Objective: To evaluate the impact of
Female Literacy (FL), an integrated objective of Integrated Child Development
Services Scheme (ICDS) and maternal nutrition on birth weight of infants.
Keywords: Birth Weight of Infants; Integrated Child Development Services Scheme; Female Literacy; Maternal Nutrition
1. Introduction
2.1 Profile of Selected Study Areas of a District of Uttar Pradesh
· Group A: These included participants from villages where, Females literacy and maternal nutritional supplementation was done under ICDS scheme.
· Group B: These included participants from villages where only Female literacy was done under ICDS scheme and no maternal nutritional supplementation was done.
· Group C: These included participants from villages neither Females literacy nor maternal nutritional supplementation was done as ICDS scheme was not implemented.
2.1.2 Inclusion Criteria for Villages and Women participants:
· Villages with maximum number of married / pregnant women. Married women in average same age group between 20-35 yrs. accessibility to nearby Anganwadi centre.
· Women participants from low socio-economic families and same cast. With on average same pre-pregnancy health parameters and same number of living children having live infant birth on average having similar health parameters like weight and height.
2.2 Data Collection
Data collection for study included a Schedule along with Medical records of studied women available with Anganwadi workers. A sample of the Schedule used for collecting data is as follows:
2.2.1 Anthropometeric measurements
Maternal height, weight and mid-arm circumference were measured as per standard techniques using Chattilon weighing scale (USA), anthropometric rod and fiber glass tape, respectively. Birth weight was recorded on a modified Tansy scale [1,4,5]. Abdominal girth was measured by fiber glass tape at the level of umbilicus by crossover technique. Pre-pregnancy weight, mid-arm circumference and height measurements were available for these study women.
2.2.2 Hemoglobin estimation and dietary assessment
Hemoglobin was estimated by cyanmethemoglobin method. Dietary survey was done by 24 hr recall method using standard utensils. These estimations were undertaken in all pregnant women. During pregnancy women were examined at 16±2, 28±2 and 36±2 weeks of gestation and also within 48hr of delivery for estimation of gestational age at the time of birth and birth weight.
2.3 Statistical Methods
Means, standard deviation, ANOVA and multiple regression analysis were performed on SPSS 19 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) Analysis Software.
3. Results
3.1 Socio-demographic
and Biological Characteristics (Table 1)
3.2 Anthropometry During Pregnancy
The
mean weight gain during pregnancy was 7.5±1.0,
6.3±0.9 and 5.6±1.1
kg for the nutrition supplemented and un-supplemented women of FL group and
non-FL group, respectively Table 2. Gain in
weight of >6.0 kg was observed in 72.3%, 69.5% and 32.3%, women respectively
in the three groups. Even in the third trimester of pregnancy, 37.4% women
remained <45.0 kg in the non-FL group as compared to 13.8% and 12.7% in the
supplemented and the un-supplemented groups of FL group, respectively (p
<0.05).
3.3 Hemoglobin and Dietary Intake
At 28 weeks, the mean hemoglobin decreased by 0.2 and 0.4 g/dl amongst the FL group (supplemented and un-supplemented, respectively) and 0.3 g/dl in non-FL group women. At 36 weeks, there was further fall of 0.1 and 0.2 g/dl in the supplemented and the un-supplemented FL groups, whereas the non-FL group women showed no fall. These hemoglobin changes were significantly (p<0.001) different Table 2. The dietary intake between 16-28 weeks did not change in any of the groups. The average caloric intake was 1650 kcal per day and protein intake around 52 g per day. By about 36 weeks of pregnancy, FL supplemented group women received 1676±200 kcal/day as compared to 1654±198 kcal/day for the un-supplemented FL group.
3.4 Effect on Birth Weight and Gestation
In the FL village group, birth weight for supplemented women was significantly higher by 58g as compared to un-supplemented women. The birth weight in un-supplemented FL group was 25g higher as compared to non FL group. Women in FL supplemented group had a significantly smaller proportion of low birth weight babies (14.4%) compared to FL un-supplemented (20.4%) and non-FL group women (26.3%). The prevalence of pre-term births was 2.0, 2.4 and 4.3% in the supplemented and un-supplemented FL group and non-FL group respectively (p <0.001).
3.5 Determinants of Birth Weight
Multiple
regression analysis revealed that weight gain in pregnancy, length of gestation
and caloric intake in the third trimester made significant contribution to
birth weight in both the FL and non-FL group Table 3. In addition, pre-pregnancy height and hemoglobin at
36 weeks made significant contribution to birth weight in FL group only.
