerized NDGA-gelatin hydrogels.  Biomaterials 24: 1285-1292.
  116. Koob G1, Kreek MJ (2007) Stress, dysregulation of drug reward pathways, and the transition to drug dependence.  Am J Psychiatry 164: 1149-1159.
  117. Pandey SC (2004) The gene transcription factor cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein: role in positive and negative affective states of alcohol addiction. Pharmacol Ther 104: 47-58.
  118. Wikler A (1973) Dynamics of drug dependence. Implications of a conditioning theory for research and treatment.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 28: 611-616.
  119. Collins BN1, Brandon TH (2002) Effects of extinction context and retrieval cues on alcohol cue reactivity among nonalcoholic drinkers.  J Consult Clin Psychol 70: 390-397.
  120. Bouton ME, Bolles RC (1979) Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear.  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 5: 368-378.
  121. Klingemann HK1 (1991) The motivation for change from problem alcohol and heroin use.  Br J Addict 86: 727-744.
  122. Blume AW, Schmaling KB, Marlatt GA (2006) Recent drinking consequences, motivation to change, and changes in alcohol consumption over a three month period. Addict Behav 31: 331-338.
  123. Ihssen N, Cox WM, Wiggett A, Fadardi JS, Linden DE (2011) Differentiating heavy from light drinkers by neural responses to visual alcohol cues and other motivational stimuli. Cereb Cortex. Jun 21: 1408-1415.
  124. Myrick H, Anton RF, Li X, Henderson S, Randall PK, et al. (2008) Effect of naltrexone and ondansetron on alcohol cue-induced activation of the ventral striatum in alcohol-dependent people. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 466-475.
  125. Schulte T, Oberlin BG, Kareken DA, et al. (2012) How acute and chronic alcohol consumption affects brain networks: insights from multimodal neuroimaging. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research 36: 2017-2027.
  126. Shin LM (2009) The amygdala in post-traumatic stress disorder. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Springer 319-334.
  127. Pfefferbaum A1, Sullivan EV, Rosenbloom MJ, Mathalon DH, Lim KO (1998) A controlled study of cortical gray matter and ventricular changes in alcoholic men over a 5-year interval.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 55: 905-912.
  128. Harris GJ1, Jaffin SK, Hodge SM, Kennedy D, Caviness VS, et al. (2008) Frontal white matter and cingulum diffusion tensor imaging deficits in alcoholism.  Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32: 1001-1013.
  129. Pfefferbaum A1, Rosenbloom M, Rohlfing T, Sullivan EV (2009) Degradation of association and projection white matter systems in alcoholism detected with quantitative fiber tracking.  Biol Psychiatry 65: 680-690.
  130. Oscar-Berman M1, Marinković K (2007) Alcohol: effects on neurobehavioral functions and the brain.  Neuropsychol Rev 17: 239-257.
  131. Salloum JB, Ramchandani VA, Bodurka J, et al. (2007) Blunted rostral anterior cingulate response during a simplified decoding task of negative emotional facial expressions in alcoholic patients. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 31: 1490-1504.
  132. Millan EZ1, Marchant NJ, McNally GP (2011) Extinction of drug seeking.  Behav Brain Res 217: 454-462.
  133. Koob GF, Volkow ND (2010) Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 217-238.
  134. Bowirrat A, Oscar-Berman M (2005) Relationship between dopaminergic neurotransmission, alcoholism, and Reward Deficiency syndrome. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 132B: 29-37.
  135. Raichle ME1, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, et al. (2001) A default mode of brain function.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 676-682.
  136. Andrews-Hanna JR1, Reidler JS, Sepulcre J, Poulin R, Buckner RL (2010) Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network.  Neuron 65: 550-562.
  137. Chanraud S1, Pitel AL, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2011) Disruption of functional connectivity of the default-mode network in alcoholism.  Cereb Cortex 21: 2272-2281.
  138. Chanraud S, Reynaud M, Wessa M, et al. (2009) Diffusion tensor tractography in mesencephalic bundles: relation to mental flexibility in detoxified alcohol-dependent subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 1223-1232.
  139. Schulte T, Muller-Oehring EM, Rohlfing T, Pfefferbaum A, (2010) Sullivan EV. White matter fiber degradation attenuates hemispheric asymmetry when integrating visuomotor information. J Neurosci  30: 12168-12178.
  140. Schulte T, Muller-Oehring EM, Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A (2012) Synchrony of corticostriatal-midbrain activation enables normal inhibitory control and conflict processing in recovering alcoholic men. Biol Psychiatry 71: 269-278.
  141. Wise RA1 (2009) Roles for nigrostriatal--not just mesocorticolimbic--dopamine in reward and addiction.  Trends Neurosci 32: 517-524.
  142. Dypvik AT, Bland BH (2004) Functional connectivity between the red nucleus and the hippocampus supports the role of hippocampal formation in sensorimotor integration. J Neurophysiol 92: 2040-2050.
  143. Bédard P1, Sanes JN (2009) On a basal ganglia role in learning and rehearsing visual-motor associations.  Neuroimage 47: 1701-1710.
  144. Rushworth MF1, Behrens TE, Rudebeck PH, Walton ME (2007) Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour.  Trends Cogn Sci 11: 168-176.
  145. Cárdenas C1, Quesada AR, Medina MA (2011) Anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties of kahweol, a coffee diterpene.  PLoS One 6: e23407.
  146. Marinkovic K, Rickenbacher E, Azma S, Artsy E (2012) Acute alcohol intoxication impairs top-down regulation of Stroop incongruity as revealed by blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 33: 319-333.
  147. Wilcox RE1, McMillen BA (1998) The rational use of drugs as therapeutic agents for the treatment of the alcoholisms.  Alcohol 15: 161-177.
