Gene-Based Anti-Corona Vaccines are Dangerous: The “Pseudo-COVID Syndrome”

Authors: Winfried Stöcker*

*Corresponding Author: Winfried Stöcker, Clinical-Immunological laboratory, Am Sonnenberg 9, D-23627 Groß Grönau, Germany.

Clinical-Immunological laboratory, Am Sonnenberg 9, D-23627 Groß Grönau, Germany

Received Date: 03 June, 2022

Accepted Date: 28 June, 2022

Published Date: 01 July, 2022

Citation: Stöcker W (2022) Gene-Based Anti-Corona Vaccines are Dangerous: The “Pseudo-COVID Syndrome”. J Vaccines Immunol 7: 174. DOI:

Short Commentry

Scientists have pointed out that some serious side effects may occur after gene-based anti-corona vaccinations, causing symptoms comparable to those of the disease itself, due to similar pathomechanisms: The establishing immunity against corona antigens generates pro-inflammatory immunocomplexes and furthermore, attacks the body’s own cells, whether infected with true virus or only with gene components of the virus. Thus, as a result of the vaccination, a myocarditis can develop, just as in the case of a corona infection. The same applies to other diseases, e.g. stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome and diabetes mellitus. Protein-based vaccines (with already synthesized antigen) do not cause such damage. Therefore, from the perspective of physicians, vaccination with a gene ferry to a pre-immunized organism is medical malpractice. The danger increases with every single booster vaccination!

According to the genetic code of the introduced RNA or DNA, the cells of the different organs and tissues synthesize corona antigens, against which the vaccinated person is supposed to build up immunity. Antibodies are generated, which protect from COVID-19, but which on the other hand form immune complexes with the antigens repeatedly induced by each booster vaccination. The result is an inflammation. Tissue thrombokinase is released and coagulation activated. In addition to humoral stimulation of the immune system, cellular immune responses are simultaneously induced (which is extolled by apparently deceived scientists and pharmaceutical entrepreneurs as a QUANTUM LEAP in genetic immunizations) by mass presentation of these corona antigens to the immune system at the surface of endogenous cells, along with HLA antigens of the vaccinated person. This generates an excess of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which unnecessarily destroy countless numbers of the abused endogenous cells, as if they were infected with real corona viruses. Due to these humoral and cellular defense reactions, the genetic vaccination often causes serious side effects that resemble the symptoms of a real corona infection: A “pseudo-COVID syndrome.” This is probably the main cause of many severe, often fatal side effects of the gene-ferries.

The authorities responsible for the temporary authorization of genetic vaccines admit that severe side effects have occurred in 0.02% of these injections. The cases of severe myocarditis and pericarditis also described (admitted) by the Paul Ehrlich Institute, more than 50 per two million vaccinations (one in 40,000) in males under 30 years of age, would be reason enough to immediately withdraw the causative genetic vaccines from the market - if things were legal! Especially since there are reasonable, harmless alternatives.

In the eyes of practicing physicians, the statistics of the authorities are far understated; almost every one of them is repeatedly confronted with such severe side effects. Whoever reports something different is defrocked or disempowered. At present, conditions like in China and Russia can be seen. But even 0.02% dangerous side effects would be already far too much: One per 5,000 vaccinations! So in Germany at least 16,000 people are victims of this coercive measure by state power - a catastrophe, which is ignored by the responsible authorities! In comparison, as expected, there has not been a single case of this kind in 60,000 (legal) LubecaVax applications so far.

The resulting vaccination damages are maliciously concealed by the authorities. Perhaps in order to prevent their failure from becoming obvious, due to which thousands of people have already lost their lives worldwide, or perhaps in order to deny compensation in terms of the German Federal War Victims Relief Act (Paragraph 60 of the German Infection Protection Act) for vaccination invalids and relatives of those who have died as a result of vaccination. Professor Peter Schirmacher, director of the Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, remarks: “Our investigations show that in people who die unexpectedly and shortly after vaccination, there is a direct link to vaccination in 30% of cases.” It must be assumed that these cases would predominantly not be detected without an autopsy.

According to the report from Heidelberg, 90 percent of those affected were found dead at home. “Usually, these deceased individuals are not autopsied because they are not patients, they die without contact to a physician, and no third-party negligence is found,” says Schirmacher. For this reason, the pathologist believes that in Germany the real case numbers are vastly underreported. One focus is on heart myocarditis with fatal outcome. Threequarters of vaccine-related decedents are men. In almost a quarter of those autopsied, death occurs by the third day after vaccination, in more than a quarter by 14 days afterward, and in almost half of them after two weeks.

For the responsible Paul Ehrlich Institute, this alarm from Heidelberg means “no risk signal”. In its safety report (up to the end of 2021), the institute records a total of 2,255 suspected cases of fatal side effects, 1,671 of which were caused by the Biontech vaccine, which “in very rare cases can lead to myocarditis.” If all these vaccinations with fatal outcomes were recorded with the required care, there would probably be at least twenty deaths in one million gene ferry vaccinations – but one tenth of that would already be too much!  At least the German authorities meanwhile recommend vaccinees to avoid physical exertion within three weeks after a gene-ferry vaccination. As a consolation, it can be written on the tombstone of those who died as a result of the vaccination that the applied vaccine was at least temporarily approved by the Paul Ehrlich Institute.

Holding on to these dangerous gene ferry vaccinations is not justified and, in the opinion of some people, even criminal, since there are proven alternatives that do no harm. No one should be forced to expose themselves to this attack on their own health. Instead, the authorities should immediately ensure that vaccines are used such as LubecaVax, whose proven principle every true expert immediately recognizes as harmless. The vaccination with LubecaVax should immediately get at least limited emergency use authorization (even today gene-ferry vaccinations have nothing more to offer). The global experiment with gene ferries has already killed far too many people or harmed their health.

In our currently ideologically superimposed democracy, the state takes action against “agitators” who do not want to join in this game, following a pattern that has become common in Germany. Judges who pass undesirable sentences receive criminal charges and house searches, as do scientists and anyone else who does not want to agree to the global experiment with a dangerous mass vaccination campaign. Physicians are threatened with the loss of their license to practice medicine if they exercise their basic constitutional right to produce their own vaccine and administer it individually to their patients in line with the freedom of choice of treatment. As everywhere and more than allowed, the state interferes in our affairs and tries to restrict our freedom with newly invented rules and regulations. Those who refuse to be patronized by authorities which lack competence, and those who express a different opinion, are isolated and criminalized. Some call this practice vaccination fascism.


© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

Journal of Vaccines, Immunology and Immunopathology