4. Discussion
Literacy for females has very far reaching implications both for society as well as the recipient females. Literacy for females is a crucial input for developing and preserving human resource development, which in the ultimate analysis is a national asset. The main problem associated with women’s health in India during pregnancy is their low levels of education and nutrition. Women’s low level of literacy rate is definitely an important cause of their ill health and nutrition deficiency and also of the infants [3].
The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of Female Literacy, an important intervention provided by the Government of India in the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and maternal nutrition on pregnancy outcome during the years 2011-2016. This is an important research question that arises on the ICDS scheme about their usefulness as these services have already being extended to cover all the blocks and urban slum areas without any improvement in Female literacy and quality of nutrition supplementation in those areas. Furthermore, the nutritional status of women in various parts of India is similarly poor, with lower weight gain in pregnancy [1,4].
There is a definite need to provide women, the information related to health issues like importance of adequate nutritious diet, how to maintain their health, how to take care of minor illnesses, to know about the treatments of major illnesses and to understand the relative risks of malnourishment and risk or benefits of any treatment offered to them during pregnancy and its relative impact on the infant. Improving female literacy mainly for creating health awareness during pregnancy will thus be beneficial for improving health of both mother and infant in India [6,7].
In several other studies, low weight gain during pregnancy has been observed in undernourished women, e.g. 6.4 kg in Gambia [5], 7.6 kg in Taiwan [8,9] and 5.5 kg in East Java [10]. In Bangladesh [11] Urban high class gained 6.7 kg and low social class gained 5.5 kg. Nutrition intervention in most of these studies improved weight gain in pregnancy and marginally improved the birth weight [12].
The pregnant women of Mohanlalganj in this study showed only marginal increase in energy intake and poor weight gain. Hemoglobin concentration between the 16 and 36 weeks reduced by 6% in the supplemented (Group A) and 6.9% in un-supplemented area (Group B), with negligible change in the non-FL group (Group C) [13]. Reported their study that hemoglobin decrease by 1.7%, 12.5% and 10% by 5, 8 and 9 month of gestation, respectively. These findings suggest that the FL group women (Group A and B) could increase blood volume only to around 1/3 of the expected and the non-FL group (Group C) had negligible expansion thereby explaining the need of literacy and nutrition during pregnancy as the fall in hemoglobin in second half of pregnancy is important for reducing pre-term and low birth weight deliveries [14].
As per the Integrated Child Development Services guidelines women should receive 450-500 kcal with 20 g protein per day in the latter half of pregnancy; this should provide around 45,000-50,000 kcal extra supplement in pregnancy. This was neither reflected in their dietary intake nor in weight gain during pregnancy in the results obtained. The possibility of food sharing in these poor families remains an important possibility for these observations. Inspire of very low level of supplementation as compared to the un-supplemented group, the positive achievements were: (a) lower percentage of low birth weight deliveries (14.4% vs 20.4%); (b) more newborns weighed >3000g (16.2% vs 11.0%); (c) 100 g extra gain in maternal weight; and (d) the gestational age increased by 0.3 week (p <0.001). A comparison of un-supplemented FL group (Group B) with non-FL women (Group C), showed 44.2% reduction in pre-term births and 23.1% reduction in low birth weights. These achievements can be attributed to Female literacy provided in the Integrated Child Development Services scheme in un-supplement FL (Group B).
The Integrated Child Development Services Scheme(ICDS) to a large extent can be compared to the Women-Infant-Child (WIC) supplementation program of the USA [9,15] providing milk, cheese, eggs, iron fortified cereal, beans, butter and 100% fruit juice (900 kcal/day). In WIC supplemented group (pregnancies = 1154673; during 1972-80) there was increase in birth weight by 23.9 g and gestational age by 0.2 day; reduction in pregnancy wastage (fetal mortality reduced by 2.3/1000), small for gestational age births (reduced by 1.1%) and maternal weight increased by 70g. Among women receiving nutrition supplement during second pregnancy, birth weight increased by 136 g. In contrast, the present study on rural women had several well known factors predisposing for a small size baby: short stature, under-weight mothers and low mid-arm circumference (early as well as current under-nutrition). The normal pregnancy contributes 20% extra weight over the pre-pregnancy weight. For the mean height of the present study women, the expected weight should have been around 49 kg, which at term with 20% increase would be 59 kg. The study women however had a mean weight of 42.5 kg (around 86.7% of the expected). To approach the desired weight of 59 kg the gain should be 16.5 kg (deficit + required pregnancy gain). This will require 460-490 kcal/day extra from 12th week of gestation or before for ideal pregnancy outcome. The present study women gained an average weight of 6.3 kg (baby = 2.7 kg + placenta 0.4 kg + uterus + blood 3-4 kg) thus maintaining a deficit balance. Earlier studies in the same area revealed that treatment of anemia in pregnant women had also resulted in better birth weight [16].