  148. Volkow ND1, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, et al. (2006) Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction.  J Neurosci 26: 6583-6588.
  149. Volkow ND1, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, et al. (2008) Dopamine increases in striatum do not elicit craving in cocaine abusers unless they are coupled with cocaine cues.  Neuroimage 39: 1266-1273.
  150. Haber SN, Kim KS, Mailly P, Calzavara R (2006) Reward-related cortical inputs define a large striatal region in primates that interface with associative cortical connections, providing a substrate for incentive-based learning. J Neurosci 26: 8368-8376.
  151. Wilcox REaE CK, McNeece AD (2011) The brain biology of drug abuse and addiction. Chemical Dependency: A Systems Approach: Pearson Education.
  152. Tapert SF1, Brown GG, Baratta MV, Brown SA (2004) fMRI BOLD response to alcohol stimuli in alcohol dependent young women.  Addict Behav 29: 33-50.
  153. Naqvi NH1, Rudrauf D, Damasio H, Bechara A (2007) Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette smoking.  Science 315: 531-534.
  154. Wilcox RE, Mikula JA, Levitt RA (1979) Periaqueductal gray naloxone microinjections in morphine-dependent rats: hyperalgesia without "classical" withdrawal. Neuropharmacology 18: 639-641.
  155. Olive MF, Cleva RM, Kalivas PW, Malcolm RJ (2012) Glutamatergic medications for the treatment of drug and behavioral addictions. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 100: 801-810.
  156. Bremner JD, Licinio J, Darnell A, et al. (1997) Elevated CSF corticotropin-releasing factor concentrations in posttraumatic stress disorder. The American journal of psychiatry 154: 624-629.
  157. Defense VADo (2010) Clinical practice guidelines: Management of posttraumatic stress. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense.Version 2.0.
  158. Forbes D, Lloyd D, Nixon RD, et al. (2012) A multisite randomized controlled effectiveness trial of cognitive processing therapy for military-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Anxiety Disord 26: 442-452.
  159. Kapfhammer HP (2014) Patient-reported outcomes in post-traumatic stress disorder. Part II: focus on pharmacological treatment. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience 16: 227-237.
  160. Wallace D1, Cooper J2 (2015) Update on the management of post-traumatic stress disorder.  Aust Prescr 38: 55-59.
  161. Melbourne (2013) Australian guidelines for the treatment of acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. . Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health.
  162. Steenkamp MM, Litz BT, Hoge CW, Marmar CR (2015) Psychotherapy for Military-Related PTSD: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 314: 489-500.
  163. Karlin BE, Cross G (2014) Enhancing access, fidelity, and outcomes in the national dissemination of evidence-based psychotherapies. Am Psychol 69: 709-711.
  164. Ruzek JI, Karlin BE, Zeiss A (2012) Implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments in the Veterans Health Administration. Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Psychological Interventions 78-96.
  165. Katzman MA, Bleau P, Blier P, et al. (2014) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders. BMC psychiatry 14 Suppl 1: S1.
  166. Bisson J, Andrew M (2007) Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18: CD003388.
  167. Beidel DC, Frueh BC, Uhde TW, Wong N, Mentrikoski JM (2011) Multicomponent behavioral treatment for chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord 25: 224-231.
  168. Xie X, Lasseter HC, Ramirez DR, Ponds KL, Wells AM, et al. (2012) Subregion-specific role of glutamate receptors in the nucleus accumbens on drug context-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Addiction Biology 17: 287-299.
  169. Alvarez J, McLean C, Harris AH, Rosen CS, Ruzek JI, et al. (2011) The comparative effectiveness of cognitive processing therapy for male veterans treated in a VHA posttraumatic stress disorder residential rehabilitation program. J Consult Clin Psychol 79: 590-599.
  170. Macdonald A, Monson CM, Doron-Lamarca S, Resick PA, Palfai TP (2011) Identifying patterns of symptom change during a randomized controlled trial of cognitive processing therapy for military-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 24: 268-276.
  171. Monson CM, Schnurr PP, Resick PA, Friedman MJ, Young-Xu Y, Stevens SP (2006) Cognitive processing therapy for veterans with military-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 74: 898-907.
  172. Resick PA, Galovski TE, O'Brien Uhlmansiek M, Scher CD, Clum GA, et al. (2008) A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence. J Consult Clin Psychol 76: 243-258.
  173. Resick PA, Williams LF, Suvak MK, Monson CM, Gradus JL (2012) Long-term outcomes of cognitive-behavioral treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder among female rape survivors. J Consult Clin Psychol 80: 201-210.
  174. Galovski TE, Monson C, Bruce SE, Resick PA (2009) Does cognitive–behavioral therapy for PTSD improve perceived health and sleep impairment? Journal of traumatic stress 22: 197-204.
  175. Beck JS (2011) Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond: Guilford Press.
  176. Schacter DL, Gilbert DT, Wegner DM (2011) Psychology (2nd Edition). New York.
  177. Keane TM, Fairbank JA, Caddell JM, Zimering RT (1989) Implosive (flooding) therapy reduces symptoms of PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans. Behavior Therapy 20:245-260.
  178. Gros DF1, Frueh BC, Magruder KM (2011) Prevalence and features of panic disorder and comparison to posttraumatic stress disorder in VA primary care.  Gen Hosp Psychiatry 33: 482-488.
  179. Kazi A, Freund B, Ironson G (2008) Prolonged exposure treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder following the 9/11 attack with a person who escaped from the twin towers. Clinical Case Studies 7:100-117.
  180. Shapiro F, Solomon RM. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Wiley Online Library.
  181. Boudewyns PA, Hyer L (1990) Physiological response to combat memories and preliminary treatment outcome in Vietnam veteran PTSD patients treated with direct therapeutic exposure. Behavior Therapy 21: 63-87.
  182. Carlson JG, Chemtob CM, Rusnak K, Hedlund NL, Muraoka MY (1998) Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EDMR) treatment for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Traumatic Stress 11: 3-24.
  183. Rogers S, Silver SM, Goss J, Obenchain J, Willis A et al. (1999) A single session, group study of exposure and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in treating posttraumatic stress disorder among Vietnam War veterans: Preliminary data. J anxiety disorders 13: 119-130.
  184. Devilly GJ, Spence SH, Rapee RM (1998) Statistical and reliable change with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Treating trauma within a veteran population. Behavior Therapy 29: 435-455.
  185. Jensen JA (1994) An investigation of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMD/R) as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms of Vietnam combat veterans. Behavior Therapy 25: 311-325.
  186. Powers MB, Halpern JM, Ferenschak MP, Gillihan SJ, Foa EB (2010) A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin Psychol Rev 30: 635-641.
  187. Price M, Gros DF, Strachan M, Ruggiero KJ, Acierno R (2013) Combat Experiences, Pre-Deployment Training, and Outcome of Exposure Therapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans. Clinical Psychol Psychother 20: 277-285.
  188. Stein NR1, Mills MA, Arditte K, Mendoza C, Borah AM, et al. (2012) A scheme for categorizing traumatic military events.  Behav Modif 36: 787-807.
  189. Litz BT, Stein N, Delaney E, Lebowitz L, Nash WP, et al. (2009) Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clin Psychology Rev 29: 695-706.
  190. Steenkamp MM, Litz BT, Gray MJ, Lang AJ (2011) A brief exposure-based intervention for service members with PTSD. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 18: 98-107.
  191. Bradley R1, Greene J, Russ E, Dutra L, Westen D (2005) A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD.  Am J Psychiatry 162: 214-227.
  192. Gerger H, Munder T, Barth J (2014) Specific and nonspecific psychological interventions for PTSD symptoms: A meta-analysis with problem complexity as a moderator. J Clin Psychol 70: 601-615.
  193. Blount TH, Cigrang JA, Foa EB, Ford HL, Peterson AL (2014) Intensive outpatient prolonged exposure for combat-related PTSD: A case study. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 21: 89-96.
  194. Schnurr PP, Lunney CA (2015) Differential effects of prolonged exposure on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in female veterans. J Consult Clin Psychol Dec 83: 1154-1160.
  195. Kredlow MA, Unger LD, Otto MW (2016) Harnessing reconsolidation to weaken fear and appetitive memories: A meta-analysis of post-retrieval extinction effects. Psychol Bull 142: 314-336.
  196. Torregrossa MM, Taylor JR (2013) Learning to forget: manipulating extinction and reconsolidation processes to treat addiction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226: 659-672.
  197. Bouton ME (2002) Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biol psychiatry 52: 976-986.
  198. Bystritsky A1 (2006) Treatment-resistant anxiety disorders.  Mol Psychiatry 11: 805-814.
  199. Schottenbauer MA, Glass CR, Arnkoff DB, Tendick V, Gray SH (2008) Nonresponse and dropout rates in outcome studies on PTSD: Review and methodological considerations. Psychiatry 71: 134-168.
  200. Pollack MH, Otto MW, Roy-Byrne PP,Coplan JD, Rothbaum BO, et al. (2008) Novel treatment approaches for refractory anxiety disorders. Focus 6: 486-495.                            
  201. McHugh RK, Smits JA, Otto MW (2009) Empirically supported treatments for panic disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am 32: 593-610.
  202. Hofmann SG, Smits JA (2008) Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry 69: 621-632.
  203. Olatunji BO, Cisler JM, Deacon BJ (2010) Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: a review of meta-analytic findings. Psychiatr Clin North Am 33: 557-577.
  204. Davis M, Myers KM, Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO (2005) Facilitation of Extinction of Conditioned Fear by D-Cycloserine Implications for Psychotherapy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14: 214-219.
  205. Richardson R1, Ledgerwood L, Cranney J (2004) Facilitation of fear extinction by D-cycloserine: theoretical and clinical implications.  Learn Mem 11: 510-516.
  206. Rodrigues H1, Figueira I1, Lopes A1, Gonçalves R1, Mendlowicz MV2, et al. (2014) Does D-cycloserine enhance exposure therapy for anxiety disorders in humans? A meta-analysis.  PLoS One 9: e93519.
  207. Lowry CA, Hale MW, Evans AK,Heerkens J, Staub DR, et al. (2008) Serotonergic systems, anxiety, and affective disorder: focus on the dorsomedial part of the dorsal raphe nucleus. Ann N Y Acad Sci Dec 1148: 86-94.
  208. Murrough JW, Huang Y, Hu J,Henry S, Williams W, et al. (2011) Reduced amygdala serotonin transporter binding in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 70: 1033-1038.
  209. Grillon C, Levenson J, Pine DS (2007) A single dose of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram exacerbates anxiety in humans: a fear-potentiated startle study. Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 32: 225-231.
  210. Burghardt NS, Bush DE, McEwen BS, LeDoux JE (2007) Acute selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increase conditioned fear expression: blockade with a 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist. Biol psychiatry 62: 1111-1118.
  211. Burghardt NS, Sullivan GM, McEwen BS, Gorman JM, LeDoux JE (2004) The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram increases fear after acute treatment but reduces fear with chronic treatment: a comparison with tianeptine. Biol psychiatry 55: 1171-1178.
  212. Armbruster D, Moser DA, Strobel A, Hensch T, Kirschbaum C, et al. (2009) Serotonin transporter gene variation and stressful life events impact processing of fear and anxiety. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology / official scientific journal of the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologicum (CINP) 12: 393-401.