5. Conclusion
The present study demonstrated that female education improved weight gain in pregnancy and birth weight with reduction in pre-term and low birth weight deliveries with an addition that nutritional supplements if provided along with literacy had a greater impact in poor population of rural areas in which the study was conducted.
Based
on the results, the suggestions would involve expanding female education
initiatives along with providing nutritional supplements to females during
pregnancy in poor population of rural areas. These two initiatives do not
necessarily need to be compounded, but their effects are expected to be very
interrelated provided that both the female education and nutritional
supplementation access were equally distributed. It is important to remember
that women’s literacy is statistically significant in predicting health
indicators during pregnancy and so the suggestion would be to equally expand
the present education and health networks in the poor population of rural areas
and urban slums of the country.
Table I - Socio-demographic and Biological pre-pregnancy Characteristics of Women in FL and Non-FL Areas (Mean±SD) |
|||||||
Characteristics |
FL Group |
Non-FL |
p value |
|
|||
Supplemented |
Unsupplemented |
Significance |
|||||
1. Age (years) |
26.1±5.6 |
26.1±6.0 |
24.9±5.8 |
<0.0001 |
C vs A & B |
||
2. Education (years) |
Females |
3.7±2.3 |
2.5±3.0 |
1.8±3.07 |
<0.0001 |
A vs B & C; B vs C |
|
Males |
5.5±4.9 |
5.7±4.8 |
5.0±4.7 |
<0.0001 |
C vs A & B |
||
3. Living children |
2±1 |
2±1 |
2±1 |
- |
- |
||
4.Pre-pregnancy |
Weight (kg) |
42.1±3.9 |
42.6±4.2 |
41.3±4.9 |
<0.0001 |
C vs A & B |
|
Height (cm) |
149.6±4.1 |
149.4±4.1 |
148.9±5.0 |
<0.0001 |
C vs A & B |
||
MAC (cm) |
22.0±1.6 |
22.3±1.7 |
21.9±1.8 |
<0.002 |
B vs C |
Table 1: A comparison of age, education and number of living children in the FL and non-FL group is depicted.
Table II - Details of Maternal Anthropometry During Pregnancy |
|||||
Maternal |
FL Group |
Non-FL |
p value |
Significance |
|
Supplemented |
Un-supplemented |
||||
|
|
16 Weeks (1) |
|
|
|
1.(a) Weight (kg) (b) MAC (cm) (c) Abdominal girth (cm) (d) Hemoglobin (g/dl) |
43.2±4.1 22.2±1.6 69.1±19.7 |
42.9±4.1 22.2±1.7 68.5±3.7 |
42.1±4.9 22.8±1.8 67.4±4.4 |
<0.01 <0.0001 |
A vs C & B vs C C vs A & B |
|
|
28 Weeks (2) |
|
|
|
2.(a) Weight (kg) (b) MAC (cm) (c) Abdominal girth (cm) (d) Hemoglobin (g/dl) |
45.9±4.0 22.4±1.6 78.4±3.5 |
45.8±4.5 22.3±1.7 78.6±4.3 |
44.9±5.1 22.6±1.8 74.2±5.0 |
0.004 <0.0001 <0.03 |
A & B vs C C vs A & B B vs C |
|
|
36 weeks (3) |
|
|
|
3.(a) Weight (kg) (b) MAC (cm) (c) Abdominal girth (cm) (d) Hemoglobin (g/dl) |
49.8±4.4 22.5±1.7 89.9±4.5 |
48.9±4.5 22.6±2.0 89.3±4.6 |
46.9±5.2 22.7±1.8 85.2±5.2 8.8±1.1 |
<0.0001 <0.02 <0.0001 |
C vs A & B A vs C C vs A & B |
4. Wt. gain in pregnancy (kg) |
7.5±1.0 |
6.3±0.9 |
5.6±1.1 |
<0.001 |
C vs A & B |
Table 2: The total increase in abdominal girth was about 21 cm in the FL group and 17 cm in the non-FL group. These differences were significant (p <0.001). The change in mid-arm circumference during pregnancy was not significant in all the three groups at 36 weeks of gestation.