  213. Welsh SE1, Romano AG, Harvey JA (1998) Effects of serotonin 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonists on associative learning in the rabbit.  Psychopharmacology (Berl) 137: 157-163.
  214. Bonn M, Schmitt A, Lesch KP, Van Bockstaele EJ, Asan E (2013) Serotonergic innervation and serotonin receptor expression of NPY-producing neurons in the rat lateral and basolateral amygdaloid nuclei. Brain Struct Funct 218: 421-435.
  215. Li GF, Luo HK, Li LF, Zhang QZ, Xie LJ, et al. (2012) Dual effects of hydrogen Sulphide on focal cerebral ischaemic injury via modulation of oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 39: 765-771.
  216. Christianson JP, Ragole T, Amat J, Greenwood BN, Strong PV, et al. (2010) 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C receptors in the basolateral amygdala are involved in the expression of anxiety after uncontrollable traumatic stress. Biol Psychiatry 67: 339-345.
  217. Vertes RP1 (1991) A PHA-L analysis of ascending projections of the dorsal raphe nucleus in the rat.  J Comp Neurol 313: 643-668.
  218. Azmitia EC, Segal M (1978) An autoradiographic analysis of the differential ascending projections of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei in the rat. J Comp Neurol 179: 641-667.
  219. McQuade R, Sharp T (1997) Functional mapping of dorsal and median raphe 5-hydroxytryptamine pathways in forebrain of the rat using microdialysis. J Neurochem 69: 791-796.
  220. Ranade SP, Mainen ZF (2009) Transient firing of dorsal raphe neurons encodes diverse and specific sensory, motor, and reward events. J Neurophysiol 102: 3026-3037.
  221. Schweimer JV1, Ungless MA (2010) Phasic responses in dorsal raphe serotonin neurons to noxious stimuli.  Neuroscience 171: 1209-1215.
  222. Waterhouse BD, Devilbiss D, Seiple S, Markowitz R (2004) Sensorimotor-related discharge of simultaneously recorded, single neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus of the awake, unrestrained rat. Brain Res 1000: 183-191.
  223. Yokoyama M, Suzuki E, Sato T, Maruta S, Watanabe S, et al. (2005) Amygdalic levels of dopamine and serotonin rise upon exposure to conditioned fear stress without elevation of glutamate. Neurosci Lett 379: 37-41.
  224. Zanoveli JM, Carvalho MC, Cunha JM, Brandao ML (2009) Extracellular serotonin level in the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala and dorsal periaqueductal gray under unconditioned and conditioned fear states: an in vivo microdialysis study. Brain Res 1294: 106-115.
  225. Michelsen KA1, Schmitz C, Steinbusch HW (2007) The dorsal raphe nucleus--from silver stainings to a role in depression.  Brain Res Rev 55: 329-342.
  226. Hale MW, Shekhar A, Lowry CA (2012) Stress-related serotonergic systems: implications for symptomatology of anxiety and affective disorders. Cell Mol Neurobiol 32: 695-708.
  227. Cools R, Roberts AC, Robbins TW (2008) Serotoninergic regulation of emotional and behavioural control processes. Trends Cogn Sci 12: 31-40.
  228. Kennett GA, Wood MD, Bright F, Trail B, Riley G, et al. (1997) SB 242084, a selective and brain penetrant 5-HT2C receptor antagonist. Neuropharmacology 36: 609-620.
  229. De Berardis D, Serroni N, Marini S, Moschetta FS, Martinotti G, et al. (2012) Agomelatine for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a case report.  Ann Clin Psychiatry 24: 241-242.
  230. Davis M1 (1992) The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety.  Annu Rev Neurosci 15: 353-375.
  231. LeDoux J1 (2007) The amygdala.  Curr Biol 17: R868-874.
  232. Zhang G1, Ásgeirsdóttir HN, Cohen SJ, Munchow AH, Barrera MP, et al. (2013) Stimulation of serotonin 2A receptors facilitates consolidation and extinction of fear memory in C57BL/6J mice.  Neuropharmacology 64: 403-413.
  233. Burghardt NS, Bauer EP (2013) Acute and chronic effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment on fear conditioning: implications for underlying fear circuits. Neuroscience 247: 253-272.
  234. Deschaux O, Spennato G, Moreau JL, Garcia R (2011) Chronic treatment with fluoxetine prevents the return of extinguished auditory-cued conditioned fear. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 215: 231-237.
  235. Surís A1, North C, Adinoff B, Powell CM, Greene R (2010) Effects of exogenous glucocorticoid on combat-related PTSD symptoms.  Ann Clin Psychiatry 22: 274-279.
  236. de Quervain DJ1, Bentz D, Michael T, Bolt OC, Wiederhold BK, et al. (2011) Glucocorticoids enhance extinction-based psychotherapy.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 6621-6625.
  237. Soravia LM1, Heinrichs M, Aerni A, Maroni C, Schelling G, et al. (2006) Glucocorticoids reduce phobic fear in humans.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 5585-5590.
  238. Yehuda R, Bierer LM, Pratchett LC, Lehrner A, Koch EC, et al. (2015) Cortisol augmentation of a psychological treatment for warfighters with posttraumatic stress disorder: Randomized trial showing improved treatment retention and outcome. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51: 589-597.
  239. Roozendaal B1 (2000) 1999 Curt P. Richter award. Glucocorticoids and the regulation of memory consolidation.  Psychoneuroendocrinology 25: 213-238.
  240. McNally GP1, Pigg M, Weidemann G (2004) Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate extinction of pavlovian fear conditioning.  J Neurosci 24: 6912-6919.
  241. Parsons RG, Gafford GM, Helmstetter FJ (2010) Regulation of extinction-related plasticity by opioid receptors in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter. Front Behav Neurosci 4.
  242. McNally GP1, Westbrook RF (2003) Opioid receptors regulate the extinction of Pavlovian fear conditioning.  Behav Neurosci 117: 1292-1301.
  243. Hernández LL, Powell DA (1980) Effects of anloxone on Pavlovian conditioning of eyeblink and heart rate responses in rabbits.  Life Sci 27: 863-869.
  244. Fanselow MS, Calcagnetti DJ, Helmstetter FJ (1998) Peripheral versus intracerebroventricular administration of quaternary naltrexone and the enhancement of Pavlovian conditioning. Brain Res 444: 147-152.
  245. Knoll AT1, Meloni EG, Thomas JB, Carroll FI, Carlezon WA Jr (2007) Anxiolytic-like effects of kappa-opioid receptor antagonists in models of unlearned and learned fear in rats.  J Pharmacol Exp Ther 323: 838-845.
  246. Knoll AT1, Muschamp JW, Sillivan SE, Ferguson D, Dietz DM, et al. (2011) Kappa opioid receptor signaling in the basolateral amygdala regulates conditioned fear and anxiety in rats.  Biol Psychiatry 70: 425-433.
  247. McNally GP, Lee BW, Chiem JY, Choi EA (2005) The midbrain periaqueductal gray and fear extinction: opioid receptor subtype and roles of cyclic AMP, protein kinase A, and mitogen-activated protein kinase. Behav Neurosci 119: 1023-1033.
  248.  Pietrzak RH, Naganawa M, Huang Y, Corsi-Travali S, Zheng MQ, et al. (2014) Association of in vivo kappa-opioid receptor availability and the transdiagnostic dimensional expression of trauma-related psychopathology. JAMA Psychiatry 71: 1262-1270.
  249. Good AJ1, Westbrook RF (1995) Effects of a microinjection of morphine into the amygdala on the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear and hypoalgesia in rats.  Behav Neurosci 109: 631-641.
  250.  Szczytkowski JL, Lebonville C, Hutson L, Fuchs RA, Lysle DT (2013) Heroin-induced conditioned immunomodulation requires expression of IL-1beta in the dorsal hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun 30: 95-102.
  251. Schiller D1, Monfils MH, Raio CM, Johnson DC, Ledoux JE, et al. (2010) Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms.  Nature 463: 49-53.
  252.  Nader K, Schafe GE, Le Doux JE (2000) Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 406: 722-726.
  253.  Monfils MH, Cowansage KK, Klann E, LeDoux JE (2009) Extinction-reconsolidation boundaries: key to persistent attenuation of fear memories. Science 324: 951-955.
  254. McKenzie S1, Eichenbaum H (2011) Consolidation and reconsolidation: two lives of memories?  Neuron 71: 224-233.
  255. Sara SJ1 (2000) Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering.  Learn Mem 7: 73-84.
  256. Nowak A1, Werka T, Knapska E (2013) Social modulation in extinction of aversive memories.  Behav Brain Res 238: 200-205.
  257. Bartolomucci A, Palanza P, Sacerdote P, Ceresini G, Chirieleison A, et al. (2003) Individual housing induces altered immuno-endocrine responses to psychological stress in male mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology May 28: 540-558.
  258. Kiyokawa Y1, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y (2007) Two types of social buffering differentially mitigate conditioned fear responses.  Eur J Neurosci 26: 3606-3613.
  259. Xue YX1, Luo YX, Wu P, Shi HS, Xue LF, et al. (2012) A memory retrieval-extinction procedure to prevent drug craving and relapse.  Science 336: 241-245.
  260. Das RK1, Freeman TP, Kamboj SK (2013) The effects of N-methyl D-aspartate and B-adrenergic receptor antagonists on the reconsolidation of reward Vengeliene V, Kiefer F, Spanagel R (2008) D-cycloserine facilitates extinction of conditioned alcohol-seeking behaviour in rats. Alcohol Alcohol 43: 626-629.
  261. Santa Ana EJ, Rounsaville BJ, Frankforter TL, Nich C, Babuscio T, et al. (2009) D-Cycloserine attenuates reactivity to smoking cues in nicotine dependent smokers: a pilot investigation. Drug Alcohol Depend 104: 220-227.
  262.  Dhonnchadha BN, Szalay JJ, Achat-Mendes C, Platt DM, Otto MW, et al. (2010) D-cycloserine deters reacquisition of cocaine self-administration by augmenting extinction learning. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 357-367.
  263.  Brunet A, Orr SP, Tremblay J, Robertson K, Nader K, et al. (2008) Effect of post-retrieval propranolol on psychophysiologic responding during subsequent script-driven traumatic imagery in post-traumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res 42: 503-506.
  264.  Brunet A, Poundja J, Tremblay J, Bui E, Thomas E, et al. (2011) Trauma reactivation under the influence of propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress symptoms and disorder: 3 open-label trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol 31: 547-550.
  265.  Hoskins M, Pearce J, Bethell A, Dankova L, Barbui C, et al. Pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry: the journal of mental science 206: 93-100.
  266.  Petrakis IL, Ralevski E, Desai N, Trevisan L, Gueorguieva R, et al. (2012) Noradrenergic vs serotonergic antidepressant with or without naltrexone for veterans with PTSD and comorbid alcohol dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology 37: 996-1004.
  267. Marmar CR1, Schoenfeld F, Weiss DS, Metzler T, Zatzick D, et al. (1996) Open trial of fluvoxamine treatment for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder.  J Clin Psychiatry 57 Suppl 8: 66-70.