Table 3: Multivariate Analysis of Determinants of Birth Weight in FL and non-FL Group |
|||||||
Variables |
FL |
Non-FL |
|||||
Coefficient |
SE |
p |
Coefficient |
SE |
p |
||
Constant |
–865.28084 |
478.29463 |
|
–129.838883 |
489.685419 |
|
|
Calories |
0.16645 |
0.04546 |
0.0003 |
0.226384 |
0.054686 |
0.0000 |
|
Gestation |
24.98118 |
8.30030 |
0.0027 |
27.16507 |
7.625302 |
0.0004 |
|
Hemoglobin |
18.53742 |
8.77162 |
0.0349 |
4.238330 |
9.995086 |
0.6717 |
|
Weight gain |
155.90639 |
11.35094 |
0.0000 |
83.521083 |
10.446403 |
0.0000 |
|
Pre-pregnancy |
Height |
6.35163 |
2.481886 |
0.0107 |
1.934464 |
2.582162 |
0.4541 |
Weight |
–0.44979 |
2.88339 |
0.8761 |
10.682159 |
3.408719 |
0.0018 |
|
Mid Arm Circumference(MAC) |
9.139508 |
6.71613 |
0.1740 |
2.152766 |
8.693745 |
0.8045 |
Table 3: Multivariate Analysis of Determinants of Birth Weight in FL and non-FL Group.
- Tripathi AM, Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN, Devi RR, Cherian S (1987) Nutritional status of rural pregnant women and fetal outcome. Indian Pediatr 24: 703-712.
- Kandpal E, Baylis K, Arends-Kuennining M (2012) Empowering Women through Education and Influence: An Evaluation of the Indian Mahila Samakhya Program. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6347.
- Ram F and Singh A (2006) Is antenatal care effective in improving maternal health in rural Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from a district level household survey. J Biosoc Sci 38: 433-438.
- National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau. Report of Repeat Surveys (1988-90). National Institute Nutrition 1991, Hyderabad.
- Prentice AM, Whitehead RG, Watinson M, Lamb WH, Cole TJ (1983) Prenatal dietary supple-mentation of African women and birth weight. Lancet 321: 489-492.
- Frey RS, & Field C (2000) The determinants of infant mortality in the less developed countries: cross-national test of five theories. Soc Indic Res 52: 215-234.
- Gokhale MK, Rao SS, Garole VR (2002) Infant Mortality in India: Use of Maternal and Child Health Services in Relation to Literacy Status. J Health Popul Nutr 20: 138-147.
- McDonald EC, Pollit, Mueller W, Hsuch AM, Shervig R (1981) The Bacon Chow study: Maternal nutrition supplementation and birth weight of offspring. Am J ClinNutr 34: 2133-2144.
- Adair LS, Pollit E (1985) Outcome of maternal nutritional supplementation: A comprehensive review of the Bacon Chow study. Am J ClinNutr 41: 948-978.
- Kardjati S, Kusin JA, Schofield WM (1990) Energy supplementation in the last trimester of pregnancy in East Java Indonesia: Effect on maternal anthropometry. Am J ClinNutr 52: 987-994.
- Canosa CA (1989) Intrauterine growth retardation in India and BaglaDesh. In: Intrauterine growth Retardation. Ed. Senterre J, Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series, New York, Raven Press: 183-204.
- Kramer MS (1993) Effects of energy protein intakes on pregnancy outcome. An overview of the research evidence from controlled clinical trials. Am J ClinNutr 58: 627-635.
- Paintin DB, Thomson AM, Hytten FE (1966) Iron and the hemoglobin level in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynec Brit CmmWlth 73: 181-186.
- Steer P, Alam MA, Wadsworth J, Welch A (1995) Relation between maternal hemoglobin concentration and birth weight in different ethnic groups. Brit Med J 310: 489- 491.
- Rush D, J Leighton, NL Sloan, JM Alvir, DG Horvitz, et al. (1988) The national WIC-evaluation: Evaluation of the special supplement food program for women infants and children. Am J ClinNutr 48: 484-511.
- Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Mishra KP (1991) Impact of anemia prophylaxis in pregnancy on maternal hemoglobin, serum ferritin and birth weight. Indian J Med Res 94: 277-280.