  268. Escalona R1, Canive JM, Calais LA, Davidson JR (2002) Fluvoxamine treatment in veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder.  Depress Anxiety 15: 29-33.
  269. Davis LL1, Frazier EC, Williford RB, Newell JM (2006) Long-term pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder.  CNS Drugs 20: 465-476.
  270. Susskind O, Ruzek JI, Friedman MJ (2012) The VA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Post-Traumatic Stress (update 2010): development and methodology.  J Rehabil Res Dev 49: xvii-xxviii.
  271. Davidson JR1, Weisler RH, Butterfield MI, Casat CD, Connor KM, et al. (2003) Mirtazapine vs. placebo in posttraumatic stress disorder: a pilot trial.  Biol Psychiatry 53: 188-191.
  272. Chung MY1, Min KH, Jun YJ, Kim SS, Kim WC, et al. (2004) Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and sertraline in Korean veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized open label trial.  Hum Psychopharmacol 19: 489-494.
  273. Alderman CP1, Condon JT, Gilbert AL (2009) An open-label study of mirtazapine as treatment for combat-related PTSD.  Ann Pharmacother 43: 1220-1226.
  274. Frank JB1, Kosten TR, Giller EL Jr, Dan E (1988) A randomized clinical trial of phenelzine and imipramine for posttraumatic stress disorder.  Am J Psychiatry 145: 1289-1291.
  275. Kosten TR1, Frank JB, Dan E, McDougle CJ, Giller EL Jr (1991) Pharmacotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder using phenelzine or imipramine.  J Nerv Ment Dis 179: 366-370.
  276. Davidson J1, Kudler H, Smith R, Mahorney SL, Lipper S, et al. (1990) Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder with amitriptyline and placebo.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 47: 259-266.
  277. Ravindran LN1, Kim DS, Letamendi AM, Stein MB (2009) A randomized controlled trial of atomoxetine in generalized social anxiety disorder.  J Clin Psychopharmacol 29: 561-564.
  278.  Pae CU, Lim HK, Peindl K, Ajwani N, Serretti A, et al.(2008) The atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 23: 1-8.
  279.  Kozaric-Kovacic D, Pivac N (2007) Quetiapine treatment in an open trial in combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder with psychotic features. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 10: 253-261.
  280. .Byers MG, Allison KM, Wendel CS, Lee JK (2010) Prazosin versus quetiapine for nighttime posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in veterans: an assessment of long-term comparative effectiveness and safety. J Clin Psychopharmacol 30: 225-229.
  281.  Krystal JH, Rosenheck RA, Cramer JA, Vessicchio JC, Jones KM, et al.        (2011) Adjunctive risperidone treatment for antidepressant-resistant symptoms of chronic military service-related PTSD: a randomized trial. JAMA 306: 493-502.
  282. .Bartzokis G, Lu PH, Turner J, Mintz J, Saunders CS (2005) Adjunctive risperidone in the treatment of chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 57: 474-479.
  283.  Hamner MB, Faldowski RA, Ulmer HG, Frueh BC, Huber MG,et al.(2003) Adjunctive risperidone treatment in post-traumatic stress disorder: a preliminary controlled trial of effects on comorbid psychotic symptoms. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 18: 1-8.
  284. Monnelly EP1, Ciraulo DA, Knapp C, Keane T (2003) Low-dose risperidone as adjunctive therapy for irritable aggression in posttraumatic stress disorder.  J Clin Psychopharmacol 23: 193-196.
  285. Reich DB1, Winternitz S, Hennen J, Watts T, Stanculescu C (2004) A preliminary study of risperidone in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse in women.  J Clin Psychiatry 65: 1601-1606.
  286. Stein MB1, Kline NA, Matloff JL (2002) Adjunctive olanzapine for SSRI-resistant combat-related PTSD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  Am J Psychiatry 159: 1777-1779.
  287.  Hawkins EJ, Malte CA, Imel ZE, Saxon AJ, Kivlahan DR (2012) Prevalence and trends of benzodiazepine use among Veterans Affairs patients with posttraumatic stress disorder, 2003-2010. Drug Alcohol Depend 124:154-161.
  288. Braun P, Greenberg D, Dasberg H, Lerer B (1990) Core symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder unimproved by alprazolam treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 51:236-238.
  289. Gelpin E1, Bonne O, Peri T, Brandes D, Shalev AY (1996) Treatment of recent trauma survivors with benzodiazepines: a prospective study.  J Clin Psychiatry 57: 390-394.
  290. van Minnen A1, Arntz A, Keijsers GP (2002) Prolonged exposure in patients with chronic PTSD: predictors of treatment outcome and dropout.  Behav Res Ther 40: 439-457.
  291. Raskind MA, Peterson K, Williams T, Hoff DJ, Hart K, et al. (2013) A trial of prazosin for combat trauma PTSD with nightmares in active-duty soldiers returned from Iraq and Afghanistan.  Am J Psychiatry 170: 1003-1010.
  292. Raskind MA1, Peskind ER, Kanter ED, Petrie EC, Radant A, et al. (2003) Reduction of nightmares and other PTSD symptoms in combat veterans by prazosin: a placebo-controlled study.  Am J Psychiatry 160: 371-373.
  293. Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Hoff DJ, Hart KL, Holmes HA, et al. (2007) A parallel group placebo controlled study of prazosin for trauma nightmares and sleep disturbance in combat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 61: 928-934.
  294. 296. Donovan E (2010) Propranolol use in the prevention and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in military veterans: forgetting therapy revisited. Perspect Biol Med 53: 61-74.
  295.  Germain A, Richardson R, Moul DE, Mammen O, Haas G, et al (2012) Placebo-controlled comparison of prazosin and cognitive-behavioral treatments for sleep disturbances in US Military Veterans. J Psychosom Res 72: 89-96.
  296.  Manion ST, Gamble EH, Li H (2007) Prazosin administered prior to inescapable stressor blocks subsequent exaggeration of acoustic startles response in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86: 559-565.
  297. Holbrook TL1, Galarneau MR, Dye JL, Quinn K, Dougherty AL (2010) Morphine use after combat injury in Iraq and post-traumatic stress disorder.  N Engl J Med 362: 110-117.
  298. Lubin G1, Weizman A, Shmushkevitz M, Valevski A (2002) Short-term treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder with naltrexone: an open-label preliminary study.  Hum Psychopharmacol 17: 181-185.
  299. Bohus MJ, Landwehrmeyer GB, Stiglmayr CE, Limberger MF, Bohme R, et al. (1999) Naltrexone in the treatment of dissociative symptoms in patients with borderline personality disorder: an open-label trial. J Clin Psychiatry 60: 598-603.
  300. Bills LJ, Kreisler K (1993) Treatment of flashbacks with naltrexone.  Am J Psychiatry 150: 1430.
  301. Glover H1 (1993) A preliminary trial of nalmefene for the treatment of emotional numbing in combat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.  Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 30: 255-263.
  302. Simeon D1, Knutelska M (2005) An open trial of naltrexone in the treatment of depersonalization disorder.  J Clin Psychopharmacol 25: 267-270.
  303. Nuller YL1, Morozova MG, Kushnir ON, Hamper N (2001) Effect of naloxone therapy on depersonalization: a pilot study.  J Psychopharmacol 15: 93-95.
  304.  Mills KL, Teesson M, Ross J, Peters L (2006) Trauma, PTSD, and substance use disorders: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Am J Psychiatry 163: 652-658.
  305. Zohar J1, Juven-Wetzler A, Sonnino R, Cwikel-Hamzany S, Balaban E, et al. (2011) New insights into secondary prevention in post-traumatic stress disorder.  Dialogues Clin Neurosci 13: 301-309.
  306. Yehuda R1, LeDoux J (2007) Response variation following trauma: a translational neuroscience approach to understanding PTSD.  Neuron 56: 19-32.
  307.  Cohen H, Zohar J, Gidron Y, Matar MA, Belkind D, et al. (2006) Blunted HPA axis response to stress influences susceptibility to posttraumatic stress response in rats. Biological psychiatry 59: 1208-1218.
  308.  Cohen H, Matar MA, Buskila D, Kaplan Z, Zohar J (2008) Early post-stressor intervention with high-dose corticosterone attenuates posttraumatic stress response in an animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological psychiatry 64: 708-717.
  309.  Cohen H, Kozlovsky N, Matar MA, Zohar J, Kaplan Z (2011) The characteristic long-term upregulation of hippocampal NF-kappaB complex in PTSD-like behavioral stress response is normalized by high-dose corticosterone and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate administered immediately after exposure. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 2286-2302.
  310. Aerni A1, Traber R, Hock C, Roozendaal B, Schelling G, et al. (2004) Low-dose cortisol for symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder.  Am J Psychiatry 161: 1488-1490.
  311.  Whittle N, Schmuckermair C, Gunduz Cinar O, Hauschild M, Ferraguti F, et al. (2013) Deep brain stimulation, histone deacetylase inhibitors and glutamatergic drugs rescue resistance to fear extinction in a genetic mouse model. Neuropharmacology 64: 414-423.
  312. Norberg MM1, Krystal JH, Tolin DF (2008) A meta-analysis of D-cycloserine and the facilitation of fear extinction and exposure therapy.  Biol Psychiatry 63: 1118-1126.
  313.  Smits JA, Rosenfield D, Davis ML, Julian K, Handelsman PR, et al. (2014) Yohimbine enhancement of exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 75: 840-846.
  314.  Powers MB, Smits JA, Otto MW, Sanders C, Emmelkamp PM (2009) Facilitation of fear extinction in phobic participants with a novel cognitive enhancer: a randomized placebo controlled trial of yohimbine augmentation. J Anxiety Disord 23: 350-356.
  315. . Do-Monte FH, Rodriguez-Romaguera J, Rosas-Vidal LE, Quirk GJ (2013) Deep brain stimulation of the ventral striatum increases BDNF in the fear extinction circuit. Front Behav Neurosci 7: 102.
  316. Rodriguez-Romaguera J1, Do Monte FH, Quirk GJ (2012) Deep brain stimulation of the ventral striatum enhances extinction of conditioned fear.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 8764-8769.
  317. Kaysen D1, Schumm J, Pedersen ER, Seim RW, Bedard-Gilligan M, et al. (2014) Cognitive processing therapy for veterans with comorbid PTSD and alcohol use disorders.  Addict Behav 39: 420-427.
  318.  Riggs DS, Rukstalis M, Volpicelli JR, Kalmanson D, Foa EB (2003) Demographic and social adjustment characteristics of patients with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence: potential pitfalls to PTSD treatment. Addict Behav. 28: 1717-1730.
  319. Back SE (2010) Toward an improved model of treating co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorders.  Am J Psychiatry 167: 11-13.
  320. Becker CB1, Zayfert C, Anderson E (2004) A survey of psychologists' attitudes towards and utilization of exposure therapy for PTSD.  Behav Res Ther 42: 277-292.
  321.  Killeen TK, Back SE, Brady KT (2011) The Use of Exposure-Based Treatment Among Individuals With PTSD and Co-occurring Substance Use Disorders: Clinical Considerations. J Dual Diagn 7: 194-206.
  322. Najavits LM (2006) Present-versus past-focused therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder/substance abuse: A study of clinician preferences. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 6: 248.
  323. Ouimette P1, Moos RH, Finney JW (2003) PTSD treatment and 5-year remission among patients with substance use and posttraumatic stress disorders.  J Consult Clin Psychol 71: 410-414.
  324.  Resick PA, Schnicke M (1993) Cognitive processing therapy for rape victims: A treatment manual 4.
  325.  Resick PA, Nishith P, Weaver TL, Astin MC, Feuer CA (2002) A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 70: 867-879.
  326.  Back SE, Killeen T, Foa EB, Santa Ana EJ, Gros DF, et al. (2012) Use of an integrated therapy with prolonged exposure to treat PTSD and comorbid alcohol dependence in an Iraq veteran. Am J Psychiatry 169: 688-691.
  327.  Coffey SF, Stasiewicz PR, Hughes PM, Brimo ML (2006) Trauma-focused imaginal exposure for individuals with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence: revealing mechanisms of alcohol craving in a cue reactivity paradigm. Psychol Addict Behav 20: 425-435.
  328. Foa EB, Williams MT (2010) Methodology of a randomized double-blind clinical trial for comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence. Ment Health Subst Use 3: 131-147.
  329. .Mills KL, Teesson M, Back SE, Brady KT, Baker AL, et al. () Integrated exposure-based therapy for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder and substance dependence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 308: 690-699.
  330. Ouimette PC1, Moos RH, Finney JW (2000) Two-year mental health service use and course of remission in patients with substance use and posttraumatic stress disorders.  J Stud Alcohol 61: 247-253.
  331. Morris EP1, Stewart SH, Ham LS (2005) The relationship between social anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorders: a critical review.  Clin Psychol Rev 25: 734-760.
  332. Nosen E1, Littlefield AK2, Schumacher JA3, Stasiewicz PR4, Coffey SF5 (2014) Treatment of co-occurring PTSD-AUD: effects of exposure-based and non-trauma focused psychotherapy on alcohol and trauma cue-reactivity.  Behav Res Ther 61: 35-42.
  333.  Brown PJ, Stout RL, Mueller T (1999) Substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder comorbidity: Addiction and psychiatric treatment rates. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 13:115-122.
  334. Ouimette PC1, Brown PJ, Najavits LM (1998) Course and treatment of patients with both substance use and posttraumatic stress disorders.  Addict Behav 23: 785-795.
  335.  Vogt D, Bergeron A, Salgado D, Daley J, Ouimette P, et al. (2006) Barriers to Veterans Health Administration care in a nationally representative sample of women veterans. J Gen Intern Med 21: S19-S25.
  336.  Sannibale C, Teesson M, Creamer M, Sitharthan T, Bryant RA, et al. (2013) Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy for comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorders. Addiction 108: 1397-1410.
  337. Tuerk P1, Brady KT, Grubaugh AL (2009) Clinical Case Discussion: Combat PTSD and Substance Use Disorders.  J Addict Med 3: 189-193.
  338. R. AF, A. FJ (1991) Behavioral treatment of the PTSD-substance abuser: a multidimensional stage model. Saigh P., editor. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Behavioral Approach to Assessment and Treatment. New York: Pergamon Press 111-146.
  339. . Batts V (2016) FDA approves clinical trial of ecstasy for possible treatment of PTSD. In: FDA, ed. FDA 4.
  340.  Philipps D.(2016) F.D.A. Agrees to New Trials for Ecstasy as Relief for PTSD Patients. The New York Times 5.
  341.  Limited B. (2016) Bionomics Announces Positive Results From Phase 2 Trial Of BNC210 In Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Clinical Leader.
  342.  Marin MF, Camprodon JA, Dougherty DD, Milad MR (2014) Device-based brain stimulation to augment fear extinction: implications for PTSD treatment and beyond. Depress Anxiety 31: 269-278.
  343. Pena DF, Childs JE, Willett S, Vital A, McIntyre CK, et al. (2014) Vagus nerve stimulation enhances extinction of conditioned fear and modulates plasticity in the pathway from the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to the amygdala. Front Behav Neurosci 8: 327.
  344. Mayberg HS1, Lozano AM, Voon V, McNeely HE, Seminowicz D, et al. (2005) Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.  Neuron 45: 651-660.
  345. . Koek RJ, Langevin JP, Krahl SE, Kosoyan HJ, Schwartz HN, et al. (2014) Deep brain stimulation of the basolateral amygdala for treatment-refractory combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial with blinded, staggered onset of stimulation. Trials 15: 356.
  346. Yu H1, Neimat JS (2008) The treatment of movement disorders by deep brain stimulation.  Neurotherapeutics 5: 26-36.
  347. Mian MK1, Campos M, Sheth SA, Eskandar EN (2010) Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: past, present, and future.  Neurosurg Focus 29: E10.
  348.  Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A, Safety of TMSCG (2009)  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 2008-2039.
  349.  Boggio PS, Rocha M, Oliveira MO, Fecteau S, Cohen RB, et al.(2014) Noninvasive brain stimulation with high-frequency and low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 71: 992-999.
  350. .Osuch EA1, Benson BE, Luckenbaugh DA, Geraci M, Post RM, et al. (2009) Repetitive TMS combined with exposure therapy for PTSD: a preliminary study.  J Anxiety Disord 23: 54-59.
  351.  Isserles M, Shalev AY, Roth Y, Peri T, Kutz I, et al. (2013) Effectiveness of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with a brief exposure procedure in post-traumatic stress disorder--a pilot study. Brain Stimul 6: 377-383.

Citation: Loggins, K., Wilcox RE, Gutierrez CA (2017) Treatment of Co-Morbid Alcohol Use Disorder and PTSD In Veterans. J Addict Ther 2017: J112. DOI: 10.29011/JATP-112/100012